Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains high but unevenly distributed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Current risk stratification strategies are far from optimal, leading to both undertreatment and overtreatment of patients. The STENO INTEN-CT trial aims to evaluate a strategy of improved CVD risk management by using cardiac CT (coronary artery calcification (CAC)) for stratification and tailoring of multifactorial cardiovascular treatment based on CAC score. We hypothesise that (1) intensified medical treatment will lower CVD event rates in high-risk patients (CAC≥100), and (2) less intensive multifactorial treatment is safe in very low-risk patients (CAC=0).

The Steno INTEN-CT trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, open-label, event-driven randomised controlled trial including patients with T2DM without known CVD. All participants (expected n=7300) will be invited for a non-contrast coronary CT scan. After the scan, participants will be randomised to either standard treatment (blinded for CAC results) or CAC-based treatment. Participants in CAC-based treatment and their general practitioner (GP) will receive information on CAC and a recommendation of multifactorial treatment. High-risk participants in the interventional arm will be invited for one or more initial study visits to intensify treatment with a combination of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, high-dose lipid-lowering, antihypertensive and antithrombotic treatment. Very low-risk patients in the interventional arm will be recommended less intensive treatment targets. After initial study-related activities, all participants will continue to be taken care of by their GP guided by specific treatment recommendations. The primary outcome in the primary hierarchical analysis (the rate of the combined CVD endpoint of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke and hospitalisation for heart failure) will be monitored through national health registries. The trial is event-driven, but a median follow-up of 5 years is expected. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported outcomes, quality-adjusted life years and healthcare costs.

The protocol V.1.9 is approved by the Research Ethics Committee and the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The results of the study—positive, negative or neutral—will be published in peer-reviewed journals and through www.clinicaltrials.org.

NCT05700877.

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a serious, untreatable complication of diabetes that contributes to excess cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. CAN is associated with increased fibrosis and inflammation, possibly driven by increased sympathetic activity and overactive mineralocorticoid receptors (MRs). These may represent a potential therapeutic target. MR antagonists (MRAs) improve autonomic function in non-diabetic diseases, and finerenone, a non-steroidal MRA, has demonstrated promising results in managing diabetic kidney disease and cardiovascular complications, suggesting its potential as a novel therapy for early-stage CAN. This trial aims to evaluate whether daily administration of finerenone can modify the disease progression of early-stage CAN.

This trial is a two-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, 1:1 randomised, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of 78 weeks of intervention with finerenone or placebo on early-stage CAN in 100 individuals with type 2 diabetes in Denmark. The primary endpoint is the between-group difference in the expiration:inspiration ratio of the cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests (CARTs). Secondary endpoints are the between-group differences in the remaining CARTs, heart rate variability measures and fibrosis markers. Treatment effects on other forms of neuropathy and related pathological mechanisms will be explored.

The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Counsil for Harmonisation good clinical practice guidelines, with ethics approval obtained from the Danish Medical Research Ethics Committee. All participants will provide written informed consent. Due to the risk of hyperkalaemia associated with finerenone, safety will be closely monitored throughout the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and clinical trial registries. A lay summary will be provided to participants on study completion.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06906081; registration date: 25 March 2025. Clinical Trials Information System: EUCT no. 2024-516597-30-00; registration date: 3 September 2024.

There are global concerns about the rise in opioid prescribing. Patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) are at high risk of adverse outcomes from opioid-related complications, including delayed discharge and adjuvant chemotherapy, long-term opioid use and reduced cancer-free survival. We aimed to develop a set of actionable quality indicators for opioid stewardship for patients undergoing CRC surgery, and an implementation toolkit to support professional behaviour change to improve appropriateness of perioperative opioid prescribing.

A five-round modified RAND consensus process was conducted in 2021–2024.

14 secondary care trusts across the UK Yorkshire and Humber region.

Consultant anaesthetists and national perioperative opioid stewardship experts (expert panel) and patient and public panel.

Potential indicators were identified from a literature review, guideline search and expert panel. All potential indicators were rated on relevance and actionability (online survey, expert panel) and importance to patient care (online meeting, patient panel). A hybrid consensus meeting involving a patient representative and the expert panel discussed and rerated the indicators. An online expert survey identified potential barriers to implementation. An actionable toolkit was developed using implementation strategies and supporting resources developed where appropriate.

73 potential indicators were identified. All indicators remained in the process through the online survey and patient panel. After the final meeting, four indicators remained: (1) hospital trust presence of an opioid stewardship protocol; (2) inpatient functional post-operative pain assessments; (3) patient education and discharge leaflet; and (4) senior clinician review of ‘strong’ opioids on discharge (British National Formulary definition). The number of barriers identified ranged from 8 to 22 per indicator. 49 different implementation strategies were identified for the toolkit (range 32–45 per indicator).

We identified four actionable quality indicators and developed an implementation toolkit that represents consensus in defining quality of care in opioid stewardship for CRC surgery.