FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Depressed mood as a transdiagnostic target relevant to anxiety and/or psychosis: a scoping review

Por: Mavindidze · E. · Dambi · J. · Nyamayaro · P. · Beji-Chauke · R. · Tunduwani · T. D. · Shava · B. K. · Mavhu · W. · Abas · M. · Chibanda · D. · Nhunzvi · C.
Introduction

Depressed mood is a psychological state characterised by sadness or loss of interest in activities, is a common symptom that accompanies most major mental disorders. It is therefore reasonable to consider it as a transdiagnostic target, which when addressed, may improve the functioning and quality of life of persons with lived experience of mental disorders. However, there is limited understanding of the depressed mood as a transdiagnostic target across major mental disorders. Therefore, this scoping review aims to synthesise knowledge on depressed mood, its measurement and interventions among persons with anxiety and/or psychosis.

Methods and analysis

This scoping review followed Arksey and O'Malley’s framework. Peer-reviewed articles and grey literature published from January 1988 to April 2024 were searched in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Africa-Wide Information, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Humanities International Complete, Sabinet, Open Grey and Google Scholar. Articles were screened at title, abstract and full article levels. Data extracted were analysed using thematic analysis and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We also consulted stakeholders such as lived experience experts, clinicians and researchers to contextualise our findings.

Results

We screened 245 full articles out of the 4039 hits and included 28 articles in this review. Although depressed mood is conceptually different from clinical depression, the terms are used interchangeably in the literature. The prevalence of depressed mood in psychosis was 7.3–33.3%, with no prevalence studies specific to anxiety disorders. Commonly used outcome measures included Beck’s Depression Inventory (n=6) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (n=5). Psychosocial conservative interventions such as cognitive–behavioural therapy were the most common interventions. Other interventions, including yoga, pharmacotherapy and Ecology Momentary Interventions, were also reported. All interventions were reported to improve depressed mood, and most were implemented in high-income settings. Stakeholders, including lived experience experts, concurred on the importance of using depressed mood as a transdiagnostic target, viewing it as a ‘window’ for early identification and management of many common mental disorders.

Discussion

There is a need to clarify the definition and diagnostic cut-off points on common outcome measures of depressed mood. There is also a need for increased research on depressed mood as a viable transdiagnostic target in anxiety and/or psychosis with a special focus on low-to-middle income countries.

Conclusion

Depressed mood is an important and prevalent transdiagnostic target with great promise for early management in anxiety and/or psychosis. Valid diagnostic and measurement tools are developing, and so are the targeted interventions in the context of anxiety and/or psychosis.

Determinants of the optimal selection of vascular access devices: A systematic review underpinned by the COM‐B behavioural model

Abstract

Background

Optimal selection of vascular access devices is based on multiple factors and is the first strategy to reduce vascular access device-related complications. This process is dependent on behavioural and human factors. The COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour) model was used as a theoretical framework to organize the findings of this systematic review.

Methods/Aims

To synthesize the evidence on determinants shaping the optimal selection of vascular access devices, using the COM-B behavioural model as the theoretical framework.

Design

Systematic review of studies which explore decision-making at the time of selecting vascular access devices.

Data Sources

The Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and EbscoHost databases were interrogated to extract manuscripts published up to 31 December 2021, in English or Spanish.

Results

Among 16 studies included in the review, 8/16 (50%) focused on physical capability, 8/16 (50%) psychological capability, 15/16 (94%) physical opportunity, 12/16 (75%) social opportunity, 1/16 (6%) reflective motivation and 0/16 (0%) automatic motivation. This distribution represents a large gap in terms of interpersonal and motivational influences and cultural and social environments. Specialist teams (teams created for the insertion or maintenance of vascular access devices) are core for the optimal selection of vascular access devices (75% physical capability, 62% psychological capability, 80% physical opportunity and 100% social opportunity).

Conclusion

Specialist teams predominantly lead all actions undertaken towards the optimal selection of vascular access devices. These actions primarily centre on assessing opportunity and capability, often overlooking motivational influences and social environments.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

A more implementation-focused professional approach could decrease inequity among patients and complications associated with vascular access devices.

Impact

Optimal selection of vascular access devices is the primary strategy in mitigating complications associated with these devices. There is a significant disparity between interpersonal and motivational influences and the cultural and social environments. Furthermore, specialized teams play a pivotal role in facilitating the optimal selection of vascular access devices. The study can benefit institutions concerned about vascular access devices and their complications.

Reporting Method

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

Patient or public contribution

No Patient or Public Contribution.

What does this article contribute to the wider global clinical community?

Optimal selection of vascular devices remains a growing yet unresolved issue with costly clinical and patient experience impact. Interventions to improve the optimal selection of vascular devices have focused on training, education, algorithms and implementation of specialist vascular teams; alas, these approaches do not seem to have substantially addressed the problem. Specialist vascular teams should evolve and pivot towards leading the implementation of quality improvement interventions, optimizing resource use and enhancing their role.

Effects of interventional public health laws and regulations intended to reduce gambling-related harms: a realist review study protocol

Por: Fisher · M. · Piper · T. · Mavi · S. · Nambiar · J. · Sharma · P. K. · Kirby · J. · Melendez-Torres · G. J. · Montgomery · P. · Fewell · G. · Chandan · J. S. · Bedford · K.
Introduction

Gambling is now widely acknowledged to be a major public health (PH) issue. The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities conservatively estimated that gambling harm is associated with an annual cost of £1.05–£1.77 billion in England alone. Marionneau et al have categorised gambling harms into seven themes: (1) financial, (2) relationship/conflict, (3) emotional and psychological (mental health), (4) health decrements (physical health), (5) employment/education, (6) cultural and (7) criminal activity. In this understanding, gambling harms are not restricted to individual experiences: they also impact families, the wider community and society, and hence they require a whole systems, PH approach, anchored in population-level interventions to reduce harms. We aim to identify the effects of interventional PH laws and regulations on the harms associated with gambling.

Methods and analysis

We limit our focus to interventional PH laws and regulations within a comprehensive search of scientific and legal databases, grey literature and books. Following Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study, Timing inclusion criteria, evidence will be screened and appraised in Covidence by two reviewers (MF and TP). Included evidence will be analysed and synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. Methodological quality will be appraised using the relevant risk of bias tool. Randomised controlled trials will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2), Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) will be used for other non-randomised studies. Qualitative studies will be appraised using the EPPI reviewer software for systematic reviewing.

Ethics and dissemination

The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) at the National Institute for Health Research and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) at the University of York (CRD42024574502). We aim to define a theory of change and produce a context-mechanism-outcome framework with relevant experts using the findings. We plan to disseminate the findings through peer-reviewed publications, meetings with relevant experts and international conference presentations.

❌