FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Effectiveness of exoskeleton training on turning-while-walking and balance control in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: protocol for a randomised clinical trial

Por: Chen · M. · Chan · C. W.-n. · Wang · P. Y. · Tsang · W. W.-n.
Introduction

Individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) often experience impaired balance control and turning-while-walking ability, which increase the risk of falls and limit their community mobility. While overground exoskeleton training has shown promise in improving gait and balance, evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on ambulation of individuals with iSCI remains limited. This protocol outlines a cluster RCT investigating the effectiveness of overground exoskeleton-assisted gait training compared with conventional training and usual care in improving turning-while-walking performence, balance control, and functional mobility in individuals with iSCI.

Methods and analysis

This multicentre, cluster RCT will compare 12-week interventions across three groups: (1) overground exoskeleton training group, (2) conventional training group and (3) usual care group. Participants with ambulatory iSCI will be recruited from three centres in Hong Kong SAR and mainland China. Primary outcomes include turning duration and number of steps during a 2-m turning-while-walking test. Secondary outcomes include static and dynamic balance, sensorimotor integration, gait performance, muscle strength, spasticity, quality of life, self-efficacy and fall incidence. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention, postintervention and at the 1-month follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination

This study has received approval from the Research Ethics Committees of Hong Kong Metropolitan University, the Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, and Changzhou Sunshine Rehabilitation Hospital. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrolment. Study findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries available to participants upon request.

Trial registration number

NCT06971510.

Effect of acupoint stimulation after caesarean section: a protocol for systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Por: Xiong · F.-j. · Zhao · W. · Jia · S.-j. · Song · K. · Lei · X.-h. · Jia · W.-n. · Chen · L.-m. · Nie · H.-m.
Introduction

Although caesarean sections (CSs) are essential for the management of obstructed labour and other obstetric complications, postoperative pain, delayed recovery and complication risks continue to be significant challenges in perioperative management. Improvements in traditional medications and surgical techniques have helped, yet issues, including medication side effects and extended recovery times, persist. Therefore, it is particularly important to seek non-pharmacological interventions, such as acupoint stimulation, to optimise the perioperative management of CS. The aim of this systematic review protocol is to synthesise the available evidence and assess the effect of acupoint stimulation in the perioperative period of CS.

Methods and analysis

We plan to search PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, from their inception to August 2025. Primary outcome indicators will include pain, time to first defecation, time to first bowel movement and time to return of bowel sounds. Secondary outcome indicators will include postoperative complications, such as nausea and vomiting, bloating, anxiety and depression, as well as length of hospital stay and morphine consumption. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses will be used to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity and to test the stability of the results. Trial sequential analysis will be introduced to enhance the reliability of the evidence.

Ethics and dissemination

No ethical approval is required as this study synthesises the existing published data. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. Any protocol amendments will be documented in PROSPERO and detailed in the final publication.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42024558572.

❌