Conectar
Large language model tools are increasingly used in higher education, offering opportunities to support self-directed learning. In nursing education, course-specific AI virtual tutors may provide contextualised support while addressing concerns about content accuracy and alignment; yet empirical evidence remains limited.
This study evaluated the use and perceived impact of a co-designed AI-powered virtual tutor embedded in a graduate-level Master of Nursing (MN) course. We explored how students used the tutor, their perceptions of benefits and limitations, and its influence on learning and engagement.
A pilot study using a mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed. The tutor was trained on course-specific materials and integrated into the institutional learning management system. Data included anonymised usage logs and user interactions coded using Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, post-course surveys assessing AI self-efficacy, usability, and learning impact, and semi-structured interviews with students and teaching assistants (TAs). Quantitative and qualitative strands were integrated through a joint display.
A total of 651 interactions by individuals within a group of ~120 MN students were logged. Interactions peaked in evenings and around assignment deadlines. Most interactions reflected lower-order education processes, with more application and analysis later in the course. Eleven participants completed surveys; students reported high AI self-efficacy and moderate tutor use. Perceived usefulness was mixed, but most reported the tutor enhanced both lower- and higher-level learning and recommended its future use. Interviews revealed that students valued the tutor's immediacy and course-specific accuracy, while TAs noted efficiency gains. Reported challenges included usability issues, scope limitations, privacy concerns, and risk of over-reliance on the tool.
A co-designed AI virtual tutor was feasible and valued for contextual relevance, though perceived usefulness was variable. Findings support responsible, pedagogically integrated use of AI tutors in graduate nursing education.
While compassion is widely recognised as an essential component of high-quality patient care, the compassion needs of clinicians often go unrecognised and unmet. Clinicians face multifaceted sources of workplace suffering, both sources inherent to working with the sick and avoidable sources due to healthcare systems and leadership challenges. Organisational compassion, defined as the continuous and systematic identification, prevention and alleviation of sources of suffering for healthcare workers, offers a paradigm shift in mitigating and preventing clinician suffering and burnout. Yet little is known about how clinicians experience suffering and compassion from their organisations, teams and leaders.
Our overarching goal is to develop a clinician-reported experience measure of organisational compassion. The purpose of this study was to explore how clinicians experience suffering and compassion in healthcare organisations.
This qualitative study used semistructured interviews of interdisciplinary paediatric hospice and palliative care clinicians from across the USA. A moderator’s guide was developed based on the literature of organisational compassion in management and healthcare and validated through practice interviews with clinicians. 22 participants were recruited via national paediatric hospice and palliative care email list serves. Video interviews were conducted via Zoom. Transcripts were analysed using a hybrid grounded theory-thematic analysis methodology to identify themes and to construct a theoretical framework of compassion experiences.
Five major themes of experiencing compassion emerged: (1) Feeling cared about, characterised by authentic, empathetic responses to clinician distress; (2) Dignity, encompassing being valued, respected and recognised as a whole person and professional; (3) Proximal (team) compassion, including camaraderie, shared workload and mutual support within teams; (4) Structural (organisational) compassion, reflecting policies, practices and benefits that alleviate or exacerbate suffering and (5) Compassionate leadership behaviours, such as presence, empathy and connection to frontline staff needs.
Healthcare work includes sources of both inherent and avoidable suffering for clinicians. In this study, we sought to understand how clinicians experience compassion from their organisations, leaders and team members during times of distress. We found five themes of experiencing compassion in healthcare organisations: feeling cared about; dignity; proximal (team) compassion; structural (organisational) compassion and compassionate leadership behaviours. These qualitative data and results will provide an empiric foundation for the development of a clinician-reported experience measure of compassion for use in healthcare settings. Such a measure will enable future research examining how compassion experiences in healthcare may predict workforce outcomes such as burnout, satisfaction, engagement and thriving. Ultimately, this work may support the design of interventions aimed at strengthening compassionate organisational cultures and improving conditions for the healthcare workforce and both experiences and outcomes of the patients they serve.
Patient decision aids (PtDAs) are effective interventions to support patient involvement in health decisions and have the potential to impact favourably on health inequities by reducing gender bias in clinical practice. The aim was to explore sex and gender reporting and differences in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PtDAs for adults making treatment or screening decisions.
Secondary analysis of the Cochrane review of PtDAs of RCTs that reported sex and/or gender. The original review searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO and EBSCO from journal inception to March 2022. Two team members independently screened citations, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. For this secondary analysis, we only included primary outcomes from the original review. We assessed appropriate use of terminology for sex (biological attribute) and gender (social construct). When terms were used interchangeably, it was considered inaccurate. Findings were synthesised descriptively, and we used meta-analysis when two or more RCTs were conducted with females/women or males/men using similar outcome measures.
Informed values-choice congruence and the quality of the decision-making process (eg, knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision making, undecided) and adverse events (eg, decision regret, emotional distress) by sex and gender.
Of 209 RCTs in the original review, 206 reported sex and/or gender, with 35 (17%) using accurate terminology. Of 206 RCTs, 70 were with females/women only, 27 males/men only, 12 analysed by sex/gender and 97 RCTs did not disaggregate findings by sex or gender. Meta-analysis comparing RCTs for females/women to usual care and RCTs for males/men only compared with usual care showed similar mean differences in knowledge scores (10.84 vs 9.38 out of 100; p=0.44). Males/men had significantly higher self-reported participation in decision making compared with females/women (RR 3.16 vs 0.95; p
In PtDA RCTs, sex and gender terms are used interchangeably and 6% analysed outcomes by sex or gender. Meta-analysis of males/men only given PtDAs showed higher self-reported decision making participation in clinical practice compared to usual care versus females/women only compared with usual care. Researchers must improve reporting sex and gender in PtDA RCTs to assess how it influences health inequities.
by Paola Ximena Gonzalez-Lerma, Crystal Lloyd, Scarlet J. Park, Ken Dawson-Scully
Chemotherapeutic agents used for most common cancers are frequently associated with neurotoxicity, which often include debilitating side effects such as seizures. Docetaxel, one of the most widely and effectively used chemotherapeutic drugs, is associated with an array of symptoms referred to as Docetaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathies (DIPNs), including motor neuropathy, tingling, muscle weakness, and numbness. In this study, we use the electroconvulsive assay to model DIPN-related muscle weakness in C. elegans, via shock induction. We show that acutely or chronically exposing nematodes to docetaxel increases time to recovery from shock-induced seizure-like behaviors. Additionally, we find that sildenafil citrate, a PDE-5 inhibitor, and a novel bicyclic bridge compound, Resveramorph-3 (RVM-3), are both effective at rescuing the animals from prolonged seizure-like movement duration following acute and chronic exposure to docetaxel. The results demonstrate that sildenafil citrate and RVM-3 are potential candidates for mitigating the neurological deficits resulting from DIPNs.Falls represent the most frequent reason older people are admitted to hospital and significantly increase the likelihood of functional decline, healthcare utilisation and early mortality. The aim of this study is to comprehensively delineate the burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people in Ireland.
Population-representative analysis of Wave 6 of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) estimating incidence of falls requiring medical attention and emergency department (ED) attendance, fractures and fear of falling over 12 months. Additional data detailing falls-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) and prior falls were also analysed.
Using Central Statistics Office Census 2022, the population of older people in Ireland was multiplied by the proportion of TILDA participants with each outcome of interest to yield population-level estimates.
Population-representative sample of 2299 (55% female) community-dwelling people in Ireland aged ≥70 years.
Almost 12% (proportion 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.13)) of participants, corresponding to almost 62 000 older people in Ireland, reported a fall requiring medical attention in 12 months, with 6% (proportion 0.06 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.07)), or over 32 000 people, attending ED due to a fall. Over 3% (proportion 0.03 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.04)) reported sustaining a fracture. Almost half of participants reporting a fall requiring medical attention were prescribed FRIDs, and over half had also reported a fall when assessed at the prior wave of the study (ie, 2 years ago).
The burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people is considerable; 1 in 8 required medical attention for a fall and 1 in 16 attended the ED with falls over 12 months.
Currently, there is no national falls strategy in Ireland. These findings, alongside our ageing population, underscore the need for strengthened falls-prevention strategies to reduce avoidable morbidity and healthcare utilisation.
Infectious diseases are a major global health concern, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. To advance the understanding and treatment of these diseases, biobanks and biorepositories play a crucial role in guaranteeing sample traceability through their entire life cycle (collection, acquisition and registration, processing, storage, distribution) and future analysis of clinical and biological data.
The INfectious DIsease REgistry BIObank (INDI-REBIO) is an observational, prospective, monocentric, open-ended registry with ad hoc procedures and a systematic collection of uniform clinical, laboratory, imaging and therapeutic data of patients with suspected or microbiologically documented bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infectious diseases from the IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy). The study aims to collect both uniform data and biological samples such as blood and other relevant specimens. The registry aims to include significant patient numbers across various conditions (among others: bloodstream infections, endovascular infections as infective endocarditis, central nervous system infections, bone and joint infections, multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) colonisation, sexually transmitted infections, HIV infection, emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases), enabling comprehensive research on disease evolution, treatment outcomes and the identification of biomarkers.
The study adheres to ethical principles outlined by the Helsinki Declaration and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. It has received ethical approval (Comitato Etico CET Lombardia 1, CET 138–2023) and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06418048). Participants will provide informed consent and can withdraw at any time. The study results will be disseminated through major international conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed research journals.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06418048.
FreshRSS 