The National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP) currently involves a healthcare professional collecting a cervical sample in a healthcare setting. This method of screening has barriers associated with access to screening appointments and the poor acceptability of the speculum examination. Primary screening through HPV testing has led to the development of self-sampling screening methods including vaginal and urine self-sampling, with many UK studies comparing these screening methods with the current NHSCSP. It is not known what features of self-sampling influence individuals’ preferences and cervical screening uptake. To understand these preferences, we plan to undertake a discrete choice experiment (DCE). This protocol aims to describe the steps taken to design the DCE and the proposed approach to fielding the DCE to identify preferences for different sampling approaches in cervical screening.

An online survey comprising a DCE was designed to understand preferences of individuals for self-sampling methods within the NHSCSP. Attributes and levels for the DCE were generated through an iterative process including a literature review of qualitative studies about self-sampling cervical screening methods, input from cervical screening clinical experts and a patient and public involvement group (n=6). A D-efficient design was used to create choice sets for the DCE survey. Regression-based analysis will be used to estimate the impact of each attribute and level on individual choices.

This study has been approved by The University of Manchester Proportionate Research Ethics Committee (2024-20767-37669). The results of the DCE will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer review journal and the results will be presented at national and international conferences.

There are no data associated with this protocol. The data produced by this study and analysis scripts will be made available in a public repository following publication of the study.

Infant feeding practices in the first 2 years of life are linked to long-term weight trajectories. Despite the importance of obesity prevention interventions, there are no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating early childhood education and care (ECEC) and primary caregiver-targeted interventions on child weight and feeding outcomes.

To assess the efficacy of an 18-month digital health intervention (Tiny Bites) delivered to ECEC services and primary caregivers of children aged 4 to ≤12 months on child age-adjusted and sex-adjusted body mass index-for-age z-score (zBMI) relative to usual care control in the Hunter New England (HNE) region of New South Wales, Australia.

This type 1 hybrid cluster RCT will include up to 60 ECEC services and 540 children/caregiver dyads. The intervention supports ECEC services and caregivers to deliver recommended responsive feeding practices to infants. ECEC services will receive access to an online assessment platform, training and resources, and implementation support. Primary caregivers will receive text messages, monthly e-newsletters, online links and direct communication from ECEC services. We will assess the impact on child zBMI at 18-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include duration of consuming any breastmilk, child diet and caregiver responsive feeding practices. We will also assess ECEC policy and practice implementation related to targeted feeding practices, programme cost effectiveness, adverse effects and engagement with the programme (ECECs and caregivers). For the primary outcome, between-group differences will be assessed for paired data using two-level hierarchical linear regression models.

Ethics approval has been provided by HNE Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (2023/ETH01158), Deakin University (2024-202) and University of Newcastle HREC (R-2024-0039). Trial results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific conferences locally and internationally and to relevant practice stakeholders.

ACTRN12624000576527.

Endovascular therapy is the main treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia in the UK. Despite a restenosis risk of 50% over 2 years, reintervention rates are low, potentially resulting in preventable amputations. European guidelines recommend ultrasound surveillance to facilitate early treatment of restenosis. This study will investigate the use of duplex ultrasound after endo revascularisation (DUSTER). The aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact on clinical decision-making of a 1-year integrated ultrasound surveillance programme after lower limb endovascular therapy.

DUSTER is a mixed-methods study. Phase I is a three-site, feasibility, open-label, randomised controlled trial. The standard of care, the control arm, is standard clinical surveillance by a vascular specialist at 1, 6 and 12 months. The intervention arm will receive integrated ultrasound (ankle-brachial pressure index, toe pressure and duplex) plus standard clinical surveillance. Primary outcomes are rates of attendance and completion of ultrasound surveillance tests, as well as the percentage of participants undergoing reintervention for restenosis. Secondary outcomes are limb salvage, amputation-free survival, reasons for amputation, complications, serious adverse events and mortality.

Phase II comprises independent semistructured interviews with intervention arm participants. The interviews will explore barriers and facilitators to ultrasound surveillance and the effect of ultrasound surveillance on patients’ lives.

Phase III has two separate focus groups for participants and clinical stakeholders to identify which outcomes matter most in any subsequent large-scale effectiveness trials.

This research has been approved by a UK (West Midlands, Black Country) Research Ethics Committee (reference 24/WM/0232) and the Health Research Authority (IRAS 349192). Dissemination of results will be by the DUSTER co-investigators in peer-reviewed journals, to the National Institute for Health and Care Research and to a lay audience via the Mid and South Essex NHS Foundations Trust website.

NCT06702306.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) among pregnant women in Sri Lanka and examine the association between NCDs and maternal and fetal outcomes.

A hospital-based, descriptive cross-sectional study.

The study was conducted in three tertiary care hospitals in the Western Province and one intermediate obstetrics care facility in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka, encompassing diverse, multiethnic populations, over 3 months.

Data from 1350 pregnant women were collected from discharged bed head tickets of the postnatal obstetric wards using a standardised checklist.

The primary outcomes were the prevalence of NCDs. Secondary outcomes included associations between maternal NCDs and adverse fetal outcomes such as preterm births and neonatal complications.

Among the participants, 68.5% (n=926) had one or more NCDs, with anaemia (37.9%), obesity (18.1%), gestational diabetes mellitus (14.9%) and hypertensive disorders (13.6%) being the most prevalent. Women with NCDs were at significantly higher odds of adverse fetal outcomes, including preterm birth (OR=2.3, 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.4), neonatal sepsis (OR=2.5, 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.04) and hypoglycaemia (OR=3.5, 95% CI: 1.2 to 10.0). Maternal complications, including postpartum haemorrhage (3.3%) and placental abruption (0.7%), were also more frequent in this group.

NCDs are highly prevalent among pregnant women in Sri Lanka and are significantly associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Enhanced screening and management strategies during antenatal care are essential to mitigate risks and improve health outcomes, aligning with global efforts to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.