Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia, with patients being 1.5–2 times more likely to develop these conditions. While both sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) have shown potential neuroprotective effects in previous studies, their comparative effectiveness for preventing neurodegenerative outcomes has not been established. This study aimed to compare the risk of stroke, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) between patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors and those treated with TZDs.

Multicentre, retrospective, observational, new-user, active-comparator cohort study.

Electronic health record-based databases from 11 secondary and tertiary institutions in South Korea from 1 January 2014 to 31 July 2025. The study period began in 2014, following the post-marketing surveillance initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in Korea (November 2013), to ensure adequate drug availability and clinical adoption.

Patients aged 40 years or older who were newly prescribed either SGLT2 inhibitors or TZDs without prior exposure.

Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using sex as the primary covariate due to data availability constraints in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model framework. The HRs with 95% CIs were measured via Cox regression analysis.

The study analysed 24 172 matched pairs for stroke outcomes (40 483 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 39 363 person-years in the TZD group), 25 111 matched pairs for dementia (41 924 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 726 person-years in the TZD group) and 25 237 matched pairs for AD (42 139 person-years in the SGLT2 inhibitor group and 40 895 person-years in the TZD group) across 11 participating hospitals. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, the SGLT2 inhibitors showed no significant difference in stroke risk (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.62 to 2.23, p=0.62), while having significant reductions in dementia risk (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98, p=0.04) and AD risk (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.83, p=0.005). Moreover, these protective effects for neurodegenerative outcomes were shown to be consistent across multiple hospital sites.

SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of dementia and AD compared with TZDs in patients aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and have neutral effects on stroke risk. These findings confirm the potential selective neuroprotective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors for neurodegenerative outcomes, which may inform therapeutic decision-making for diabetic patients at risk of cognitive decline.

Urgent and emergency care in Germany is delivered across multiple, loosely connected sectors. In the absence of coherent, time-resolved data on patient movements between emergency medical services (EMS), out-of-hours ambulatory care, emergency departments (EDs) and inpatient care, inefficiencies and coordination gaps remain difficult to quantify. A process-centric, trans-sectoral analysis is required to characterise real-world patient pathways and identify actionable levers for improvement. The study aims to reconstruct, model and analyse patient pathways for urgent health complaints across all relevant sectors of the healthcare system in a German model region.

We will employ a mixed-methods observational study design. Routine data from EMS, out-of-hours ambulatory care, EDs and subsequent inpatient care will be pseudonymised at source, linked via a trusted third party and analysed within a trusted research environment. Time-stamped event logs will support process mining for discovery, conformance and performance analysis alongside descriptive statistics with stratification by context, such as setting, time of day, urgency and patient cohorts. Anonymous cross-sectional surveys of patients and front-line professionals, complemented by quarterly snapshot surveys in out-of-hours ambulatory care and interviews, will provide convergent evidence on the motives, barriers and coordination of utilisation behaviour. Enrolment for surveys is anticipated from the fourth quarter of 2025; routine data capture covers 1 January–31 December 2026; analyses and dissemination run until 31 December 2027.

The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty at RWTH Aachen University (EK 25-351). Survey modules are conducted anonymously with voluntary participation and without collection of direct identifiers; routine care data are processed in pseudonymised form and analysed within a trusted research environment. Stakeholder interviews will be conducted with informed consent. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summary reports for participating institutions and stakeholders, complemented by plain-language materials to support patient-centred navigation.

DRKS00035916.

To assess health service use between days 43 and 365 postdelivery, comparing individuals with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM).

Population-based cohort study.

Linked datasets from Population Data BC in British Columbia, Canada, April 2013–March 2021.

Postpartum individuals aged >18 years with a hospital or home delivery, with/without SMM occurring from 20 weeks’ gestation through 42 days post partum. Ectopic pregnancies, missing identifiers and maternal deaths at delivery or within 42 days post partum were excluded.

The primary outcome was high health service use, defined as being in the 95th percentile for use of one or more of the following non-obstetric visits: emergency department, hospitalisations and outpatient visits to a primary care physician or specialist—each occurring between 43 and 365 days after delivery hospitalisation discharge. Secondary outcomes included being in the 95th percentile for each visit type. Log binomial regression assessed the rate and risk of high health service use in SMM compared with non-SMM pregnancies, adjusting for confounders.

The cohort included 261 287 deliveries (5575 (2.1%) with SMM). Those with >15 visits within 43–365 days postdelivery were classified as having high health service use. SMM-affected individuals were twice as likely to have high health service use (9.2% vs 4.3%; adjusted relative risk (aRR)=1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.17). Individuals with non-hypertensive cardiovascular SMM had markedly higher health service use (21.4% vs 4.3%; aRR=5.18, 95% CI 3.28 to 8.16). There was heterogeneity in the association between SMM and high health service use among those without versus with previous comorbidities, without versus with high service use in the 2 years prior to delivery, and without vs with preterm birth.

Our study revealed high health service use after SMM. These findings can help guide the development of standardised postpartum care pathways.

Timely publication of preregistered study outcomes is not self-evident. Discrepancies can lead to significant research waste.

To assess timely (within 7 years) and consistent publication of preregistered primary outcomes and associated factors of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) studies registered between 2000 and 2017 over time.

An observational study.

ClinicalTrials.Gov, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and Google Scholar.

Registered TKA trials at ClinicalTrials.Gov between 2000 and 2017.

ClinicalTrials.Gov’s required and optional data elements for registering a study and the preregistered and published primary outcome, defined as the outcome stated in the primary outcome field on ClinicalTrials.Gov. We used descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses.

1352 registered TKA (1072 interventional; 280 observational) studies were included, with 967 (811 interventional; 156 observational) unique references. Regarding the publication of preregistered primary outcomes within 7 years, the results for interventional trials were 0% (2000), which increased to 59.6% (2017). Observational studies were timely published in 0% (2000) and 37.5% (2017). Interventional trials and observational studies not funded by industry were more likely to have timely and consistent publication of their primary outcomes. Drug intervention trials were more likely to be timely and consistently published than procedure-focused trials. Phase 3 interventional trials were more likely, while phase 1 trials were less likely to be consistently published on time.

Despite ongoing efforts to improve publication rates, over a third of interventional trials remain unpublished within 7 years. For observational studies, the rate is even lower, with only two-fifths published on time, contributing to significant research waste.

CRD42021246599.

This scoping review will evaluate and synthesise what is known about the impact of structural and social determinants of health on neurodegeneration among adults of African American or Black (AAB) racial identity with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The primary objective is to examine how structural factors, such as healthcare access, influence disparities in neurodegeneration following TBI. Given higher rates of TBI and worse outcomes among Black individuals compared with White individuals, this review seeks to fill the gap in research concerning underrepresentation of AAB populations.

Guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence framework, this review will systematically search PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL Library (Wiley) for relevant studies. Eligible studies will involve adult human participants diagnosed with neurodegenerative conditions, including dementia and cognitive impairment, and with a history of TBI. Studies must include participants of AAB and non-Hispanic White (NHW) racial identity to facilitate comparisons. The review will focus on identifying potential factors contributing to disparities in neurodegeneration. Data synthesis will include narrative summaries, comparative tables and visualisations to highlight racial disparities in neurodegeneration risk and AAB representation in TBI research. This approach is its structured framework will evaluate the depth of racial inclusion across studies, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of how structural and social determinants shape outcomes.

As this review involves only previously published literature, institutional review board approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and lay summaries.

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has shown promising effects in managing postoperative pain following conventional periapical surgery, although current evidence remains limited. This study aims to assess the effect of PBM on postoperative pain 24 hours after periapical surgery.

A randomised, controlled, double-blind trial will include 34 patients undergoing periapical surgery in the maxillary region, randomly assigned to an experimental group (n=17) or control group (n=17). The experimental group will receive PBM (GaAlAs diode laser, 808 nm, 100 mW, 4 J/cm², applied at five vestibular points) and placebo ibuprofen immediately and 24 hours postoperatively. The control group will receive simulated PBM and active ibuprofen. The primary outcome is postoperative pain assessed by the visual analogue scale at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes include pain at the seventh day, paracetamol intake, oedema, ecchymosis, soft tissue status and temperature at 24 hours and 7 days. Radiographic evaluation of healing will be performed at 1 and 3 months. Statistical analysis will be conducted based on data distribution, using repeated measures ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) or non-parametric equivalents for longitudinal outcomes, and appropriate tests for categorical variables. Significance will be set at p

The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Universidad Católica del Uruguay (process no. 220914). Results will be disseminated to participants, healthcare professionals, the public and scientific communities.

NCT05935306.

The introduction of fentanyl and its analogues in the illicit drug supply has prompted greater emphasis on refining clinical treatment protocols to ensure sustained retention in opioid agonist treatment (OAT). Take-home dosing may lessen the treatment burden on clients and thus reduce the risk of treatment discontinuation. The evidence base supporting the use of take-home dosing, including the optimal duration of dispensations, is, however, limited. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of alternative take-home dosing schedules, as observed in clinical practice in British Columbia, Canada from 2010 to 2022.

We propose to emulate a target trial with a population-level retrospective study of individuals initiating methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022 who are 18 years of age or older and not currently incarcerated or pregnant with no history of cancer or palliative care. Our study will draw on nine linked health administrative databases from British Columbia and will evaluate take-home doses of 2–5 days, 6 days or >6 days compared with continuous daily dosing. The primary outcomes include OAT discontinuation and all-cause mortality on treatment. A causal per-protocol analysis is proposed with longitudinal matching and inverse probability of censoring weighting approaches to adjust for time-fixed and time-varying confounding. A range of sensitivity analyses will be executed to determine the robustness of results.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. Results will be disseminated and shared with local advocacy groups and decision-makers, developers of national and international clinical guidelines, presented at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are highly prevalent and recurrent complications of diabetes mellitus that have significant health and cost implications. Self-care is critical for preventing or delaying DFU and promoting healing, yet adherence to self-care recommendations is low. Interventions using motivational interviewing (MI) have been effective in supporting behaviour change and emotional adjustment, but evidence for DFU is scarce. This study will assess the acceptability, feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an MI-guided programme, Healing DFU through Empowerment and Active Listening (HEALing), and its integration in usual wound care practice.

This single-arm pilot study adopts a mixed-methods approach to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the HEALing intervention. HEALing is a practical, low-intensity, clinic-integrated personalised self-care support intervention, comprising three 30 min face-to-face sessions delivered over 6 weeks by trained wound care nurses, aiming to enhance self-care behaviours and support emotional adjustment in patients with DFU. Data will be collected from a battery of questionnaire-based surveys with patients (n=30), and in-depth individual interviews with both patients (n=30) and wound care nurse facilitators (n=10) from nurse-led wound clinics in a large primary care sector in Singapore.

The primary feasibility outcomes will include enrolment, retention (≥80%), data completion (≥80% of surveys) and participant satisfaction. Secondary outcomes will include self-report measures of illness perceptions, foot care confidence, diabetes distress, foot self-care behaviour, DFU knowledge, autonomy support and health-related quality of life, taken at baseline and post-intervention. Post-intervention interviews with patients and wound care nurse facilitators will be conducted to collect feedback on the programme and its implementation feasibility.

The study protocol has been approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through the first author’s PhD thesis, peer-reviewed journals, national and international conferences and public events.

NCT06540170; Pre-results.

Selecting an optimal initial dosage of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) balances effectiveness and safety, as initial doses that are too low may be insufficient, potentially prompting clients to seek unregulated drugs to alleviate withdrawal symptoms, which may increase the likelihood of treatment discontinuation. Conversely, initial doses that are too high carry a risk of overdose. As opioid tolerance levels have risen in the fentanyl era, linked population-level data capturing initial doses in the real world provide a valuable opportunity to refine existing guidance on optimal OAT dosing at treatment initiation. Our objective is to determine the comparative effectiveness of alternative initial doses of methadone, buprenorphine-naloxone and slow-release oral morphine at OAT initiation, as observed in clinical practice in British Columbia (BC), Canada.

We propose a population-level retrospective observational study with a linkage of nine provincial health administrative databases in BC, Canada (1 January 2010 to 31 December 2022). Our study includes two time-to-event primary outcomes: OAT discontinuation and all-cause mortality during follow-up. We propose ‘initiator’ target trial analyses for each medication using both propensity score weighting and instrumental variable analyses to compare the effect of different initial OAT doses on the hazard of time-to-OAT discontinuation and all-cause mortality. A range of sensitivity analyses will be used to assess the robustness of the results.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. Results will be disseminated to local advocacy groups and decision-makers, national and international clinical guideline developers, presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.

While group, task-oriented, community-based exercise programs (CBEPs) delivered in-person can increase exercise and social participation in people with mobility limitations, challenges with transportation, cost and human resources, threaten sustainability. A virtual delivery model may help overcome challenges with accessing and delivering in-person CBEPs. The study objective is to estimate the short-term effect of an 8-week, virtual, group, task-oriented CBEP called TIME™ (Together in Movement and Exercise) at Home compared with a waitlist control on improving everyday function in community-dwelling adults with mobility limitations.

A randomised controlled trial incorporating a type 1 effectiveness-implementation hybrid design is being conducted in four Canadian metropolitan centres. We aim to stratify 200 adults with self-reported mobility limitations by site, participation alone or with a partner, and functional mobility level, and randomise them using REDCap software to either TIME™ at Home or a waitlist control group. During TIME™ at Home classes (2 classes/week, 1.5 hours/class), two trained facilitators stream a 1-hour exercise video and facilitate social interaction prevideo and postvideo using Zoom. A registered healthcare professional at each site completes three e-visits to monitor and support implementation. Masked evaluators with physical therapy training evaluate participants and their caregivers at 0, 2 and 5 months using Zoom. The primary outcome is the change in everyday function from 0 to 2 months, measured using the physical scale of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome. The study is powered to detect an effect size of 0.4, given α=0.05, power=80% and a 15% attrition rate. Secondary outcomes are mobility, well-being, reliance on walking aids, caregiver assistance, caregiver mood, caregiver confidence in care-recipient balance and cost-effectiveness. A multimethod process evaluation is proposed to increase understanding of implementation fidelity, mechanisms of effect and contextual factors influencing the complex intervention. Qualitative data collection immediately postintervention involves interviewing approximately 16 participants and 4 caregivers from the experimental group, and 8 participants and 4 caregivers from the waitlist control group, and all healthcare professionals, and conducting focus groups with all facilitators to explore experiences during the intervention period. A directed content analysis will be undertaken to help explain the quantitative results.

TIME™ at Home has received ethics approval at all sites. Participants provide verbal informed consent. A data safety monitoring board is monitoring adverse events. We will disseminate findings through lay summaries, conference presentations, reports and journal articles.

NCT06245135.

Health advocacy (HA) is acknowledged as a core competence in medical education. However, varying and sometimes conflicting conceptualisations of HA exist, making it challenging to integrate the competence consistently. While this diversity highlights the need for a deeper understanding of HA conceptualisations, a comprehensive analysis across the continuum of medical education is absent in the literature. This protocol has been developed to clarify the conceptual dimensions of the HA competence in literature as applied to medical education.

The review will be conducted in line with the JBI (formerly Joanna Briggs Institute) methodology for scoping reviews. A comprehensive literature search was developed and already carried out in eight academic databases and Google Scholar, without restrictions on publication date, geography or language. Articles that describe the HA role among students and physicians who receive or provide medical education will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will independently complete title and abstract screening prior to full-text review of selected articles and data extraction on the final set. A descriptive-analytical approach will be applied for summarising the data.

This scoping review does not involve human participants, as all evidence is sourced from publicly available databases. Therefore, ethical approval is not required for this study. The findings from this scoping review will be disseminated through submission to a high-quality peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic conferences. By clarifying the conceptualisations of HA, this review aims to contribute to a shared narrative that will strengthen the foundation for integrating the HA role into medical education.

A preliminary version of this protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework on 9 December 2024, and can be accessed at the following link: https://osf.io/ed2br. We have also registered our scoping review protocol as a preprint at medRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.09.24318699.

Methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone are effective medications for people with opioid use disorder; however, interruptions in daily dosing are common and diminish the benefits of these medications. While clinical guidelines in most North American jurisdictions, including British Columbia (BC), recommend dose adjustment after treatment interruptions to varying levels of specificity, the evidence to support these recommendations is limited. We aim to estimate the comparative effectiveness of alternative dose adjustment strategies on subsequent overdose-related acute care visits and discontinuation of opioid agonist treatment in BC, Canada.

Using a linkage of nine health administrative databases, we propose a population-level retrospective cohort study of adults aged 18 years or older in BC who initiated methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. We will specify parallel hypothetical trials, known as target trials, for methadone interruptions of 1–3 days, 4 days and 5–14 days, and buprenorphine/naloxone interruptions of 1–5 days and 6–14 days. Following the index interruption, the primary outcomes are the time to overdose-related acute care visits and treatment discontinuation (interruptions lasting >14 days), with time to all-cause acute care visits as a secondary outcome. The intention-to-treat effect will be estimated using both propensity score and instrumental variable approaches. A range of sensitivity analyses will assess the robustness of our results, including cohort and timeline restriction, alternative definitions of exposure and outcome and alternative estimation strategies.

The protocol, cohort creation and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by Providence Health Care Research Institute and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. All data are deidentified, securely stored and accessed in accordance with provincial privacy regulations. Results will be disseminated to local advocacy groups and decision-makers, national and international clinical guideline developers, presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals electronically and in print.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, a substantial decrease was observed in hospital admissions and in-hospital procedures for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). The extent to which measures to prevent COVID-19 transmission, for example, lockdowns, affected the outpatient care of patients at higher cardiovascular risk remains unclear. We aimed to compare outpatient department (OPD) attendance, cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) and cardiovascular health (CVH) of patients at higher cardiovascular risk referred to an OPD of a tertiary care centre between preCOVID-19, during and postCOVID-19 periods.

We included all adult patients at higher cardiovascular risk referred to the cardiology, vascular medicine, diabetology, geriatrics, nephrology or multidisciplinary vascular surgery OPDs of the University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands, between March 2019 and December 2022, in a prospective cohort study.

We assessed trends in the number of first and follow-up appointments and in the completeness of extractable CVRM indicators from the electronic health record (EHR) as a proxy for CVRM guideline adherence. CVH was determined using the Life’s Essential 8 metric (score 0–100, the higher score, the better). We investigated whether CVH differed between COVID-19 periods compared with the reference period (ie, 2019) and stratified by OPDs, using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, gender, CVD history and whether the patient had a previous appointment before the reference period.

Among 15 143 patients, we observed a 33% reduction in the weekly number of first appointments during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the largest reductions in the cardiology and nephrology OPDs, with no differences between women and men. Follow-up appointments conducted remotely, compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic, increased significantly for all OPDs. CVRM indicators were up to 11% less extractable during the first lockdown yet returned to prepandemic levels directly after the first lockdown period. The CVH score of patients visiting the nephrology, vascular medicine and geriatrics OPDs during the first lockdown was 11.23 (95% CI 2.74 to 19.72), 5.68 (95% CI 0.82 to 10.54) and 5.66 (95% CI 0.01 to 11.31) points higher, respectively, compared with the prepandemic period. In between the second and third lockdowns, the CVH score was comparable to the preCOVID reference period, yet for the cardiology OPD it was significantly higher (5.54, 95% CI 2.04 to 9.05).

During the COVID-19 pandemic, weekly numbers of first appointments to OPDs decreased, and a population with a higher CVH score (ie, better CVH) visited certain OPDs, especially during the first lockdown period. These suggest that patients with poorer CVH more often avoided or were unable to visit OPDs, which might have resulted in missed opportunities to control cardiovascular risk factors and potentially may have led to preventable disease outcomes. For future epidemics and pandemics, it seems vital to develop a strategy that includes an emphasis on seeking healthcare when needed, with specific attention to patients at higher CVD risk.

Social norms are often implicit informal rules that most people accept and abide by, and can influence how people behave, sometimes based on perceived rewards and/or sanctions. Social norms are propelled by some reference or population groups who exert a considerable amount of influence on behaviour because people value their approval or disapproval. Despite these observations, little research exists on the influence of social norms on diabetes risk-taking behaviours. We explored diet-related social norms and their influence on risk-taking behaviours for type 2 diabetes (T2D).

We conducted a multi-method qualitative study guided by the Social Norms Exploration Toolkit participatory tools. A total of 45 participants were interviewed for this study, including (10) T2D patients, (10) caregivers of T2D patients, (10) healthcare providers, (2) village health teams, (4) diabetes-free community members; (4) community influencers like cultural leaders and (5) family members. The study was conducted in eastern Uganda in the districts of Bugiri and Busia. Data were collected on health workers, caregivers, patients and community members using focus group discussions, in-depth interviews and non-participant observation. Data were manually analysed to identify emerging social norms and other information of interest following a thematic framework approach.

Most participants were aware that frequent consumption of fatty foods and sugary refined foods could increase one’s risk of getting T2D. The study highlights three themes: general awareness of T2D risk factors, common social norms influencing dietary behaviours and behavioural risk factors that are influenced by the social norms. The study highlights significant behavioural and social drivers of T2D, which include consumption of high-fat, high-sugar diets, limited exercise and stress. Gendered and cultural norms strongly influence dietary behaviours, with women preparing unhealthy foods to meet societal expectations, fearing sanctions like divorce or community stigma, while men’s dietary preferences were linked to respect and social status. Norms around staple food preferences and respect linked to weight further perpetuate T2D risk behaviours. Community influencers, family dynamics and cultural traditions reinforce these practices, underscoring the need for gender-transformative, culturally sensitive and community-centred interventions. However, healthcare providers and village health teams are critical for promoting healthier behaviours and reducing T2D prevalence.

Our deep-dive social norms diagnosis has revealed that even when people know the risk factors for T2D, they will still follow the social norm influence regarding lifestyles. Inclusive strategies that actively engage and reshape norms are therefore vital to reduce the prevalence of T2D.

Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) are conditions with progressive cognitive decline. Still, people living with late-stage ADRD (PLWD) have been reported to exhibit transient recovery of communication or behavioural abilities that had seemingly been lost. These lucid episodes (LEs) are underinvestigated and poorly understood. This study aims to advance scientific understanding of the incidence, prevalence and predictors of LEs and assess from family caregivers if LEs are associated with changes they make in care planning or experiences with burden, distress or grief.

This study recruited 545 caregivers from five ADRD-related registries in the USA. Eligibility included caregivers over 18 years who currently provide care to someone with moderate to very severe ADRD and can complete online questionnaires. Using a longitudinal observational study design, consented caregivers will be assessed monthly for 1 year using online questionnaires that inquire about witnessing LEs. If witnessed, the context and content of the LE is reported. Changes in caregiver decision-making about care for the PLWD, and caregiver burden, distress and grief are assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Analysis of baseline data will assess descriptive aspects of LEs that are currently unknown (eg, prevalence, content, antecedents, duration). Longitudinal analysis will examine the incidence of LEs, characteristics of PLWD and caregivers that are predictors of episodes, and the associations between LEs and caregiver outcomes (eg, burden, distress, grief).

This study is being conducted in accordance with all Federal Policies for the Protection of Human Subjects. The protocol has been approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (ID 22-006861). Findings will be presented at scientific conferences and disseminated through journal publications and outreach efforts with collaborating partners invested in brain health and caregiver support.