Despite its serious impact, anorexia nervosa (AN) remains one of the least understood mental illnesses, with significant gaps in effective treatment options. No medications have been deemed effective and only 50% of individuals respond to conventional psychotherapies. Gastrointestinal (GI) bacteria have been found to be altered in individuals with AN. While, Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown potential for alleviating anxiety and depression, its effects remain understudied for individuals with AN. This study aims to determine whether oral capsular FMT is acceptable to adolescents with AN and results in clinical improvement in weight and/or psychological symptoms.

This study will randomise 20 adolescents with AN, ages 12–17 years, to receive either FMT or placebo capsules. These 20 youth, as well as an additional 10 youth who decline trial enrolment, will participate in qualitative interviews. We will track recruitment rates and collect psychological and biological measures (blood, stool, urine and saliva) at multiple timepoints to assess how gut microbiota and their metabolites may influence the symptoms of AN. Interviews with participants and caregivers will explore their experiences and views on FMT as a treatment approach.

This study has received ethics approval by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (#17493) and investigational drug approval by Health Canada (Dossier ID: c292423). Informed consent will be obtained by research staff from all participants. Findings will be disseminated through academic conferences, clinical forums and partnerships with advocacy organisations to reach clinicians, researchers and individuals with lived experience.

NCT06593366.

Providing peer support can benefit youth peer support workers (peers)et by supporting self-determination, recovery and resilience to self-stigma. There is a need to clarify the role of the organisation in providing benefits for peers. We aimed to identify the organisational contexts and mechanisms that result in the creation of healthy workplaces for peers.

Rapid realist review guided by the Realist and Meta-Narrative Evidence Syntheses–Evolving Standards guidelines and Pawson’s iterative approach.

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, SocINDEX, Google Scholar and Embase were searched from 1979 to 2025.

We included qualitative and quantitative peer-reviewed studies and grey literature that captured characteristics of organisational practices and employment considerations in youth peer support programmes.

Articles were screened independently by multiple reviewers. Inclusion criteria were adjusted to capture literature on organisational practices, and employment considerations for youth peer support programmes. Data were extracted and analysed retroductively to develop Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations (CMOCs).

Five employment-related risks to peer well-being were identified: (1) difficulty entering the job market, (2) lack of role clarity, (3) pressure to live up to ideals, (4) retraumatisation and (5) stigma. Six CMOCs were developed; all focused on the creation of equitable employment and supporting peer development and empowerment were developed.

Community-based mental health organisations can facilitate equitable peer employment through strategies that reduce professional stigma, enhance peer resilience and promote professional and personal development. Policy reform that addresses precarious work conditions is needed to support healthy work environments.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury is common in intensive care and is linked to high morbidity and mortality, yet no specific therapy exists beyond supportive care. Excess circulating labile iron contributes to oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and cell death via ferroptosis. We hypothesise that targeted removal of labile iron during dialysis may reduce this pathogenic process. This study will evaluate the performance and safety of adding a novel iron chelator named MEX-CD1 (Metal EXtraction - Chitosan DOTAGA 1) to dialysate during continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (CVVHD) in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

This is a single-centre, randomised, open-label, crossover phase I–II pilot study in the intensive care unit of Nîmes University Hospital, France. 14 adult patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy will receive two consecutive 24-hour CVVHD sessions: one with standard dialysate and one with dialysate supplemented with MEX-CD1 at 50mg/L. Each patient serves as their own control. The primary outcome is the iron concentration in the effluent to measure iron removal performance. Secondary outcomes include plasma iron clearance, trace element loss, biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation, and safety outcomes monitored up to 28 days. Statistical analyses will use paired tests and mixed linear regression models.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Comité de Protection des Personnes (no. 25.01220.000448) and the French National Agency for Safety of Drugs and Medical Devices (no. 2024-A01530-47). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

NCT07236463.

Community-acquired pneumonia is the leading global cause of infection-related death. A subset of patients with pneumonia develops aberrant immune responses, resulting in harmful inflammation, tissue damage and significant mortality. Immunomodulatory therapies aim to blunt this dysregulated immune response and reduce resultant injury. No consensus exists on the use or impacts of immunomodulatory therapies in the management of community-acquired pneumonia. This protocol describes the methods we will use to undertake a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the effects of immunomodulatory therapies on the mortality of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

We will undertake a systematic review and network meta-analysis investigating the use of immunomodulatory therapies in community-acquired pneumonia. Our protocol has been developed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024565301). The primary objectives of this work are to compare the impact of immunomodulatory therapies on 28-day and 90-day mortality in adult patients admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. The secondary objectives of this work are to identify any differences in the effectiveness of these immunomodulatory therapies in managing community-acquired pneumonia of differing aetiology and severity.

We will conduct a literature search of Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Global Health for all relevant articles until 30 June 2024. All observational, interventional and epidemiological studies published in English will be included, and each type of study design will be examined separately. All studies will have their titles and abstracts independently screened by two reviewers, followed by a full article eligibility review and data extraction. A third reviewer will adjudicate any disagreements. Data extracted will include, but not be limited to, the study design, country in which it was undertaken, patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, cause of CAP, severity of CAP), details regarding the immunomodulatory therapy and dosing used and the 28-day and 90-day mortality of each study arm.

The risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Exposure tool for non-randomised studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised control trials. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations for network meta-analysis framework. A quantitative synthesis of data is planned for 28-day and 90-day mortality rates.

We will fit a random-effects network meta-analysis model that includes random effects for between-study heterogeneity and for inconsistency. This will be done using the metafor package for R. We will use a contrast-based approach, modelling estimated treatment effects using reference treatments. In the case of the primary objective, this will be the log odds ratio (OR) of mortality in one treatment compared with another.

Each type of study design will be examined separately. Treatments using the same immunotherapy at different doses may be grouped if appropriate.

This will be a systematic review of published literature; therefore, ethical approval is not required. To ensure communication of our findings, we will publish our results in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at appropriate local, national and international meetings.

CRD42024565301.