FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
Hoy — Marzo 4th 2026Tus fuentes RSS

Measuring Advanced Practice in Health Visiting: Development and Psychometric Testing of the Health Visiting Advanced Practice Scale in Public Health Nursing

ABSTRACT

Background

The debate about whether health visiting, a specialist community public health nursing role, is at the level of advanced practice nurse has gone on for more than a decade. There is little empirical evidence that the role matches the traditional role of an advanced practice nurse, although many of the attributes of advanced practice nursing such as prescribing rights, managing complex cases, caseloads with undifferentiated need and advanced assessment and decision-making are certainly present.

Aim

The current study aimed to develop, refine and test the Health Visiting Advanced Practice Scale to assess the scope of advanced practice of UK health visitors.

Design

A cross-sectional and methodological scale validation design, following classical test theory.

Methods

The design consisted of three phases; the first involved scale development including item generation, phase two assessed the content validity index, and the third phase involved a cross-sectional survey to establish construct validity, content validity, and internal consistency reliability, and conduct exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results

The initial 44-item scale underwent iterative exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, leading to a refined 5-factor structure with 29 items covering domains such as family-centred care, leadership, prescribing, diagnostic reasoning, and professional practice. This final version demonstrated strong reliability and construct validity in the EFA but mixed fit indices in the CFA, supporting both internal consistency and validity of the scale.

Conclusion

The final scale offers a rigorously validated tool for assessing advanced practice among UK health visitors, capturing core domains such as family-centred care, leadership, prescribing, and diagnostic reasoning. By bridging theoretical frameworks with real-world practice, it fills a critical gap in evaluating and supporting the professional scope of this public health nursing specialty.

Impact

These findings provide valid and reliable insights for measuring and improving health visitors' advanced practice and developing future professional policies.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

Reporting Method

STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines for cross-sectional studies.

AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Parenterally administered pegbovigrastim alters leukocyte counts, granulocyte functions, and uterine cell population in healthy postpartum dairy cows

by Dinesh Dadarwal, Kira Crooks, Patricia Lainetti, Ryan Dickinson, Khawaja Ashfaque Ahmed, Colin Palmer

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a single postpartum administration of pegbovigrastim, a recombinant bovine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF), on peripheral leukocyte profiles, granulocyte function, and uterine cytology in healthy Holstein dairy cows. We hypothesized that rG-CSF would enhance leukocyte counts and granulocyte function without adversely affecting uterine immune cell composition. Twenty-three cows between 19–23 days in milk were randomly assigned to receive either rG-CSF (n = 12) or saline (n = 11). Blood samples were collected on the day of injection and on Days 3, 6, 10, and 21 post-treatment to assess total and differential leukocyte counts. Granulocyte phagocytosis of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Staphylococcus aureus and oxidative burst capacity following PMA stimulation were evaluated using flow cytometry. Vaginoscopy and transrectal ultrasound examinations were conducted at each time point, and uterine cytobrush samples were collected from a subset of cows for cytological analysis. Compared to controls, rG-CSF-treated cows exhibited a significant (2–3 fold) increase in total leukocytes and neutrophils (P P P = 0.04) and phagocytic activity as well as capacity (P = 0.01) that peaked on Days 3 and 6 post-treatment, respectively, following rG-CSF treatment. Furthermore, uterine samples from treated cows showed higher proportions of neutrophils (Days 6, 10, and 21) and macrophages (Day 10) compared to controls (P

Protocol for a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership to identify the most important research priorities addressing respiratory health disparities affecting the Black community in the UK

Por: Wolffs · K. · Etti · M. · Zelzer · R. · Punja · P. · Kinsella · S. · Kennington · E. · Adebajo · A.
Introduction

Respiratory diseases affect millions of people in the UK, with a disproportionately high burden seen among many marginalised communities. They are the third leading cause of death in the UK and a major driver of morbidity, disability and healthcare service use. Many respiratory conditions cause debilitating symptoms and deterioration in patients’ health and quality of life over time, resulting in substantial increases in National Health Service (NHS) expenditure. Social inequalities, including occupational, housing and environmental disparities, have led to a disproportionate burden of respiratory disease among the Black community. For many Black people living in the UK, respiratory conditions have been under-recognised, misdiagnosed or inadequately treated, further contributing to disparities in health outcomes. Despite the need to address these urgent challenges, research in this area is fragmented and rarely informed by the views and opinions of those most affected. Research prioritisation provides a structured methodology to address this unmet need. The Equal Breath Priority Setting Partnership (PSP) aims to identify the 10 most urgent research priorities in respiratory health for people of Black heritage through meaningful collaboration with people with lived experience of respiratory disease, their caregivers and family members and the healthcare professionals caring for them.

Methods and analysis

The top 10 research priorities for the Equal Breath PSP will be established using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method. A steering group comprising approximately 12 people from key stakeholder groups will first be assembled to guide the PSP. Once the context and scope of the PSP has been agreed, the first survey will be developed and disseminated among stakeholder communities to identify evidence uncertainties. Data analysis of the survey responses will create summary questions and critical appraisal of available evidence will verify which of these are evidence gaps. A longlist of approximately 50 summary questions derived from the first survey will be shared with stakeholders in a second shortlisting survey. The highest ranking questions from this survey will be taken into a workshop where the top 10 research priorities will be established through a consensus process.

Ethics and dissemination

This PSP employs the JLA methodology, which does not constitute research as defined by the Health Research Authority. Survey respondent data will be stored in accordance with UK General Data Protection Regulation by Asthma+Lung UK. The final 10 research priorities will be shared with funders, policymakers, professional bodies and relevant communities to inform future investment and promote equity in respiratory health.

Parent's Process of Escalation of Care for Their Deteriorating Children Admitted to Paediatric Wards: A Grounded Theory

ABSTRACT

Aim

Explore the care escalation process initiated by parents concerned about their hospitalised child's deterioration and healthcare providers' response to parental concerns.

Design

A qualitative study using Charmaz's constructivist grounded theory.

Methods

Participants included healthcare providers, cultural mediators and parents of children hospitalized for ≥ 3 days, who had experienced previous urgent intensive care admission or parental concern during hospitalization, in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were collected through focus groups, and analyzed using a grounded theory methodology with NVivo Software.

Results

A total of 13 parents, 7 cultural mediators and 68 healthcare providers participated in 16 focus groups. Two main categories were identified: (1) Parents navigating the uncertainty of the escalation system to get a response; (2) Healthcare providers balancing parents' concerns, their own situation awareness, escalation processes and team relations. We developed a Grounded theory called ‘Parents Supporting Timely Escalation Processes’ (P-STEP). By monitoring their children, parents identify early signs of deterioration and advocate for escalation. Reasons for concern are their child's behaviour, communication failure and admission on an off-service ward. Parents escalate by contacting ward providers, their child's specialist or the most trusted staff and, only selected parents, the Rapid Response Team. Staff escalate parents' concern according to their own situation awareness, parent evaluation and ward escalation practices. Parent's emotions and trust are influenced by the timeliness and type of staff response.

Conclusion

While some parents effectively advocate for their child, others face obstacles due to unclear and lack of formal care escalation systems. Understanding how parents escalate care and healthcare providers respond is essential to identify facilitators, barriers, key stakeholders, and implement a formal system for parent-initiated escalation of care.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

Integrating parents into processes of escalation and rapid response systems could optimise early recognition and improve responsiveness in paediatric deterioration.

Reporting Method

The study adheres to the COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research (COREQ) guidelines.

Patient or Public Contribution

Parents and HCPs participated as interview respondents.

Update of the Novara Cohort Study (NCS): protocol evolution of a population-based longitudinal study on ageing in Northern Italy - cohort profile

Por: Cracas · S. V. · Garro · G. · Venetucci · J. · Martorana · M. · Antona · A. · Bettio · V. · Rossato · D. · Briacca · L. · Viola · E. · Caristia · S. · Colombo · V. · Capuzzi · L. · Roveda · C. · Varalda · M. · Rolla · R. · Sacchetti · S. · Tillio · P. A. · Capello · D. · Faggiano · F.
Purpose

The Novara Cohort Study (NCS) was established to investigate the biological, psychological and social factors that influence ageing in the general population. The study aims to identify early risk factors for frailty, allostatic load and cognitive decline, and to uncover molecular and functional markers of accelerated biological ageing. NCS addresses the need for detailed life-course data from Southern Europe to support personalised prevention and early diagnosis, and to promote healthy longevity.

Participants

NCS is a population-based, longitudinal cohort in the Novara province (Northern Italy), originally enrolling adults aged 35 and older. The inclusion criteria were later expanded to encompass all residents aged 18 and over, facilitating the study of ageing trajectories from early adulthood onward. As of mid-2025, about 1000 participants have been enrolled, and recruitment is ongoing. The cohort’s diversity in age, employment status and health conditions enhances its value for life-course analysis.

Findings to date

Following a pilot phase in 2022–2023, the whole study protocol now includes detailed demographic, clinical, behavioural, cognitive and psychosocial data, along with biological samples stored in the UPO Biobank. The protocol incorporates validated tools, comprehensive physical and cognitive assessments, and over 90 laboratory biomarkers covering inflammation, metabolism, hormonal function and coagulation. Additionally, a subset of participants underwent advanced inflammatory profiling by simultaneous measurement of 92 immune-related proteins and comprehensive genomic profiling using Illumina Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays, capturing common genetic variation across multiple biological domains. Preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating deep phenotyping, reveal the roles of frailty in ageing and show initial evidence of age-related changes in inflammatory proteins.

Future plans

NCS plans to enrol at least 10 000 participants and will conduct long-term follow-up using both passive methods, such as linking with clinical records and administrative health databases, and active in-person reassessments. Future phases will integrate clinical, behavioural and cognitive data with large-scale omics analyses, including genomics, proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics. Machine learning techniques will be employed to model biological age, identify early signs of age-related decline and develop personalised prevention strategies. By combining high-resolution phenotyping with multidimensional data, NCS aims to find modifiable risk factors and molecular signatures of ageing, supporting national and European research efforts and encouraging collaborative studies through open data-sharing frameworks.

“<i>My childhood affected my ability to be resilient in both good and bad ways</i>”: A mixed methods examination on the links between adverse childhood experiences, resilience, and transactional sex among young South African women

by Deborah Baron, Nisha Gottfredson O’Shea, Alexandra Lightfoot, Caroline Kuo, Sheri Lippman, F. Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Kathleen Kahn, Audrey Pettifor, Suzanne Maman

Background

South African women are disproportionately impacted by HIV. Among these women, adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are common and have been linked to HIV risk behaviors, including transactional sex (TS). Resilience—or multi-level processes related to overcoming adversity—provides a strengths-based lens that may buffer effects between ACEs and TS.

Methods

We conducted a convergent mixed methods study among women aged 18–25 years in Mpumalanga, South Africa. We used logistic regression to assess the association between ACEs and TS; and tested moderation effects of five resilience scales across social-ecological levels hypothesized to dampen the effect of ACEs on TS. In parallel, we conducted a photovoice study that utilized participant-generated images and narratives, and thematic and sequence analysis to explore how women exposed to ACEs perceive and use resilience to navigate TS relationships.

Results

Our analysis included 1,222 women aged 18–25 years, of whom 714 (58.43%) reported ACE exposure, with 519 (42.47%) reporting 1–2 ACEs and 195 (15.96%) reporting ≥3 ACEs; 340 (27.82%) reported TS. Women reporting ACE exposure had increased odds of TS compared to those without ACE exposure, controlling for confounders (AOR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.17–1.99, P = 0.002). Among women with histories of ACEs, women with ≥3 ACES had 2.55 times the odds of TS than those reporting 1–2 ACEs (95% CI: 1.79–3.63, P= Conclusion

We examined the interplay between resilience, ACEs, and TS. Although quantitative results showed resilience did not buffer negative effects of ACEs on TS, the photovoice findings suggest resilience was salient and influential in women’s lives. Future research should explore resilience measures and interventions that address the complex gender and power dynamics that exacerbate women’s exposure to TS and HIV.

Italian EBP Implementation Scales: A Psychometric Validation Study

ABSTRACT

Background

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is widely endorsed as a cornerstone for high-quality, patient-centered care. However, its integration into daily clinical routines remains inconsistent, particularly in settings where cultural, educational, and organizational challenges persist. Reliable, contextually adapted tools are essential to measure EBP implementation and guide improvement efforts.

Aims

This study aimed to validate the Italian versions of the EBP Implementation Scale and its short-form (3-item) version.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Both versions of the EBP Implementation Scale were translated and culturally adapted in accordance with internationally recognized guidelines. Data were gathered from a national sample of 405 nurses through a combination of convenience and snowball sampling. Psychometric assessment encompassed confirmatory and Bayesian factor analyses, evaluation of internal consistency and test–retest reliability, and measurement invariance testing. All analyses were performed in R Studio.

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that both versions (long and short) of the scale measure a single underlying construct. The instruments demonstrated high reliability (ω = 0.96 and 0.87 respectively). Measurement invariance across educational groups was partially established, as the partial scalar invariance model demonstrated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.991, RMSEA = 0.045), suggesting consistent interpretation of the scale across different levels of EBP training. Latent profile analysis revealed distinct subgroups of EBP implementers, with notable differences in latent means (p < 0.001) associated with previous education in evidence-based practice.

Discussion

The Italian EBP Implementation Scales are valid and reliable tools for assessing EBP implementation behaviors. They can support education planning, monitor practice changes over time, and inform interventions aimed at enhancing evidence-based care.

Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE)--protocol for a multiphase study

Por: Cubillo (Larrakia/Wadjigan) · B. J. · Browne · J. · Sherriff · S. · Walker (Yorta Yorta) · T. · Hill · K. · Crocetti · A. · Mitchell · F. · Backholer · K. · Maddox · R. · Brown · A. · Allender · S. · Wright · C. J. C. · Lacy-Nichols · J. · Chamberlain · C. · Ropitini (Ngati Kahungu
Introduction

The commercial determinants of health (CDoH) are a rapidly growing field of research and global health priority. Despite being disproportionately affected, Indigenous Peoples’ voices and perspectives are conspicuously absent from CDoH research and policy. This article outlines the protocol for Addressing Commercial Health determinants: Indigenous Empowerment and Voices for Equity (ACHIEVE), an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led project in Australia.

Methods and analysis

ACHIEVE integrates four research streams, using a novel combination of methods. The first three streams will (i) conceptualise the CDoH using Indigenous yarning methodology, (ii) evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies to reduce exposure to harmful marketing and (iii) assess the impacts of specific commercial entities on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health using case studies. The final stream will consolidate findings from streams 1–3 and work with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) to co-create strategies for addressing the commercial determinants of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval for streams 1–3 has been granted by Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee. ACHIEVE is guided by a governance model that prioritises Indigenous data sovereignty, community and ACCHO partnerships, capacity building and knowledge translation. Findings will be shared with participants, ACCHOs and policymakers to maximise research impact.

Burnout and Back Pain and Their Associations With Homecare Workers' Psychosocial Work Environment—A National Multicenter Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aims

To determine the prevalence of burnout and back pain in homecare workers in Switzerland and assess their associations with psychosocial work environment factors.

Design

National multicentre cross-sectional study.

Methods

Using paper-pencil questionnaires, data were collected from January 2021 to September 2021 from employees of 88 homecare agencies across Switzerland. Respondents who identified themselves as administrators, apprentices, or trainees, who were in leadership positions, or who were not involved in the provision of care or housekeeping were excluded from this analysis. Burnout was assessed with the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale (possible score range 0–100) and back pain with a single item from the Federal Statistical Office's Swiss Health Survey. Multilevel regression analyses were used to assess burnout and back pain's associations with psychosocial work environment factors.

Results

We included 2514 homecare workers. More than two-thirds (68.6%) reported back pain in the past 4 weeks. The overall mean burnout score was 36.0 (SD 18.3). Poorer work-life balance, higher perceived workload and verbal aggression from clients were positively associated with both outcomes. Better leadership and social support from colleagues were negatively associated with burnout. Higher role conflict levels correlated with higher burnout levels.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the psychosocial work environment should be considered when designing interventions to reduce the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

The high reported burnout and back pain prevalences among homecare workers highlight an urgent need to design and implement psychosocial work environment-improving interventions. In addition to contributing to homecare employees' long-term attraction and retention, protecting and promoting their health and well-being will likely not only benefit them, but also contribute to patient safety, quality of care and homecare sustainability.

Impact

The study reports the prevalence of burnout and back pain among homecare workers and their associations with psychosocial work environment factors. The results indicate that six psychosocial work environment factors—work-life balance, perceived workload, leadership quality, levels of social support from colleagues, role conflict levels, and verbal aggression from clients—all correlate with burnout and/or back pain in homecare workers. For policy makers, researchers, healthcare managers, and homecare agencies, this study's findings will inform the development of interventions to enhance homecare work environments, leading to improvements both in workers' health and in the quality of their care.

Reporting Method

We have adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting checklist for cross-sectional studies.

Patient or Public Contribution

Our stakeholder group included patient representatives, policy makers, researchers, clinicians and representatives of professional associations. Throughout the study, all provided support and input on topics including questionnaire development, result interpretation and the design of strategies to improve response rates.

UNIversity students LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M): study protocol of a multicentre, prospective cohort study

Por: Schuch · F. B. · Waclawoscky · A. · Tornquist · D. · Oyeyemi · A. L. · Sadarangani · K. P. · Takano · K. · Teychenne · M. · Balanza-Martinez · V. · ONeil · A. · Romain · A. J. · McGrath · A. · Alselmi · A. · Andrade-Lima · A. · Zanetti · A. C. G. · Trompetero-Gonzalez · A.-C. · Heiss
Introduction

Students enrolling in higher education often adopt lifestyles linked to worse mental health, potentially contributing to the peak age onset of mental health problems in early adulthood. However, extensive research is limited by focusing on single lifestyle behaviours, including single time points, within limited cultural contexts, and focusing on a limited set of mental health symptoms.

Methods and analysis

The UNIversity students’ LIFEstyle behaviours and Mental health cohort (UNILIFE-M) is a prospective worldwide cohort study aiming to investigate the associations between students’ lifestyle behaviours and mental health symptoms during their college years. The UNILIFE-M will gather self-reported data through an online survey on mental health symptoms (ie, depression, anxiety, mania, sleep problems, substance abuse, inattention/hyperactivity and obsessive/compulsive thoughts/behaviours) and lifestyle behaviours (ie, diet, physical activity, substance use, stress management, social support, restorative sleep, environment and sedentary behaviour) over 3.5 years. Participants of 69 universities from 28 countries (300 per site) will be assessed at university admission in the 2023 and/or the 2024 academic year and followed up for 1, 2 and 3.5 years.

Ethics and dissemination

The study was first approved at a national level in Brazil (CAE:63025822.8.1001.5346). Study sites outside Brazil obtained additional ethics approval from their institutions using the main approval. Results from the UNILIFE-M cohort will be disseminated through scientific publications, presentations at scientific meetings, press releases, the general media and social media.

Identifying risk patterns for sudden cardiac death in athletes: A clustering and principal component analysis approach

by Giacinto Angelo Sgarro, Paride Vasco, Domenico Santoro, Luca Grilli, Marco Giglio, Natale Daniele Brunetti, Luigi Traetta, Giuseppe Cibelli, Anna Antonia Valenzano

Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) is a critical and unexpected condition that occurs due to cardiac causes within one hour of the onset of acute cardiovascular symptoms or twenty-four hours in unwitnessed cases. Despite advancements in cardiovascular medicine, practical methods for predicting SCD are still lacking, and there are no standardized systems to identify individuals at risk, especially in seemingly healthy populations such as athletes. In this study, we employed hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) on data from 711 competitive athletes, revealing distinct patterns and cluster distributions in PCA space. Specifically, Clustering revealed characteristic feature combinations associated with increased SCD risk in athletes. Notably, certain clusters shared traits, including participation in Class C sports, sinus tachycardia, ventricular pre-excitation, personal or family history of heart disease, T-wave inversions, and prolonged QTc intervals. PCA helped visualize these patterns in distinct spatial regions, highlighting underlying structures and aiding intuitive risk interpretation. These results enable scientists to derive cluster metrics that serve as reference points for classifying new individuals and visually representing risk patterns in a clear graphical format. These findings establish a foundation for predictive tools that, with additional clinical validation, could aid in the prevention of SCD. The dataset used in this study, along with the clustering and PCA results, is available to the scientific community in an open format, together with the necessary tools and scripts to enable independent experimentation and further analysis.

Organ donation for research purposes: a qualitative focus group study on the views of donor families, transplant recipients and heart failure patients in the UK

Por: Louca · J. O. · Asemota · N. · Thren · J. · Manara · A. · Bhagra · S. · Wang · L. · Bargehr · J. · Burton · N. · Burton · S. · Rockell · K. · Nunes · J. P. · White · P. · Berman · M. · Pettit · S. · Rubino · A. · Reyahi · A. · Large · S. · Sinha · S. · Wilson · C.
Background

Declined donor organs and explanted recipient organs may hold considerable value for biomedical research, particularly in advancing knowledge of disease mechanisms and supporting drug development. However, public perceptions of such use, and preferences for how consent should be obtained, remain underexplored.

Methods

Four workshops were held across the UK to examine the views of organ donor families and transplant recipients regarding the use of human organs in research, with a focus on myocardial regeneration. Each workshop included three brief presentations on transplantation and cardiac regeneration, followed by facilitated small-group discussions. Observational notes were taken to capture participants’ perspectives on the use of organs unsuitable for transplantation. A follow-up survey generated both quantitative and qualitative data, the latter analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Participants expressed strong support for the use of declined donor and explanted recipient organs in research. Transplant recipients frequently cited a desire to give back to the National Health Service (NHS), while donor families viewed research use as a meaningful way to honour their loved ones when transplantation was not possible.

Conclusion

This exploratory study highlights widespread support for using non-transplantable organs in research among individuals with personal experience of transplantation. The findings suggest a need for further research into how best to support and inform potential donors and families. Participants emphasised the importance of sensitive communication, clear consent processes and transparency regarding the use of donated organs.

Creating a Healthy Work Environment by Balancing Work–Family Conflict Through Ethical Leadership: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Creating a healthy work environment requires balancing organizational goals with ethical responsibilities, where head nurses' ethical leadership can shape staff outcomes by mitigating work–family conflicts and promoting nurses' well-being, retention, and patient safety. This study aims to analyze the mediating role of work–family between head nurses' ethical leadership and nurses' reported errors, turnover intention, and physical and mental health.

Design

Nationwide Multicenter cross-sectional study.

Methods

Validated self-report scales were used to assess nurses' perceptions of head nurses' ethical leadership, work–family conflict, error, turnover intention, physical and mental health. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted. Structural equation modeling examined the relationships among these variables based on Della Bella's and Fiorini's framework.

Results

Data from 409 nurses across seven Italian hospitals was analyzed. The structural equation model showed an excellent fit. Head nurses' Ethical leadership was negatively associated with work–family conflicts, turnover intention, and errors, and positively associated with nurses' health. Work–family conflicts were significantly linked to turnover intention, errors, and nurses' health. Work–family conflicts mediate the relation between ethical leadership and turnover intention, errors, and nurses' health.

Conclusion

Promoting healthy work environments is crucial for nurses', patients', and organizations' well-being. Ethical leadership helps achieve this condition by reducing work–family conflicts, fostering nurses' well-being, decreasing turnover intention, and improving care quality. Disseminating ethical leadership programs and integrating with work–life balance policies can therefore strengthen both staff retention and organizational outcomes.

Clinical Relevance

Ethical leadership can foster patient care, reduce turnover intention and errors, and improve nurses' well-being. Therefore, maintaining employee performance and organizational results requires integrating work–life balance policies with ethical leadership development programs.

Reporting Method

The study adhered to The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist.

No Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement.

Protocol Registration

The study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8jk37/overview.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Profiling Healthcare Professionals' Digital Health Competence and Associated Factors: A Cross‐Sectional Study

ABSTRACT

Aim

To assess healthcare professionals' digital health competence and its associated factors.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Methods

The study was conducted from October 2023 to April 2024 among healthcare professionals in Italy, using convenience and snowball sampling. The questionnaire included four sections assessing: (i) socio-demographic and work-related characteristics; (ii) use of digital solutions as part of work and in free time, and communication channels to counsel clients in work; and DigiHealthCom and DigiComInf instruments including measurements of (iii) digital health competence and (iv) managerial, organisational and collegiality factors. K-means cluster analysis was employed to identify clusters of digital health competence; descriptive statistics to summarise characteristics and ANOVA and Chi-square tests to assess cluster differences.

Results

Among 301 healthcare professionals, the majority were nurses (n = 287, 95.3%). Three clusters were identified: cluster 1 showing the lowest, cluster 2 moderate and cluster 3 the highest digital health competence. Most participants (n = 193, 64.1%) belonged to cluster 3. Despite their proficiency, clusters 2 and 3 scored significantly lower on ethical competence. Least digitally competent professionals had significantly higher work experience, while the most competent reported stronger support from management, organisation, and colleagues. Communication channels for counselling clients and digital device use, both at work and during free time, were predominantly traditional technologies.

Conclusion

Educational programmes and organisational policies prioritising digital health competence development are needed to advance digital transition and equity in the healthcare workforce.

Implications for the Profession

Greater emphasis should be placed on the ethical aspects, with interventions tailored to healthcare professionals' digital health competence. Training and policies involving managers and colleagues, such as mentoring and distributed leadership, could help bridge the digital divide. Alongside traditional devices, the adoption of advanced technologies should be promoted.

Reporting Method

This study adheres to the STROBE checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

None.

Artificial intelligence tools for the assessment and management of dysphagia: protocol for a scoping review

Por: Sreedevi · E. V. · Iyer K · S. · Thankappan · K. · Janakiram · C. · Karuveettil · V. · Krishnan · R. · Guntha · R. · Roe · J. · Menon · J. R.
Introduction

Dysphagia, or difficulty in swallowing, significantly impacts the quality of life of the affected individuals. Diagnostic approaches, including video fluoroscopic swallowing studies and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, are the most commonly used methods for assessing swallowing function. Recent advancements have led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), which will provide innovative approaches to dysphagia diagnosis and treatment planning. There is a limited synthesis of literature on AI tools in dysphagia. There is an urgent need for a more rigorous and structured scoping review that can address the existing gaps, provide a more comprehensive evidence synthesis, and establish clearer guidelines for the clinical implementation of AI in assessments and management of dysphagia. This review will include studies focusing on AI tools such as ML, DL and computer vision for assessing and managing dysphagia. The context will be clinical or therapeutic settings, and all language articles will be considered for the review. Studies not involving AI technologies, those without clinical outcomes and ethical approval, and those focusing solely on the paediatric population will be excluded. This scoping review will systematically map and synthesise the existing literature on the use of AI tools for the assessment and management of dysphagia.

Methods and analysis

This scoping review will follow JBI methodology and PRISMA ScR guidelines. Information to be searched from January 2000 to May 2025 will include MEDLINE (via Ovid), Scopus, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, JBI Evidence Synthesis, ProQuest and Google Scholar. The titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened by two independent reviewers. Data extraction will use a study-specific customised form, with descriptive analysis employed to categorise studies by AI tools and outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval is not mandatory for this scoping review as it does not entail the collection of any individual patient data. Secondary data from publicly accessible research papers will be used. All the data sources will be appropriately cited. The findings will be propagated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific presentations.

Trial registration number

Open Science Framework: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/DYCE9.

LIVERATION trial: a multicentre European randomised study on radiofrequency margin coagulation and its impact on oncological outcomes after liver surgery - study protocol

Por: Luque Villalobos · E. · Ielpo · B. · Aldrighetti · L. · Anselmo · A. · Beghdadi · N. · Berardi · G. · Briceno · F. · Ciria · R. · Dorcaratto · D. · Durczynski · A. · Ettorre · G. M. · Delvecchio · A. · Ferri · V. · Grat · M. · Garces-Albir · M. · Grochola · L. F. · Hogendorf · P. · Izzo
Introduction

Surgical margins are crucial in determining postoperative local recurrence (LR) in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Achieving a margin greater than 1 cm can be challenging due to constraints related to remnant liver reserve, proximity to major vascular structures and tumour depth. We previously published findings from a retrospective study suggesting that additional margin coagulation (AMC) using radiofrequency may reduce LR, and this multicentre randomised clinical trial aims to further assess this hypothesis.

Methods and analysis

The LIVERATION trial is an international, multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial involving 698 patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM or HCC. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either AMC (study group) or conventional liver resection (control group) to assess oncological outcomes for both CRLM and HCC. The primary outcome is the incidence of LR. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, surgical complications and quality of life. Follow-ups occur at 30 days, 90 days, and 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively.

Ethics and dissemination

The LIVERATION trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee at the sponsor site Hospital del Mar de Barcelona, CEIM-PSMAR (Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos – Parc de Salut Mar), as well as by the Institutional Ethics Committees in all participating countries. The results of the main trial, along with each of the secondary endpoints, will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The study adheres to national and international guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki, and complies with regulations for studies involving biological samples under Law 14/2007 on Biomedical Research. A dissemination strategy has been developed to engage stakeholders and facilitate knowledge transfer to support the use of the findings of the study. LIVERATION is funded by the European Union under the Horizon Europe Framework Programme (Project Number: 101104360).

Trial registration number

NCT05492136.

Feasibility of an AI-assisted transcranial duplex sonography protocol for early detection of intracerebral haemorrhage: the HYPER-AI-SCAN single-centre prospective study

Por: Simonetti · R. · Canals · P. · Gonzalez Riveros · J. D. · Alanis-Bernal · M. · Pancorbo · O. · Rodriguez-Luna · D.
Introduction

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high early mortality and morbidity. Early clinical deterioration is common and influenced by haematoma expansion, which can occur within the first hours after symptom onset. Transcranial duplex sonography (TCD) is a rapid, non-invasive tool that may aid in early ICH detection but is highly operator-dependent. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis of ultrasound images has shown promise in other fields but has not yet been validated in acute ICH.

Methods and analysis

This is a single-centre, prospective feasibility study involving 500 patients with acute ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke (

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been obtained. Informed consent will be collected. Data will be coded and stored securely. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

Trial registration number

Not applicable at this stage (observational AI study).

Development of the Social Relationship Expectations Scale: protocol for a multi-country, multi-method observational study

Por: Akhter-Khan · S. C. · Ell · T. · Buck · L. · Haucke · M. · Luchetti · M. · Li · L. · Ong · A. · Chua · K.-C. · Mayston · R. · Prina · M. · Liu · S. · Wong · G.
Introduction

While loneliness has been recognised as a global public health concern, there are still knowledge gaps about how to prevent or reduce loneliness. The Social Relationship Expectations (SRE) Framework (Akhter-Khan et al, 2023) has been developed to enhance mechanism-based interventions targeting individuals’ expectations for social relationships. However, no scale has yet been developed to measure these expectations. We aim to measure SRE across the six interdependent dimensions identified in the theoretical framework, across diverse settings. This protocol outlines the methodology for developing the SRE scale.

Methods and analysis

The scale will be developed using both inductive and deductive techniques in a multicountry observational study. First, items will be extracted from published qualitative studies on loneliness and SRE across 15 lower-middle-income countries and from a qualitative focus group study with older Myanmar and Thai adults. Second, using a Delphi process for item development, experts across five world regions (Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania) will be involved in the item selection and scale creation process. A preliminary item pool will be administered in English, German and Chinese. Classical test theory as well as network analysis will be used to assess the dimensionality of the scale, understand item relationships and clusters, and select the final items for the SRE scale.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethics approval for the scale development has been obtained from King’s College London (reference number: MRSP-24/25-46512). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to completing the cognitive interviews and online surveys. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals in collaboration with coauthors across different countries and disciplines.

Attitudes, awareness and experience of Italian women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a nationwide cross-sectional study

Por: Godino · L. · Nardi · E. · Lanzoni · G. · Pompilii · E. · Calabrese · S. · Bertonazzi · B. · Carrara · M. · Gazineo · D. · Turchetti · D.
Objectives

Despite the increasing availability of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), women’s experiences and motivations remain largely unknown. The use of NIPT is increasing in Italy; however, its organisation and access paths vary considerably. Women may undergo testing in either public or private facilities, where differences in pretest information, testing procedures and result communication may influence their experience. This study aims to investigate the attitudes, awareness and experiences of Italian women undergoing NIPT.

Design

A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted via social media in the period March–August 2023.

Setting

This nationwide study was conducted in Italy.

Participants

Women over 18 years old who had undergone NIPT were included.

Results

Responders were 4154 women from every part of Italy. Most participants perceived the information provided during pre-NIPT counselling as extremely/very clear (68.2%) and helpful (72.5%), with higher proportions observed when counselling was delivered by geneticists. The mean knowledge score was 12.3 (range: 0–15) and was statistically higher for women with higher education level and prior NIPT experience. Half of the women reported no change in their perceived risk of having a child with chromosomal abnormalities after pre-NIPT counselling, and risk perception reduction was associated with lower knowledge scores. Pretest negative emotions were common (54.9%) and influenced by testing context, information sources and reasons for testing. Most women reported a positive impact from results (92.7%), shaped by information delivery made and prior knowledge. Regret was rare (3.0%) and linked to reasons and perceived risk changes. Overall, satisfaction was high (97.3%), particularly among those prioritising informed decision-making.

Conclusions

Improving personalised counselling and education throughout the NIPT journey seems crucial to minimise negative emotional impacts, highlighting the need for well-trained healthcare professionals.

❌