Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most urgent global health threats, responsible for an estimated 4.95 million deaths annually, including 1.27 million directly linked to drug-resistant infections. Nigeria is particularly affected, ranking 19th globally in AMR-related mortality, with an estimated 64 500 attributable and 263 400 associated deaths in 2019. These estimates are likely conservative due to limited surveillance. Economically, AMR could cost Nigeria 5%–7% of its GDP by 2050.

Despite this burden, antibiotic misuse remains widespread, with 42% of adults and over 46% of children under 5 receiving antibiotics without prescriptions. At the primary healthcare (PHC) level, where most antibiotics are prescribed, challenges such as limited diagnostics, inconsistent prescription and poor access to digital tools hinder effective antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).

The primary objective of this study is to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among PHC prescribers in Imo State, Nigeria. A secondary objective is to explore preliminary indicators of their digital readiness to inform future technological interventions for AMS.

A cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire.

PHC facilities across all 27 local government areas of Imo State, Nigeria.

A purposive sample of 547 facility-based public PHC prescribers included 84% of all facility Officers-in-Charge of health facilities in the state and 16% of other PHC workers who were involved in prescription.

The primary outcome measures were composite scores for knowledge (adequate/inadequate), attitude (positive/negative) and prescribing practice (good/poor), derived from a validated questionnaire. Secondary measures included sources of AMR information and indicators of digital readiness.

While 77.1% demonstrated adequate knowledge, only 32.7% exhibited positive attitudes and 88.5% reported poor prescribing practices. Attitude was the strongest predictor of good practice (OR=17.585, p

These findings underscore a critical gap between knowledge and practice, driven in part by limited access to digital decision-support tools. To address the documented gaps in tool access and training, strengthening digital inclusion through context-adapted e-learning, offline-compatible AMS tools and simplified digital antibiograms is a necessary implication for improving antibiotic stewardship and clinical outcomes at the PHC level.

People with serious mental illness (SMI) can experience significant physical health challenges. The Health Champions intervention was developed to support their physical health through using trained volunteers. However, volunteer and patient perspectives on the impact and implementation of this intervention have yet to be understood.

To compare the views of patients and volunteers on the Health Champions intervention.

A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted on interviews with 29 study participants. Interviews were carried out either face-to-face, via Microsoft Teams, or by telephone and included 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) and 17 volunteers (the Health Champions) (5 men and 12 women).

Four overarching themes were identified, highlighting both similarities and differences between stakeholders’ perspectives: (1) supporting goal setting; (2) impact on positive lifestyle; (3) experiences and perception of the programme and (4) navigating challenges during the programme. Both groups found the programme to be largely successful, by motivating patients to work towards their physical health goals and facilitating successful matching of patients with volunteers. Volunteers and patients valued good communication with the research team. Though both groups shared some views on the challenges with scheduling and a lack of face-to-face contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, their perceptions on how patients incorporated their health changes during and after the programme, as well as other administrative concerns such as views on the efficacy of journaling and breakdown of roles, differed.

The Health Champions intervention was perceived as useful to improve the physical health of patients with SMI. Differences in the views between the two stakeholders may result from their distinct experiences and expectations. Future volunteering programmes should further support the diverse physical health needs of patients with SMI.

Group A Streptococcus (Strep A) causes a wide spectrum of diseases, ranging from pharyngitis and impetigo to severe invasive infections and immune-mediated conditions such as acute rheumatic fever, rheumatic heart disease and acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. Contemporary data on the global burden of Strep A diseases are lacking. The proposed study aims to use administrative data from numerous jurisdictions to estimate age-specific incidence or prevalence of Strep A diseases, with an emphasis on severe clinical endpoints. Depending on the availability of data, a secondary objective will be to estimate the economic burden of Strep A diseases.

This population-based descriptive study will use routine health data obtained from different low-income and middle-income and high-income countries through international research collaborations to estimate the country-level and global burden of Strep A diseases. Data will be primarily obtained and collated from hospital or national health laboratory databases for individuals across all age groups, along with emergency department, primary care and microbiological datasets where available. Strep A disease endpoints will be identified using International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision or other relevant coding systems and microbiological diagnosis. Age-specific incidence and prevalence rates will be computed using population denominators, and country-level age-adjusted rates will be applied to standard global reference populations to estimate the number of cases globally.

Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Western Australia (reference: #2024/ET000401) and governance approval was obtained from The Kids Research Institute Australia. The findings from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at Strep A Vaccine Global Consortium collaborative meetings.

To assess nutrition-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among pregnant women, and identify socioeconomic and healthcare determinants.

A cross-sectional study on maternal nutrition during pregnancy.

Pregnant women attending primary healthcare centres in the south of Tehran from December 2022 to March 2024.

1535 pregnant women of all ages living in the south of Tehran (both Iranian and non-Iranian).

Pregnant women were systematically selected from primary healthcare centres. Data were collected via validated questionnaires and electronic health records. Statistical analyses included multivariate logistic regression (adjusted ORs (aORs) with 95% CIs) and generalised linear mixed models.

The findings revealed that a majority of pregnant women (83.3%; 95% CI 81.2% to 85.3%) exhibited low levels of nutritional knowledge (scores below 12), whereas 14% demonstrated moderate knowledge (scores between 12 and 17), and only 2.7% (95% CI 1.9% to 3.8%) possessed high nutritional knowledge (scores above 18). In terms of attitudes, 36.9% of respondents expressed positive views toward nutrition, with higher education significantly associated with positive attitudes (aOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5, comparing higher vs lower education levels). Dietary variety was consistently reported by 65.4% of participants, while 8.5% lacked dietary variety. Statistically significant associations were observed between educational attainment, socioeconomic status and nutrition-related practices (p

As a cross-sectional study, these findings highlight substantial gaps in nutrition knowledge among pregnant women in Tehran, with socioeconomic status and education playing crucial roles in shaping dietary behaviours. Improving nutritional education through healthcare interventions is essential for enhancing maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Early screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can enhance educational and health outcomes for affected children. This narrative systematic review explores school-based screening tools used around the world to identify children with ASD and explore the differences across socio-demographic groups.

Systematic review of electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane and Scopus) in October 2024 of papers published between 2011 and 2024.

Mainstream school-based settings globally.

Children aged 4–16 years old attending mainstream school.

School-based screening tools for ASD, including all types of informant and format of tools reported in eligible studies.

Primary outcomes included prevalence of screen positives, sensitivity and specificity of the screening tools. Secondary outcomes included participants’ sex, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and the relation of this to the primary outcomes.

Of 7765 eligible articles, 14 studies were included in this review. We identified eight different school-based ASD screening tools. Study populations ranged from 103 to 16 556 children, with sensitivity and specificity varying by screening tool used, age group, setting and ASD prevalence. The percentage of children screening positive for ASD ranged from 0.7% to 8.5%. Studies were conducted in Europe (n=6), Western Pacific (n=4), the Americas (n=3) and Eastern Mediterranean (n=1) regions. No studies explicitly explored accuracy or validity outcomes based on ethnicity or socioeconomic status. Half of the 14 studies (n=7) reported the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tools; sensitivity ranged from 58% to 94% and specificity from 61% to 100%. There was insufficient evidence to recommend any single ASD screening tool.

ASD screening tools vary widely across the globe, with limited standardisation. Evidence is lacking on how ethnicity and socioeconomic status affect their effectiveness in schools. Given the dearth of scientific evidence in this field, collaboration among educators, researchers and policymakers is needed to establish the evidence base for universal screening, identify optimal tools, coordinate their use and ensure their validation for specific populations.

Many researchers conduct a process evaluation alongside an effectiveness trial of a public health intervention to better understand mechanisms behind observed effects. Yet, there is no standardised, scientifically accepted guideline for reporting such process evaluations, which impedes interpretation and comparison of study results. The aim of this project was to develop a consensus-based and expert-based guideline for reporting process evaluations of public health interventions conducted alongside an effectiveness trial.

We conducted an e-Delphi study with a large panel of international experts.

Based on purposive sampling, we invited 137 international experts that had been involved in the design of process evaluations, researchers who published high-profile process evaluations or frameworks, editors of journals that publish process evaluations, and authors of other reporting guidelines.

Based on a literature search, a first draft of the reporting guideline included 32 items, which was proposed to panel members during the first round. Of the invited 137 invited international experts, 73 (53%) participated in at least one round of the e-Delphi study. Participants rated the inclusion and comprehensibility of the proposed items on a 5-point Likert scale and provided comments and suggestions for relevance and definitions of the items. Adjustments to the items and descriptions were proposed to the e-Delphi panel until consensus of ≥67% for each individual item was reached. In total, 64 (88% of 73) completed round 2, and 55 (76% of 73) completed round 3. This resulted in 19 items that are included in the consensus-based process evaluation reporting guideline for public health intervention studies (CONPHES) guideline. The items cover a detailed description of the intervention that is evaluated, the implementation strategies applied, and underlying causal pathways, and the role of the delivery and support team. The guideline also requires describing the evaluation framework and how evaluation outcomes were assessed. Lastly, the guideline includes items on providing a detailed description of applied analyses (both quantitative and qualitative) and measures for assuring quality. The guideline is accompanied by an Explanation and Elaboration document, with a more detailed explanation of each item.

We expect that the CONPHES reporting guideline for process evaluations of public health interventions can improve the reporting of process evaluations of interventions aimed at promoting public health. This can potentially facilitate more effective translation of public health research into practice and contribute to improving both individual and population health outcomes.

To develop a context-specific health technology assessment (HTA) framework tailored to the healthcare needs and system of Iran, to improve evidence-based decision-making, optimise resource allocation and support progress towards universal health coverage.

A mixed-methods Delphi consensus study conducted using a three-phase, sequential approach: document review, qualitative focus group discussions and Delphi consensus rounds. The study reporting follows the Accurate Consensus Reporting Document guideline to ensure transparent reporting of consensus methods.

A national-level study conducted in Iran’s healthcare system between January 2023 and March 2024, including perspectives from public and academic institutions, policy bodies and patient organisations.

The study involved 18 purposively selected stakeholders in three focus group discussions, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers and patient representatives. Subsequently, 20 HTA experts participated in three iterative Delphi rounds to refine and reach consensus on the framework components.

Identification of core components and operational steps required to develop and implement a comprehensive HTA framework in Iran.

The final HTA framework includes nine core components: (1) establishing a national HTA body; (2) engaging stakeholders; (3) building capacity through training and research; (4) developing standard HTA methodologies; (5) implementing prioritisation and evaluation processes; (6) ensuring sustainable funding; (7) enhancing transparency and accountability; (8) promoting continuous improvement and (9) fostering innovation. Detailed operational steps and micro-activities were developed for each component. The framework achieved an 84% consensus among Delphi panellists, indicating strong agreement on its content and applicability.

This tailored HTA framework provides a structured roadmap to institutionalise evidence-based decision-making in Iran’s healthcare system. Its implementation can strengthen the efficiency, equity and sustainability of healthcare planning and policy. Pilot testing is recommended to assess feasibility and scalability, with potential to serve as a model for other low-income and middle-income countries.

An abnormal composition of gut bacteria along with alterations in microbial metabolites and reduced gut barrier integrity has been associated with the pathogenesis of chronic autoimmune and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). The aim of the systematic review, for which this protocol is presented, is to evaluate the clinical benefits and potential harms of therapies targeting the intestinal microbiota and/or gut barrier function in AIRDs to inform clinical practice and future research.

This protocol used the reporting guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. We will search Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid) and the Cochrane Library (Central) for reports of randomised controlled trials of patients diagnosed with an AIRD. Eligible interventions are therapies targeting the intestinal microbiota and/or gut barrier function including probiotics, synbiotics, faecal microbiota transplantation, live biotherapeutic products and antibiotics with the intent to modify disease activity in AIRDs. The primary outcome of the evidence synthesis will be based on the primary endpoint of each trial. Secondary efficacy outcomes will be evaluated and selected from the existing core domain sets of the individual diseases and include the following domains: disease control, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, health-related quality of life, fatigue, pain and inflammation. Harms will include the total number of withdrawals, withdrawals due to adverse events, number of patients with serious adverse events, disease flares and deaths. A meta-analysis will be performed for each outcome domain separately. Depending on the type of outcome, the quantitative synthesis will encompass both ORs and standardised mean differences with corresponding 95% CIs.

No ethics approval will be needed for this systematic review. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to disseminate the study results through a peer-reviewed publication.

CRD42025644244.

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) remains challenging to diagnose owing to the marked clinical heterogeneity associated with the disease. This heterogeneity stems from the complex interplay of various clinical phenotypes, genetic mutations and underlying neuropathologies, such as TDP-43 and tau proteinopathies. Currently, there is no single confirmed biomarker that can reliably diagnose disease, specifically disease stage, disease subtype and underlying neuropathology. Recent research has indicated that neuroimaging techniques hold the most promise for the discovery of FTD biomarkers. We propose a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) biomarkers associated with clinical, genetic and pathological subtypes of FTD. We aim to address the following research questions: can regional MRI volumetry and FDG-PET hypometabolism differentiate (1) FTD patients from healthy controls; (2) sporadic cases of FTD from healthy controls; (3) genetic cases of FTD (MAPT, GRN, and C9orf72 mutations); and (4) underlying neuropathology, specifically discriminating between tau- and TDP-43-based FTD?

Literature searches will be performed across three databases: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase and Web of Science. Publications that have fewer than five participants, are non-human-based, not written in the English language or contain unpublished data will be excluded. Two independent investigators will screen and subsequently evaluate which publications to include. Should any disagreements arise, a third investigator will settle the discrepancy. After the random-effects meta-analysis has been used to extract and pool the data, I² analysis will be used to quantify heterogeneity.

Ethics approval will not be required for this research. On completion, the systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CRD42024545302.

Group-format, peer-led parenting interventions may be valuable for parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties in improving child behaviour, parenting and parent mental health. This article presents the results of a feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel peer-led group intervention, Being a Parent (BaP)-Enjoying Family Life.

Two-arm, parallel group superiority feasibility RCT, with pre–post intervention (postintervention) and 6-month follow-up (6-month follow-up).

Community recruitment across four South London boroughs.

Main inclusion criteria were (1) primary parental caregivers, (2) aged 18–65 years and (3) significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties (score ≥3 on Standardised Assessment of Personality–Abbreviated Scale screening tool) and had a child (a) aged 2–11 years, (b) living with parent participant and (c) with caregiver-reported behavioural difficulties.

Intervention arm: BaP-Enjoying Family Life, a 10-session, peer-led, group intervention for parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties. Control arm: BaP-Standard, a nine-session, peer-led group parenting intervention.

Primary feasibility criteria were rates of recruitment, retention, intervention acceptability and fidelity. Initial estimates of intervention effect were measured using the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (primary outcome), and the Concerns about my Child scale, Arnold O’Leary Parenting Scale, Parental Reflective Function Questionnaire, Kansas Parent Satisfaction Scale, Brief Parent Self Efficacy Scale, Brief Adjustment Scale-6 and Home Observation Measurement of the Environment (secondary outcomes). Data collection was conducted with the researcher masked to intervention allocation.

Predefined thresholds were met for three of five feasibility indices and partially met for the remaining two. Eligibility criteria were met by 70% (n=77) of 110 interested parents, and 85% (n=66) of those eligible completed baseline data collection and were randomised. Data were collected at postintervention for 91% (n=60) of parents. 75% (n=49) of participants attended at least one session and 50% (n=33) completed 5 or more sessions (intervention completers). The intervention was found to be acceptable by 60.71% of participants in BaP-Enjoying Family Life and 62.50% of participants in BaP-Standard arm, increasing to 93.33% and 88.24%, respectively, among intervention completers. Fidelity was reached for three of five groups in each arm, with missing data and group cancellation contributing to lack of observed fidelity in the remaining two groups. We aimed to obtain estimates of intervention effect and, while underpowered, estimates of effect on the primary outcome (child behaviour) were moderate within each arm (BaP-Enjoying Family Life d=0.73 (95% CI 0.30 to 1.15), BaP-Standard d=0.73 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.12)) from baseline to postintervention. Improvements were maintained at 6-month follow-up. Moderate and large pre–post effects were observed on most secondary outcomes. Effect sizes also indicated no between-arm effect of intervention BaP-Enjoying Family Life and BaP-Standard on most primary and secondary outcomes.

Findings indicate that both interventions show promise in supporting parents with significant emotional and interpersonal difficulties with limited differential effects. Further refinements which increase intervention completion, acceptability and fidelity should be conducted prior to progression to a full-scale RCT.

ISRCTN10950727.

Past studies show a mixed relationship between the Global Health Security (GHS) Index and COVID-19 pandemic health outcomes. Some recent work that suggested higher GHS Index scores are associated with better mortality outcomes has been criticised on methodological grounds. There remains scope for improved analyses of these relationships, including of island nations and macroeconomic pandemic outcomes. We aimed to determine the relationship between GHS Index scores and COVID-19 pandemic excess mortality 2020–2021 and macroeconomic pandemic outcomes.

Cross-sectional, multivariable regression design (controlling for per capita gross domestic product (GDP) and political corruption), comparing island and non-island jurisdictions.

194 jurisdictions with 2019 GHS Index scores.

Age-standardised cumulative excess mortality 2020–2021, GDP per capita growth 2019–2020 and 2020–2021.

The GHS Index predicted better health outcomes in terms of age-standardised excess mortality through 2020–2021 in non-island jurisdictions (β=–0.046, p=0.00068, adj R²=0.48), but not in island jurisdictions (β=0.012, p=0.734). For a starting age-standardised excess mortality of 100 per 100 000, a +10-point rise in overall GHS Index score predicts a 26.7 per 100 000 reduction in age-standardised mortality. We found no robust evidence that a higher GHS Index predicted higher year-on-year GDP per capita growth through 2019–2020 or 2020–2021.

The GHS Index demonstrated clear associations with favourable health outcomes of non-island jurisdictions through the COVID-19 pandemic, supporting its use to guide pandemic preparedness investments. Contrasting findings for islands suggest the need to enhance how the Index measures border biosecurity capacities and capabilities, including the ability to support the exclusion/elimination strategies that successfully protected islands during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To estimate the sociodemographic and geographical variation in prescribing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and medications for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to children and young people (CYP) in North West London, UK.

Cross-sectional population-based study.

General practices in North West London, UK, with data for the period 2020–2022 obtained from the Discover Now platform, which covers approximately 95% of the local population.

762 390 CYP aged 5–24 years in the year 2022.

Primary outcome: Prescription rates of SSRIs and ADHD medications. Secondary outcomes: Associations between prescription rates and sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, geographical area (local authority), ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation (measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation).

The total sample comprised 762 390 CYP. 2.20% of the sample were prescribed an SSRI (95% CI 2.17% to 2.24%) and 0.50% an ADHD medication (95% CI 0.49% to 0.52%) in years 2020–2022. High deprivation was associated with the highest rates of an SSRI prescription (2.5%). In contrast, low deprivation was associated with the highest rates of an ADHD medication prescription (0.70%). This divergent pattern was evident in some London boroughs and not in others. The relationship between level of area deprivation and prescription rates also differed by borough. Overall, the sociodemographic factors could not explain most of the variation in prescription rates (Pseudo R² 0.18 for SSRI and 0.06 for an ADHD medication).

Prescriptions for common mental disorders and ADHD for CYP from North West London varied by sociodemographic characteristics and London borough of residence, potentially exacerbating mental health inequalities. To monitor and address these inequalities, more extensive use of linked electronic health records should be undertaken; for example, data on mental health diagnosis and service utilisation are needed to investigate the relationship between diagnosis and treatment over time.

To explore how parents of children with de novo retinoblastoma (RB) experience the diagnostic process and acute treatment phase, and to identify factors that may support parental coping and adaptation.

A qualitative interview study using reflexive thematic analysis.

National Retinoblastoma Unit at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

Thirty-one parents (21 mothers, 10 fathers) of 21 children diagnosed with de novo RB were recruited via hospital follow-up clinics and a support group day.

For most parents, the diagnostic process was short. In cases of diagnostic delay, parents described frustration and guilt due to missed symptoms. Receiving the RB diagnosis was described as a surreal experience, accompanied by feelings of shock, grief and loss of control. Parents faced challenges in adapting to rapid medical decisions and the unfamiliar demands of hospital protocols. However, meeting the clinical experts was a relief, as parents felt they were in capable hands, experiencing empathetic communication and a clearly framed treatment plan. Parents emphasised the importance of support systems, including family, healthcare professionals and the child’s resilience, as crucial for coping with and managing the diagnosis.

Parents faced a sudden and disruptive transition from symptom recognition to life-altering diagnosis and treatment. While professional care and communication were experienced as supportive, they did not eliminate the emotional impact. Clinical pathways should prioritise early validation of parental concerns and provide transparent communication, both prior to referral and throughout treatment. Future research should examine longer-term parental adjustment and identify interventions that support emotional resilience beyond the acute phase.

To evaluate the effectiveness of the recommendation improvement matrix (RIM) methodology for improving the quality of recommendations resulting from sentinel event analysis, where we hypothesise that the use of the RIM methodology leads to better quality recommendations.

A before-and-after analysis of the quality of the formulated recommendations after sentinel event analysis.

The study was carried out during the 2023 Saudi Patient Safety Centre International Patient Safety Conference.

36 conference participants, including nurses, medical doctors, pharmacists, dentists, general practitioners and quality officers.

RIM methodology training during a structured 3-hour workshop.

The primary outcome was the proportion of recommendations that using the ² test, passed the RIM filter criteria before and after training. Secondary outcomes included changes in recommendation categorisation within the matrix and participant ratings of feasibility and usability on a five-point Likert scale using a t-test for comparison.

Prior to training, 49 recommendations were generated, of which 63.3% met the filter criteria. Post-training, the proportion of recommendations passing the filter increased significantly to 83% (p=0.00543). Adjustments to recommendations primarily improved alignment with the filter criteria, though limited improvements were observed in matrix categorisation. Participants rated the methodology’s feasibility and usability highly, with average scores of 4.39/5 and 4.43/5, respectively. However, 46% expressed a need for additional training, particularly on the matrix application.

The RIM methodology significantly improves the quality of recommendations following sentinel event analyses. To enhance its impact, further training focusing on matrix application is necessary. Incorporating the methodology into healthcare education and professional development could strengthen patient safety practices.