Cycling can be beneficial for health, well-being and the environment; however, cycling participation in the UK remains low. Effective and cost-effective strategies are needed to support people in the community to increase cycling. The Cycle Nation Communities randomised controlled trial (RCT) will evaluate whether a 9 week multi-component cycling programme (Cycle Nation) is more effective and cost-effective than an existing national cycle training session on cycling participation, transport use and health and well-being.

This pragmatic, single-blinded, two-arm RCT will recruit ≥268 adults who cycle infrequently. Participants will be randomised to the 9 week multi-component individual/social-level group-based Cycle Nation programme or an existing national standard single group-based cycle training session. Both arms will be delivered by community-based cycling organisations in Glasgow. Participants will complete self-reported measurements at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants cycling at least weekly at 12 weeks; change in weekly number of rides and minutes of cycling and use of private car, taxi, public transport and walking at 12 weeks and 12 months; change in motivation, perceptions of cycling safety, confidence to cycle, self-esteem, vitality, health-related quality of life and perceived general physical health at 12 weeks and 12 months. A within-trial economic evaluation from a National Health Service/personal social service and a broader societal perspective will be undertaken. Pending within-trial results, a long-term model may be developed. An embedded process evaluation will use participant and facilitator interviews, participant acceptability questionnaires, facilitator delivery proforma and session observations.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Glasgow Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee (11 April 25). Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to stakeholders and the public.

NCT07005674.

Asthma is a major personal and public health problem worldwide, with a significant impact on patients’ quality of life and health systems. The prevalence of asthma in children is 9.1% and in adolescents is 11%. Greater literacy among children is related to better asthma control. There are many validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) related to asthma, but there are only a few, and no gold standard, to measure children and adolescents’ knowledge of asthma. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the most suitable asthma self-knowledge PROMs for the paediatric population with asthma.

The inclusion criteria will be children and adolescents diagnosed with asthma (population), validated PROMs about asthma self-knowledge (intervention), between each PROM (comparison) and measurement properties (outcome) (validity, reliability, interpretability and responsiveness). The search process will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and SCOPUS. The risk of bias evaluation will be done independently by two authors with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist, and the quality of evidence will be evaluated based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since the data that will be collected are secondary data and are already in the public domain. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.

CRD42024577500.