Hyperkalaemia (HK) is common in the emergency department (ED) and can cause life-threatening arrhythmias. Patiromer is a potassium binder whose role in acute HK management is uncertain; therefore, we investigated the efficacy and safety of patiromer as an adjunct to the standard of care treatment of HK in the ED.

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

16 ED sites across the USA.

Patients aged ≥18 years treated at a participating ED who were found to have serum potassium ≥5.8 mEq/L.

Participants were randomised 1:1 to standard combination therapy (25 g intravenous dextrose, 5 units intravenous insulin and 10 mg albuterol) with either patiromer or placebo. The initial dose was given within 1 hour of the potassium result, and the second dose 24 hours later.

The primary endpoint was net clinical benefit (NCB) at 6 hours, defined as the change in number of potassium-lowering interventions minus change in serum potassium. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.

The study was terminated early and did not reach the prespecified sample size. Overall, 111 patients (53 patiromer and 58 placebo) were analysed. Mean (SD) age was 61.34 (15.21) years, 34% were female, 48% white and 22.5% received chronic haemodialysis. Mean baseline potassium was 6.5 mmol/L. NCB at 6 hours was similar between patiromer and placebo (–0.6 vs –0.4; p=0.44). Potassium levels at 2, 4 and 6 hours were similar between the groups (5.50 vs 5.70, 5.45 vs 5.65, 5.50 vs 5.60; patiromer and placebo (all p>0.05)). The number of interventions per patient was similar (p>0.05) between groups at each time point. The proportion of patients experiencing AEs was not significant between the patiromer and placebo groups (16.98% vs 32.76%; p=0.08).

No differences in efficacy were reported in this study, which was underpowered to detect statistical efficacy of patiromer over placebo.

NCT04443608.

Involuntary sterilisation, the non-consensual medical control of an individual’s fertility, is recognised by the WHO, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and UN Women as a serious human rights violation and form of gender-based violence. Survivors of involuntary sterilisation who can prove they were sterilised in their countries of origin have a legal path to asylum in the USA. This study aims to describe the experiences of women seeking asylum in the USA who were subjected to involuntary sterilisation in their countries of origin.

Semistructured, first-person interviews.

A New York City-based medical human rights programme.

14 adult women who experienced involuntary sterilisation at an average age of 27 years old in their countries of origin (79% from Honduras, 14% from Guatemala, 7% from Mexico) before applying for protected immigration status in the USA.

Inductive qualitative analysis identified common themes across participants including shared experiences of discrimination due to race/ethnicity, exposure to lifelong violence in women’s home countries, involuntary sterilisation during antepartum and intrapartum care, lack of informed consent, psychological symptoms, delayed discovery, an appreciation for more responsive healthcare in the USA and a desire to have additional children. Of note, only 43% of participants were aware that they had been sterilised and were therefore eligible for asylum when they entered the USA. 71% of participants had been granted protected status in the USA at the time of interview; 29% were engaged in the asylum process.

The results of the study can inform clinicians about the impact of involuntary sterilisation, heighten awareness of this violation in the context of gender-based violence as a nexus for asylum and advance advocacy in healthcare and policy. Results suggest women would benefit from more comprehensive screening for involuntary sterilisation before and during the asylum process, as well as culturally-responsive and trauma-informed support.

Falls represent the most frequent reason older people are admitted to hospital and significantly increase the likelihood of functional decline, healthcare utilisation and early mortality. The aim of this study is to comprehensively delineate the burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people in Ireland.

Population-representative analysis of Wave 6 of the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) estimating incidence of falls requiring medical attention and emergency department (ED) attendance, fractures and fear of falling over 12 months. Additional data detailing falls-risk increasing drugs (FRIDs) and prior falls were also analysed.

Using Central Statistics Office Census 2022, the population of older people in Ireland was multiplied by the proportion of TILDA participants with each outcome of interest to yield population-level estimates.

Population-representative sample of 2299 (55% female) community-dwelling people in Ireland aged ≥70 years.

Almost 12% (proportion 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.13)) of participants, corresponding to almost 62 000 older people in Ireland, reported a fall requiring medical attention in 12 months, with 6% (proportion 0.06 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.07)), or over 32 000 people, attending ED due to a fall. Over 3% (proportion 0.03 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.04)) reported sustaining a fracture. Almost half of participants reporting a fall requiring medical attention were prescribed FRIDs, and over half had also reported a fall when assessed at the prior wave of the study (ie, 2 years ago).

The burden of falls amongst community-dwelling older people is considerable; 1 in 8 required medical attention for a fall and 1 in 16 attended the ED with falls over 12 months.

Currently, there is no national falls strategy in Ireland. These findings, alongside our ageing population, underscore the need for strengthened falls-prevention strategies to reduce avoidable morbidity and healthcare utilisation.

Few artificial intelligence (AI) clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) are ever evaluated in practice. Although some signal of clinical effectiveness may be needed to justify AI deployment and testing, such data are typically unavailable in early-stage research. This conundrum is especially relevant in the intensive care unit (ICU), where conditions like sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) require high-stakes decisions. Our group developed the AI ventilator assistant (AVA), a novel AI CDSS for patients with sepsis ARDS receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. But the promising results of predictive performance estimates are not sufficient to assess AVA’s clinical safety and appropriateness prior to future evaluation and deployment. Therefore, we propose a Clinician Turing Test as a novel validation approach to determine whether clinicians can distinguish AVA-generated treatment recommendations from those enacted by real human clinicians. If AVA’s recommendations are consistently indistinguishable from those of real clinicians, thereby ‘passing’ this Turing test, this would provide a strong preclinical signal of safety and appropriateness.

This multisite, randomised, electronic, vignette-based Phase 1b study will use a Clinician Turing Test design. We aim to recruit 350 critical care clinicians, including physicians and advanced practice providers from six US hospitals. Participants will review nine clinical vignettes of patients with sepsis and ARDS derived from the Molecular Epidemiology of Severe Sepsis in the ICU cohort and an associated profile of a suggested treatment plan. For each participant–vignette combination, the source of the treatment profile will be randomly assigned (AI-generated by AVA vs the actually enacted treatment from real human clinicians) in a 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint is the participants’ accuracy in identifying whether a treatment profile was AI-generated or human-generated, assessed using equivalence testing through a mixed-effects logistic regression model with random effects for participants and vignettes. Secondarily, a fitted binary classifier will assess discrimination ability using the C-statistic. Secondary endpoints include clinicians’ perceptions of the safety and appropriateness of the treatment profiles, confidence in distinguishing AI-generated and human-generated recommendations, interest in AI CDSSs for sepsis and ventilator management and the time to complete the survey. This novel Phase 1b design provides preliminary but essential information about an AI CDSS’s clinical appropriateness without the risk or cost of actual deployment, thereby informing decisions about future clinical implementation and evaluation in real clinical environments.

This protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Pennsylvania (Protocol #858201). Results are expected in 2026 and will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.

NCT07025096.

The ‘time-limited trial’ for patients with critical illness is a collaborative plan made by clinicians, patients and families to use life-sustaining therapies for a defined duration. After this period, the patient’s response to therapy informs decisions about continuing recovery-focused care or transitioning to comfort-focused care. The promise of time-limited trials to help navigate the uncertain limits and benefits of life-sustaining therapies has been extensively discussed in the palliative and critical care literature, leading to their dissemination into clinical practice. However, we have little evidence to guide clinicians in how to conduct time-limited trials, leading to substantial variation in how and why they are currently used. The overall purpose of this study is to characterise the features of an optimal time-limited trial through a rich understanding of how they are currently shaping critical care delivery.

We are conducting an observational, multicentre, focused ethnography of time-limited trials in patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in six intensive care units (ICUs) within five hospitals across the US. Study participants include patients, their surrogate decision makers and ICU clinicians. We are pursuing two complementary analyses of this rich data set using the open-ended, inductive approach of constructivist grounded theory and, in parallel, the structured, deductive methods of systems engineering. This cross-disciplinary, tailored approach intentionally preserves the tension between time-limited trials’ conceptual formulation and their heterogeneous, real-world use.

This study has been reviewed and approved by the University of Wisconsin Institutional Review Board (IRB) as the single IRB (ID: 2022-1681; initial approval date 23 January 2023). Our findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations, and summaries for the public.

NCT06042621.

Older age is one of the greatest risk factors of dementia, and the rural demographic is ageing in Canada. Compared with their urban counterparts, rural older adults often face unique challenges in accessing cognitive healthcare, which is exacerbated by a shortage of healthcare specialists, public transportation, finances, education, services and dispersed geography. This scoping review protocol outlines the methodology that will be used to examine the literature about the care priorities, service needs and lived experiences from the perspectives of rural older adults living with cognitive impairment and dementia in Canada.

Our scoping review protocol will follow the guidance of Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extensions for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search strategy will identify relevant peer-reviewed literature in databases including Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The database search dates for this scoping review will be from 1 January 2015 to 1 January 2025. The data will be charted by two reviewers using a standardised data extraction table. Inductive content analysis will be performed using a three-step process.

Given this scoping review will be an examination of the published literature, human subjects will not be included in this research. Therefore, ethics approval is not required. Knowledge mobilisation and dissemination strategies will include peer-reviewed journal articles, conference presentations, community workshops, newsletter articles and webinars. This study may provide valuable information for healthcare practitioners, community leaders and policymakers working to support people living with cognitive impairment and dementia in rural communities.

The Quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Evaluation Study with Addition of the Nonavalent Vaccine Study (QUEST-ADVANCE) aims to provide insight into the long-term immunogenicity and effectiveness of one, two and three HPV vaccine doses. Here, we describe the protocol for QUEST-ADVANCE.

QUEST-ADVANCE is an observational cohort study including males and females who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine in British Columbia, Canada. Female participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1–3 doses of the quadrivalent or nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited approximately 5 or 12 years postvaccination eligibility. Male participants who are unvaccinated or vaccinated with 1 or 2 doses of the nonavalent HPV vaccine at 9–14 years of age will be recruited at approximately 5 years postvaccination eligibility. The study involves a maximum of four visits over a period of 4–5 years for female participants, and two visits over a 12-month period for male participants. At each visit, self-collected swabs (cervico-vaginal or penile) and questionnaire data will be collected. In each study group, a subset of participants will be invited to participate in a substudy evaluating the long-term humoral immunogenicity of the HPV vaccine. Additional blood samples will be collected from participants who are part of the immunogenicity substudy. The total required sample size is 7180 individuals. The primary objectives are (1) to examine vaccine effectiveness in males and females against prevalent genital HPV infections for one, two and three doses of the HPV vaccine compared with unvaccinated participants and (2) to evaluate if there is non-inferior immunogenicity as indicated by type-specific antibody response of one dose of the HPV vaccine in 20–27-year-old females vaccinated at 9–14 years of age compared with historical data of three doses of the HPV vaccine females vaccinated at 16–26 years of age up to 12 years postvaccination.

QUEST-ADVANCE was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia/Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British Columbia (H20-02111). Individual electronic informed consent or assent will be obtained from each participant before any study-specific procedures are undertaken. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and on the study website.

Despite global efforts, gender disparities in oncology may persist. Understanding these disparities within the context of major conferences can inform strategies to promote gender inclusiveness in the field. This study evaluates the participation of women and men at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2024 congress, focusing on chairs, speakers and audience questioners.

Observational study.

152 recorded sessions of the ASCO 2024 annual meeting, one of the largest conferences in the field of oncology, available on the ASCO website.

Individuals serving as chairs, speakers and audience members who asked questions.

In this observational study, gender for chairs, speakers and audience questioners across 152 sessions of the ASCO 2024 congress was assessed by two independent reviewers using audio and video recordings. Speaking times for questions and responses were also evaluated. Statistical analyses, including ² and unpaired t-tests, were conducted to analyse the data.

Women were well represented as chairs (n=124) and speakers (n=402) in 66% and 95% of sessions, respectively. However, only 21% of questions from the audience were posed by women, while 37% of questions were asked by men and 42% online or by chairs/speakers. Women were more likely to pose questions when the sessions were chaired by women (71% vs 53%; p=0.047). There were no statistically significant gender disparities concerning speaking time (questions: p=0.30; responses: 0.53). The response dynamics indicated a pattern of gender homogeneity, with individuals more frequently responding to questions from their own gender.

While the balanced representation of women in leadership roles at the ASCO 2024 congress reflects positive development in gender equality, disparities in active participation persist. These findings underscore the need for strategies that not only promote women in visible roles but also foster an environment that supports their active engagement in scientific discussions.

To describe the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) at the time of diagnosis of adult-onset type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes, in a recent cohort and compare to a previous cohort from the same region. Further, to explore factors influencing the prevalence of pre-existing CVD, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and C-peptide; in the later cohort also heart failure, hyperlipidaemia, tobacco use and physical activity.

Two prospective cross-sectional cohort studies compared.

All primary health care centres and hospitals in Kalmar and Kronoberg counties in Southeastern Sweden.

Adults with newly diagnosed T1D or T2D (classified by combination of islet antibodies and C-peptide) in 1998–2001 and 2016–2017.

Prevalence of hypertension and CVD at diagnosis of diabetes, and associations with beta-cell function, in two cohorts collected 15 years apart. Further, to explore factors influencing the prevalence of hypertension and CVD, and level of C-peptide.

In patients with newly diagnosed T2D, mean age-at-onset had decreased (66±14.1 years vs 63±12.6, p≤0.001) and mean BMI had increased (29.0±5.4 vs 31.4±5.8 kg/m², p≤0.001). Prevalence of pre-existing myocardial infarction had decreased in both T1D (18% vs 7%, p=0.03) and T2D (25% vs 11%, p≤0.001). Pre-existing hypertension had increased in both T1D (23% vs 40%, p=0.01) and T2D (44% vs 61%, p≤0.001). C-peptide level was lower and was associated with several cardiovascular conditions in newly diagnosed T2D in 2016–2017 (p=0.048 p≤0.001).

Patients with newly diagnosed T2D were younger, with higher BMI, compared with 15 years earlier, a challenge for diabetes care. Prevalence of pre-existing myocardial infarction had decreased notably, in line with, but still less than in the general population; while pre-existing hypertension had increased, in both diabetes types. C-peptide was associated with several cardiovascular conditions in newly diagnosed T2D in the recent cohort, which warrants further investigation.