FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
Hoy — Marzo 4th 2026Tus fuentes RSS

COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices among people vulnerable to HIV in Uganda: A cross-sectional cohort analysis

by Job Kasule, Julius L. Tonzel, Natalie Burns, Tyler Hamby, Roger Ying, Grace Mirembe, Immaculate Nakabuye, Hannah Kibuuka, Margaret Yacovone, Betty Mwesigwa, Trevor A. Crowell, for the Multinational Observational Cohort of HIV and other Infections (MOCHI) Study Group

Background

People with behavioral vulnerability to HIV face barriers to healthcare engagement that may impede uptake of non-pharmaceutical and other interventions to prevent COVID-19. Understanding COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices in this population can inform disease prevention efforts during future pandemics.

Materials and methods

From October 2022 to September 2024, we enrolled participants aged 14–55 years without HIV who endorsed recent sexually transmitted infection, injection drug use, transactional sex, condomless sex, and/or anal sex with male partners. At enrollment, we collected socio-behavioral data, including assessments of COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Robust Poisson regression with purposeful variable selection was used to estimate prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals for factors associated with COVID-19 preventive practices.

Results

Among 418 participants, 228 (56.9%) were female, the median age was 21 years (interquartile range 19−24), and 362 (84.9%) reported sex work. Knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 transmission routes was high (95.4%) but lower for the consequences of genetic variants (48.5%−69.7%) and possibility for asymptomatic infection or transmission (66.7%−80.8%). Handwashing was practiced by 90.8% of participants in the preceding month, whereas mask-wearing (76.5%), avoiding symptomatic people (73.7%), and any history of COVID-19 vaccination (46.9%) were less prevalent. Males were more likely to report avoiding symptomatic people (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.16 [95% confidence interval 1.03–1.31]) and COVID-19 vaccination (1.30 [1.05–1.60]). Enrollment during the BQ.1/BQ.1.1 Omicron wave was associated with less mask-wearing (0.81 [0.67–0.99]) but more vaccination (1.59 [1.29–1.95]).

Discussion

We observed variable COVID-19 knowledge and attitudes among Ugandan adolescents and adults with little impact on COVID-19 preventive practices. Efforts to address suboptimal uptake of disease preventive practices during this and future disease outbreaks will require more than just improving knowledge.

Simulation of phased alerting of community first responders for cardiac arrest

by Pieter L. van den Berg, Shane G. Henderson, Hemeng Li, Bridget Dicker, Caroline J. Jagtenberg

Background

Community First Responders (CFRs) are commonly used for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, and advanced systems send so-called phased alerts: notifications with built-in time delays. The policy that defines these delays affects both response times and volunteer fatigue.

Methods

We compare alert policies by Monte Carlo Simulation, estimating patient survival, coverage, number of alerts and redundant CFR arrivals. In the simulation, acceptance probabilities and response delays are bootstrapped from 29,307 rows of historical data covering all GoodSAM alerts in New Zealand between 1-12-2017 and 30-11-2020. We simulate distances between the patient and CFRs by assuming that CFRs are located uniformly at random in a 1-km circle around the patient, for different CFR densities. Our simulated CFRs travel with a distance-dependent speed that was estimated by linear regression on observed speeds among those responders in the above-mentioned data set that eventually reached the patient.

Results

The alerting policy has a large impact on the four metrics above, and the best choice depends on volunteer density. For each volunteer density, we are able to identify a policy that improves GoodSAM New Zealand’s current policy on all four metrics. For example, when there are 30 volunteers within 1 km from the patient, sending out alerts to 7 volunteers and replacing each volunteer that rejects by a new one, is expected to save 10 additional lives per year compared to the current policy, without increasing volunteer fatigue. Our results also shed light on polices that would improve one metric while worsening another, for example, when there are 10 volunteers within 1 km from the patient, dispatching them all immediately increases our survival estimate by 11% compared to the current policy, with the downside of also increasing the redundant arrivals by 137%.

Conclusions

Monte Carlo simulation can help CFR system managers identify a good policy before implementing it in practice. We recommend balancing survival and volunteer fatigue, aiming to ultimately further improve a CFR system’s effectiveness.

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain management in chronic kidney disease

by Chi Peng Chan, Babaniji Omosule, Courtney Lightfoot, Ellesha A. Smith, Ffion Curtis, James O. Burton, Paul Gardner, Sarah Jasat, Sherna F. Adenwalla, Jyoti Baharani, Daniel S. March

Background

Chronic pain affects up to 60% of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), yet remains under-recognised and under-treated. Pain management in this population is complicated by altered drug pharmacokinetics, polypharmacy, and the potential nephrotoxicity of conventional analgesics. Despite the high prevalence and significant impact on quality of life, evidence-based guidance specific to pain management in CKD remains limited.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in reducing chronic pain intensity among people with CKD on dialysis, not on dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients, across all stages of CKD.

Methods

The primary outcome is the effectiveness of interventions in reducing chronic pain intensity as assessed by pain assessment tools. We will conduct a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to the present date to identify studies for chronic pain management in people living with CKD. Study screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. One reviewer will extract data from each study, with a second reviewer cross-checking for accuracy and completeness. Data will be extracted on study characteristics, participant demographics, intervention components, pain outcomes, and adverse events. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated independently by two reviewers using the GRADE approach. Where applicable, data will be combined in meta-analyses using random-effects models. Additionally, a network meta-analysis will be performed if enough studies are available.

Expected results

This review will synthesise the current evidence for pain management strategies in CKD, by evaluating effectiveness of interventions among people receiving different renal replacement therapy modalities with varying pain and disease phenotypes. Findings will highlight the comparative effectiveness of various interventions while considering their safety profiles specific to the CKD context. The review will identify gaps in the literature and provide recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

Significance

This review seeks to deliver a thorough evaluation of pain management strategies for people living with CKD. This systematic review is supported by the UK Kidney Association (UKKA), and findings will inform the upcoming UKKA guideline on symptoms management in people with CKD, alongside the other symptoms including itch, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. This review will aid clinicians in making well-informed decisions regarding pain management strategies, ensuring a balance between effectiveness and the specific risks associated with CKD.

Computational frameworks for automated detection and quantification of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity among traumatic brain injury patients

by Xiangxiang Kong, Lujie Karen Chen, Sancharee Hom Chowdhurry, Ryan B. Felix, Shiming Yang, Peter Hu, Neeraj Badjatia, Jamie Erin Podell

Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a syndrome that occurs in a large subset of critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and is associated with complications and poor recovery. PSH is defined by recurrent episodic vital sign elevations in the appropriate clinical context. However, standard diagnostic criteria rely heavily on subjective judgment, leading to challenges and delays in recognition, monitoring, and management. The objective of this study was to develop automated PSH detection and quantification tools that exclusively utilize objective bedside continuous vital sign data. Using a cohort of 221 critically ill acute TBI patients with at least 14 days of continuous physiologic data (of which 107 were clinically diagnosed with PSH) we developed a high-resolution clinical feature scale based on established PSH-Assessment Measure criteria and two artificial intelligence-based episode detection models including an expert system approach and a machine learning model approach, using a clinician-annotated case example as ground truth. For the episode detection methods, PSH was quantified as the number, duration, and overall temporal burden of detected episodes. To evaluate performance, we compared quantifications across PSH cases and controls and explored precision and recall. All three methods demonstrated initial face validity to delineate PSH cases from non-PSH TBI controls. Future optimization and implementation of the described computational frameworks with real-time patient data could improve the standard monitoring and management of this challenging clinical syndrome.

“The system is a bit broken…” a qualitative exploration of barriers in the pathway for diagnosing Developmental Coordination Disorder

by Lucy H. Eddy, Nat K. Merrick, Cara E. Staniforth, Jade L. Jukes, Liam J. B. Hill, Mark Mon-Williams, Farid Bardid, Rebecca Murray

Background

Approximately 5% of children are affected by a neurodevelopmental disorder of their sensorimotor skills. DSM-V and ICD-10, the two most widely used diagnostic systems, define this diagnostically as ‘Developmental Coordination Disorder’ (DCD) or ‘Specific Developmental Disorder of Motor Function’ (SDDMF), respectively. A diagnosis of DCD has been found to have a detrimental impact on a range of outcomes (e.g., health and education). It is therefore crucial that these children receive timely intervention. This is reliant, however, on effective assessment and support pathways. Research has shown there is great parental dissatisfaction, but there has been limited research exploring a clinical and education perspective. This study therefore aimed to understand barriers and facilitators for clinical and education practitioners in the pathway in a diverse district in the UK (Bradford).

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were completed with stakeholders across the pathway to identify barriers and facilitators to assessing, diagnosing, and supporting children with sensorimotor skill difficulties. Theoretical thematic analysis aligned to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation model of Behaviour change (COM-B) was used to analyse the qualitative data.

Results

Interviews revealed many barriers in the DCD pathway related to capability (confusing terminology, inconsistent knowledge, inappropriate referrals), opportunity (resource constraints, DCD being considered low priority, and disconnected services), and motivation (overlapping job roles, a desire to consider those with difficulties not eligible for a diagnosis). No facilitators were consistently identified across interviews.

Conclusion

Families face multiple barriers to obtaining a diagnosis for their child through existing clinical pathways for assessment and support. These findings are unlikely to be unique to Bradford, due to international research highlighting these issues via parental interviews. These findings therefore may reflect challenges both nationally and internationally within DCD pathways. There is an urgent need for: (i) clear communication across different services (with consistency in terminology), and (ii) a more collaborative and integrated approach to assessment, diagnosis, and support in order to help these children thrive.

Mental health help-seeking intentions among health workers in the east coast of peninsular Malaysia: Perceived barriers and predictive factors

by Muhammad Syafiq Kunyahamu, Aziah Daud, Ijlal Syamim Mohd Basri, Tengku Alina Tengku Ismail, Mohd Faiz Md Tahir

Introduction

Mental health problems among health workers are a growing concern globally, including in Malaysia. Despite the availability of mental health services, some health workers do not seek professional help. This study aims to determine the level of health workers’ intention to seek professional help, examine the barriers they perceive, and identify predictors of mental health help-seeking intention.

Methods

This cross-sectional study involved 470 health workers in the East Coast region of Peninsular Malaysia. Data was collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Linear regression analysis was employed to identify the predictors of professional help-seeking intention.

Results

The mean score for mental health help-seeking intention was 4.90 (SD = 1.03). Perceived need for help positively predicted help-seeking intention (B = 0.532, p  Conclusions

This study highlights the roles of the perceived need for help and perceived stigma barriers in predicting health workers’ help-seeking intentions, offering a basis for targeted interventions and policies to enhance mental health support within Malaysian healthcare settings.

Methodological review of the design, objectives and sample size of Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) applications that use an external randomised controlled pilot trial design: A protocol

by Claire L. Chan, Saskia Eddy, Jennie Hejdenberg, Ben Morgan, Heather M. Morgan, Gillian Lancaster, Clare Robinson, Sandra M. Eldridge

Background

The National Institute for Health and Care Research accepts applications for pilot and feasibility studies to their Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) programme. There has been limited work describing the design practices of these applications and funding status. Knowing some of the qualities which may contribute towards a pilot or feasibility study application successfully gaining funding could help researchers improve the quality of their applications. Therefore, this study describes the protocol for a review looking at the characteristics of funded and non-funded external pilot trial applications. In particular, the primary objective is to describe the planned sample size and sample size justifications.

Methods

The study will be conducted on 100 applications from Competition 31–37 with a randomised feasibility design, identified and given access to us by RfPB where the lead applicant has consented. We will screen these applications to identify the external pilot trials, first looking through the titles and then the full text. Following this, we will extract data on information such as medical area, study design, objective(s), sample size, sample size justification, and funding outcome stage one and two. Validation will be performed on 20% of the data extracted; discrepancies will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer will decide if there is no consensus. We will use descriptive statistics to summarise quantitative data, and will analyse qualitative data using thematic analysis. Findings will be summarised through discussion with the project contributors to produce a reader-friendly guidance document.

Discussion

This work will provide a more complete picture of RfPB external randomised pilot and feasibility trials. The findings will assist researchers when planning their pilot trials, and could help improve the quality of submitted applications.

Protocol Registration

Open Science Framework protocol registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PYKVG.

Comprehensive post-marketing safety evaluation of atezolizumab: A disproportionality analysis based on individual case safety reports in the FAERS

by Yu Cui, Yuxuan Gao, Na Meng, Xiaojuan Li, Na Zhao, Lili Yu

Atezolizumab is a widely used immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for cancer treatment, and postmarketing testing is important. This study aims to provide a reference for the safe and rational use of drugs in clinical practice by mining and analyzing the adverse event (AE) signals of atezolizumab on the basis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). This research extracted AE reports from the second quarter (Q2) of 2016 to Q2 of 2024 from the FAERS. AEs were standardized and classified on the basis of the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 23.0. This study utilized disproportionality analysis (DPA) for signal mining and analysis, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) method, and the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method. We obtained a total of 3,124 AE signals and identified 640 PTs and 21 SOCs for atezolizumab. The highest signal intensity was systemic immune activation (n = 15, ROR = 449.20, PRR = 449.07, IC = 8.06), and the most frequently reported AEs were death, pyrexia, infectious pneumonia, anaemia, and febrile neutropenia. The top 100 PTs in terms of signal intensity involved a total of 16 SOCs, including those associated with endocrine disorders; respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders; and renal and urinary disorders. This study revealed that AEs in the endocrine, respiratory and urinary systems need to be monitored in clinical practice.

Pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial to guide initial therapy for immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis comparing standard of care (prednisolone) to adalimumab without glucocorticoids: REACT trial protocol

Por: Fisher · B. A. · Rowe · A. · Hodson · C. · Wilkhu · M. · Williams · E. · Turner · E. · Allard · A. · Blake · T. · Bombardieri · M. · Cope · A. P. · Dubey · S. · Mankia · K. · Malley · T. · Moore · O. · Payne · M. · Plummer · R. · Tilby · M. · Tillett · T. · Wong · E. · Wu · Y. · Filer · A. · Pra
Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised cancer treatment through targeted disruption of the physiological pathways that maintain tissue tolerance, but which are co-opted by cancers to evade immunosurveillance. Thus, the resultant T-cell activity often causes immune-related adverse events including immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced inflammatory arthritis (ICI-IA). ICI-IA results in functional impairment that frequently persists, even after ICI discontinuation, with substantial quality-of-life impacts for cancer survivors.

A high-quality body of evidence to guide ICI-IA management remains an unmet need. Pharmacological treatment may be prolonged, typically begins with non-specific immunosuppression, including systemic steroids, and is usually only rationalised to more targeted therapy in resistant cases. Moreover, retrospective data suggest the high dose glucocorticoids sometimes used in new-onset ICI-IA may be associated with worse cancer outcomes.

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibition strategies are well established with excellent efficacy and safety profiles in ‘spontaneous’ inflammatory arthritides including rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis. Mechanistic evidence from ex vivo and murine studies also supports the utility of anti-TNF therapy for steroid-refractory cases of ICI-IA. Although good clinical responses have been reported in this setting, the REACT trial (REmission induction of Arthritis caused by Cancer ImmunoTherapy) aims to provide randomised and robust clinical evidence for deploying targeted therapy earlier in ICI-IA management. It will test whether up-front anti-TNF therapy can more effectively and quickly control symptoms, reduce glucocorticoid exposure, prevent early ICI discontinuation and increase the frequency of drug-free ICI-IA remission.

Methods and analysis

REACT is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, superiority, two-arm, randomised controlled clinical trial to guide initial therapy for patients with ICI-IA. The trial will compare the current standard of care (initial prednisolone; Arm A) with the anti-TNF drug, adalimumab without glucocorticoids (Arm B).

The primary outcome is glucocorticoid-free arthritis remission rate at 24 weeks where remission is defined as: (i) No use of systemic or intra-articular glucocorticoids (except when used for adrenal insufficiency) within 4 weeks prior to assessment at 24 weeks; and (ii) absence of synovitis on clinical examination.

Ethics and dissemination

The protocol was approved by East Midlands—Leicester South Research Ethics Committee on 31-Oct-2024 (Ref: 24/EM/0202). Participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results of this trial will be disseminated through national and international presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN18217497.

Fighting for care: how can we better support people with multiple long-term conditions who are accessing community mental health groups? A qualitative interview study within a UK arts therapies trial

Por: Hounsell · L. · Millard · E. · Medlicott · E. · Fry · E. · Fernandes · J. · Carr · C.
Objective

To explore the impact of multiple long-term conditions (MTLCs) and a comorbid mental health condition on decision-making processes, attendance and engagement in NHS community-based therapy groups.

Design

Qualitative in-depth interviews analysed using reflexive codebook analysis as part of a study within a trial.

Setting

Secondary community mental health teams from two UK sites.

Participants

Purposive sample of 20 participants recruited to a randomised controlled trial of group therapies (arts therapies and counselling) holding a mental health diagnosis and self-reported as having at least one additional physical health condition.

Results

Six themes were constructed: (1) MLTCs influenced arts modality choices and goals; (2) importance of planning ahead to be organised; (3) the journey loomed over participants; (4) the impact of MLTCs on group attendance and participation; (5) the group was valued and important; (6) determination and fighting to get what I need.

Decisions about arts modalities and group attendance were based on a self-perceived level of felt capability. It was important for participants to plan in advance and feel informed ahead of making commitments, enabling them to prepare and manage symptoms. Travelling to the groups was dreaded, and many participants required support with travel in order to attend. Managing symptoms during the journey and groups was challenging; however, participants had a strong determination to uphold the commitment to attend despite their difficulties, as the group was highly valued.

Conclusions

MLTCs have a large impact on people’s capacity to engage in community groups, requiring additional planning and effort. The scale of this impact is often not recognised. Despite this, the benefits of groups for people with MLTCs are especially important, including motivation to leave the house, opportunities for socialisation and a means of reaching one’s own goals. Clinicians are recommended to accommodate the needs of MLTCs when designing community group interventions and consider multiple attendees with MLTCs in the group composition to improve attendance and group engagement.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN88805048.

Associations between indices of body composition and metabolic status in normal-weight adults: a cross-sectional study of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

Por: Maleki · S. · Hosseinpanah · F. · Mahdavi · M. · Momenan · A. A. · Ebadi · S. A. · Rahmani · F. · Azizi · F. · Valizadeh · M.
Objective

To investigate associations between body composition indices and metabolic status among normal-weight adults.

Design

Cross-sectional study using data from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (phaseVII: 2019–2021).

Setting

Primary care and community health services in an urban Tehran population.

Participants

1298 adults (40.5% men, 59.5% women), aged 18–80years, body mass index (BMI) 18.5–24.9 kg/m². Exclusions: known diabetes, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, malignancy, pregnancy or lactation, diuretic or glucocorticoid use. Participants were classified as metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW) or unhealthy (MUHNW).

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was the association between body composition and anthropometric indices with metabolic status. The secondary outcome was identification of the strongest predictors of MUHNW. Body composition was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis to obtain fat mass (FM), body fat percentage (BFP), skeletal muscle mass percentage (SMM%), fat mass index (FMI), fat-free mass index, skeletal muscle indices and the fat-to-muscle mass ratio (FMR). Anthropometric measures included waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Associations were examined using logistic regression adjusted for age, smoking and physical activity.

Results

Mean age: 37.5±12.8 y; MUHNW participants were older than MHNW (44.5±13.2 vs 35.8±12.1 years, p

Conclusions

BMI, WC, WHR and body fat indices were positively associated with metabolically unhealthy status among normal-weight adults of both sexes. WHR was the strongest predictor, highlighting its value for identifying at-risk individuals where advanced body composition tools are unavailable.

Performance validation of an artificial intelligence-assisted chest radiograph algorithm for incidental pulmonary nodule detection in Malaysian healthcare facilities: a multicentre cross-sectional study protocol

Por: Megat Ramli · P. N. · Ahmad · N. · Aizuddin · A. N. · Abdul Hamid · Z.
Introduction

Incidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly encountered on chest radiographs (CXRs) performed for routine clinical indications and may represent early manifestations of significant pulmonary pathology, including lung cancer. While low-dose CT screening has mortality benefits in selected high-risk populations, its implementation remains limited in many healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted CXR interpretation has the potential to enhance pulmonary nodule detection. However, evidence from Malaysian clinical practice is scarce. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of AI-assisted CXR interpretation for detecting IPNs across healthcare facilities in the Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Methods and analysis

This prospective, multicentre study will include 2452 CXRs from patients aged ≥35 years over a 6-month period across four Klang Valley healthcare facilities. Each CXR will be independently interpreted by an experienced radiologist (>5 years of experience) and analysed separately using an AI system (qXR-LNMS). An independent thoracic radiologist will determine the final classification for analysis if there is IPN detection discordance. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy) will be calculated using a 2x2 classification matrix. Agreement between AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reports will be assessed using Cohen’s kappa statistic. The prevalence of IPNs detected by AI-assisted interpretation and radiologist reporting will be compared using a two-proportion z-test. AI discriminative performance will be evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve estimation. Statistical analyses will be conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences V.29, with p

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Research Ethics Committee and the Ministry of Health Malaysia Medical Research and Ethics Committee. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and engagement with relevant stakeholders.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for postoperative pain: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Por: Lu · Y. · Lv · H. · Bian · Z. · Shen · Y. · Li · R. · Xia · Y. · Fang · J.-Q. · Wan · Y.
Introduction

Postoperative pain is common after surgery, with a high incidence and risk of becoming chronic. Current multimodal analgesia has drawbacks, including limited efficacy from single agents and opioid side effects and addiction risk. These issues have led to opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is non-invasive and convenient. Studies have shown it can reduce postoperative pain, improve mood and lower adverse events. However, taVNS lacks a comprehensive evaluation and standardised protocols, so further research is needed to provide reliable evidence.

Methods and analysis

This study strictly adheres to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. To identify suitable randomised controlled trials (RCTs), eight credible databases will be searched, including four English databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE) and four Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database). RevMan V.5.3 will be employed to integrate the retrieved data and conduct meta-analyses. The methodological quality of included RCTs will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment 2.0 tool. Additionally, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be applied to assess the strength and certainty of the evidence. We will also conduct publication bias analyses, sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses.

Ethics and dissemination

No ethical review is required as no private or confidential patient data will be included. Results of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD420251207651.

Determinants of barriers to accessing healthcare services among married women in Somalia: a multilevel analysis of nationwide survey data

Por: Ali · A. S. · Hassan · Y. S. A. · Ahmed · M. M. · Omar · M. A.
Objectives

To identify the individual and community-level factors associated with barriers to accessing healthcare services among currently married women in Somalia.

Design

A cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2020 Somalia Demographic and Health Survey.

Setting

Somalia.

Participants

A nationally representative sample of 30 311 currently married women aged 15–49 years with complete data on outcome and explanatory variables.

Primary outcome measures

The primary outcome was ‘reporting at least one barrier to accessing healthcare’, a composite binary variable based on four specific problems: obtaining permission to go for treatment, getting money for treatment, distance to the health facility and not wanting to go alone.

Results

A substantial majority (77.06%) of married women reported experiencing at least one barrier to accessing healthcare. Financial cost was the most common barrier (69.91%), followed by distance to health facilities (65.95%), reluctance to go alone (49.64%) and the requirement for permission (46.03%). Multilevel analysis confirmed that higher household wealth was strongly protective (richest vs poorest: adjusted OR (aOR)=0.27, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.32). Paradoxically, factors typically considered protective were associated with increased barriers: women with secondary education (aOR=1.19, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.41) and those with educated husbands (aOR=1.23, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.33) reported more obstacles. Similarly, urban residents faced higher odds of barriers than their nomadic counterparts (aOR=1.40, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.55). Significant regional disparities were evident, with community-level context explaining 26.30% of the total variance in reporting barriers.

Conclusion

Access to healthcare for married women in Somalia is predominantly hindered by economic, educational and community-level constraints. Targeted interventions addressing socioeconomic disparities, infrastructural deficits and specific community contexts are essential to alleviate these barriers.

Beyond the doctors office: a longitudinal study mapping womens experiences of the maternal healthcare journey as a pathway to reducing maternal mortality in Nigeria

Por: Ope · B. W. · Attwood · P. · Mullins · E. · Hirst · J. E. · Norton · R. · Peden · M.
Objectives

Nigeria has one of the highest maternal mortality burdens globally. Improving maternal outcomes requires a better understanding of how women experience care across pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period. This study explored women’s maternal healthcare experiences across the perinatal continuum in Nigeria, with a focus on how challenges emerge and interact over time.

Design

Longitudinal qualitative study using patient journey mapping.

Setting

Public primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in Abuja, Nigeria.

Participants

12 pregnant women were purposively sampled. Each woman participated in two rounds of in-depth interviews: once in late pregnancy and again 2–6 weeks postpartum. All participants completed both interview rounds.

Methods

Data were collected through 24 semistructured in-depth interviews conducted longitudinally to capture changes in women’s experiences before and after childbirth. Interview guides were informed by existing maternal health frameworks. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and organised across five stages of the maternal healthcare journey: Awareness, Consideration, Access, Treatment and Recovery.

Findings

This study introduces a five-stage framework: Awareness, Consideration, Access, Treatment and Recovery, to comprehensively explore maternal healthcare experiences. The findings reveal systemic inefficiencies at every stage of the pregnancy journey, from limited awareness of pregnancy test kits to unreliable booking systems and inadequate postpartum mental health support. This study highlights how early-stage barriers cascade into later phases, unlike traditional research that focuses only on clinical interactions. This study emphasises the importance of maternal care accessibility and recovery support, moving beyond a treatment-centric lens. 

Conclusion

This study presents a transformative framework for understanding maternal healthcare as a continuum of interconnected experiences. The research offers actionable insights to enhance maternal health outcomes through stage-specific strategies. The globally adaptable framework provides policymakers and healthcare practitioners with a roadmap to improve maternal healthcare systems in Nigeria and beyond. This holistic approach lays the foundation for reducing maternal mortality while ensuring equitable care for all.

Adapting substance use treatment for black adolescents in the US legal system: protocol for a mixed-method, exploratory, feasibility and acceptability study using the eight-step ADAPT-ITT framework

Por: Bryant · B. E. · Tolou-Shams · M. · Ezimora · I. · Zapolski · T. C. · DiClemente · R. · Jordan · A. · Becker · S. J. · Squeglia · L. M.
Introduction

This community-led research study protocol emphasises placing black youth impacted by the legal system, their families and their communities at the forefront of substance use treatment development research and decision-making. The study, the Cultural Adaptation of a Substance Use Treatment (CAST) Project, challenges traditional top-down approaches to treatment creation, advocating for a grassroots model that centres community knowledge, values and active participation.

Methods and analysis

The CAST project is a US-based mixed-methods study with an exploratory design that examines the impact of racial discrimination on substance use in black youth impacted by the legal system. The study participants are black youth impacted by the legal system (N=15), parents of black youth impacted by the legal system (N=10) and community members who serve black youth (N=10) (total N=35 study participants). Study participants from each group (youth, parents and community members) will participate in three separate focus groups, respectively, to provide feedback on the culturally responsive content needed to best support black youth impacted by the legal system around substance use and mental health. The eight-step Assess, Decision, Adaptation, Production, Topical Expert, Integration, Training, Testing framework will be used as a guide to inform adaptations to the Motivational Enhancement Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (MET/CBT12) for black youth impacted by the legal system. Once the cultural adaptation process has been completed, the study will conclude with an open feasibility and accessibility trial of the culturally adapted MET/CBT12 manual. The primary outcomes of this study are the feasibility and acceptability of the culturally adapted manual, measured by treatment attendance and participant feedback. Secondary outcomes include reductions in substance use and discrimination distress, and improvements in mental health symptoms.

Ethics and dissemination

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the University of California, San Francisco (IRB Protocol Number: 23-40126). All study procedures will be conducted in accordance with the ethical standards outlined by the institutional review board. The results from this study will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, academic conferences, community forums and policy briefs to support broader implementation of culturally adapted adolescent substance use interventions that address discrimination-related stress and substance use among black individuals impacted by the legal system.

Trial registration number

NCT06003725.

Doctoral Education in Nursing Is a ‘Special Issue’

ABSTRACT

The extent to which the analysis of the state of play of doctoral education and suggested ways forward are seen as being radical is of course dependent on the context within which nursing research programs currently exist. We are aware that no one size fits all contexts, but we are also aware of a critical need to challenge dominant perspectives and practices and work toward a radical repositioning of the nursing PhD. At a time when the narrative of nursing shortages is pervasive, we need to be positioning nursing research and researchers at the heart of the solution. Without a radical reconsideration of how we build sustainable research teams, the opportunity will bypass us. The special issue on doctoral education deliberately set out to be disruptive, to surface critical questions and trigger a conversation that needs to be had. We are open to continuing this conversation.

Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Perceptions of Work Environments: A Cross‐Sectional Study From Five European Counties

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore intensive care nurses' perceptions of their work environments at the unit and organisational levels according to the American Association of Critical Care Nurses standards, their impact on care quality, national differences, and demographic associations.

Design

Cross-sectional study using a survey design.

Methods

Study conducted between January 2021 and April 2022, using a convenience sample of intensive care unit nurses across Cyprus, Spain, Croatia, and Poland, Romania. The Critical Elements of a Healthy Work Environment Scale (CEHWES) developed by the American Association of Critical Care Nurses and cross-culturally adapted by the authors was used, which included four sections, including sociodemographic data and a total of 50 questions. The core section of the tool comprised 16 questions using Likert-type response (1—strongly disagree—4 strongly agree). Perception of fulfilment of healthy work environment standards was calculated using the aforementioned Likert-type scale.

Results

A total of 1183 nurses participated reporting moderate perception of fulfilment of the standards, with mean scores ranging from 2.6 to 2.8. Skilled communication and effective decision making were the highest rated. 56% (n = 662) reported awareness of some standards and while 25.8% (n = 305) reported full or significant implementation in their unit. Significant differences related to the perception of all standards were observed across countries. Implementation of the standards was significantly associated with higher quality of care having better perception when standards were fully implemented.

Conclusions

This study shows moderate perception of healthy work environment standards among intensive care nurses. Country differences highlight the need for more awareness, training, and further implementation of the standards, which is linked to better care quality.

Implications for the Profession

Work environment still need to improve and needs to be prioritised by organisations, considering local and national particularities. Having a measuring tool available in multiple languages facilitates comparisons and getting a global picture.

Impact

The questionnaire used is validated in different languages, allowing results to be compared with other countries. Novel data from countries that were poorly investigated is now available. More evidence points out the need to prioritise work environment for maintaining quality in patient care.

Reporting Method

The study has been reported following the STROBE checklist.

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Home Care Organisational Models in Italy: A Cross‐Sectional Study of Cluster Analysis and Stakeholder Perceptions

ABSTRACT

Aim

To classify Italian home care models based on structural characteristics, process factors and stakeholder perceptions.

Design

This is a secondary analysis of the AIDOMUS-IT multicentre cross-sectional study, conducted in Italy between July 2022 and December 2023.

Methods

Data were collected via online surveys completed by 33 Local Health Authority Nursing Directors, home care nurses and patients. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to classify different organisational models based on structural and process-related factors. Nurses' and patients' perceptions of care were described for each identified cluster.

Results

The analysis identified three distinct organisational home care models: The ‘multidisciplinary model’, in which nurses reported high dissatisfaction due to organisational complexity and excessive workloads. In the ‘nurse-centred model’, characterised by publicly employed nurses, strong leadership, and a supportive work environment, patients reported high levels of satisfaction. The ‘performance-based model’, which operated with a lower nurse-to-patient ratio, reduced service hours, and greater reliance on external professionals. Nurses in this model reported high job satisfaction but also a greater intention to leave, while patient satisfaction was lower.

Conclusions

This study underscores the importance of leadership, resource management, and a supportive work environment in influencing both job satisfaction and patient outcomes in home care settings.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patients Care

Policymakers could use these findings to refine care models and improve service delivery.

Impact

Limited research has examined the organisational structures of home care services, which are important for professionals' organisational well-being, patient safety, and quality of care. This study identified three distinct organisational home care models that could be used to refine care approaches and improve service delivery.

Reporting Method

This study respects the EQUATOR guideline for observational studies (STROBE).

Patient or Public Contribution

This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct, or reporting.

Wound Management and Surgery for Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy (Calciphylaxis): A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

ABSTRACT

Wound care in calciphylaxis remains poorly defined without evidence-based consensus on timing and technique of surgical intervention. We demonstrate that surgical debridement and subsequent wound closure are safe and effective in calciphylaxis and describe a systematic multidisciplinary approach to intervention. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with calciphylaxis at our institution. Those who underwent surgical debridement and wound closure were analysed with emphasis on wound healing, progression to amputation and mortality. Sixty-two patients with calciphylaxis underwent surgical debridement. Twenty patients had wound closure by skin grafting, five were excised with primary wound closure, and 37 were debrided and allowed to heal by secondary intention. There were excellent rates of healing in all groups, and no patients demonstrated wound progression or new lesions following operative intervention. Surgical debridement and wound closure are safe and effective in treating wounds related to calciphylaxis.

❌