To detail the development of the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM), a questionnaire aimed at assessing the perspectives of key stakeholders towards elements of overdose prevention interventions—supervised consumption sites (SCSs) and overdose hotlines and applications (ORHAs).

Cross-sectional survey.

Canadian health system.

English or French speaking adults from four key informant groups: people who use substances (PWUS), health professionals, emergency responders and the general public.

Test–retest reliability of CNQOM items.

A novel questionnaire was developed. Item development followed a standard approach, with face validity verified by representatives from the four informant groups. Input from experts in harm reduction and addiction medicine enhanced content and face validity of the questionnaire. A rigorous response validation approach was undertaken to ensure respondents were human and from Canada. Test–retest reliability items were assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation, Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Cohen’s kappa.

After data cleaning and response validation, 4445 valid responses were obtained from the four key informant groups. Respondents represented a range of sociodemographic backgrounds and housing scenarios from all provinces and territories in Canada. Test–retest reliability was assessed using a small subsample of 142 participants (primarily from general public informants). Questionnaire items demonstrated slight to substantial stability in responses (kappa coefficients: 0.15–0.58; Spearman’s r: 0.08–0.66).

The CNQOM is the first online questionnaire in Canada designed to capture perspectives and attitudes towards specific elements of SCSs and ORHAs among diverse key informant groups. Our questionnaire was administered to a large, geographically diverse sample and designed to capture the perspectives of four key informant groups. Lower than expected test–retest reliability may be explained by lack of participant familiarity with SCS and especially ORHAs and the impersonal nature of the instrument content among some respondents. Future work will elucidate key informant perspectives on these services based on the data.

Recent legislation in the UK regarding requirements for new developments to increase biodiversity may have significant implications for the environment and population health. Despite this, relatively little is known regarding the health and social benefits of increasing biodiversity in densely populated urban areas.

This protocol outlines plans for a mixed-method, longitudinal, natural experiment study which will evaluate the planned, biodiversity-focused redevelopment of six small urban parks in Edinburgh, Scotland (UK). Using systematic observation (at baseline, 1 month post-intervention and 1 year post-baseline) and a longitudinal household survey (at baseline and 1 year post-baseline), the primary outcomes of personal well-being, and secondary outcomes of nature connectedness and park usage behaviours, will be assessed, respectively. Consent for data linkage of respondent’s health records will also be sought. Process evaluation will employ semi-structured, qualitative interviews with stakeholders and walk-along interviews with local residents in order to understand implementation processes. Space-related well-being will also be assessed using citizen science approaches.

This study was approved by the University of Edinburgh’s School of Health in Social Sciences ethics committee. This study will provide further evidence for policymakers, the public and researchers of the health and social well-being effects of urban biodiversity interventions. Study findings will be disseminated via public forums such as community workshops and through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific conferences.