To describe disability severity transitions in the ageing population in Switzerland using an overall functioning score to define four disability severity states (no, mild, moderate and severe) and death, and to investigate the association of multimorbidity and further predictors with these transitions.

Secondary analysis of the Swiss version of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).

Switzerland.

Community-dwelling population aged 50+ with at least two interviews in SHARE (N=3505).

Not applicable.

Primary outcome measures are the disability severity as assessed by a previously developed overall functioning score, and death status as assessed by the SHARE end-of-life interview. Transition analysis between disability severity states and death was conducted using multistate Markov models. The association between predictor variables and transition intensities was quantified using the proportional hazards assumption. Two distinct operationalisations of multimorbidity (count, burden) were used and analysed according to two separate models (A, B).

The findings for both models were similar: Estimated HRs for transition intensities suggest that being multimorbid or having a higher disease burden score increases the risk of transitioning to higher disability severity states and death for most transitions (HRs between 0.90 and 2.34 for model A compared with not being multimorbid; HRs between 0.95 and 1.46 for model B for a one-point increase in the disease burden score). In addition, most transitions to higher disability severity states and death are more likely for higher age (HRs between 1.00 and 1.14 for model A, and between 1.00 and 1.15 for model B for a 1 year increase in age), and transitions to death are less likely for women, compared with men (HRs between 0.34 and 0.88 for model A, and between 0.38 and 0.71 for model B).

This study is a first attempt to understand disability severity transitions in the older population in Switzerland. Although we believe that such an approach is suitable to inform resource allocation to LTC, rehabilitation and prevention, more detailed information on contextual factors will be important to consider for future research. Moreover, our study contributes to the discussion on how to operationalise multimorbidity in healthy ageing research.

Poor access to surgical wound swabbing in the community often results in delayed or inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for surgical site infections. This delay can contribute to prolonged wound healing and poor antimicrobial stewardship. Patient self-swabbing at home could improve access to diagnostic testing, but its feasibility and acceptability remain unexplored.

TREASURE is a multicentre, mixed-methods feasibility study. A total of 40 patient participants and 10 staff stakeholders will be included. 40 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy will be recruited from Harefield Hospital (n=25) and the Royal Sussex County Hospital (n=15). Eligible participants will receive a coproduced self-swabbing set of instructions and kit at discharge and perform wound swabbing at home within 1–21 days, observed remotely by a researcher via Microsoft Teams. Swabs will be couriered to a central laboratory for bacterial culture with antimicrobial susceptibility testing for pathogens.

The primary feasibility outcome is the proportion of patients successfully completing self-swabbing at home to obtain usable culture swabs with samples received at the laboratory within 24 hours and deemed suitable for processing. Secondary safety and acceptability outcomes include usability of the kit and instructions; patient satisfaction; viability of samples for laboratory analysis; and recruitment and retention rates. A 30-day follow-up will capture wound complications, antibiotic prescribing and healthcare utilisation via patient questionnaires, case note review, general practitioner confirmation and patient interviews. 10 staff stakeholders will be interviewed to inform pathway development.

Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively, with proportions reported alongside 95% CIs. Qualitative data from patients will undergo thematic analysis, and stakeholder interviews will be coded using Normalisation Process Theory. An early health economic model will be developed to explore resource use, costs and proportions of appropriate and timely antibiotic use between current pathways and a proposed pathway, including self-swabbing.

West of Scotland Research Ethics Service has reviewed and approved the study (REC reference: 25/WS/0079). Findings will be disseminated through the study website, a webinar, peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, patient and public involvement-led activities and engagement with National Health Service (NHS) stakeholders.

NCT07200401, ISRCTN28466609.

To assess health service use between days 43 and 365 postdelivery, comparing individuals with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

Population-based cohort study.

Linked datasets from Population Data BC in British Columbia, Canada, April 2013–March 2021.

Postpartum individuals aged >18 years with a hospital or home delivery, with/without SMM occurring from 20 weeks’ gestation through 42 days post partum. Ectopic pregnancies, missing identifiers and maternal deaths at delivery or within 42 days post partum were excluded.

The primary outcome was high health service use, defined as being in the 95th percentile for use of one or more of the following non-obstetric visits: emergency department, hospitalisations and outpatient visits to a primary care physician or specialist—each occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery hospitalisation discharge. Secondary outcomes included being in the 95th percentile for each visit type. Log binomial regression assessed the rate and risk of high health service use in SMM compared with non-SMM pregnancies, adjusting for confounders.

The cohort included 261 287 deliveries (5575 (2.1%) with SMM). Those with >15 visits within 43–365 days postdelivery were classified as having high health service use. SMM-affected individuals were twice as likely to have high health service use (9.2% vs 4.3%; adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.17). Individuals with non-hypertensive cardiovascular SMM had markedly higher health service use (21.4% vs 4.3%; aRR=5.18, 95% CI 3.28 to 8.16). There was heterogeneity in the association between SMM and high health service use among those without versus with previous comorbidities, without versus with high service use in the 2 years prior to delivery, and without vs with preterm birth.

Our study revealed high health service use after SMM. These findings can help guide the development of standardised postpartum care pathways.

The term ‘culture of care’ began to be used following the Francis Report in the UK in 2013. This concept involves three dimensions: personal care, leadership care and co-worker care. Personal care focuses on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Co-worker care relates to a sense of community, and leadership care relates to how employees perceive leaders and managers as caring individuals dedicated to ensuring the well-being of others. Previous studies investigating culture assessment tools used in the healthcare system reported that although organisations are increasingly using culture assessment instruments, there is a focus on assessing safety and quality cultures rather than on caring perspectives. This scoping review aims to map existing studies related to the assessment of culture of care.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will include four indexed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences) and additional sources not retrieved with the adopted search strategy. The search strategy will be constructed using the controlled vocabulary in Health Sciences Descriptors, Medical Subject Headings and Emtree. Relevant articles in all languages, without restrictions related to date of publication, will be considered eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers will select articles based on the inclusion criteria, and a third author will be consulted to establish consensus, if necessary. Data extraction will involve a form with information on the study characteristics, methodological issues and main results from the evidence sources. The extracted data will be analysed using descriptive and content analysis.

Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use data from publicly available bibliographic sources. The results will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and presentation of the evidence to interested parties.

The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9Q53).

The transition from hospital to home can be challenging for parents of premature infants due to a lack of education on specific care. This may lead to both higher readmission rates and healthcare costs. Telehealth interventions can improve the quality of care specific to premature and critically ill newborns. This protocol outlines the WELCOME study and evaluates its feasibility and effectiveness of this approach.

This two-centre randomised control trial (RCT) will assign 240 families with premature and critically ill newborns to an intervention or control group. The study has a parallel group design and an exploratory framework. The control group will receive standard postdischarge care. The intervention group will additionally receive scheduled video consultations, digital assessments and 24/7 access to educational resources. Primary outcomes will focus on 30-day readmission and emergency care use. Secondary outcomes will include child development and parental health. The intervention is expected to be feasible, with high acceptance and minimal drop-out. It will aim to improve parents’ self-efficacy and health literacy. If successful, insights from this multimethod telehealth study will inform standard care.

Results will be published in anonymised and summarised form in international and national journals and symposia. The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich (No. 25-0028) and was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register on 6 March 2025 (DRKS00034422).

DRKS00034422.

Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.

Cross-sectional with a nested case–control study.

Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.

Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.

We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.

Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score

Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).

Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.

Delirium is one of the most common forms of acute cerebral dysfunction in critically ill children, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim was to identify studies describing or evaluating non-pharmacological interventions to prevent or treat paediatric delirium.

Scoping review.

Searches were performed in Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Journals), EMBASE and Web of Science from January 2000 to April 2023. A hand search and update were conducted on 01 June 2024.

We included studies involving critically ill children (0–18 years) in intensive care settings that examined non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention or treatment of paediatric delirium. Only empirical studies and reviews with transparent methodology were considered.

Title and abstract screening and full-text review of articles were conducted by two reviewers based on prespecified inclusion criteria. Two reviewers extracted relevant information from the included studies in tabular form. Extracted variables included publication year, title, author(s), country, setting, population and age, design, sample size, intervention components, outcome(s) and findings.

Nine studies were included. In total, 16 different intervention components were identified. The most frequently reported components for preventing and treating paediatric delirium were promoting mobilisation, encouraging family presence and involvement, improving sleep, and standardised instruments or checklists for underlying aetiology. Most intervention studies were before-and-after studies; overall, seven different outcomes were used. Study results regarding the effects of delirium were inconsistent.

Various non-pharmacological interventions are currently described to mitigate paediatric delirium, but the underlying evidence is limited. High-quality intervention research using relevant and comparable outcomes is needed to evaluate the effect of non-pharmacological interventions. Despite employing a comprehensive search strategy, we must consider the possibility that relevant articles were overlooked.