There are limited data about how South Asian (SA) patients, their caregivers and their physicians make decisions about treatment, in particular advanced therapies. The study aimed to explore how SA people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), their family members and clinicians experience and perceive treatment-related decision-making with the aim of identifying strategies to improve treatment decision-making in Canada.

A descriptive qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews.

Canada.

Adults residing in Canada, who self-identified as SA, had received treatment or cared for someone who received treatment for IBD from a gastroenterologist in Canada, and who spoke and understood English, Hindi and/or Punjabi were eligible to participate in the study. Clinician participants (eg, nurses, gastroenterologists, colorectal surgeons) were eligible if they had experience treating SA patients with IBD.

Data from 1:1, semi-structured interviews were analysed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

The length of time spent in Canada played a central role in patient perspectives on decision-making around IBD treatment. First or second-generation SA people, residency status, family and community involvement, universal factors like stigma, medication costs and preferences for non-pharmacological treatments influenced decision-making. Patient and caregiver participants reported high satisfaction with treatment-related decision-making processes, while clinician participants self-reported lesser satisfaction.

Clinicians and researchers working with SA patients in chronic disease specialties can use these findings to meet the healthcare needs and reduce disparities in optimal treatment for this patient population.

N/A.

In 2017, the Japan Diabetes Society and Japan Geriatrics Society published the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetes in older adults, marking a major shift in glycaemic management policy for older adults. The guidelines represented a transition from conventional, uniform targets, originally developed for the general adult population, to stratified glycaemic goals tailored to the complex care needs of older patients, including comorbidities and frailty. Although the 2017 guidelines aimed to promote individualised care and reduce adverse events such as severe hypoglycaemia, the real-world impact on patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures has not been evaluated at the national level.

A population-based interrupted time-series analysis will be conducted using data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims of Japan, which captures nearly all insured healthcare encounters nationwide. This study will include individuals aged ≥65 years with diabetes who received insurance healthcare services between April 2016 and June 2019. Outcomes will be evaluated across three domains: patient outcomes, clinical practice and healthcare expenditures. Specifically, these will include the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, acute coronary syndrome, hyperglycaemic emergencies such as diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, number of antidiabetic prescriptions and total healthcare expenditures. Primary analyses will use generalised linear mixed-effects models assuming Poisson or negative binomial distributions with adjustments for facility-level heterogeneity. Stratified analyses will be performed according to comorbidity burden, frailty status and receipt of relevant healthcare services. Sensitivity analysis will assess the robustness of the results using an alternative definition of severe hypoglycaemia.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology (No. 1752), and the need for informed consent was waived owing to the use of anonymised administrative data. These findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international academic conferences.

Older adults with cancer have ageing-related vulnerabilities that influence their treatment tolerance and decision-making. In our previous randomised controlled trial (MAPLE), integrating geriatric assessment (GA) with communication support using a question prompt list (QPL), delivered by trained intervention providers, facilitated patient–oncologist communication, increased implementation of GA-guided management (GAM) and improved patient outcomes. However, its widespread adoption has been limited by the need for trained personnel and dedicated time. To enhance scalability and sustainability, we developed a mobile application-based intervention to deliver GAM and communication support. This MAPLE2 study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the intervention using this mobile application-based GA and QPL among older adults with cancer.

This multicentre, open-label, pilot randomised controlled trial will be conducted at two academic hospitals in Japan. Patients aged≥70 years with solid cancer or lymphoma initiating or changing systemic therapy will undergo baseline GA. Patients with any GA impairment will be randomised to receive either (1) a mobile application-based intervention providing feedback of GA summary with tailored GAM recommendations and QPL or (2) usual care. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who complete all of the following interventions using the mobile application: (1) self-administered GA, (2) receipt of the tailored GAM recommendations and QPL and (3) confirmation that their oncologists review the tailored GAM recommendations and QPL at subsequent visits. Forty participants are planned to be enrolled.

The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center, Japan (approval number: 2025-089). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be presented at academic conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Recruitment has been initiated from 8 September 2025 and is planned to be completed by 31 August 2026, with a follow-up period by 31 August 2027.

UMIN000058887

To characterise patient and medication-related patterns observed in drug-related pressure ulcers (DRPUs) and provide descriptive findings that may support future consensus-building.

Multicentre retrospective observational study.

20 hospitals across Japan participated in the study with hospital pharmacists specialised in PU care.

A total of 1113 hospitalised patients with existing PUs were included and classified into three groups (definite, probable and no-possibility of DRPUs) based on predefined criteria.

The primary outcome was the description of medication-related characteristics observed in each DRPU classification group, including polypharmacy, initiation of new medications and dose adjustments. Secondary outcomes included differences in ulcer characteristics and functional status across DRPU categories.

The definite group (n=128, 11.5%) showed a significantly higher prevalence of polypharmacy (83.6% vs 71.1% in the no-possibility group, p

Medication-related characteristics such as polypharmacy, initiation of new medications, dose modifications and use of antipsychotics were more frequently observed in the definite DRPU group. These descriptive findings may help characterise the clinical patterns of DRPUs and may inform future hypothesis generation.

Excessive opioid prescribing after surgery can lead to adverse events and exacerbate the opioid crisis. Patients undergoing outpatient breast surgery are often prescribed opioids to manage pain at home; however, the value of this approach is uncertain. The Postoperative Analgesia Intervention with Non-opioid Alternatives (PAIN Alt) trial will address the following research question: among patients undergoing outpatient breast surgery, does opioid-free analgesia (OFA) result in non-inferior 7-day pain intensity and pain interference in comparison to opioid analgesia (OA)?

This is a parallel, assessor-blind, open-label randomised trial conducted at seven university-affiliated hospitals in Canada. A sample of 540 adult patients (>18 years) undergoing outpatient mastectomy or lumpectomy will be included. Participants are allocated 1:1 to receive OA (around-the-clock non-opioids and opioids for breakthrough pain) or OFA (around-the-clock non-opioids, with adjustment of non-opioid drugs and/or non-pharmacological interventions for breakthrough pain). The co-primary outcomes are 7-day pain intensity and pain interference (measured using the Brief Pain Inventory). Secondary outcomes include adverse drug events, physical and mental health status, satisfaction with pain management, postoperative complications, chronic pain, opioid misuse, persistent opioid use, healthcare utilisation and costs. The primary statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle and be conducted using mixed-effects modelling.

This trial is coordinated by the McGill University Health Centre (ethics approval MP-37-2024-102530), with ethics approval being sought at all participating sites. Our results will be published in an open-access, peer-reviewed journal, presented at relevant conferences and disseminated to the public through press releases.

NCT06507345.

Bangladesh is highly prone to recurrent flooding that disrupts all four pillars of food security. This study aimed to explore the effect of household food insecurity on the underweight status of women in flood-affected areas of Bangladesh, which remains underexplored.

This is a cross-sectional analysis.

This study was conducted in eight sub-districts (upazilas) across eight districts in Bangladesh that experience severe to moderate river flooding, flash floods and substantial tidal surges.

A total of 532 women participated in the study. The inclusion criteria for participation were as follows: (1) being at least 18 years of age, (2) residing in the household for at least 1 year and (3) having experienced limited food access in the 4 weeks before data collection due to flood-related constraints.

Household food insecurity was measured using the U.S. Agency for International Development Household Food Insecurity Access Scale questionnaire. An underweight status was evaluated through anthropometric measurements of women. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were estimated using robust log-linear models.

Moderate food insecurity was the most common (58.3%) among the participants. The prevalence of underweight was the highest (52.1%) in the severely food-insecure group and decreased significantly with improved food security. Severe household food insecurity was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of underweight individuals (aPR = 4.12; 95% CI, 1.60 to 10.60). An underweight status was also prevalent in women from moderately food-insecure households (aPR = 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.55).

This study reveals a significant association between household food insecurity and underweight status, highlighting the major challenges faced by women living in flood-prone areas of Bangladesh. These findings emphasise the urgent need to address household food insecurity to improve nutritional outcomes for women in vulnerable communities.