Japanese medical academia continues to depend on quantitative indicators, contrary to the general trend in research evaluation. To understand this situation better and facilitate discussion, this study aimed to examine how Japanese medical researchers perceive quantitative indicators and qualitative factors of research evaluation and their differences by the researchers’ characteristics.

We employed a web-based cross-sectional survey and distributed the self-administered questionnaire to academic society members via the Japanese Association of Medical Sciences.

We received 3139 valid responses representing Japanese medical researchers in any medical research field (basic, clinical and social medicine).

The subjective importance of quantitative indicators and qualitative factors in evaluating researchers (eg, the journal impact factor (IF) or the originality of the research topic) was assessed on a four-point scale, with 1 indicating ‘especially important’ and 4 indicating ‘not important’. The attitude towards various opinions in quantitative and qualitative research evaluation (eg, the possibility of research misconduct or susceptibility to unconscious bias) was also evaluated on a four-point scale, ranging from 1, ‘strongly agree’, to 4, ‘completely disagree’.

Notably, 67.4% of the medical researchers, particularly men, younger and basic medicine researchers, responded that the journal IF was important in researcher evaluation. Most researchers (88.8%) agreed that some important studies do not get properly evaluated in research evaluation using quantitative indicators. The respondents perceived quantitative indicators as possibly leading to misconduct, especially in basic medicine (strongly agree—basic, 22.7%; clinical, 11.7%; and social, 16.1%). According to the research fields, researchers consider different qualitative factors, such as the originality of the research topic (especially important—basic, 46.2%; social, 39.1%; and clinical, 32.0%) and the contribution to solving clinical and social problems (especially important—basic, 30.4%; clinical, 41.0%; and social, 52.0%), as important. Older researchers tended to believe that qualitative research evaluation was unaffected by unconscious bias.

Despite recommendations from the Declaration on Research Assessment and the Leiden Manifesto to de-emphasise quantitative indicators, this study found that Japanese medical researchers have actually tended to prioritise the journal IF and other quantitative indicators based on English-language publications in their research evaluation. Therefore, constantly reviewing the research evaluation methods while respecting the viewpoints of researchers from different research fields, generations and genders is crucial.

This study aimed to examine the association between home meal preparer and salt intake among haemodialysis patients, including daily dietary status. We hypothesised that salt intake is higher among individuals who rely on meal preparation from others than those who prepare meals by themselves.

Cross-sectional study.

Two medical facilities in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan.

237 haemodialysis outpatients who visited one of the medical facilities between February 2020 and August 2021 and were diagnosed with anuria, defined as urination of

Salt intake amount was calculated from the results of predialysis and postdialysis blood draws, using Watson’s formula based on predialysis weight, predialysis serum sodium level, postdialysis weight and serum sodium level at the end of dialysis.

Salt intake was significantly higher in participants who relied on meal preparation from others (‘relying on others’) than those who prepared meals by themselves (‘self-prepared’) (B=1.359; 95% CI: 0.495 to 2.222). No statistical difference was found between individuals who ate out or ate takeout (‘outsourcing’) and those who prepared their own meals (‘self-prepared’). These results were robust after adjustment for confounding factors.

The present study revealed an association between self-preparation of meals at home and reduced salt intake among dialysis patients. Our findings suggest that whoever is the home meal preparer is possibly a social determinant of salt intake. To improve the prognosis of haemodialysis patients, actively reaching out to the family and assessing their social environment, such as identifying the home meal preparer and, if the patient relies on others for meal preparation, conducting nutritional/dietary guidance for that person, are effective in enhancing salt reduction.

We examined literacy related to healthy gestational weight gain (GWG) in immigrant and native Japanese mothers and determined whether it is associated with children’s birth weight.

Longitudinal cohort study.

As the baseline survey in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS), mothers completed self-administered questionnaires distributed by hand during pregnancy. The self-administered questionnaires used in this study were distributed by mail 6 months after delivery. Children’s birth weight, actual GWG and any complications during delivery were recorded by obstetricians collaborating with JECS.

Of 97 452 mothers who consented to participate in the JECS during pregnancy between January 2011 and March 2014, 67 953 were included in this study after exclusions for multiple births, multiple instances of consent by the same pregnant woman, miscarriages/stillbirths or withdrawal from the study within 3 years after participating. In total, 324 immigrant mothers and 963 native Japanese mothers were selected by propensity score matching for analysis.

Data were collected on maternal literacy related to healthy GWG at the baseline survey, and data on actual GWG and children’s birth weight were collected by obstetricians. The associations of knowledge about healthy GWG and mothers’ actual GWG with maternal nativity status were examined using a ² or Student’s t-test.

More native Japanese mothers than immigrant mothers knew the appropriate GWG and reason the for needing to know this. Actual GWG was significantly higher among the immigrant mothers, but was within the recommended range. The low birthweight (LBW) incidence was significantly higher among the native mothers.

Immigrant mothers to Japan had less knowledge about appropriate GWG, but their actual GWG was appropriate and they delivered fewer LBW infants than native Japanese mothers. These findings may indicate the presence of other protective factors for pregnancy or delivery among immigrant mothers.

To clarify the reasons for consultation, advice sought by frontline physicians and relationship between the patient’s pathology and the type of advice provided to guide the future development of telecritical care services.

Secondary analysis of transcripts of telephone calls originally recorded for quality control purposes was conducted using a thematic content analysis. The calls were conducted between December 2019 and April 2021 (total cases: 70; total time: ~15 hour).

Intensivists provided consultation services to frontline physicians at secondary care institutions in the Kansai and Chubu regions.

Non-intensive care frontline physicians working in five secondary care institutions in the Kansai and Chubu regions and intensivists providing a consultation service (n=26).

Not applicable.

The main outcome was the themes emerging from the language used during telephone and video consultations, indicating the gap filled by the telecritical care service.

We analysed 70 cases and approximately 15 hours of anonymised audio data. We identified the following reasons for consultation: ‘lack of competence in treatment and diagnostic testing’ and ‘lack of access to consultation in their own hospital’. Frontline physicians most often sought advice related to ‘treatment’, followed by ‘patient triage and transfer’, ‘diagnosis’ and ‘diagnostic testing and evaluation’. Regarding the relationship between the patient’s pathology and type of advice provided, the most commonly sought advice by frontline physicians varied based on the patient’s pathology.

This study explored the characteristics of 70 telecritical sessions and identified the reasons for and nature of the consultations. These findings can be used to guide the future provision and scale up of telecritical services.

Haemophilic arthropathy, a serious complication of haemophilia, results from recurrent joint bleeding, causing progressive joint damage and severely impacting patient quality of life. Rehabilitation therapy (RT) effectively addresses declining physical function due to joint degradation, but pain during RT can hinder its success. Therefore, an effective pain-alleviating treatment method is required. The single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ), a powered exoskeleton, measures bioelectric potential during muscle contraction and provides motorised support, potentially alleviating pain.

This study outlines our protocol for a randomised, prospective, single-blind (evaluator) trial aimed to investigate the effects of HAL-SJ on pain reduction during RT, kinesiophobia and other physical functions in patients with haemophilia.

This two-group comparison intervention study will include 24 male patients aged 12–85 years diagnosed with a bleeding disorder necessitating RT for pain and physical function improvement. The primary outcome measures pain changes during the first and second RT session in patients receiving HAL-SJ-assisted RT compared with traditional RT without HAL-SJ. The secondary outcomes include kinesiophobia (Japanese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia), standing position gait (zebris FDM-T treadmill), range of motion (manual goniometer) and body surface temperature (infrared thermography camera) during the study period of up to 3 months or until the end of 10 RTs. RT intensity remains below that required to move the affected joint against gravity, given HAL-SJ’s muscular support. The follow-up period extends to 1 month after the last RT. Intergroup study variables are compared by an unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Intragroup comparisons of secondary outcomes are analysed by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

This study was approved by the accreditation committee of Nara Medical University Hospital. The study results will disseminate through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

jRCTs052220076.