Conectar
To adapt an instrument to measure patient safety culture, as rated by home care workers, and examine its psychometric properties.
A multicentre cross-sectional psychometric study.
We adapted the Nursing Home Survey SOPS to measure safety culture in home care. The questionnaire was translated to French following the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretest and Documentation (TRAPD) approach. Experts in home care evaluated the content validity of the adapted and translated instrument. To pre-test the questionnaire, we conducted cognitive interviews. We invited home care workers from two home care agencies in the French-speaking region of Switzerland to participate in the cross-sectional study from November to December 2024. We performed confirmatory factor analysis using the R package ‘lavaan’ and assessed convergent, discriminant and known-groups validity.
Eight experts assessed the content validity of the adapted and translated instrument. Responses from 672 home care workers were analysed. Except for compliance with procedures, all dimensions showed acceptable or good internal consistency. Regarding construct validity, first-order and second-order level confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable model fit. Safety culture correlated with overall patient safety rating and psychosocial safety climate. Regarding known-groups validity, participants who do not work directly with clients most of the time, and those willing to recommend the organisation rated the safety culture higher.
The psychometric evaluation indicated that the adapted instrument can be used as a valid and targeted tool to assess patient safety climate/culture in Swiss French-speaking home care agencies.
The existence of an adapted and validated instrument for use in home care enables managers to monitor safety culture and develop interventions to improve it and consequently ensure patient safety.
To the best of our knowledge, there was no instrument specifically targeting the measurement of patient safety culture in the home care setting. The adapted instrument for home care showed to be a valid tool to provide information about safety culture in this setting. The availability of an instrument to measure safety culture in the home care setting can promote its monitoring, raise awareness of safety culture among staff, help managers prioritise key aspects for culture change, and thus improve patient safety. A wider adoption of the same instrument could also facilitate comparative analyses.
We used the COSMIN guidelines for the psychometric evaluation of the instrument and the STROBE reporting guidelines for the cross-sectional study.
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of I-PASS-structured (Identification—Patient—Action—Situation—Synthesis) bedside nursing handovers on the handover global quality and the patients trust in nurses.
Oral end-of-shift nursing handovers can become moments of patient vulnerability. Moving handovers from nurses' offices to patients' bedsides is a means of improving them; however, implementing this remains a challenge.
This was a Type-1 effectiveness–implementation hybrid study.
We measured the effectiveness using a simple interrupted time series with three measurement points before and after the introduction of I-PASS-structured bedside nursing handovers between August and November 2022. Implementation was explored using multi-method measurements of quantitative and qualitative data. As an implementation strategy, we developed a specific training session, including simulations.
Bedside nursing handovers were introduced into one surgery and one medicine ward, with the 831 handovers evaluated showing significant improvements in handover quality compared to before implementation, although handover duration increased. Patient outcomes validated this change in nursing practice. However, examining nurses' perspectives of the implementation process revealed several obstacles to using bedside nursing handovers that training alone was not strong enough to overcome.
Given the findings of the present project, the use of bedside nursing handovers should be extended to other units by developing strategies that will make the practice sustainable.
Bedside nursing handovers improved handover quality and created a true partnership with the patient: nurses feel more confident about seeing the patient quickly. Patients felt more taken into consideration and safer.
For feasibility reasons, patients and the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of this research. The trial was prospectively registered before the first participant was recruited under the ISRCTN # 81701569.
Internationally, the vision of a ‘Digital Trustworthy Evidence Ecosystem’ is being pursued with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as one element of such a system. Consequently, CPGs and CPG repositories need to be digitalised.
The objective of this prospective, before-after study is to evaluate the impact of digitalising a quality-assured CPG registry using the international data format standard ‘Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources’ (FHIR). This includes the architecture of the registry, the format of individual guidelines and application programming interfaces to import and export CPG content. The study is guided by a scoping review.
The primary outcome is the usability of the digitalised CPG registry and CPG content for different user groups comprising CPG developers, CPG administrators, health care professionals and patients—including at the point of care in in- and outpatient settings—and technical professionals as users of CPG content in digital applications.
For the before-after comparison, semi-quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (focus groups) methods are applied. All user groups will be involved in a baseline analysis to assess user expectations and technical requirements. According to the results, the digitalised guideline registry will be implemented. The intervention comprises the testing of the digitalised registry with guideline content by all user groups. Analysis of outcomes will include formative and summative evaluation. Final results and further research needs will be discussed in a World Café with all stakeholders.
The Ethics Committee of the Berlin chamber of physicians, in accordance with its code of conduct §15 section 1 (Eth-KB-24-11) confirmed that no ethical approval is needed for this study. The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (No: DRKS00034111). Results will be presented at national and international conferences, published in peer-reviewed journals and on the website of the funding institution.
German Clinical Trials Registry (No: DRKS00034111).
Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition affecting 2%–10% of women worldwide, often leading to severe pain, organ dysfunction and infertility. Despite its prevalence, diagnosis is frequently delayed, and treatment options remain limited. Mobile health (mHealth) applications have gained popularity as tools for symptom tracking, yet concerns about their accessibility, evidence-based content and inclusivity persist. Ensuring that these digital tools are culturally relevant, user-friendly and available to diverse populations is crucial for improving patient care and engagement. This study aims to systematically review mobile applications designed for tracking endometriosis symptoms, with a focus on content quality, inclusivity and functionality. The objective is to identify gaps in existing apps and provide recommendations for developing more inclusive digital health solutions.
This study follows a systematic review methodology proposed by Gasteiger et al. The research process consists of seven steps, including defining research questions, identifying relevant applications, determining eligibility criteria, selecting and analysing apps and synthesising results. The apps will be sourced from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store via predefined search strategies. The evaluation criteria include content accuracy, usability, inclusivity, privacy protection and adherence to evidence-based medical guidelines. Data extraction focuses on app characteristics, including language availability, user accessibility, evidence-based symptom tracking and adherence to health equity principles. The Mobile App Rating Scale will be used to assess usability, functionality, aesthetics and information quality. The findings will be systematically compared to identify strengths, limitations and areas for improvement in existing applications.
This systematic review of applications offers an overview of available apps that can be downloaded in Switzerland. Furthermore, it will present a detailed analysis of those that are specifically geared towards symptom tracking and will evaluate the level of evidence-based content, inclusivity, data protection and quality. A key strength of this review is its multidisciplinary approach, which involves engaging experts in healthcare, digital technology, inclusivity and individuals with lived experiences with endometriosis.
Approval from an ethics committee is not required. Data and material will be available on request from the authors.
FreshRSS 