Long-term brain health profiles following exposure to repetitive head impacts and/or concussions in contact sports are a public health focus and the subject of a national debate. The true prevalence rates of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or neurobehavioural dysregulation are unknown in the nearly 20 000 current/living former professional football players. Here, we describe the procedures and methodology of the prevalence study of cognitive function in former professional football players from the Brain Health Initiative at the University of Pittsburgh. The objective is to define the prevalence of normal cognitive function versus neurodegeneration in former professional football players through clinical, neuroimaging and biomarker assessments.

Participants include former professional football players aged 29–59 years at study onset who played a minimum of three professional football games in three professional seasons and non-exposed controls. Participants are recruited by two mechanisms, a random and non-random sample. The full study protocol includes a 3–4-day, multidomain assessment (eg, neurological, neurocognitive, psychiatric, sleep, vestibular, orthopaedic and cardiovascular) for neurodegenerative disease and overall health and function, including MRI, positron emission tomography scans, analysis of blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid, neurocognitive assessments, applanation tonometry, overnight sleep study and informant interview. A multidisciplinary clinical panel conducts a blinded diagnostic consensus conference to adjudicate the presence of MCI and/or traumatic encephalopathy syndrome, which serve as the study’s primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Point prevalence of these for both the exposed and unexposed cohorts will be calculated as the primary statistical analysis.

The University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board approved the study prior to recruiting human subjects (protocol numbers STUDY19010008: sIRB - Brain Health Initiative (Part 1) and STUDY19030211: sIRB - Brain Health Initiative (Part 2)). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and as presentations at national and international scientific conferences.

Concussion is an acute injury that may contribute to short-term limitations and potential long-term risks.

To test whether a past concussion is associated with the risk of a subsequent serious motor vehicle crash.

Population-based longitudinal cohort analysis.

Ontario, Canada, from 1 April 2002 to 31 March 2022 (178 emergency departments).

Adults diagnosed with a concussion (cases) or an acute ankle sprain (controls), excluding individuals with a disqualifying illness (blindness, dementia, delirium), severe cases resulting in hospitalisation or those who died within 90 days.

Subsequent motor vehicle crash requiring emergency medical care.

We identified 3 037 028 patients, including 425 158 with a concussion and 2 611 870 with an ankle sprain. A total of 200 603 patients were injured in a subsequent motor vehicle crash over a median follow-up of 10 years, equal to an absolute risk of 1 in 15 patients (6.64 per 1000 patient-years). Patients with a concussion had a 49% higher motor vehicle crash risk compared with those with ankle sprain (adjusted relative risk=1.49, 95% CI 1.47 to 1.50, p

This study suggests a significant increased risk of a motor vehicle crash after a concussion that may justify a safety warning from clinicians.

Patients with chronic somatic diseases such as obesity often develop comorbid depressive symptoms. E-mental health interventions are an innovative and effective treatment option within a stepped care approach. Studies have shown that acceptance and adherence are higher when they are tailored to the specific needs of the target group. This study protocol describes a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an internet-based self-help intervention, Fit4Mood, to improve mental health in the high-risk group of adults with obesity. The objective of the @ktivPLUS research project is to evaluate the effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in comparison to an online bibliotherapy.

Eligible individuals will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (access to an internet-based intervention) or to an active control group (access to an online bibliotherapy). Assessments will be conducted before the start of the intervention (baseline (BL)) and 4 months after BL (follow-up (FU)). The primary outcome is the reduction in depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) in n=190 participants. Secondary outcomes are anxiety, quality of life, activity, self-efficacy, resilience, mental and digital health literacy, stress, sleep quality, weight loss, weight management activities and readiness to lose weight, weight self-stigma, uptake, adherence and satisfaction with the intervention, workability and cost-effectiveness at follow-up. Additionally, sociodemographics, health, comorbidities and disabilities, as well as internet-specific information, will be assessed at BL. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalised linear mixed models will be applied.

Approval for this study has been granted by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (ID: 140/25-ek). All participants will provide informed consent prior to participation in the study. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. In the case of a successful evaluation, the internet-based self-help intervention Fit4Mood will be provided as freeware, which will be easily accessible and free of charge.

The current RCT study has been registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (Identifier: DRKS00036178, Registered 24 June 2025; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00036178).

Due to the documented benefits of peripheral resistance training (RT) and inspiratory resistance training, known as inspiratory muscle training (IMT), in patients with cardiovascular disease, both exercise forms are regularly used in cardiac rehabilitation. However, little is known about the haemodynamic responses to different intensities of dynamic RT, isometric RT, and IMT in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study is designed to evaluate and compare the acute haemodynamic responses elicited by different RT and IMT modalities in patients with CAD.

This study design is a prospective, single-centre, randomised crossover trial. A total of 20 participants with CAD will be included. All participants will undergo four different exercise training interventions: IMT, isometric wall squat training (IWS), dynamic leg press training (DLP) and isometric handgrip training (IHG). For each intervention, participants will perform two intensity modalities in randomised order: IMT (low vs high), IWS (low vs moderate), DLP (low vs high) and IHG (low vs moderate). The primary outcomes are the acute exercise-induced haemodynamic responses (esp. systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, stroke volume, cardiac output) across the different exercise training interventions, as well as the changes in haemodynamic responses during the recovery phase for each intervention. Secondary outcomes include changes in tissue oxygen saturation, oxygen saturation, and perceived dyspnoea and exertion. The study period is planned for 2025.

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the German Sport University Cologne (Ethical Approval Code: 209/24). The findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed publications. This study is supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation via the partnership with the Coordenacão de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)(CAPES-Humboldt Research Fellowship for Experienced Researchers) and by research funding from Edwards Lifesciences LLC (Limited Liability Company).

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00035668.

Informal caregivers play a vital role in caring for individuals who choose to spend the end of their life at home. However, this caregiving role often imposes considerable physical, emotional, social and financial burdens that can negatively impact caregivers’ quality of life. A comprehensive understanding of the breadth of interventions designed to support caregivers of individuals receiving home-based palliative and end-of-life care is essential, along with insights into how these interventions are perceived by those who have received them. The objective of this review is to synthesise existing evidence on the effectiveness and appropriateness of interventions that support informal caregivers of patients receiving home-based palliative care in order to address the caregivers’ needs and improve their quality of life. Additionally, this review aims to explore the acceptability and perceived benefits of these interventions from the perspectives of informal caregivers who have received them.

A comprehensive search will be performed in the following databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cairn.info, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). This review will include studies that focus on adult informal caregivers of adult patients with serious life-threatening illnesses receiving home-based palliative care. Interventional studies that employed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches will be considered. Quantitative studies will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Qualitative studies will encompass research that explores informal caregivers’ experiences with the interventions, perceived benefits and barriers and enablers influencing intervention effectiveness. Mixed-methods studies using convergent, embedded or sequential designs will also be included.

The search will include studies published in English or French, with no restrictions on the publication period. Study selection, critical appraisal and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers to ensure methodological rigour. This review will adhere to the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for mixed-methods systematic reviews, using a convergent segregated approach. Findings will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Ethical review is not required for this study, as it is a literature review that does not involve the collection of primary data. The findings of this review will be disseminated to the scientific community through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications. Additionally, lay summaries will be prepared and shared with the general public and relevant stakeholders.

PROSPERO, registration number CRD420251006612.

Patients receiving long-term ventilation (LTV) in out-of-hospital intensive care facilities often suffer from persistent impairments of their cognition, mental health and physical health, limiting their social participation. Chronically ill patients are often unable to express their care preferences. Thus, their medical care often lacks integration of patients’ wishes and values. Telemedicine may be used to collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from these patients to align medical care with their preferences. Early integration of teleconsultation to provide rapid support for specific patient symptoms can reduce economic costs.

This is a multicentre, prospective, non-blinded, single-arm interventional trial with a pre-post design and follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials statement. 10 out-of-hospital intensive care facilities in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany, are grouped into three clusters. The study population includes adult patients (≥18 years) receiving LTV and residing in participating care facilities. During the preintervention phase, standard patient care remains unchanged. From the start of the intervention phase, enrolled patients receive telemedicine rounds in addition to standard care. These telemedicine rounds, conducted at least weekly, involve on-site healthcare professionals, patients and their relatives. Data are collected at predefined time points—study months 1,3, 9, 15 and 21—with a target of 57 participants at each time point. The study aims to evaluate whether a structured telemedicine intervention (1) increases the proportion of patients receiving record-documented PROMs in routine care and (2) reduces hospital readmissions. Secondary outcomes include the evaluation of post-intensive care syndrome, healthcare costs and the usability, applicability and perceived benefits of telemedicine. Additionally, qualitative interviews with patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals will explore individual experiences with chronic critical illness, the perceived quality of life of the patients and how team members manage moral distress in caregiving contexts. A mixed-effects logistic regression model will be used to analyse patients’ access to PROMs, while a mixed-effects Poisson regression model will be employed to evaluate hospital readmission rates. The findings may provide valuable insights into how telemedicine can improve patient-centred care for this particular patient group.

This study protocol received approval from the Ethics Committee of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany (EA2/136/22). The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at international conferences.

This study was registered in the ‘German Register of Clinical Studies’ (DRKS; DRKS00029326).

Preterm infants, particularly those born before 29 weeks of gestation, are at increased risk of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and other complications of prematurity. Substantial evidence suggests that respiratory tract colonisation with Ureaplasma species significantly contributes to pulmonary inflammation, impaired lung function and subsequent lung disease especially in very immature infants. Moreover, Ureaplasma exposure has been implicated in the pathogenesis of other inflammation-related sequelae of prematurity. Although representing a potentially actionable risk factor for adverse short-term and long-term neonatal outcome, controversies on Ureaplasma-associated morbidity remain and recommendations for screening practices in preterm infants are missing. The NEO-CONSCIOUS (Neonatal Colonisation and Infection with Ureaplasma in very immature preterm infants born Ureaplasma colonisation and infection in very preterm infants at high risk of adverse outcome, the extent of potentially accompanying inflammation and the impact on short-term and long-term morbidity.

This is a prospective observational multicentre study being conducted in level III neonatal intensive care units in Germany and Austria. In total, 400 infants born before 29 weeks of gestation are screened for Ureaplasma colonisation immediately after birth. In addition, biomarkers of systemic inflammation are determined on day 1 and day 28. The study infants are followed up until discharge and at 2 years corrected age. The primary outcome BPD and/or death is assessed at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. Secondary outcomes include systemic inflammation, secondary infections, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months corrected age.

The study has been approved by the ethics committees in Würzburg and Leipzig and the local ethics committees of all participating centres. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed international publications and conferences. The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00033001.

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00033001).

Knee osteoarthritis often starts in the patellofemoral compartment of the knee and is diagnosed in about 39% of people with knee pain aged above 30 years. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis plays a crucial role in the reduction of quality of life and in the rise of healthcare costs. There is still no consensus for treatment recommendation for isolated patella-femoral osteoarthritis in clinical guidelines. Current therapeutic approaches are limited to pain management, alleviation of symptoms or total knee replacement. Nasal chondrocyte tissue-engineered cartilage (N-TEC) has already been successfully introduced in clinical studies phase I and II for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions and in pilot studies in osteoarthritis patients.

A randomised controlled trial involving 75 patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis from nine different clinical centres in Switzerland, Germany and Croatia is being conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of N-TEC implantation compared with standard treatment with platelet-rich plasma (PRP). In the intervention group, an autologous nasal cartilage cell-derived graft is implanted into the cartilage defects of the patella and/or trochlea during an open surgical procedure. The control group receives three PRP injections at weekly intervals. The primary outcome is the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain Change from baseline to 24 months between groups. Secondary outcomes, including patients’ self-assessed questionnaires, X-ray and MRI scans, physiotherapeutic assessments and safety, will be assessed and compared between the intervention and control group. In addition, the study is complemented with a health-economic evaluation to establish the intervention’s value for money and impact on productivity in working-age individuals. The planned duration of the study is 4 years including baseline and follow-up measurements at 6, 12 and 24 months.

All centres involved in the implementation of the intervention have obtained approval from their respective competent ethics committees. This includes approval from the following ethics committees: Ethics Committees of North-Western and Central Switzerland (EKNZ): 2024–00075 (associated ethical committees: Cantonal Ethics Committee Bern, Cantonal Research Ethics Commission Geneva (CCER), Cantonal Ethics Committee Ticino, Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich). The EKNZ covers several cantons in Switzerland, including Basel. The site in Lugano falls under the Cantonal Ethics Committee Ticino. Ethics Germany according to CTIS: 2023-508640-21-00 (Medicinal Ethical Commission of the Julius-Maximilians-University Wuerzburg, Ethical Commission of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg) and Central Ethical Committee Croatia, Republic of Croatia Ministry of Health: 2023-508640-21-00. The Swissmedic reference number is 701788.

Prior to participation, all participants must have signed informed consent. Study information will be disseminated via hospital websites, newsletters and an open-access publication of the protocol. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at national and international conferences and shared with the public.

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration No.: NCT06163573; Registration number CTIS: 2023-508640-21-00.