Oxaliplatin, a key drug in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), can cause oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in a dose-dependent manner. These symptoms can severely affect daily life, and chronic OIPN often limits treatment continuation because of its correlation with the cumulative dose of oxaliplatin. Currently, effective preventive measures are unavailable. However, surgical glove compression therapy may reduce paclitaxel-induced neuropathy, suggesting its potential in preventing OIPN.
This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II/III trial evaluates surgical glove compression therapy to investigate the possible preventive effects of OIPN in patients with CRC receiving adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy. Patients with stage III CRC undergoing curative surgery will be enrolled and randomised into two groups. The intervention group will wear two layers of tight-fitting surgical gloves from 30 min before to 30 min after oxaliplatin infusion, whereas the control group will receive standard care. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥2 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria. Secondary endpoints include quality of life assessments (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-12 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-item), duration and extent of OIPN as assessed using the Debiopharm Neurologic and Sensory Toxicity Criteria, chemotherapy completion rates, and adverse events. To detect a significant reduction in the incidence of CIPN, 170 patients will be enrolled (36% in the control group vs 15% in the intervention group). The planned case enrolment period is from 1 November 2024 to 31 October 2026.
This trial was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hiroshima University, Japan (approval no. CRB2024-0008), and has been registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs062240066). The results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with the scientific community at international conferences.
jRCTs062240066
In 2017, the Japan Diabetes Society and Japan Geriatrics Society published the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetes in older adults, marking a major shift in glycaemic management policy for older adults. The guidelines represented a transition from conventional, uniform targets, originally developed for the general adult population, to stratified glycaemic goals tailored to the complex care needs of older patients, including comorbidities and frailty. Although the 2017 guidelines aimed to promote individualised care and reduce adverse events such as severe hypoglycaemia, the real-world impact on patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures has not been evaluated at the national level.
A population-based interrupted time-series analysis will be conducted using data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan, which captures nearly all insured healthcare encounters nationwide. This study will include individuals aged ≥65 years with diabetes who received insurance healthcare services between April 2016 and June 2019. Outcomes will be evaluated across three domains: patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures. Specifically, these will include the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, acute coronary syndrome, hyperglycaemic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, number of antidiabetic prescriptions and total healthcare expenditures. Primary analyses will use generalised linear mixed-effects models assuming Poisson or negative binomial distributions with adjustments for facility-level heterogeneity. Stratified analyses will be performed according to comorbidity burden, frailty status and receipt of relevant healthcare services. Sensitivity analysis will assess the robustness of the results using an alternative definition of severe hypoglycaemia.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology (No. 1752), and the need for informed consent was waived owing to the use of anonymised administrative data. These findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international academic conferences.
The intestinal microbiota of people with Parkinson’s disease (PwP) differs significantly from that of healthy individuals. Given that altered microbiota may play a role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic approach. However, the efficacy of FMT in improving motor symptoms in PwP has been inconclusive in some pilot randomised controlled trials (RCT). Previous RCTs on PwP employed simple FMT, but our modified approach—pretreatment with antibiotics before FMT (A-FMT)—has been shown to improve the engraftment rate of given species and the beneficial effects of FMT. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of A-FMT for PwP, particularly in those with motor fluctuations.
This study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with an 8-week observation period following a single A-FMT. Thirty clinically established PwP with prominent motor fluctuation episodes will be randomised 1:1 to FMT or placebo. Participants in both groups will receive antibiotic treatment prior to colonoscopy for FMT or placebo treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints will include subjective and objective evaluations of motor and non-motor symptoms and will be evaluated before and after antibiotic treatment and at 4 and 8 weeks after the procedure. Exploratory endpoints will include blood and faecal sample analyses, advanced brain MRI and pharmacokinetic assessment of levodopa concentrations during a levodopa challenge test.
This study has been approved by the ethical committee of Juntendo University in August 2024 (J24-005) and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Japan Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Clinical Trials Act and related laws and regulations. All patient data will be anonymised to protect privacy and used solely for study purposes. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.
jRCTs031240344.
Neonatal haemochromatosis, considered to be a gestational alloimmune liver disease (NH-GALD), is a rare but serious disease that results in fulminant hepatic failure. The recurrence rate of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant of a mother with an affected infant is 70%–90%. Recently, antenatal maternal high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy has been reported as being effective for preventing recurrence of NH-GALD in a subsequent infant. However, no clinical trial has been conducted to date.
This is a multicentre open-label, single-arm study of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in pregnant women with a history of documented NH in a previous offspring. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antenatal maternal high-dose IVIG therapy in preventing or reducing the severity of alloimmune injury to the fetal liver.
The clinical trial is being performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board at four hospitals. Before enrolment, written informed consent would be obtained from eligible pregnant women. The results are expected to be published in a scientific journal.
28 October 2024, V.8.0.
jRCT1091220353.
En el presente artículo se presenta la ciencia como un producto cultural occidental que ha evolucionado desde la modernidad. Debido a ello se obtuvo su forma actual, la cual logró imponerse, por su efectividad, a nivel global. Se reflexiona también sobre el origen y la evolución de lo que se conoce como “método científico” y se problematiza la naturaleza de la hipótesis y su corroboración empírica. El objetivo de este trabajo es reflexionar epistemológicamente sobre la práctica social de la ciencia, el método y la hipótesis científica. El escrito está estructurado en tres apartados. El primero, presenta la ciencia y el método científico desde sus orígenes hasta la actualidad. El segundo, se centra en los supuestos epistemológicos del método científico, profundizando en el inductivismo y las diversas alternativas que Bunge, Popper y Hempel plantean. Por último, se analiza la hipótesis científica, estudiando su naturaleza y los requisitos obligatorios que esta exige. Concluye sosteniendo que la “ciencia” es un producto occidental con tendencias empiristas y en muchos casos experimentales. Además, se logró determinar los componentes fundamentales del método científico, el cual no es estático, pues varía cada vez que cambia la concepción o la práctica social de la ciencia. Asimismo, se estableció que la contrastación empírica es fundamental para confrontar la hipótesis con la realidad.