To understand how reductions in resource allocation affect food safety services in England.

This longitudinal ecological study analysed secondary observational data.

England, data at the local authority level.

Ecological study, without human participants.

The primary outcome measures were the number of staff, represented by the number of full-time equivalents per capita, number of interventions per establishment, and proportion of hygiene-compliant establishments.

A £1 decrease in food safety expenditure per capita was associated with a 2% (–3.3 to –0.7) decrease in staffing levels and a 1.6% (–3.2 to –0.1) decrease in the number of interventions achieved per establishment. A one-unit reduction in staff was associated with a 42.2% (–80.5 to –11.9) decrease in the number of interventions achieved. No evidence of an association was found between expenditure or staff levels and the proportion of compliant establishments.

Spending reductions negatively affected the capacity of food safety teams to provide key services. Reductions in food safety expenditure significantly affected food hygiene staff levels and service provision. This finding raises concerns about the capacity of food safety teams to operate and the potential for increased public risk of gastrointestinal infections.

To explore the role of senior and mid-level managers as barriers or enablers to change in tackling the discriminatory challenges experienced by Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) employees working in the National Health Service (NHS).

A multi-level, multi-sourced qualitative study of five NHS Trusts in England.

26 qualitative interviews with senior leaders and BME network chairs (27 participants) and five focus groups (37 participants) with BME employees, across five NHS Trusts in England.

Our findings revealed that discrimination, racial harassment, incivilities, lack of progression and exclusion experienced by BME employees appear to be deeply ingrained in the culture of the NHS. Despite numerous national and local initiatives aimed at promoting inclusivity and addressing discriminatory behaviours, our findings also revealed a notable disparity between what senior leaders thought was effective in addressing discriminatory behaviours and the actual lived experiences of BME employees. Finally, a key finding was the pivotal role middle managers played in setting the tone for whether discriminatory behaviours are challenged or allowed to persist, which directly impacts on the overall experiences of BME employees within the NHS.

Our results provide evidence that not only does racial discrimination continue to be experienced by NHS BME employees, but that middle managers are key to addressing and improving this situation. Despite there being national policies and initiatives addressing racial discrimination, our study found that positive change, whether at an individual or organisational level, is dependent on the actions and commitment of middle managers.

Despite the continued burden of opioid overdose in communities in the USA, effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), such as medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), remain underused. Motivational interviewing techniques and linkage to MOUD via digital health are innovative practices developed to overcome persistent barriers to accessing MOUD treatment. These practices are merged in a comprehensive digital health platform, RecoveryPad (developed by the Center for Progressive Recovery). Our study, ‘Using System Dynamics Modeling to Foster Real-time Connections to Care’ (NIH Award #: 1R61DA057675-01), is a pilot to assess the feasibility and behaviour change potential of RecoveryPad for our target audience of people experiencing OUD.

This study will recruit 40 participants in Connecticut and New York through online platforms, such as social media and digital advertising, and direct access via quick-response (QR) codes distributed by local community partners. Eligibility assessment and enrolment will be conducted virtually. Individuals reporting symptoms indicating moderate to severe OUD who are at least 18 years of age are eligible for the study, excluding those who are currently receiving MOUD, pregnant or incarcerated. Enrolled participants will interact with an automated chatbot, live recovery coaches and, if desired, be referred to a telehealth MOUD provider via the RecoveryPad platform. Participants will have access to the platform for 30 days and will be asked to complete brief surveys to assess MOUD engagement and secondary outcomes at 30 and 90 days. Additionally, system dynamics (SD) models will be developed at the individual level to simulate participant interactions with RecoveryPad, and at the community level to improve understanding of the systems affecting OUD and MOUD access.

This project received approval from the Yale University Human Investigation Committee in 2024 (HIC # 2000034414). All participants will complete an electronic consent form with detailed study information and release of information to obtain data related to MOUD appointment attendance. Findings and conclusions from this pilot will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication, advisory board meetings and meetings with community partners.

NCT05832879.