Conectar
Risk reduction training for UK care home staff is limited, not standardised and challenging to implement. Virtual reality (VR) is an immersive, engaging method of education delivery that is being adopted in health and social care. VR may be an effective education tool in care homes, but this research has yet to be conducted.
The VR-CARE project aims to create a new VR risk reduction training programme for care homes that combines hand hygiene and falls prevention modules, and to evaluate this through a pilot trial to inform a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).
There are two research phases with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities embedded throughout. Care home stakeholders are collaborating to design the training and toolkit, oversee methods, review resources for accessibility, support recruitment and ensure the project meets the needs of the workforce and positively impacts resident care.
In phase 1, we will use a mixed-methods and user-centred design approach to develop the VR training and an accompanying implementation toolkit needed to deliver it. The training will be developed and tested by 15 care home staff across three rounds to identify and inform changes that maximise usability and acceptability. We will conduct up to 20 interviews with staff from VR companies and care homes to support toolkit development.
Phase 2 is a mixed-methods pilot cluster RCT, with a waitlist control and process evaluation with up to 80 unregistered staff members from six North England care homes, to develop the measures and methods to inform a future trial. The process evaluation will generate knowledge about VR as a training mechanism in care homes. This phase will focus on the practicality of using VR, broader impacts (eg, on residents), contextual considerations and how it might be scaled up.
The University of Manchester Proportionate University Research Ethics Committee has approved phase 1 (Reference: 2025-24416-44642). We will obtain further approval before commencing phase 2.
Outputs will include user-friendly and acceptable VR risk reduction training for care homes, accompanied by an implementation toolkit adaptable for other VR training in social care settings. Materials (eg, training overviews, infographics and videos) will be developed to support uptake. Findings will be presented at conferences and published in journals. Lay summaries will be co-created with our PPIE group, and additional dissemination methods will be co-developed to broaden reach.
Despite the increasing interest in wearable devices for monitoring body temperature in acute hospital settings, their integration into routine clinical workflows remains limited. There is a growing need to map the existing evidence on the use of temperature data generated by wearable devices to enhance our understanding of how these data are monitored, presented and used in clinical practice.
A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2013 to February 2025 will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. A search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and IEEE Xplore Databases will be undertaken using the Population, Concept, Context framework to identify studies that use wearable devices to monitor patients’ body temperature in acute hospital settings to support the management of fever or infections. A pilot search has been conducted to identify key search terms and specific types of wearable devices, followed by analysis of retrieved literature. We will use a two-step screening process to identify eligible articles, starting with title/abstract screening, followed by full-text screening. A hand search of the reference lists and citation lists of eligible articles and identified reviews will be conducted for additional publications that meet the inclusion criteria. Primary studies published in English and Chinese will be included regardless of their design and type of publication. Information on the characteristics of wearable devices, clinical contexts of device usage, strategies of presenting and analysing temperature data, and their integration into clinical workflows will be extracted. In the article presenting the results of the scoping review, we will provide a descriptive synthesis of the findings, supported by visual representations, such as charts, tables and images to describe the current evidence base.
As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed journal article and at healthcare or medical informatics conferences. The findings will provide insights into the interpretation of temperature data generated by wearable devices to support clinical decision-making and inform strategies to facilitate their incorporation into clinical practice.
This scoping review protocol is registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/v6sp8).
There is interest in using predictive models to address non-attendance of healthcare appointments without prior notification. Although several National Health Service (NHS) hospital trusts have piloted predictive models for non-attendance, there is a lack of published evidence in clinical settings.
This mixed-methods evaluation of the pilot of a predictive model intervention in outpatient services aimed to examine (1) the effect of the intervention on patient non-attendance and (2) staff engagement in the delivery of the intervention.
A mixed-methods study across two pilot phases. Quantitative data explored the use and impact of the predictive model on non-attendance. Z-tests were conducted to assess changes to non-attendance rates prepilot and in the two phases. Qualitative ethnographic work included 30 periods of observation and interviews with staff.
Nine outpatient services in an NHS Foundation Trust that volunteered to pilot the predictive model intervention. Qualitative participants were NHS clerical and administrative staff delivering the intervention and service managers.
An off-the-shelf predictive model, consisting of a cloud-based, random forest algorithm, produced a risk score of non-attendance by drawing on information from patients’ electronic health records. Staff in the pilot sites attempted to phone patients with a risk score to remind them of upcoming appointments.
Quantitative analysis showed that in phase 1, there were low volumes of intervention calls made across services, but three of nine outpatient services significantly reduced their non-attendance rate. There was a lower overall call rate in phase 2 among the four remaining participating services. One significantly reduced its non-attendance rate from 20.4% to 19.1% (p
The predictive model intervention was positioned as a simple solution to address a complex problem; however, there were challenges inherent in deployment within a dynamic healthcare setting. The sustainability of the intervention and its impact on patient experience warrants further exploration.
To explore why there is variation in implementation of multifactorial falls prevention practices that are recommended to reduce falls risks for older patients in hospital.
Mixed method, realist evaluation.
Three older persons and three orthopaedic wards in acute hospitals in England.
Healthcare professionals, including nurses, therapists and doctors (n=40), and patients aged 65 and over, and carers (n=31).
We examined mechanisms hypothesised to underpin the implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and multidomain, personalised prevention plans.
We developed an explanation detailing that how contextual factors supported or constrained implementation of recommended falls prevention practices.
Nurses led delivery of falls risk assessment and prevention planning using their organisation’s electronic health records (EHR) to guide and document these practices. Implementation of recommended practices was influenced by (1) organisational EHR systems that differed in falls risk assessment items they included, (2) competing priorities on nurse time that could reduce falls risk assessment to a tick box exercise, encourage ‘blanket’ rather than tailored interventions and that constrained nurse time with patients to personalise prevention plans and (3) established but not recommended falls prevention practices, such as risk screening, that focused multidisciplinary communication on patients screened as at high risk of falls and that emphasised nursing, rather than Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), responsibility for preventing falls through constant patient supervision.
To promote consistent delivery of multifactorial falls prevention practices, and to help ease the nursing burden, organisations should consider how electronic systems and established ward-based practices can be reconfigured to support greater multidisciplinary staff and patient and carer involvement in modification of individual falls risks.
To explore nurses' experiences of the adoption, implementation, and use of digital technologies during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK.
A qualitative descriptive study.
A qualitative study using two data sources: qualitative responses from 55 respondents to an online survey, and data from in-depth interviews with 21 individuals. The NASSS framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
Respondents reported using a variety of technologies including video conferencing applications, telemonitoring, systems to support care management and telecommunication systems. The analysis identified a range of reasons why technology had been introduced into services, and a recognition of its value in a situation where otherwise care may not have been able to continue. During the pandemic nurses were expected to change their work practices very rapidly, and we identified situations where organisational infrastructure either supported this effectively or created additional burdens for the nurses' work.
Nurses had to adapt to new ways of working rapidly, with digital technology being one of the primary means through which communication and care were delivered. The Covid-19 pandemic provided a unique set of circumstances where layers of governance and many of the existing barriers to technology introduction were reduced.
It is important to learn from these experiences, to understand how to sustain innovations that have proved to be successful, as well as the factors that enable nurses to work effectively in this new environment.
This study adheres to the guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.
A public contributor was involved from the beginning of the study conceptualization. They had input into the study approach, were part of the team that acquired the funding for the study and gave input at various stages into the processes for data collection, analysis and writing up the findings. The public contributor is a co-author on this paper and has been involved in the writing and editing of this report.
This work aimed to explore barriers to pessary self-management and co-create strategies to address these.
Participatory Action Research.
In October 2024, eight pessary-using women living in the United Kingdom participated in cooperative inquiry, discussion and co-creation of strategies in two virtual workshops.
Pessary using women who participated in this research identified challenges affecting willingness to self-manage a pessary and proposed solutions to address these and better support women. Pessary practitioners should assess physical capabilities, consider softer, more malleable pessaries, and explore the possibility of a pessary applicator. Peer support was seen as empowering, enabling self-advocacy and improved care; therefore, establishing peer networks was prioritised. Major barriers included difficulty navigating services and limited access to a full range of pessaries, leading some women to buy devices online without medical oversight, creating a two-tier system based on ability to pay. The group called for improved, standardised pessary care, and for self-management to be reframed to avoid women feeling ‘fobbed off’ through better follow-up, positive language, and compassionate care.
The group identified strategies to address barriers to pessary self-management which require further exploration. Pessary practitioners have a responsibility to listen to these voices and take steps to improve care for women in the future.
To support women's willingness to self-manage their pessary, pessary practitioners should consider and support women to overcome physical and emotional barriers; improve information provision; maximise social support; boost women's perceived self-efficacy; reframe pessary self-management and ensure robust, accessible follow-up is in place. This will ensure pessary-using women are supported to make an informed decision about pessary self-management. This research offers pessary practitioners insight into barriers women perceive to pessary self-management and guidance as to how women can be supported to self-manage their pessary.
Only 21% of women are willing to self-manage their pessary. Therefore, this research aimed to co-create strategies to better support women to self-manage their pessary and overcome barriers to willingness. Women reported individual, societal and service factors which affect willingness to self-manage a pessary. These research findings should be translated into clinical practice and care delivery for pessary using women in both a community and hospital setting.
COREQ (COnsolidated criteria for REporting Qualitative research) Checklist.
Patients and members of the public were involved in research prioritization, study design, data analysis, interpretation of findings and dissemination.
Study not registered.
To identify the factors influencing professionals’ implementation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on self-harm.
A rapid review evidence synthesis
Five electronic databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO) and five indexing databases (Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) and Conference Proceedings Citation Index (CPCI)), using the Web of Science platform, were searched in December 2023 and repeated in July 2024.
We included quantitative and qualitative studies that investigated professionals’ knowledge and implementation of NICE guidelines on self-harm, that were in English language and published between 2004 and July 2024.
One reviewer used standardised methods to search, screen, select, quality assess and synthesise the included studies, to accelerate the review. Quality assessment was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were extracted and synthesised thematically using NICE guidance implementation priorities.
The review included 10 studies. Six were conducted in accident and emergency (A&E) settings, two in general practice, one in a burns and plastic surgery hospital department and one involved cross-sectoral health professionals. Key findings indicate that awareness and implementation of self-harm guidelines is low among health professionals. Systemic barriers include lack of staff training, negative staff attitudes towards people who self-harm and lack of resources.
There is a need to develop and implement regular training on self-harm, incorporating NICE guidance and measures, to integrate knowledge and mobilise practice changes. Further research into the implementation of NICE guidelines in children who self-harm is needed, and in a wider variety of health and social care settings. The absence of studies from the social care sector into professionals’ awareness and implementation of NICE guidelines on self-harm is a key limitation.
FreshRSS 