Sympathetic activation is the hallmark of cardiac disease, driving disease progression and triggering ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Despite optimal medical therapy, many patients experience recurrent VAs refractory to medical therapy, leading to repetitive implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, worse quality of life and adverse outcomes. Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) through surgical removal of the stellate ganglia is an effective treatment for refractory VAs but carries a high complication rate. We hypothesise that high precision image guided radiotherapy can be used to target the stellate ganglia to achieve CSD non-invasively.

RADIO-STAR (hypofractionated radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia for ventricular arrhythmia) is a first-in-human, phase 1 safety and dose finding study of radiotherapy to the stellate ganglia in patients with recurrent VAs. Patients with structural heart disease requiring recurrent ICD therapy for VAs are invited to undergo radiotherapy bilaterally to their stellate ganglia with a predetermined sample size of n=13. Radiotherapy dose will be determined by a prespecified dose escalation protocol. The primary outcome is safety defined as any treatment-related grade 3–5 toxicity occurring within 6 months of radiotherapy treatment, as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events or any treatment-related side effects detected on patient symptom questionnaires and clinical examination during study visits. Secondary outcome measures to evaluate feasibility and efficacy include ability to safely deliver radiotherapy and consequent changes in circulating catecholamines and neuropeptide-Y, heart rate variability, structural changes in the stellate ganglia on MRI imaging and ICD therapy burden.

This study has received ethical approval by the South Central—Oxford B Research Ethics Committee (REC/SC/0005). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and/or international scientific conferences.

ISRCTN49861434.

Falls are a critical problem for older people, including those from ethnically diverse communities, who are under-represented in research. The aim of this pilot trial is to evaluate (1) the implementability of a co-designed intervention developed to support the sustained uptake of tailored exercise to reduce falls (MOVE Together: Reduce Falls) and (2) the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in older people from Italian, Arabic, Cantonese or Mandarin-speaking communities.

Investigator and assessor-blinded pilot two-arm parallel RCT. 60 older people at risk of falls from Italian, Arabic, Cantonese or Mandarin speaking communities will be recruited, with the option to enrol on their own or with another participant (dyad). Participants or dyads will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control arm. The experimental arm will receive MOVE Together: Reduce Falls, which provides up to 12 sessions with a physiotherapist over 12 months and supports participants to engage in individualised exercises. Both arms will receive educational resources in the participant’s preferred language. The primary outcome is implementability of the co-designed intervention, MOVE Together: Reduce Falls; operationalised as fidelity (>70% of intended sessions delivered), feasibility (> 95% of sessions delivered with no serious adverse events related or likely related to the intervention) and acceptability (>50% acceptability score). The secondary outcome is feasibility of the RCT protocol, which will be evaluated quantitatively (eg, recruitment and retention rates, completion of clinical outcome data including prospective collection of falls data for 12 months via falls calendars) and qualitatively (eg, barriers and enablers to data collection).

Ethical approval has been granted for this study (HREC/106010/MH-2024). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and community forums.

ACTRN12624000658516.

Hospital falls persist as a major threat to patient safety. This study aimed to develop an interprofessional reference standard to prevent, manage and report hospital falls.

A Delphi consensus methodology, informed by the Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies guideline, was used to design the reference standard. An interprofessional expert panel (n=47) of health professionals, researchers, policymakers and consumers participated in three Delphi rounds. Following the review of clinical guidelines, an e-Delphi survey was developed and piloted to derive 60 initial items for the standard. Two iterative rounds of e-Delphi surveys were distributed via Research Electronic Data Capture and included free-text questions and 9-point Likert scales. An online consensus meeting followed, to ratify the final standard.

In the first Delphi round, there was over 80% agreement for 44/60 items to be included in the reference standard. This increased to 48/60 items in Round 2. At the final consensus meeting, 12 items still did not reach consensus for inclusion and one was added, yielding 49 items. Items that replicated text according to falls with injury/without injury were combined, resulting in 42 items in the final reference standard. Agreed items included: (1) brief screening of falls risk on hospital admission; (2) comprehensive falls assessment for inpatients who are older, frailer or have complex conditions; (3) single interventions (such as environmental adaptations and exercise); (4) multifactorial interventions; (5) education of patients, families and staff; (6) optimising local falls hospital policies, procedures and leadership capability; (7) optimising documentation and reporting; (8) improving accreditation processes; (9) workforce redesign to augment falls education. Items that did not reach agreement (n=12) pertained to alarms, bed rails, grip socks, artificial intelligence, volunteers and care bundles.

This new reference standard provides a checklist for staff, patients, managers and policymakers to reduce unwanted variations in prevention, management and reporting of hospital falls.

ANZCTR 386960

Identifying anxiety disorders in autistic youth can be challenging due to the unique presentation of anxiety symptoms in autistic youth and the difficulties youth may have reporting on their own anxiety symptoms. These challenges underscore the need for objective and reliable measures. Understanding whether autonomic activity is associated with the presence of anxiety may lead to its use as an objective anxiety assessment tool in individuals who may otherwise struggle to communicate their feelings of anxiety. Most published studies examining autonomic activity and anxiety in autistic individuals lack information regarding racial demographic information, and those that do are predominantly composed of White individuals. These findings highlight the critical need for future research that includes more diverse samples and uses consistent, ecologically valid methods to examine the relation between anxiety and autonomic activity in autistic populations. This study aims to recruit a large sample of racially diverse adolescents to evaluate whether atypical autonomic activity serves as a biomarker of anxiety in autistic and non-autistic youth. This manuscript outlines the recruitment strategies for this study protocol, providing a framework for understanding the interplay between physiological, psychological and contextual factors including self-identified race in anxiety among autistic and non-autistic adolescents.

Autistic (n=80) and non-autistic (n=80) adolescents aged 11–14 years and their caregivers will be invited to participate in the current study. Autism diagnosis will be confirmed by gold-standard assessments. All participants will complete an in-person visit assessing their child’s cognitive abilities and trait-level anxiety and mental health symptoms, learn how to wear a non-invasive heart rate band that will collect ECG and respiration data, complete a 5-minute in-lab baseline of autonomic activity and enroll in experience sampling. Next, participants will complete three 5-minute baselines of autonomic activity at home, followed by 5 days of wearing the heart rate band for 5 hours per day, overlapping with ecological momentary assessment of their mood. Primary outcome measures include trait-level parent and self-reports of anxiety, real-time self-reports of anxiety captured through ecological momentary assessment, and both baseline and in-the-moment heart rate variability.

The study protocol has been approved by the University of Maryland’s Institutional Review Board. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences. Deidentified data from participants who consent to have their data shared with other researchers will be uploaded to the National Data Archive Collection C5316.

To describe the available literature on the epidemiology and factors associated with osteoporosis, falls and fractures in four chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD): rheumatoid arthritis (RA); psoriatic arthritis (PsA); ankylosing spondylitis (AS); and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Scoping review, using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework.

MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL from January 2000 to December 2023.

Observational studies reporting on the epidemiology and/or associated factors for osteoporosis, falls and fractures in RA, PsA, AS or SLE.

Two independent reviewers used a standard data extraction form including report methods, definitions, outcomes and associated factors. Results are summarised with descriptive statistics.

288 studies met inclusion criteria, with 170 studies on RA, 19 on PsA, 49 on AS and 60 on SLE. Most studies were cross-sectional, with Europe and Asia having the greatest output. Most papers reported on osteoporosis and fractures as outcomes, with only 27 reporting falls, of which 24 were in RA. Participants’ demographics and disease-related parameters were the most frequently explored potential associated factors.

RA was the most well-studied CIRD with regard to the epidemiology and associated factors for osteoporosis, fractures and falls. Cross-sectional was the most common study design, with a higher proportion of cohort studies in RA. There is a paucity of studies assessing falls in CIRDs other than RA. Future observational research should be conducted with large prospective CIRD cohorts, with falls as an outcome and associated factor for fractures. This may enable better understanding of the risk and consequences of osteoporosis, fractures and falls, which may improve preventive care.