Anxiety is a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). There is no specific pharmacological intervention for people with PD who experience anxiety. Current non-pharmacological treatments have mixed or inconclusive results and there does not appear to be a non-pharmacological intervention for people with PD disease and anxiety that focuses on activity and participation.

To co-produce an occupation-focused complex intervention to help people with PD live well with anxiety that community-based occupational therapists can deliver.

Six-stage complex intervention development was conducted using online logic modelling and a participatory approach to organise the new intervention’s key inputs, processes and outcomes important to people with PD living with anxiety.

Data were collected via online logic modelling sessions involving people with Parkinson’s, care partners and occupational therapists across the UK from April 2022 to June 2022.

34 participants were recruited (people with PD n=14, care partners n=9, occupational therapists n=11) for the online logic modelling sessions.

Resources to support the new intervention (‘inputs’) include adequate resourcing, education for professionals and people with PD, flexibility of delivery methods and goal setting. The intervention’s actions to produce outcomes (‘processes’) should include 1:1 support, lifestyle management, providing meaningful information, collaborative goal setting, therapeutic use of everyday activities, and involvement of friends and families. The intended results (‘outcomes’) should include a reduction in anxiety symptoms, people with PD enjoying more meaningful activities, increased understanding of anxiety and PD, improvement in clinical outcomes and improvement of service-level outcomes. These key aspects were incorporated into an intervention manual, educational material and training video.

We have systematically coproduced a new occupation-focused complex intervention to help people with PD to live well with anxiety. This provides the basis for the next project in which this intervention will be tested for feasibility.

ISRCTN62762494.

Healthcare workers (HCWs) report overwhelming demands and experience crisis levels of burnout and unique challenges that further impair their mental health. Promotion of mental health among HCWs using information and communication technology (ICT) has received little empirical research attention and interventions for improving mental health resilience in HCWs are not well established.

Scoping review to map existing evidence and identify gaps for future research regarding the main barriers and facilitators of the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in all healthcare settings.

This protocol was developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search will be conducted between October 2024 and October 2025 in Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus, Cochrane Library and CINAHL Ultimate (MedicLatina, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection), with the assistance of a qualified research librarian, to retrieve studies describing data on the main barriers and facilitators to the acceptance of ICT-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs working in healthcare settings. There will be no restrictions based on date of publication or language. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be defined for each element of the PICO(D) framework, and both quantitative and qualitative data will be extracted. Quality will be assessed using the mixed methods assessment tool. Two independent investigators will perform the eligibility assessment and data extraction, and any disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. The main results will be narratively synthesised and analysed.

Since secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required. The results will be disseminated through publications subject to peer review.

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5R36Q.

Heart failure clinics (HFCs) are associated with increased survival rates, lower hospitalisation and improved quality of life. This study investigated factors influencing patient access to multidisciplinary outpatient HFCs from the perspective of patients and cardiologists.

This was a qualitative study. A trained researcher conducted semistructured face-to-face interviews with patients and online interviews with cardiologists. Interviews, conducted between March and October 2023, were audio-recorded. Transcripts were cleaned (deidentification, translation verification) and analysed by two trained researchers independently using systematic text condensation in NVivo v12. Codes were derived from the transcripts and grouped and organised into themes. Two authors independently coded data, reconciling disagreements with the senior author, followed by respondent validation. Member checking ensued.

Outpatient multidisciplinary HFCs in Qatar.

A purposive sample of patients diagnosed with heart failure who had attended at least one HFC appointment at Qatar’s Heart Hospital were approached in person or via phone, and cardiologists with the authority to make referrals to these clinics via the electronic medical record system were emailed; interviews ensued until theme saturation was achieved.

26 individuals (14 patients and 12 cardiologists) participated in the interviews. Four major themes were identified: health system organisation (subthemes: benefits, HFC triage criteria, need/capacity), HFC referral processes (subthemes: electronic record system, patient communication and education), care continuity and communication (subthemes: patient navigators, clinician preferences) and access challenges (subthemes: transportation, costs).

Resources are needed to expand HFC capacity and coverage, leverage electronic medical record tools as well as telehealth, educate physicians and patients on referral guidelines and processes and engage primary care to ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Hepatic impairment, especially hepatitis, is a growing public health concern in the general population globally. Viral hepatitis, a key driver of liver impairment, remains endemic in many countries across sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We conducted an umbrella review to assess the prevalence of viral hepatitis among the general population in SSA.

We conducted an umbrella review, using standardised methods to assess multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) on the prevalence of viral hepatitis.

We systematically searched PubMed and Embase to retrieve systematic reviews published from 2013–2024.

We retrieved systematic reviews published during 2013–2024 that examined the prevalence of viral hepatitis among the general population within SSA.

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and identify included studies. We conducted an umbrella review, which was a comprehensive and systematic collation and assessment of SRMAs focused on the prevalence of viral hepatitis in SSA.

The final analysis included 21 studies. Among these, one study focused on hepatitis A, 13 on hepatitis B, 10 on hepatitis C, 2 on hepatitis D and 1 on hepatitis E. Only one study reported the overall prevalence of hepatitis A and E in SSA as 90 200 and 46 860 per 100 000 population, respectively. Across SSA, hepatitis B exhibited a pooled prevalence ranging from 6000 to 18 900, while hepatitis C ranged from 720 to 7820 and hepatitis D from 50 to 28 990 per 100 000 population. Heterogeneity was high and ranged from I²=63.14% to 99%.

We present an umbrella review on viral hepatitis prevalence in SSA, providing an overall view of study quality, effect sizes, heterogeneity and bias across the search field. We found that the prevalence of viral hepatitis in many SSA countries is higher than the global estimate. However, these results are mainly based on seropositivity tests; nonetheless, the findings from this study provide an overarching picture of the burden of viral hepatitis within populations in SSA.