There is a lack of evidence on the efficacy of extracorporeal blood purification (EBP) to reduce the mortality rate in septic shock. We have designed the EABPSS (Efficacy of Adaptive Blood Purification for Septic Shock) study to confirm whether adaptive blood purification (ABP) intervention could confer a clinical benefit.
In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we are recruiting a total of 276 patients with septic shock. Eligible patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the control group or the intervention group. Patients in the control group will receive standard care according to the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. Patients in the intervention group will receive two 6-hour sessions of ABP treatment within 24 hours of enrolment, based on standard care. ABP is a novel, adaptive EBP strategy proposed by our research team. Specifically, for patients with septic shock who do not require renal replacement therapy (RRT), plasmafiltration-adsorption (PFAD) will be used alone, and for patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury meeting RRT indications, a combination of PFAD–RRT will be employed. The primary endpoint of this study is all-cause mortality at 90 days after enrolment. Secondary endpoints of the study include the declining proportion of serum cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and high-mobility group box 1 within 24 hours after enrolment. Additionally, the study will evaluate the improvement of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on day 7 postenrolment, as well as the 30-day mortality rate.
The study was approved by the respective ethical committees of the participant centres, including: Ethics Committee of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University (2024-KE-348); Ethics Committee of PLA General Hospital (S2024-716-01); Ethics Committee of China–Japan Friendship Hospital (2024-KY181); Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (2024YAN258-001); Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital (2024BJYYEC-KY106-02); Ethics Committee of Air Force Medical Center, PLA (KONGTE2024-29-PJ01); Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University (JILUN(K2023)(370)-00). The findings of the study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conference presentations.
Objetivo principal: Interpretar el significado que se le asigna a las estrategias de enseñanza-aprendizaje en el área de salud destinada a personas mayores. Método: Estudio cualitativo de carácter exploratorio. Participaron personas mayores de 60 años y profesionales del área gerontológica con experiencia en la planificación y ejecución de educación en salud. La información fue recolectada a través de entrevista semiestructurada, y los datos fueron analizados a través de análisis de contenido. Resultados principales: Las personas mayores reconocen el realizar talleres y la educación individual como las mejores estrategias para recibir educación. Al triangular la información, los profesionales gerontológicos coinciden con la apreciación positiva de los talleres, pero acompañados de un adecuado diagnóstico participativo y desde la experiencia del participante. Conclusión principal: Los talleres se reconocen como la mejor estrategia de enseñanza-aprendizaje para personas mayores. Esta debe aplicarse considerando un diagnóstico participativo, con la experiencia de la persona mayor y ser mantenido en el tiempo.