FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Effect of enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling on the nocebo effect in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving initial chemotherapy: protocol for a multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial

Por: Fujii · R. · Matsuda · Y. · Okada · M. · Ishikura · H. · Imai · Y. · Muraoka · R. · Hasuo · H.
Introduction

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a common symptom in cancer, and it is one of the distressing symptoms in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Information about side effects may exacerbate CINV due to the nocebo effect. This study aims to examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with side effects during medication counselling, which includes providing information about side effects, with the goal of mitigating the nocebo effect and reducing CINV.

Methods and analysis

This multicentre exploratory open-label randomised controlled trial will examine the efficacy of pharmacist-led enhanced support for coping with the side effects of treatments during medication counselling in patients with advanced lung cancer. The control group will receive medication counselling as usual. The study population will consist of patients with advanced lung cancer who have not received chemotherapy and are receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy or equivalent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is the prevention of nausea, and the secondary endpoints include complete response (no vomiting event and no rescue medication), stress (objectively assessed using the salivary cortisol and immunoglobulin A), coping strategies and quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination

This study received approval from the medical ethics committee of Kansai Medical University. The results will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal, and the findings will be presented at international scientific conferences.

Protocol version

1.0, 18 Mar 2025

Trial registration number

Registration number: UMIN000056068.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to assess the efficacy and safety of antibiotic faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with Parkinsons disease (FLORA-PD): a study protocol

Por: Takeshige-Amano · H. · Igami · E. · Okuzumi · A. · Kamo · R. · Iseki · M. · Tsuyama · K. · Wakamori · R. · Okada · H. · Taniguchi · D. · Ueno · S.-I. · Oji · Y. · Ishikawa · K.-i. · Nishikawa · N. · Orikasa · M. · Odakura · R. · Koma · M. · Maruyama · T. · Nomura · K. · Ishikawa · D. · Shibu
Introduction

The intestinal microbiota of people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP) differs significantly from that of healthy individuals. Given that altered microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the efficacy of FMT in improving motor symptoms in PwP has been inconclusive in some pilot randomised controlled trials (RCT). Previous RCTs on PwP employed simple FMT, but our modified approach—pretreatment with antibiotics before FMT (A-FMT)—has been shown to improve the engraftment rate of given species and the beneficial effects of FMT. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-FMT for PwP, particularly in those with motor fluctuations.

Methods and analysis

This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with an 8-week observation period following a single A-FMT. Thirty clinically established PwP with prominent motor fluctuation episodes will be randomised 1:1 to FMT or placebo. Participants in both groups will receive antibiotic treatment prior to colonoscopy for FMT or placebo treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints will include subjective and objective evaluations of motor and non-motor symptoms and will be evaluated before and after antibiotic treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks after the procedure. Exploratory endpoints will include blood and faecal sample analyses, advanced brain MRI and pharmacokinetic assessment of levodopa concentrations during a levodopa challenge test.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the ethical committee of Juntendo University in August 2024 (J24-005) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Clinical Trials Act and related laws and regulations. All patient data will be anonymised to protect privacy and used solely for study purposes. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.

Trial registration number

jRCTs031240344.

Intrauterine high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy during pregnancy for women with a history of pregnancy ending in documented neonatal haemochromatosis (NH001): study protocol

Por: Sasaki · A. · Yachie · A. · Mizuta · K. · Takahashi · H. · Okada · N. · Toma · T. · Motomura · K. · Matsumoto · K. · Wada · Y. S. · Ito · Y. · Ito · R. · Kasahara · M. · Fukuda · A. · Inoue · E. · Yamaguchi · K. · Nakamura · H. · Wada · S. · Sako · M.
Introduction

Neonatal haemochromatosis, considered to be a gestational alloimmune liver disease (NH-GALD), is a rare but serious disease that results in fulminant hepatic failure. The recurrence rate of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant of a mother with an affected infant is 70%–90%. Recently, antenatal maternal high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy has been reported as being effective for preventing recurrence of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant. However, no clinical trial has been conducted to date.

Methods and analysis

This is a multicentre open-label, single-arm study of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in pregnant women with a history of documented NH in a previous offspring. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in preventing or reducing the severity of alloimmune injury to the fetal liver.

Ethics and dissemination

The clinical trial is being performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board at four hospitals. Before enrolment, written informed consent would be obtained from eligible pregnant women. The results are expected to be published in a scientific journal.

Protocol version

28 October 2024, V.8.0.

Trial registration number

jRCT1091220353.

Neurological outcomes with hypothermia versus normothermia in patients with moderate initial illness severity following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (R-CAST OHCA)

Por: Naito · H. · Nishikimi · M. · Okada · Y. · Maeyama · H. · Kiguchi · T. · Yorifuji · T. · Nishida · K. · Matsui · S. · Kuroda · Y. · Nishiyama · K. · Iwami · T. · Nakao · A. · JAAM R-CAST OHCA Trial Group · Nishikimi · Otani · Ryosuke · Yumoto · Hayakawa · Sakurai · Fukushima · Tanaka
Introduction

Temperature control is a fundamental intervention for neuroprotection following resuscitation from cardiac arrest. However, evidence regarding the efficacy of hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS) remains unclear. Retrospective studies suggest that the clinical effectiveness of hypothermia may depend on the severity of PCAS. The R-CAST OHCA trial aims to compare the efficacy of hypothermia versus normothermia in improving 30-day neurological outcomes in patients with moderately severe PCAS following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods and analysis

The multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, superiority, randomised controlled trial (RCT) is conducted with the participation of 35 emergency and critical care centres and/or intensive care units at academic and non-academic hospitals. The study enrols moderately severe PCAS patients, defined as those with a revised post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome for induced Therapeutic Hypothermia score of 5.5–15.5. A target number of 380 participants will be enrolled. Participants are randomised to undergo either hypothermia or normothermia within 3 hours after return of spontaneous circulation. Patients in the hypothermia group are cooled and maintained at 34°C until 28 hours post-randomisation, followed by rewarming to 37°C at a rate of 0.25°C/hour. Patients in the normothermia group are maintained at normothermia (36.5°C–37.7°C). Total periods of intervention, including the cooling, maintenance and rewarming phases, will occur 40 hours after randomisation. Other treatments for PCAS can be determined by the treating physicians. The primary outcome is a favourable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 at 30 days after randomisation and compared using an intention-to-treat analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has been approved by the Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Okayama University Hospital, Ethics Committee (approval number: R2201-001). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants or their authorised surrogates. Results will be disseminated via publications and presentations.

Trial registration number

jRCT1062220035.

❌