Conectar
by Seungjae Cho, Nancy Xi, Emma A. Bateman, Cynthia Chui, Eric Poon, Aran Bains, Patrick Fangping Yao, Meiqi Guo
ObjectiveThe purpose of this scoping review is to map the existing evidence that describes strategies to improve handover from the acute care to rehabilitation settings.
IntroductionPoor handover processes have been associated with preventable errors, delays in care, and adverse patient outcomes. Effective physician-to-physician handover during transitions of care is critical to ensuring patient safety and optimizing clinical outcomes. Physician handover between acute and rehabilitation care settings is particularly complicated, as it requires transferring detailed and timely information for continuity of care for medically and/or surgically complex patients between components of healthcare systems with different cultures and goals of care. Despite numerous studies being published on handover, there has yet to be a synthesis of the existing literature that seeks to explore handovers across acute to rehabilitation settings as well as how care transitions can be improved. This scoping review aims to map the existing evidence on physician-to-physician handover from acute care to rehabilitation.
MethodsThis review will be conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A comprehensive search will be performed across the following electronic databases: MEDLINE(R) ALL (Ovid), Embase Classic + Embase (Ovid), APA PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid), Emcare (Ovid), CINAHL Ultimate (EBSCO) and Web of Science (Clarivate). All rounds of screening, data extraction, and data synthesis will be conducted independently with each stage performed in duplicate. The extracted data will be summarized both quantitively with descriptive statistics and qualitatively using content analysis.
Eligibility CriteriaQualitative and quantitative studies published in English that discuss physician-physician handover from acute care to rehabilitation settings will be included. All geographical areas will be considered. Case reports, case series, commentaries, protocols, opinion pieces (editorials), or abstracts from conferences will be excluded.
To explore the social context of violence for hospital-based and community nurses from different ethnic groups, the types of violence experienced or witnessed both in and outside the workplace, and its impact on mental and physical health.
Cross-sectional, qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 hospital-based and community nurses recruited from London, England, between May and August 2021. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
The sample comprised seven hospital nurses and five community nurses. Four themes were identified: (i) the social context in which nurses from different ethnic groups are exposed to community violence; (ii) types of workplace violence experienced or witnessed by hospital-based and community nurses from different ethnic groups; (iii) perceptions of the factors contributing to workplace violence; (iv) impacts of violence on mental and physical health outcomes. Using the social ecological framework and sociological theory of stress, these findings informed a conceptual stress process model of violence exposure for nurses.
Nurses from different ethnic groups are exposed to violence both in and outside the workplace which negatively affects their mental and physical health. Effective violence prevention requires a multi-factorial approach that addresses the social and institutional factors contributing to violence, shifting the focus from individual measures to systemic organisational changes.
The NHS workforce is currently more diverse than ever, and healthcare leaders must improve access to mental health and well-being resources for staff affected by workplace violence, particularly for those who hold multiple social identities at the intersection of ethnicity, gender and age. Prioritising this support is essential not only to safeguard against negative health outcomes but also to improve the recruitment and retention of healthcare professionals.
No patient or public contribution.
Vaping among children and young people (CYP) has increased globally over the past decade, with rates stabilising in the UK in recent years. Factors such as curiosity, social influence, stress management and attractive flavours contribute to its popularity. Although the long-term health impacts are uncertain, vaping poses risks including nicotine dependence, cardiovascular and respiratory issues, and cognitive impairment, though evidence on long-term effects is still emerging. Despite established smoking cessation programmes for adults, tailored resources for vaping cessation among CYP remain scarce, particularly within healthcare settings, which offer unique opportunities for professional intervention and ongoing support. The objective of this review is to assess the extent and nature of available literature on interventions delivered in healthcare settings to support vaping cessation among CYP under the age of 18 years.
This scoping review will include studies targeting CYP under the age of 18 years, specifically focusing on interventions delivered within healthcare settings. Studies outside healthcare contexts or those without healthcare provider involvement will be excluded. Additionally, interventions delivered solely to parents or carers will not be considered.
A comprehensive search will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL from January 2004 to present, with additional grey literature from sources including grey literature repositories and Google Scholar. Results will be imported into Rayyan for screening, with two independent reviewers assessing studies for inclusion. Data extraction will include study design, population characteristics (including explicit age ranges, specifically CYP under 18 years), intervention details and outcomes. A descriptive synthesis will map study characteristics, while thematic analysis will identify intervention themes and healthcare contexts.
Ethics approval is not required for this secondary analysis. Findings will be disseminated through publication, conference presentations and shared with public health stakeholders.
To compare the quality and time efficiency of physician-written summaries with customised large language model (LLM)-generated medical summaries integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) in a non-English clinical environment.
Cross-sectional non-inferiority validation study.
Tertiary academic hospital.
52 physicians from 8 specialties at a large Dutch academic hospital participated, either in writing summaries (n=42) or evaluating them (n=10).
Physician writers wrote summaries of 50 patient records. LLM-generated summaries were created for the same records using an EHR-integrated LLM. An independent, blinded panel of physician evaluators compared physician-written summaries to LLM-generated summaries.
Primary outcome measures were completeness, correctness and conciseness (on a 5-point Likert scale). Secondary outcomes were preference and trust, and time to generate either the physician-written or LLM-generated summary.
The completeness and correctness of LLM-generated summaries did not differ significantly from physician-written summaries. However, LLM summaries were less concise (3.0 vs 3.5, p=0.001). Overall evaluation scores were similar (3.4 vs 3.3, p=0.373), with 57% of evaluators preferring LLM-generated summaries. Trust in both summary types was comparable, and interobserver variability showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.975). Physicians took an average of 7 min per summary, while LLMs completed the same task in just 15.7 s.
LLM-generated summaries are comparable to physician-written summaries in completeness and correctness, although slightly less concise. With a clear time-saving benefit, LLMs could help reduce clinicians’ administrative burden without compromising summary quality.
The study was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance of the Hightop Syphilis Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) in comparison with the ELISA test used as a reference method.
A laboratory-based cross-sectional and comparative study was conducted to assess the diagnostic performance of the Hightop Syphilis RDT.
Blood samples obtained from adult participants in eight health facilities were analysed at the National Public Health Laboratory (NPHL), Ministry of Public Health, Yaounde, Cameroon.
From 29 April to 25 August 2023, 583 adult participants of both sexes (aged ≥21 years), including both syphilis positive and syphilis negative, were recruited consecutively in eight health facilities in eight regions of Cameroon.
Blood samples were screened for the detection of anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies using the One Step Rapid Test (Qingdao Hightop Biotech), a non-treponemal test and ELISA (Biorex Diagnostics, UK), a treponemal test used as a reference method. Diagnostic performance of the Syphilis RDT was analysed using Epi Info V.7 and validated through online statistical tools such as StatPages, GraphPad, QuickCalcs and MedCalc software.
Of the 583 samples tested, the Hightop Syphilis RDT revealed a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI: 74.8% to 91.1%) and specificity of 98.5% (95% CI: 97.5% to 99.1%). The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 84.6% (95% CI: 74.8% to 91.1%) and 98.5% (95% CI: 97.5% to 99.1%), respectively. Regarding the stratification of diagnostic performance by clinical stage, the test showed a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI: 71.51% to 100.0%) and specificity of 99.06% (95% CI: 94.86% to 99.98%). The PPV and NPV were 91.67% (95% CI: 61.00% to 98.72%) and 100.0% (95% CI: 96.55% to 100.0%), respectively, in symptomatic individuals. Among asymptomatic individuals, sensitivity was 97.56% (95% CI: 87.14% to 99.94%) and specificity was 100.0% (95% CI: 99.14% to 100.0%). The PPV and NPV were 100.0% (95% CI: 91.19% to 100.0%) and 99.77% (95% CI: 98.40% to 99.97%), respectively.
The Hightop Syphilis RDT demonstrated adequate diagnostic performance, particularly among symptomatic individuals, supporting its utility as a reliable tool for syphilis detection in clinical settings.
Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is an important modifiable risk factor of major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients without prior myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke but with established risk factors and elevated LDL-C may benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); however, the size and potential healthcare burden of this population globally are not known. The benefits of evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, in these patients, are currently being studied in the phase 3 Effect of Evolocumab in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Without Prior Myocardial Infarction or Stroke (VESALIUS-CV) trial. To characterise the high-risk pre–CV-event (VESALIUS-CV–like) individuals in the real world, an observational study is being conducted across multiple countries.
This retrospective cohort study will use a common protocol and an analytical common data model approach to characterise VESALIUS-CV–like individuals in the real world across different geographical regions and healthcare settings. The study period will be from 2010 to 2022, subject to data availability in study sites. Patients aged 50 years and older at high risk of CV disease but without prior MI or stroke will be included in this study. VESALIUS-CV–like individuals are defined through a combination of the following: (1) one diagnosis of coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease or diabetes with microvascular complications or chronic insulin use; (2) an elevated LDL-C measurement and (3) other high-risk factors. The objectives of this study are to estimate the prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals, describe their characteristics and care pathways and estimate their incidence rates of CV events and healthcare costs. The prevalence of VESALIUS-CV–like individuals will be expressed as annual prevalence; patient characteristics at index date will be presented using summary statistics; care pathways will be summarised as LLT prescription across time; and the incidence of defined CV events will be expressed as events per person-years as well as at certain time periods. Healthcare costs will be presented as CV-related costs in different time periods.
Approvals of the study protocol were obtained from relevant local ethics and regulatory frameworks for each participating database. The results of the study will be submitted to peer-reviewed scientific publications and presented at scientific conferences.
FreshRSS 