Conectar
To identify and synthesise existing evidence on family-centred care for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and other diverse identities (LGBTQ+) people in acute hospital settings, including hospital-based palliative care, oncology, general in-patient and intensive care.
A scoping review guided by the JBI methodology.
Nine databases and grey literature sources were searched. Inclusion criteria focused on LGBTQ+ adults and family-related care experiences in hospital-based acute settings. After screening, qualitative, quantitative, and narrative data were extracted. Thematic analysis synthesised findings, with quantitative data narratively integrated.
Searches were conducted across nine databases and grey literature up to April 2025.
Five studies met inclusion criteria: three qualitative, one quantitative, and one reflective narrative. Four themes emerged: (1) invisibility and disclosure dilemmas, (2) exclusion of chosen families from visiting and decision-making, (3) barriers to inclusive communication and provider competence, and (4) enabling conditions for affirming care. Challenges occurred at interpersonal (e.g., provider assumptions, discomfort) and structural (e.g., lack of inclusive protocols, failure to recognise legal surrogates) levels. In the two studies reporting gender identity, transgender participants described heightened misrecognition and exclusion.
LGBTQ+ individuals and their chosen families face relational and structural barriers in acute hospital care. Inclusive interventions, protocols, and training are urgently needed to ensure affirming care.
Acute and intensive care providers should promote inclusive family engagement by using patient-preferred terminology, recognising chosen families, and advocating for inclusive policies and staff training.
This scoping review adhered to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.
No Patient or Public Contribution.
Registered with the Open Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FSU8D (23/02/2025)
Obesity affects over a quarter of the UK population and can lead to serious health issues. NHS Specialist Weight Management Services (WMS) offer treatments including lifestyle advice, psychological support and medications, but access and availability vary by region. Although around 4 million people could be eligible for NHS Specialist WMS annually, capacity is limited to 35 000, severely limiting overall access for those who need it. While digital technology has started to be used in WMS, more evidence is needed to confirm its long-term effectiveness, acceptability and cost-effectiveness. This study explores the use of Gro Health W8Buddy, a digital platform and app providing remote Specialist WMS. It aims to determine the long-term health benefits of remote WMS pathway Gro Health W8Buddy compared with standard NHS WMS delivered in hospitals, and to improve patients access to services.
The study is a real-world evaluation with observational data collection. We will recruit 450 study participants from four NHS specialist WMS who will choose either standard NHS WMS or the digital pathway Gro Health W8Buddy. Participants are being given the option to choose their pathway to generate real-world evidence. We will measure and analyse health outcomes including weight loss, time taken to be treated and cost-effectiveness, at 18 months and follow up at 24 months for later analysis (outside of this core funding). We will gather experiential data from patients and healthcare professionals through surveys, observation and interviews.
Ethical approval has been obtained from NHS Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW) (Supplementary Figure 3) (REC reference: 25/EM/0147). Our findings will be disseminated through academic publications, conference presentations and stakeholder engagement.
ISRCTN89168871; Pre-results.
by Elizabeth Baguley, Madelyn Knaub, Jessica VanDyke, Gideon Hirschfield, Mark G. Swain, Gail Wright, Deirdre McCaughey, Abdel Aziz Shaheen
Pandemic restrictions impacted healthcare, particularly during the first year. We evaluated the impact of the pandemic on quality of life and clinical care among patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This mixed-methods study administered quality of life surveys (Fear of COVID-19 Scale [FCV-19S], EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level [EQ-5D-3L], 29-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Instrument Survey [PROMIS-29]) and a PBC Care Delivery questionnaire to 348 Canadian PBC patients, followed by two focus groups with patients (n = 14) and stakeholders (n = 3). Quality of life scores were compared among sub-groups (i.e., care delays and pandemic appointment type) and with various reference populations. Most participants were female (94.0%) and Caucasian (88.2%), with a median age of 63.0 years (IQR: 55.9–71.2). During the pandemic, 75.8% had the majority (≥ 50%) of their hepatologist appointments virtually, but only 22.4% preferred to continue with virtual care post-pandemic. Participants with care delays had worse scores on the FCV-19S (p = 0.014), EQ-5D-3L (p = 0.009), and PROMIS-29 (i.e., fatigue, anxiety, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, p pTo critically reflect on a transnational, clinically embedded doctoral journey undertaken during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, and to draw conceptual and systemic lessons for doctoral education and clinical academic nursing pathways.
Reflective accounts of doctoral study exist, yet few examine practice-based PhDs conducted across different countries and health systems during a global crisis. This paper analyses one such pathway—enrolment at an Australian university with research embedded within the UK National Health Service—to explore resilience, identity formation, mentorship ecologies and organisational conditions that support or hinder clinical academic development.
Using analytic autoethnography and reflective case study logic, experiential data (field notes, supervisory records, ethics correspondence, project artefacts and publication trajectories) were synthesised with relevant scholarship. A conceptual framework, the TCAD lens, was developed to structure analysis across contexts, constraints, mechanisms and outcomes.
Four phases are outlined: starting in crisis as a senior ICU nurse, transitioning to lead educator, serving as surgical matron while implementing changes, and moving into academia to complete the thesis by publication. Dual ethics and governance procedures, contractual arrangements and GDPR-compliant data stewardship imposed significant administrative burdens but fostered global literacy and networks. Mentorship functioned as an ecology—supportive, critical, pragmatic and strategic—evolving towards independence. COVID-19 served as a stress test, narrowing scope while improving the feasibility and sustainability of the family member's voice reorientation intervention. Personal adversity intersected with identity development, with compassionate supervision enabling timely completion (3.7 years) and five peer-reviewed publications.
Transnational, clinically embedded doctoral pathways can enhance nursing research capacity but require deliberate institutional design: genuine protected time, cross-jurisdictional support and mentorship ecosystems. The TCAD lens provides a transferable framework for educators, supervisors and health systems.
Recommendations cover programme development, cross-border oversight, NHS–university collaborations, funding arrangements in different currencies and resilience infrastructure for clinician–researchers.
by Suehyun Park, Sangho Lee, Hyeon Ju Kim, Hyung-Kee Kim, Seung Huh, Deokbi Hwang
ObjectiveRegarding revision of vascular access (VA), endovascular methods are commonly employed owing to their procedural simplicity, yet their durability remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of swing segment (SwS) revision of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RC-AVF) between endovascular and surgical approaches.
Materials and methodsA retrospective cohort study comparing two groups was conducted at one tertiary hospital in South Korea. A total of 131 patients underwent endovascular or surgical revision of SwS in RC-AVF for the first time after AVF creation between 2016 and 2023. Endovascular and surgical revisions were performed in 114 and 17 patients, respectively (interposition, n = 10; patch angioplasty, n = 5; transposition, n = 1; proximalization, n = 1). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess post-intervention primary patency (PP) and post-intervention secondary patency (SP). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounders, and a subgroup analysis was conducted based on whether the SwS was in stenosis or occlusion.
ResultsThe median minimal diameter of SwS was 1.3 mm in the endovascular group and 1.4 mm in the surgical group, and the median lesion length was 2.5 cm and 4.0 cm, respectively. Twelve-month PP was 63.5% vs 73.7% (endo vs surgical, P = 0.79). While PP did not differ in the stenosis subgroup, the occlusion subgroup showed significantly higher PP after surgical revision (P = 0.002), with surgery associated with a markedly lower risk of loss of PP events (HR 0.073).
ConclusionSurgical revision may be preferentially considered for long-segment occlusive lesions, given its superior early PP and the longer lesions typically associated with occlusions, whereas percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) remains appropriate for focal or stenotic lesions within the SwS. Consistent follow-up is essential to enable timely interventions, thereby maximizing the functionality of RC-AVF.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an emerging public health concern in low and middle-income countries, including Nigeria, because of the associated pregnancy complications, increased healthcare costs and long-term health sequelae among women of reproductive age and their offspring. We determined the cumulative incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes of GDM in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Prospective cohort study.
Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.
721 pregnant women from the Ibadan Pregnancy Cohort Study participated in the one-step 75 g-oral glucose tolerance test at 24–28 weeks’ gestation.
The primary outcome of the study is the cumulative incidence of GDM. GDM was diagnosed according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy outcomes, which included modes of delivery (CS, spontaneous vaginal delivery), macrosomia (birth weight ≥4.0 kg), gestational age at delivery and birth asphyxia. The risk factors (exposures) examined included sociodemographic, obstetric, clinical, behavioural and lifestyle factors. Bivariate and multivariate Log-binomial regression models were used to identify the independent risk factors of GDM (adjusted for maternal age ≥35 years, income, maternal body mass index, history of pregnancy loss and congenital anomaly) and the associated pregnancy outcomes of GDM (adjusted for maternal age, income and maternal body mass index). Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% CI, used to assess the strength of associations, were reported.
The cumulative incidence of GDM was 20.7%, 95% CI (17.9% to 23.9%). The mean time for the diagnosis of GDM is 25.4±1.42 weeks of gestation. After adjusting for other variables, maternal age ≥35 years: (aRR: 1.48). 95% CI (1.07 to 1.97) p=0.016), maternal obesity (aRR: 1.85, 95% CI (1.26 to 2.30) p=0.002) and a previous history of congenital anomaly (aRR: 2.83, 95% CI (1.97 to 4.07) p
The cumulative incidence of GDM is high among pregnant women in Ibadan. Maternal age ≥35 years, maternal obesity and a history of congenital anomaly were significant independent risk factors for GDM. These factors should be targeted for public health interventions, including lifestyle modification among pregnant women with obesity and early screening and diagnosis of GDM.
To investigate the relationship between demographic characteristics and extracurricular achievements among UK medical students.
National, cross-sectional survey.
All 44 UK medical schools recognised by the General Medical Council.
8,395 medical students.
Binary indicators of extracurricular engagement, including PubMed-indexed authorship, academic presentations, quality improvement projects, leadership roles and academic prizes. Logistic regression models were used to explore associations with demographic and extracurricular achievement predictors.
Logistic regression analysis showed that students from private schools (OR 1.35, CI 1.20 to 1.53, p
Significant disparities in extracurricular achievement exist among UK medical students, principally associated with gender, private schooling and familial links to medicine. Apparent ethnic differences were largely attenuated after adjustment for other variables, indicating socioeconomic factors as stronger predictors of engagement. Given the role of these achievements in postgraduate selection, targeted interventions by medical schools and professional bodies to widen access to funding, mentorship and structured guidance for all students, regardless of perceived advantage, may support equitable opportunity without undermining merit-based standards.
To explore factors influencing UK medical students’ specialty choices and examine variations in these influences across demographic groups and stages of training.
National, cross-sectional online survey.
All 44 UK medical schools recognised by the General Medical Council.
8,395 medical students.
The primary outcome was the specialty preferences of UK medical students. The secondary outcomes were factors behind these preferences and how these factors vary across demographic groups and different stages of training.
General Practice (15.3%), Paediatrics (10.6%) and Anaesthetics (9.9%) were the most preferred specialties among final-year students. Work-life balance (84.1%), compatibility with family life (78.2%), positive training experiences (85.2%) and future specialty outlook (74.9%) were key factors influencing specialty choice. Only 23.1% of students felt confident about securing a specialty training post, with confidence higher among males (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.52, p
This study highlights disparities in specialty preferences and influencing factors among UK medical students. A focus on improving career guidance, exposure to various specialties and supporting equitable access to training opportunities is essential for fostering a motivated and sustainable medical workforce.
Objetivo principal: Determinar el conocimiento y las actitudes con relación a la resistencia a los antibióticos de los estudiantes de Enfermería. Metodología: Se envió una encuesta a los estudiantes de Enfermería de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud en la que se recogía información sobre frecuencia de uso de antibióticos en el último año, conocimientos sobre antibióticos, posibles reacciones adversas, la resistencia y actitudes relacionadas con el uso de estos. Resultados principales: 167 estudiantes respondieron al cuestionario, 75 (45,7%) indicaron que habían tomado antibióticos en el último año y 159 (97%) habían oído hablar de la resistencia antimicrobiana. Los estudiantes demostraron una buena actitud con más del 90% de respuestas correctas a la mayoría de los ítems. Conclusión principal: Los estudiantes de enfermería tenían un conocimiento adecuado de los antibióticos y hacían un buen uso de ellos. Sin embargo, hubo un uso excesivo de antibióticos por parte de los estudiantes. Se proponen charlas y/o talleres, entre otros, para mejorar los resultados.
FreshRSS 