About 30% of depressed patients suffer from a protracted course in which the disorder continues to cause significant burden despite treatment efforts. While originally developed for relapse prevention, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) has increasingly been investigated in depressed patients with such ‘difficult-to-treat’ courses. This is a protocol for an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis aiming to determine efficacy and potential moderators of MBCT treatment effects in this group based on evidence from randomised controlled trials.

Systematic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register for randomised controlled trials were completed on 17 June 2024. Authors of identified studies have contributed IPD, and data extractions have been completed. An update search will be conducted immediately before the start of data analyses. We will investigate the following outcomes: (a) self-reported and observer-reported severity of depression symptomatology, (b) remission and (c) clinically meaningful improvement and deterioration. One-stage and two-stage IPD-MA will be conducted with one-stage models using the observed IPD from all studies simultaneously as the primary approach. One-stage IPD models will include stratified study intercepts and error terms as well as random effects to capture between-study heterogeneity. Moderator analyses will test treatment-covariate interactions for both individual patient-level and study-level characteristics.

The results will inform understanding of the use of MBCT in patients with current ‘difficult-to-treat’ depression and will contribute to arguments in favour of or against implementing MBCT as a treatment for this group. They will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and made available to stakeholders in accessible formats. No local ethical review was necessary following consultation with the Ethics and Governance Board of the University of Surrey. Guidance on patient data storage and management will be adhered to throughout.

CRD42022332039.

Research in people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) is increasingly focusing on non-motor symptoms like cognitive impairment, fatigue and depression. Due to the high negative impact on quality of life and high socioeconomic costs based on these symptoms, more specific research to improve non-motor symptoms is needed. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been found to be a cognitive enhancer in preclinical research and was successfully used for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders to combat dysfunctional cognitive and affective processes. However, the capacity of taVNS to improve cognitive and other non-motor symptoms in PwRRMS has not been tested yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic potential of taVNS on cognitive processing speed. Based on ample evidence demonstrating that taVNS promotes adaptive cognitive and affective processes, we hypothesised that taVNS would alleviate cognitive processing speed in PwRRMS.

This study protocol describes the prospective, single-centre, SHAM-controlled, single-blinded trial with a planned sample size of 60 participants (30 PwRRMS, with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis according to McDonald criteria and 30 healthy controls; age: 18–50 years). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) will be used to determine cognitive processing speed, Beck Depression Inventory-II to determine depression and Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions to determine fatigue. The severity of multiple sclerosis will be assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale. After baseline assessment, a taVNS protocol (duration: 30 min, tolerance threshold, pulse width: 250 μs, stimulation frequency: 25 Hz, 30 s on/30 s off) will be applied, followed by post-intervention assessment.

The study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of the University Medical Centre Greifswald (study reference number: BB137/24). Clinical trial registration: www.drks.de, number: DRKS00034912. Study results will be disseminated through academic conferences as well as peer-reviewed publications.

DRKS00034912.

To determine the association between rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection following home, community and work-related exposures, to assess real-world relative vaccine effectiveness, and to determine whether anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels were associated with the rates of subsequent infection.

Prospective cohort of 34 months’ duration (February 2021 to December 2023).

Teachers and education workers working ≥8 hours per week in the Canadian province of Ontario.

3155 education workers were eligible for the risk factor analysis; 2977 for the serological analysis.

Rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

1909 SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported (0.93 per 1000 participant-days); the highest incidence occurred during the period dominated by the Omicron BA.2 variant (2.01 per 1000 participant-days). Rates of infection were significantly higher following the repeal of the mask mandate. Compared with participants without known contact with an infected person, those in close contact with infected adult or child household members (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.43; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.65 and 1.39; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.65, respectively), coworkers (aHR 1.28; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.50), or individuals from more than one setting (aHR 1.44; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.64) had higher rates of infection. Participants with three or more doses of vaccine were 79%–87% less likely to develop SARS-CoV-2 than participants who had two or fewer vaccine doses. Blood samples with anti-RBD antibody levels in the highest quintile (≥5850 binding antibody unit/mL) were associated with a lower rate of subsequent infection (aHR 0.40; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.72) compared with samples with RBD levels below the threshold of detection.

Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in education workers occurred at home as well as the workplace, indicating the need to practise multiple intervention strategies whenever the potential for transmission of respiratory diseases is high. COVID-19 vaccines provided protection through December 2023.

The only supportive therapy for patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI), a common complication among the critically ill, is dialysis. Based on the literature and current guidelines, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with a total effluent dose of 20–25 mL/kg/hour and adjustments to ensure such dose is delivered despite down time (eg, due to surgical procedures) is recommended. However, experimental and clinical studies suggest that azotaemia, which can be induced by lowering the effluent dose, may accelerate renal recovery. This clinical study investigates whether a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) for a maximum of 7 days or until successful (>24 hours) liberation of CRRT in critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI accelerates renal recovery and reduces time on CRRT compared with guideline-directed standard dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour).

The Ketzerei trial is an international, multicentre randomised, controlled trial, designed to investigate if a lower effluent dose (10–15 mL/kg/hour) accelerates renal recovery and reduces the time on CRRT compared with the guideline directed standard effluent dose (25–30 mL/kg/hour). The study aims to enrol 150 critically ill patients with a dialysis-dependent AKI. Eligible patients will be randomised to receive either a standard effluent dose (control group, 25–30 mL/kg/hour) or lower effluent dose (interventional group, 10–15 mL/kg/hour). The primary endpoint is the number of days free from CRRT and alive (from randomisation through day 28). Key secondary endpoints include the number of (serious) adverse events due to potential uremia, the duration of RRT and intensive care unit survival.

The Ketzerei trial has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chamber of Physicians Westfalen-Lippe (2023–343 f-s), the University of Muenster and subsequently by the corresponding Ethics Committee of the participating sites. Results will be disseminated widely and published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at conferences and will guide patient care and further research.

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06021288).