Ethnic disparities in reproductive, maternal, neonatal and child health (RMNCH) persist in Latin America, rooted in structural racism and colonial legacies. Evidence on the temporal evolution of these disparities and the impact of policies targeting Indigenous populations remains limited. Following the 2000 economic crisis, Ecuador showed the region’s largest ethnic gaps in intervention coverage and social determinants. Since 2008, inclusion policies have advanced. This study analysed trends in RMNCH coverage, social determinants and their potential association with policies and strategies over 14 years.

Using a mixed-methods design, we analysed three nationally representative surveys (2004, 2012 and 2018) to assess changes in social determinants and the coverage of six RMNCH services; defined as the proportion of women and children receiving essential health services across the continuum of care, including family planning, antenatal care, skilled birth attendance and child immunisation, stratified by ethnicity (Indigenous women and children, Afro-Ecuadorian populations and Mestizo and White populations). We estimated absolute inequality measures and adjusted coverage ratios using Poisson regression models. Through a literature review and temporal graphs, we analysed plans, policies and strategies in health, education and ethnic inclusion during the same period to estimate potential impact.

By 2018, Indigenous populations doubled their representation in the highest wealth quintiles (10% to 20%) and increased secondary education attainment (25% to 45%), with slower progress in rural areas. RMNCH coverage, including prenatal care, institutional deliveries and professional-assisted births, rose significantly (27% to 75%) among Indigenous populations. Afro-Ecuadorians also experienced improvements in RMNCH coverage and social determinants, though progress was less pronounced compared with Indigenous groups. Although ethnic gaps persisted, inequalities declined over the study period. These reductions coincided with increased social investment in rural health and education, constitutional recognition of plurinationality, and policies promoting intercultural health practices. However, gaps in monitoring and impact evaluation were evident.

Ecuador demonstrates that inclusive and integrated policies, leadership, social participation and sustained social investment can reduce ethnic inequalities, promote the integral development of society and strategies that should be maintained. Temporal studies based on routine surveys are crucial for monitoring the impact of such policies. These findings provide a pre-pandemic benchmark and serve as a reference for countries aiming to improve health outcomes among Indigenous and Afro-descendant populations and advance the Sustainable Development Goals.

The term ‘culture of care’ began to be used following the Francis Report in the UK in 2013. This concept involves three dimensions: personal care, leadership care and co-worker care. Personal care focuses on employees’ attitudes and behaviours. Co-worker care relates to a sense of community, and leadership care relates to how employees perceive leaders and managers as caring individuals dedicated to ensuring the well-being of others. Previous studies investigating culture assessment tools used in the healthcare system reported that although organisations are increasingly using culture assessment instruments, there is a focus on assessing safety and quality cultures rather than on caring perspectives. This scoping review aims to map existing studies related to the assessment of culture of care.

This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy will include four indexed databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences) and additional sources not retrieved with the adopted search strategy. The search strategy will be constructed using the controlled vocabulary in Health Sciences Descriptors, Medical Subject Headings and Emtree. Relevant articles in all languages, without restrictions related to date of publication, will be considered eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers will select articles based on the inclusion criteria, and a third author will be consulted to establish consensus, if necessary. Data extraction will involve a form with information on the study characteristics, methodological issues and main results from the evidence sources. The extracted data will be analysed using descriptive and content analysis.

Ethics approval is not required, as this review will use data from publicly available bibliographic sources. The results will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and presentation of the evidence to interested parties.

The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U9Q53).