Since 1985, the international healthcare community has recommended the ideal rate of caesarean section (CS) to be 10%–15% at the national level. The literature has reported that overused CS without necessary medical indications can be harmful to both maternal and child health. To generate evidence to support policy on CS, this study evaluated the trend over time of CS in Thailand during January 2016 to October 2021 (which included the COVID-19 pandemic period) and explored predictors of CS use.

This study was a retrospective secondary data analysis of de-identified hospitalisation data under the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS) from the National Health Security Office’s e-Claims database. Descriptive analyses were conducted to explore the number and rate of CS over time and across different characteristics (ie, age, hospital type, COVID-19 status and delivery day) including a multivariable logistic analysis to explore predictors of CS. Interrupted time series analysis was adopted to investigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CS rate.

569 321 CS cases under UCS from 2016 to 2021.

The results showed an increasing trend of CS rate, from 30% in January 2016 to 35% in October 2021. Both clinical (eg, medical indication and age) and non-clinical (eg, region and day of delivery) factors were significantly associated with CS. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic had no significant effect on CS rate (level: –0.0016, 95% CI –0.0085 to 0.0053, p=0.66).

This study highlighted an increasing trend of CS in Thailand and could present supportive evidence that Thailand might have been facing an overuse of CS. More awareness and actions are warranted to ensure the movement towards reduction of unnecessary CS in Thailand.

Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common cause of hospitalisation and decompensation in the hospital, is routinely managed by a wide variety of subspecialties, and requires a host of both technical and non-technical skills (NTS). Simulation-based training (SBT) exercises are an excellent means of training physicians and other healthcare professionals in both technical skills and NTS and are frequently used to teach and assess management of high-stress situations such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and trauma situations. The manner in which SBT is used to train other types of clinical situations—and at what frequency—is less clear. The extent to which such training programmes are evaluated is also not clear. Here, we intend to characterise the body of literature describing SBT programmes for bedside management of GIB. In doing so, we will gain valuable insight into the current state of SBT as it relates to training healthcare professionals to handle complicated clinical situations.

Our review will follow the six-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O’Malley while considering elaborations and guidance made by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The protocol and review will be created in alignment with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses—scoping review checklist and explanatory paper. Using a carefully constructed search strategy, the following databases will be queried from their inception through 31 December 2025: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and ERIC. Following the initial database query and two-step screening process, included articles will be systematically examined and will serve as our data source. Our efforts will ultimately answer the following research question: How is simulation-based training currently used to teach bedside management of GIB to physicians (residents, fellows and attending physicians), and how are these simulation-based training exercises studied and evaluated?

Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board is not required for this study since all investigations are being carried out on previously published manuscripts. Final results will be compiled and submitted for publication once the study has been completed and all data has been charted/analysed.

To examine demographic and occupational attributes associated with work-life balance (WLB) satisfaction among physician assistants/associates (PAs) using a national dataset.

This is a cross-sectional study using 2023 national data.

USA.

The study included 149 909 board certified PAs who updated, confirmed or verified their profile questions.

Descriptive and bivariate statistics, followed by multivariate logistic regression, were conducted to identify factors associated with WLB satisfaction among PAs. The primary outcome was a binary variable derived from a 7-point scale assessing PAs’ satisfaction with WLB. Responses of ‘Somewhat’, ‘Mostly’ and ‘Completely’ satisfied were coded as ‘Satisfied’, while ‘Neither/Nor’, ‘Somewhat’, ‘Mostly’ and ‘Completely’ dissatisfied were coded as ‘Not satisfied’. Our analytical sample comprised 86,000 PAs who responded to a question inquiring about their satisfaction with WLB.

Over two-thirds (71.7%) of PAs indicated satisfaction with WLB. The multivariate logistic regression revealed that the types of specialties that PAs practised were among the strongest factors associated with WLB satisfaction. Compared with PAs in primary care, those practising in dermatology (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.83; 95% CI 1.66 to 2.02), general surgery (aOR=1.64; 95% CI 1.48 to 1.83), pain medicine (aOR=1.63; 95% CI 1.41 to 1.89) and hospital medicine (aOR=1.52; 95% CI 1.37 to 1.68) had higher odds of being satisfied with WLB (all p

Our findings revealed that PAs practising in non-primary care specialties had the highest odds of reporting satisfaction with WLB. Identifying factors strongly associated with PA work-life balance can aid in developing targeted interventions. However, further research is needed to understand the intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing PAs’ WLB.

To explore and understand the disease priorities and preferences for rapid diagnostic testings (RDTs) among community members and stakeholders.

Qualitative study using focused group discussions and in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes of disease priorities and RDT preferences.

uMsunduzi Municipality, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

49 community members and five community stakeholders were recruited through a combination of convenience and purposeful sampling using community events and meetings.

Participants prioritised both communicable diseases (HIV, tuberculosis) and non-communicable diseases (diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension and cancer), aligning with national health priorities. They supported RDTs for early diagnosis and home-based testing to mitigate barriers to accessing diagnostic care. A need for post-test support, such as digital support tools, was also highlighted.

Community perspectives highlighted a demand for accessible, rapid and decentralised diagnostic tools for high-burden diseases in KwaZulu-Natal. RDTs have the potential to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities through improved access to diagnostic healthcare services. The community members are potential end users of RDTs, especially in resource-constrained settings. Therefore, their perspectives should be considered in the development and implementation of RDTs to enhance acceptability and public health impact.

Multimorbidity or the presence of two or more long-term conditions is now common in people undergoing surgery. However, current care pathways often miss these healthcare encounters to support long-term health promotion. Therefore, there is a need for practical, scalable approaches that can be integrated into routine surgical care, for which limited solutions exist at present. We have co-designed a structured preoperative checklist to help identify and manage long-term conditions in patients listed for elective surgery. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of this preoperative checklist in patients undergoing elective surgery.

This is a mixed-methods feasibility study in one National Health Service trust in the UK. We will recruit up to 50 adults scheduled for elective surgery and use the checklist during initial surgical clinic appointments. Quantitative data will include recruitment and retention rates, completion of the checklist and baseline clinical characteristics, analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be collected through semistructured interviews with up to 16 patients and clinicians. These interviews will be analysed thematically, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Triangulation of quantitative and qualitative data will allow us to explore fidelity, acceptability, barriers and facilitators to implementation and refine the intervention ahead of a future pilot cluster randomised trial.

This study has received approval from the Yorkshire & The Humber - Sheffield Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 25/YH/0045). All participants will give written informed consent. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared with participants, the public and policy stakeholders.

Intermittent physiological monitoring and early warning scores (EWS) are limited in their ability to detect deteriorating patients in a timely manner. Wearable physiological sensors allow continuous remote monitoring and may be more timely and accurate in the identification of those at risk, compared with manual collection. This study aims to determine if wearable physiological sensors can be used for the early detection of postoperative deterioration, while being acceptable to patients and healthcare staff.

This is a prospective observational cohort study that will recruit adults undergoing major surgery in Benin, India, Ghana, Guatemala, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda and the UK. Participants will wear wearable physiological chest and limb sensors before, during and after surgery for up to 10 days or until discharge. In this ‘shadow-mode’ study, continuous physiological observations collected using the devices will not be made available to clinical teams. No changes in participant care will result. Standard of care clinical data will be collected contemporaneously. Continuous sensor data will be used to design algorithms to predict deterioration and specific complications in this population. Usability and feasibility testing, through focus groups, interviews and questionnaires, will be undertaken with healthcare professionals and people undergoing surgery.

Our stakeholder panel are directly involved in all aspects of this study, which will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the International Conference on Harmonisation Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH GCP) in addition to the principles of the ethics committee(s)/Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) who have reviewed and approved this study. Artificial intelligence (AI) prediction models will be reported in accordance with the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis+Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD+AI) and Developmental and Exploratory Clinical Investigations of DEcision support systems driven by Artificial Intelligence (DECIDE-AI) reporting guidelines frameworks.

NCT06565559.

Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective biomedical intervention for HIV prevention, but its access and utilisation are challenging, especially in high-burden settings such as Kenya. For potential PrEP users, long delays and repeated consultations with several providers are obstacles to both PrEP uptake and continuation. The One-Stop PrEP Care project aims to promote the use of PrEP among clients in the health system and enhance client satisfaction by reducing the waiting time.

We are conducting a 1:1 cluster-randomised trial to evaluate whether One-Stop PrEP Care achieves equivalent or better PrEP outcomes compared with the standard of care model in 12 high-volume HIV clinics in Kisumu County, Kenya. In the One-Stop model, all core PrEP components, including HIV risk evaluation, HIV testing and PrEP dispensing, are provided by one provider in a single consultation room. Programme data from ≥2400 new PrEP clients will be abstracted for 12 months each to obtain primary endpoints of PrEP initiation and continuation. Adherence will be assessed via blood drug level testing. A nested cohort of up to 300 PrEP clients will be enrolled and followed every 3 months to provide in-depth data on individual HIV prevention behaviour, risk perception and how they align PrEP use with perceived risk. We will also evaluate programme costs.

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (IRB) on 8 July 2022 (IRB ID: STUDY00015873) and the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (SERU) with a letter dated 4 May 2023 (Ref: 4697). Project findings will be shared with stakeholders, including the Ministry of Health, County health officials and participants. Results will be disseminated through manuscripts, policy briefs and health meetings.

Plans for communicating important protocol modifications include timely notifications to all study team members and training on the changes, and updates to relevant stakeholders, including the two IRBs, through protocol amendment submissions.

V. 2.0 dated 21 May 2024.

NCT03194308.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of infectious disease deaths, particularly among people living with HIV (PWH). Despite being preventable, TB preventive therapy (TPT) uptake is low in high-burden regions like South Africa, where new guidelines have expanded TPT eligibility and introduced shorter, more effective regimens like 3 months of weekly rifapentine and isoniazid (3HP). As differentiated service delivery models for HIV care have proven effective, there is increasing recognition that decentralising TPT delivery may improve coverage and completion. This study explores whether a community-based TPT delivery strategy can enhance uptake and completion of TPT compared with traditional clinic-based services.

We will conduct a household-randomised, non-blinded, controlled trial. Persons eligible for TPT will be recruited from the TB TRIAGE+Trial study, a community-based household TB screening study. Households containing at least one person eligible for TPT will be randomised 1:1 to either community-based TPT or standard-of-care clinic referral for TPT. At enrolment, all participants will be provided with a 2-week supply of TPT in the community. Participants randomised to the community arm will receive the entire course of TPT in a single dispense (12 weeks of 3HP or 6 months of isoniazid, if 3HP is contraindicated). Clinic-arm participants will be referred to their local clinic for the remainder of their course of TPT and will collect TPT refills on the clinic-determined schedule. Our primary outcome is the proportion of participants who complete a course of TPT. Secondary outcomes include overall adherence to TPT, predictors of adherence with TPT, participant satisfaction with the assigned TPT delivery method and adverse events.

The study and its tools were approved by the Human Sciences Research Councils Research Ethics Committee (approval number: 2/25/10/23), based in Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa, as well as the University of Washington Institutional Review Board (Study 00018448). Study findings will be shared through the community advisory group and local stakeholder meetings, relevant international and local meetings/conferences and peer-reviewed publications.

NCT06214910. Date and version: 3.0, 30 July 2024.