Conectar
Transgender and gender-diverse individuals often face significant barriers to accessing gender-affirming care, such as hormones and/or surgery, leading to poorer mental health, lower quality of life, and higher rates of substance use and suicidal ideation. Vaginoplasty, the most commonly sought genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), is desired by over half of all trans women but has been performed in only a minority. This is due largely to limited surgeon availability and long wait times. Peer support has been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce stigma in marginalised populations, including trans communities, but has never been studied for efficacy during the perioperative period of GGAS. Building on priorities identified by multi-stakeholder engagement from the Transgender & Non-Binary Surgery Allied Research Collective, the Support for Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals Seeking Vaginoplasty (STRIVE) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a centralised peer support and education intervention for patients seeking vaginoplasty, addressing a critical gap in perioperative care.
The STRIVE Study is a pragmatic, multi-site randomised controlled trial enrolling trans adults seeking full depth vaginoplasty. Participants are randomised to one of two arms; enhanced usual care, or a facilitated group intervention. The primary outcome is coping self-efficacy at 6 months, with a secondary outcome of surgical readiness. Primary analysis uses an intention-to-treat approach with linear mixed effects modelling, adjusting for selected baseline values and site. The feasibility evaluation data collected via qualitative interviews will be analysed thematically.
Approvals were granted by the primary site’s Institutional Review Board on 10 May 2024 (STUDY00026957). The trial was registered on 24 May 2024. Results will be published in open access journals and made available to community members in plain language formats.
Pressure injuries present significant challenges in clinical care, leading to severe complications such as infection, pain and delayed wound healing. They are a common chronic wound that contribute to increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays and substantial healthcare costs. Despite national efforts to enhance chronic wound management, development of optimal treatment strategies remains a priority. The Pressure Injury Treatment Advisory (PITA) Quick Guide was developed to provide an evidence-based guide to support clinicians in pressure injury management. A survey was conducted to evaluate clinician perspectives on the usability and practicality of the Guide in acute care, residential aged care and community settings. A post-test survey was conducted on a convenience sample of healthcare professionals from three healthcare settings across metropolitan, regional and rural Australia. The survey included 5-point Likert-scale items assessing ease of use, effectiveness and integration with workflows. Three hundred and two responses were received (66.7% response rate). Clinicians expressed overwhelmingly positive perceptions, with over 95% agreeing or strongly agreeing on the guide's utility and effectiveness. No respondents strongly disagreed with any item. Residential aged care and rural clinicians rated the tool slightly higher than acute care and medical clinicians. The PITA Quick Guide was well-received across all settings, demonstrating strong potential to enhance evidence-based pressure injury management.
by Michelle Lauge Quaade, Mikael Leijon, Mikhayil Hakhverdyan, Thomas Bruun Rasmussen, Charlotte Kristiane Hjulsager, Lars Andresen, Karin Mundbjerg, Anne Sofie Vedsted Hammer
Diarrhea outbreaks significantly affect the health and growth of farmed mink, posing economic and welfare challenges. While various pathogens have been linked to mink diarrhea, the causes during the weaning period remain unclear. Sporadic associations of mink coronavirus (MCoV), Campylobacter, and gastrointestinal disease in mink have been suggested. This study investigates the occurrence and levels of MCoV and Campylobacter in fecal samples from Danish farm mink (Neogale vison) and their potential association with post-weaning anorexia diarrhea syndrome (PADS), growth-period diarrhea (GPD), or pre-weaning diarrhea (PWD). The focus of the study is on PADS, studied through two case-control setups where case farms had known problems with PADS and control farms without such problems. Animals were also diagnosed based on necropsy pathological findings. Seventeen MCoV genomes were determined from five Danish farms. This data facilitated the development of an MCoV RT-qPCR and was applied across three study groups. Results showed high prevalence of both MCoV and Campylobacter spp. in all groups. No link was found between MCoV presence or levels and PADS diagnosis on the individual level; however, farm-level analysis revealed that MCoV was 2.35 times more likely (95% CI 1.027; 5.056) on PADS case farms than controls. Mink with PWD exhibited higher MCoV levels compared to GPD cases, suggesting a role at this developmental stage. Phylogenetic analysis revealed diverse and farm-specific MCoV strains, with sequences from healthy controls forming a distinct subclade, hinting at strain-specific pathogenicity. Campylobacter spp. presence was not significantly associated with PADS, but higher levels were observed in mink with PADS versus those without (not tested for PWD). These findings highlight the importance of surveillance and rigorous hygiene practices on mink farms to address risks from MCoV and Campylobacter spp., calling for further research to clarify their roles in PADS and overall mink health.To explore parents' experiences of holding children for healthcare procedures in an Australian paediatric hospital setting.
A qualitative exploratory study was undertaken at a paediatric tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with parents of children who had undergone a procedure during their hospital admission. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Eight parents were interviewed, with four themes becoming apparent from their experiences, representing the multiple roles parents undertook when holding their child for a procedure. Parent as a protector was identified as the overarching role, with all roles involving aspects of parents protecting their child. The remaining roles included comforter—where parents supported their child by providing reassurance and being present; helper—where parents actively sought a role or stepped up to assist during a procedure and enforcer—where at times parents had a belief that to facilitate some procedures holding was necessary. A sliding-scale schema illustrates that these roles are not static, but rather positioned along a continuum, with some parents moving between roles throughout a procedure.
This study provided valuable insight into the complexity of parents' involvement when supporting their child during a procedure. The varying roles suggest parents balance the desire for their child to feel safe (holding as a comforter) with wanting to get the procedure done (holding as an enforcer).
This research impacts clinicians, parents and children involved in healthcare procedures. Clinicians can use the sliding-scale schema that illustrates the distinct roles parents can take on, as a visual tool to promote parental involvement and help parents define their role during a procedure.
Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guideline was utilised when reporting findings.
No patient or public contribution.
This study validates the previously tested Screening for Poverty And Related social determinants to improve Knowledge of and access to resources (‘SPARK Tool’) against comparison questions from well-established national surveys (Post Survey Questionnaire (PSQ)) to inform the development of a standardised tool to collect patients’ demographic and social needs data in healthcare.
Cross-sectional study.
Pan-Canadian study of participants from four Canadian provinces (SK, MB, ON and NL).
192 participants were interviewed concurrently, completing both the SPARK tool and PSQ survey.
Survey topics included demographics: language, immigration, race, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation; and social needs: education, income, medication access, transportation, housing, social support and employment status. Concurrent validity was performed to assess agreement and correlation between SPARK and comparison questions at an individual level as well as within domain clusters. We report on Cohen’s kappa measure of inter-rater reliability, Pearson correlation coefficient and Cramer’s V to assess overall capture of needs in the SPARK and PSQ as well as within each domain. Agreement between the surveys was described using correct (true positive and true negative) and incorrect (false positive and false negative) classification.
There was a moderate correlation between SPARK and PSQ (0.44, p60), SPARK correctly classified 90.5% (n=176/191).
SPARK provides a brief 15 min screening tool for primary care clinics to capture social and access needs. SPARK was able to correctly classify most participants within each domain. Related ongoing research is needed to further validate SPARK in a large representative sample and explore primary care implementation strategies to support integration.
FreshRSS 