To evaluate the feasibility and relevance of the LIFE-UP Day audit, a simple, 1-day benchmarking tool based on the multidisciplinary LIFE-UP bundle (Limit sedation, optimise nutritional Intakes, engage Families, promote Exercise and follow-UP the patients after discharge) and assessing the implementation of postintensive care syndrome (PICS) prevention strategies in daily practice.

Exploratory multicentre cross-sectional audit study.

Eight Belgian adult intensive care units (ICUs), between April and July 2024.

All patients present at 08:00 on the audit day and hospitalised for ≥24 hours.

An independent nurse collected data on sedation, analgesia, nutrition, family empowerment, physical exercise and post-ICU follow-up. A multidimensional LIFE-UP composite score (raw 0–10 points), normalised to a 5-point scale, was created to quantify adherence to PICS prevention practices based on current recommendations. Feasibility was evaluated through data accessibility, resource needs, cooperation of ICU teams and the ability to complete the audit within 1 day. Relevance was evaluated through adherence to the bundle, assessed by comparing LIFE-UP scores between ICUs. Quantitative results were expressed as median and IQR.

The audit was tested in 87 patients aged 68 (59–74) years, 9 (5–15.5) days after their admission. The audit was feasible across all ICUs: necessary data were available, resources required were minimal and cooperation was excellent. The LIFE-UP score highlighted significant variability between ICUs (2.5 (1.75–2.75), p

The LIFE-UP Day audit proved feasible and provides a first structured framework for benchmarking. Broader implementation will be essential to validate the LIFE-UP score, refine the model and ultimately determine whether it can translate into improved patient and family outcomes.

While there exist many individual and organisation-level initiatives aimed at reducing physician burnout and promoting wellness, there are no comprehensive frameworks or guidelines for evaluating initiatives targeted at physicians. To address this gap, we conducted a rapid review to understand the current state of initiative evaluation in this field and develop an evaluation framework for initiatives aimed at physician burnout and wellness.

A rapid review based on the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance.

MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo were searched from database inception to 2 May 2024 for concepts related to physicians, wellness initiatives and burnout, and organisational efforts.

We included studies with initiatives aimed at physician burnout, wellness or experience; targeted physicians, residents, fellows and/or physician faculty; were evaluated in some format; and took place within healthcare settings.

Two independent reviewers extracted data according to a standard template. For each study, we noted information related to the type of wellness initiative, evaluation approach, components measured in evaluations (‘evaluation indicators’) and gaps in evaluation. The same reviewers analysed the data quantitatively and thematically. Findings were reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

The database search yielded a total of 3786 references, of which 105 were included based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Various types of wellness initiatives (eg, mindfulness, peer support programmes, communities of practice) were delivered multimodally, or via curriculums and workshops, among other formats. Common evaluation approaches included surveys (95%, n=100/105) and interviews or focus groups (17%, n=18/105). Evaluation indicators spanned five categories: impacts (94.3%, n=99/105), participants’ reactions (65.7%, n=69/105), perspective and behaviour changes (46.7%, n=49/105), implementation (45.7%, n=48/105) and continuous improvement (6.7%, n=7/105). Evaluation gaps included limited responses from participants, failure to capture certain indicators (eg, physician turnover) and limited longitudinal measures.

Based on the findings and existing models, we developed a physician-focused evaluation framework, constituting two domains: implementation and impacts. This framework can enable organisations to better understand, assess and improve initiatives aimed at physician well-being, which can have positive impacts on patient care and the healthcare system.

The over 14 million African children who are HIV-exposed but uninfected (CHEU) are at risk for poor health outcomes, including neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism; however, no study to date has examined autism in CHEU in Africa, where the vast majority of these children live. Scalable diagnostic and neurobehavioural tools, including powerful, low-cost approaches such as eye-tracking, for detection and study of mechanistic neural processes are necessary to advance autism research in these settings. The objective of this study is to examine autism diagnostic outcomes and eye-tracking biomarkers in relation to CHEU while at the same time building capacity for neuro-health research in Kenya.

This study will leverage a longitudinally assessed cohort of CHEU and children who are HIV-unexposed and uninfected (CHUU) with well characterised HIV-related and contextual exposures. We will first determine and compare autism diagnostic outcomes between young CHEU and CHUU across a large cohort (n=850) of Kenyan children using research-grade autism assessment tools, and, second, determine whether neurobehavioural eye-tracking markers predict autism outcomes across this cohort.

Human subjects approvals have been obtained from Moi University Institutional Review and Ethics Committee (IREC; IREC/909/2024; Approval #0004835), Kenya’s National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI; Reference #NACOSTI/P/25/415028), the Institutional Review Board of the Indiana University School of Medicine (Protocol #23171), with reliance agreements executed with Purdue University and Boston University. Dissemination of findings will occur through multiple channels within the research and clinical community, including peer-reviewed journal publications and conference abstracts and presentations. As part of capacity building efforts, the research team will also communicate study results to policy makers, the lay public and other health systems involved in the care of young children with disabilities via study-hosted workshops and conferences.

Personalised nutrition that incorporates genetic results into dietary interventions holds significant potential to optimise weight management and metabolic outcomes. While traditional calorie-restricted diets remain effective, emerging evidence suggests that variations in macronutrient distribution may offer additional benefits. Genetic variants help explain interindividual differences in dietary responses, with certain alleles showing enhanced weight loss and metabolic improvements with specific macronutrient distributions. However, comprehensive reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining genotype-based dietary effects, particularly those focusing on macronutrient distribution metabolic pathway interactions, are lacking, limiting the development of robust evidence-based guidelines for nutrigenetic counselling. This systematic review aims to assess the influence of genetic variants on weight loss outcome in adults in response to varying macronutrient distribution diets (eg, low-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets) using evidence from RCTs.

We will systematically review RCTs examining weight loss outcomes of macronutrient-varied diets in adults with genotype stratifications to risk and protective allele. Multiple databases, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Science Direct and Google Scholar, will be used. Reviewers will screen studies, extract data on study characteristics, weight loss, metabolic marker outcomes and genetic data, and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 tool.

All eligible RCTs will first be summarised in structured tables describing study characteristics, macronutrient distribution and genetic variants and will be analysed with narrative synthesis. For quantitative analysis, interventions will be grouped into three predefined diet types (high-protein, low to moderate carbohydrate and low-fat diet). Because heterogeneity across diet categories is expected, pooled effects will be estimated separately within each diet subgroup using random-effects meta-analysis, expressed as mean differences in weight change (kg). Within each subgroup, and when at least 10 studies or data are available, random-effects meta-regression will be used to examine potential moderators, including intervention duration, physical activity and ancestry. Heterogeneity will be evaluated using I² and ², and publication bias assessed when feasible. Evidence certainty will be graded using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

Ethical approval is not required for this protocol as it involves the analysis of data from primary studies. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. Any enquiries regarding research integrity of this protocol may be directed to the Head of the Doctoral Program in Medical Health and Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada via the institutional email address s3fk@ugm.ac.id, as the responsible academic authority for research integrity.

CRD420251050587.