FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Risk of cataract in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective cohort study in Taiwan

Por: Liu · D.-Y. · Chung · C. · Wang · Y.-T. · Lee · H.-M. · Cheng · T.-A. · Lin · C.-A. · Su · Y.-C. · Yao · P.-T. · Shen · T.-C. · Lin · H.-J. · Tsai · F.-J.
Objectives

To investigate whether systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) increases the risk of cataract development and to evaluate the impact of corticosteroid use and dosage on this risk.

Design

Nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Using Taiwan’s National Health Insurance (NHI) database, which covers over 99.9% of the population.

Participants

The SLE cohort included 30 501 newly diagnosed adults from 2011 to 2020. For each patient with SLE, four individuals without SLE were selected from the NHI database using frequency matching by age (in 5 year intervals), gender and index year of diagnosis, resulting in a comparison cohort of 122 004 individuals.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

The primary outcome was incident cataract. Secondary outcomes included risk stratification by age, sex, comorbidities and corticosteroid dose.

Results

SLE patients had a higher incidence of cataracts than non-SLE individuals (adjusted HR (aHR) = 1.73, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.81). Stratified analyses showed elevated risks in women (aHR=1.74, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.83), men (aHR=1.68, 95% CI 1.52 to 1.86), and across age groups 20–49 years (aHR=2.32, 95% CI 2.11 to 2.56), 50–64 years (aHR=1.60, 95% CI 1.51 to 1.69), and ≥65 years (aHR=1.50, 95% CI 1.36 to 1.66). Analysis of corticosteroid exposure revealed that cumulative dose showed a trend towards increased risk at high exposure (adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.14, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.31), while average daily dose demonstrated a dose–response effect: 1–5 mg/day (aOR=1.31, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.52) and ≥5 mg/day (OR=2.48, 95% CI 2.16 to 2.86).

Conclusions

Adults with SLE have an increased risk of developing cataracts compared with matched controls, and higher average daily corticosteroid doses are associated with this risk. These findings highlight the need for careful monitoring of ocular complications in SLE patients.

Effect of acupoint stimulation after caesarean section: a protocol for systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Por: Xiong · F.-j. · Zhao · W. · Jia · S.-j. · Song · K. · Lei · X.-h. · Jia · W.-n. · Chen · L.-m. · Nie · H.-m.
Introduction

Although caesarean sections (CSs) are essential for the management of obstructed labour and other obstetric complications, postoperative pain, delayed recovery and complication risks continue to be significant challenges in perioperative management. Improvements in traditional medications and surgical techniques have helped, yet issues, including medication side effects and extended recovery times, persist. Therefore, it is particularly important to seek non-pharmacological interventions, such as acupoint stimulation, to optimise the perioperative management of CS. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to synthesise the available evidence and assess the effect of acupoint stimulation in the perioperative period of CS.

Methods and analysis

We plan to search PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, from their inception to August 2025. Primary outcome indicators will include pain, time to first defecation, time to first bowel movement and time to return of bowel sounds. Secondary outcome indicators will include postoperative complications, such as nausea and vomiting, bloating, anxiety and depression, as well as length of hospital stay and morphine consumption. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses will be used to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results. Trial sequential analysis will be introduced to enhance the reliability of the evidence.

Ethics and dissemination

No ethical approval is required as this study synthesises the existing published data. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Any protocol amendments will be documented in PROSPERO and detailed in the final publication.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024558572.

❌