FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Delivering hospital care at home in a Dutch Tertiary University Hospital: protocol for a prospective feasibility cohort study evaluating a Virtual Ward for early discharge of inpatients

Por: van Herwerden · M. C. · Scholte · N. T. B. · Mkrtchjan · A. · Feyz · L. · Mol · A. P. · Aitken · J. · de Boer · R. A. · Chandoesing · P. P. · Gommers · D. A. M. P. J. · De Haan · B. · Den Hoed · C. M. · van den Hoogen · M. W. F. · Peeters · R. P. · Wlazlo · N. · Van Der Boon · R. M.
Introduction

Virtual Wards (VWs) facilitate hospital-level monitoring, diagnostics and treatment within patients’ homes, while the hospital team retains responsibility for care. International research indicates that VWs decrease hospital length of stay without increasing readmissions; however, the feasibility and key operational determinants within Dutch care remain uncertain. This protocol outlines the VW for Early Discharge in Patients Receiving Inpatient Care (VIP Care) study.

Methods and analysis

The VIP Care study is a single-centre prospective feasibility cohort study conducted at Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands. The study encompasses seven predefined subcohorts with n=51 eligible patients per subcohort: (1) bacterial, fungal or parasitic infections; (2) viral respiratory infections; (3) dehydration; (4) decompensated heart failure; (5) high-dose corticosteroid treatment; (6) post-transsphenoidal pituitary surgery follow-up and (7) severe inflammatory skin disease with or without bacterial or viral superinfection. Adults who require hospital-level monitoring and/or therapy may qualify for early discharge to the VW.

The VW integrates scheduled, patient-performed measurements using (European Conformity) CE-marked devices with structured symptom assessment submitted via a patient application, and data review in an electronic health record-integrated clinician cockpit. Submissions are evaluated by VW tele-nurses using prespecified Early Warning Score based thresholds and an escalation protocol. Patients receive a daily physician telephone review. Diagnostics and treatments are administered at home to hospital standards through established home-care services.

The primary outcome (feasibility) is adherence to transfer, defined as the proportion of eligible inpatients who provide written informed consent and are subsequently successfully transferred to the VW. The prespecified feasibility threshold is 30%. Secondary outcomes include reach (eligibility, invitation and consent rates among admitted patients), operational performance during the VW episode (alert frequency and handling, contact volumes and actions), length of stay on the ward and in the VW, emergency department reassessments and 30-day readmissions. Qualitative interviews will be conducted to identify implementation determinants.

Ethics and dissemination

The study received approval from the Erasmus MC Medical Ethics Committee (MEC-2024–0060; amendment MEC-2024–0060 A0001). Incremental risk is considered minimal. Written informed consent is obtained. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and an accessible lay summary.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06936891; CCMO NL85516.078.24. Recruitment began in May 2025 and is ongoing.

Reference standard for the prevention and management of hospital falls: a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study

Por: Morris · M. E. · Said · C. M. · Haines · T. · Heng · H. W. F. · Batchelor · F. · Hutchinson · A. M. · McKercher · J. P. · Semciw · A. I. · Hill · A.-M. · Peterson · S. · Kane · R. · Fowler-Davis · S. · Campbell · S. · Sherrington · C. · Gilmartin-Thomas · J. · Phan · U. · Thwaites · C.
Background

Hospital falls persist as a major threat to patient safety. This study aimed to develop an interprofessional reference standard to prevent, manage and report hospital falls.

Methods

A Delphi consensus methodology, informed by the Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies guideline, was used to design the reference standard. An interprofessional expert panel (n=47) of health professionals, researchers, policymakers and consumers participated in three Delphi rounds. Following the review of clinical guidelines, an e-Delphi survey was developed and piloted to derive 60 initial items for the standard. Two iterative rounds of e-Delphi surveys were distributed via Research Electronic Data Capture and included free-text questions and 9-point Likert scales. An online consensus meeting followed, to ratify the final standard.

Results

In the first Delphi round, there was over 80% agreement for 44/60 items to be included in the reference standard. This increased to 48/60 items in Round 2. At the final consensus meeting, 12 items still did not reach consensus for inclusion and one was added, yielding 49 items. Items that replicated text according to falls with injury/without injury were combined, resulting in 42 items in the final reference standard. Agreed items included: (1) brief screening of falls risk on hospital admission; (2) comprehensive falls assessment for inpatients who are older, frailer or have complex conditions; (3) single interventions (such as environmental adaptations and exercise); (4) multifactorial interventions; (5) education of patients, families and staff; (6) optimising local falls hospital policies, procedures and leadership capability; (7) optimising documentation and reporting; (8) improving accreditation processes; (9) workforce redesign to augment falls education. Items that did not reach agreement (n=12) pertained to alarms, bed rails, grip socks, artificial intelligence, volunteers and care bundles.

Conclusion

This new reference standard provides a checklist for staff, patients, managers and policymakers to reduce unwanted variations in prevention, management and reporting of hospital falls.

Trial registration number

ANZCTR 386960

Multilevel spatial analysis of the determinants of advanced maternal age in Ethiopia: a secondary analysis of the 2019 Ethiopian mini demographic and health survey

Por: Zewdia · W. F. · Kassie · M. Z.
Background

Advanced maternal age (AMA), defined as giving birth at age 35 or older, is an increasingly significant public health concern worldwide. This study aimed to identify the socio-demographic and economic determinants of giving birth at AMA among women in Ethiopia and to explore the resulting health consequences for both mothers and children.

Methods

This study is a secondary analysis of data from 5517 women extracted from the 2019 Ethiopian Mini Demographic and Health Survey (EMDHS), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. The data were cleaned, weighted using STATA V. 17 and analysed using ArcGIS 10.8 to map AMA. Global and local Moran’s Index methods were used to assess clustering and a multilevel binary logistic regression model was fitted to identify predictors of giving birth at AMA.

Results

The prevalence of giving birth at AMA was 12.7%, with a Global Moran’s I of 0.9964, indicating significant clustering across Ethiopian zones (p

Conclusion

This study found a high prevalence of giving birth at AMA among women with a lifetime birth history, with a spatially non-random distribution, indicated by a positive Moran’s Index. Individual and community-level factors such as having a previous male child, small family size, being Catholic or Protestant and residing in Addis Ababa or the Amhara region were positively associated with AMA. Conversely, factors including lower education level (no or primary education), contraceptive use, media access, rural residence adherence to postnatal check-ups and residing in the Afar region were negatively associated with AMA. All community-level factors were significantly associated with the outcome.

❌