To identify parent/caregiver perspectives prior to taking part in a transition care intervention involving group education sessions and peer support for parents/caregivers of adolescents with T1D.

Pre-intervention, semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents/caregivers of adolescents (14–16 years) with T1D followed in a tertiary care paediatric diabetes clinic and participating in a pilot, randomised controlled trial: The Group Education Trial to Improve Transition for Parents/Caregivers of Adolescents with T1D (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445284). We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis to identify key aspects of the intervention that may help support parents/caregivers of adolescents with T1D during their transition to adult care.

Of the 17 parents/caregivers randomized to the intervention group, 13 completed pre-intervention interviews.

Four themes were generated from the parents/caregivers, including (1) Creating a Community of Learners (i.e., importance of fostering a bidirectional and supportive environment for parents/caregivers), (2) Psychological Perspectives of Parenting (i.e., acknowledgement of shifting parental/caregiver roles during adolescents’ transition), (3) Diabetes Management During Adolescence (i.e., identification of relevant diabetes education topics to be covered), and (4) Ideal Format and Delivery of the Program (i.e., practical recommendations for the logistics of the intervention).

The findings provide practical and pragmatic suggestions to refine the parent/caregiver-based transition of care intervention for a future, full-scale trial, including addressing parental/caregiver needs as they learn how to best support their adolescent with T1D during transition to adulthood. Future transition programmes for adolescents with T1D may also benefit by incorporating aspects of the current transition readiness program for parents/caregivers of adolescents with T1D.

Women doctors face considerable challenges navigating family planning, pregnancy and motherhood. Their experiences can have relevance for health system functioning, including doctor retention. This scoping review synthesises research on family planning, fertility, pregnancy and motherhood among women doctors in the EU and the UK.

Scoping review conducted according to JBI best practice guidance.

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, PsycInfo and Web of Science were searched, and supplemented with backwards and forwards citation chasing.

Peer-reviewed, original research, in English, focusing on either fertility and family planning, pregnancy and/or motherhood among women doctors in an EU country(s) and/or the UK.

Data were extracted independently by two authors. Data were synthesised using deductive content analysis and collated using narrative synthesis.

In total, 34 studies were identified. Family planning appears complicated by medical careers. Medical specialty choice is particularly impacted, with certain specialties (eg, General Practice) considered particularly family friendly and others markedly less so. Pregnancy complications among women doctors, especially surgeons, were documented. However, women doctors’ and non-doctors’ pregnancy outcomes were overall not significantly different. Notably, doctor-mothers had fewer children and were more likely to report making compromises or facing negative consequences when balancing family and career than doctor-fathers.

Women doctors in the EU and UK report challenges in balancing work and motherhood. With the potential for their experiences to impact on health system functioning and patient outcomes, training bodies and health organisations should take proactive action to better support women doctors and ensure they can remain in the profession and practice in their desired specialty. Future research examining working practices/schedules during pregnancy, breastfeeding experiences, parenting and childcare and maternal mental health will support a better understanding of women doctors’ experiences and facilitate implementation of effective supports.

Studies suggest that extreme heat events can have negative effects on mental health. However, characterisation of these effects in urban communities remains limited, and few studies have investigated the potential modifying effects of demographic, clinical and environmental characteristics. The aim of this study is to address this knowledge gap and quantify the impacts of extreme heat on mental health, health service use and mental well-being in vulnerable urban populations.

In this multidisciplinary project, we will assess mental health outcomes in different populations by bringing together two distinct datasets: electronic health record (EHR) data on mental health service users and data from general public participants of Urban Mind, a citizen science project. We will use EHRs from the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) and the North London NHS Foundation Trust (NLFT), from six boroughs which collectively cover more than 1.8 million residents in Greater London, to capture mental health service use and mortality among people with existing diagnoses of mental illness across 2008–2023. We will use smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment data from Urban Mind to measure mental well-being in the general population (2018–2023). These datasets will be linked to high-resolution spatiotemporal data on temperature, fine and coarse particulate matter (PM_2.5, PM₁₀), nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and density of large mature tree canopy. We will employ novel quasi-experimental designs, including case time series and case-crossover analysis, to examine the impact of extreme heat on mental health and explore effect modification by sociodemographic, clinical and environmental factors, including air pollution and types of green space coverage. We will also develop a microsimulation model combined with the InVEST urban cooling model to assess and forecast the mental health and social care impacts of extreme heat events and the mitigation of these impacts by different green space coverage and pollution-reduction policies. With a core team composed of researchers, community organisations, industry partners and specialist policy experts, this project will consider lived experience, benefit from broad stakeholder engagement and address gaps in policy and practice.

Each component of this project has been approved by the relevant ethics committee (ref RESCM-22/23-6905 for Urban Mind, LRS/DP-23/24-41409 for the co-development of a screening tool, 23/SC/0257 for the SLaM EHRs, and 24/EE/0178 for the NLFT EHRs). Our dissemination plan includes peer-reviewed scientific articles, policy briefs, a practical guide on fostering ecological and human resilience at the neighbourhood level, and a technical guide for planting and improving the growing conditions of large canopy trees.