FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Immediate versus delayed dental implant placement: an umbrella review protocol

Por: Ron Canelos · M. · de Oliveira Miranda · N. · Simbana Balseca · J. P. · Benfatti · C. M. · Strauss · F. · Ruales-Carrera · E. · Pauletto · P. · Magrin · G. L.
Introduction

Immediate dental implant placement has been proposed as a strategy to reduce treatment time and improve patient satisfaction. However, systematic reviews addressing immediate versus delayed implant placement have reported inconsistent findings, limiting clinical interpretability. An umbrella review is warranted to synthesise, appraise and contextualise the existing evidence.

Methods and analysis

This umbrella review will include systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis comparing immediate implant placement after tooth extraction with delayed placement in healed sites. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in September 2026, in PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Methodological quality will be assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2). Overlap of primary studies will be quantified using the corrected covered area. Outcomes of interest include implant survival, success and failure rates, biological and technical complications, patient-reported outcomes and surgical time. A structured narrative synthesis will be performed.

Ethics and dissemination

This overview does not require ethics approval, as it uses secondary data from previously published studies. The results will be disseminated through the publication in a high-impact journal.

OSF registration number

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GZ3DR

ENding HIV transmission to infants by Generating Evidence to optimise prevention and care for pregnant and postpartum Adolescent Girls and young women with HIV in Tanzania (ENGAGE): study protocol for a mixed-methods research project

Por: Lyatuu · G. W. · Larsson · E. C. · Siril · H. · Mbunda · T. · Urrio · R. F. · Machumi · L. · Machangu · D. · Unkels · R. · Mauka · W. I. · Mahande · M. J. · Simba · B. · Festo · C. · Mganga · A. · Mfaume · R. S. · Laizer · S. · Rutatinisibwa · H. · Kibao · A. · Muhode · P. · Njau · P. · Maok
Introduction

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), including Tanzania, is double-burdened with high rates of teenage pregnancy and new HIV infections among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) aged 15–24 years. Moreover, pregnant AGYW living with HIV in SSA have poorer adherence and retention on HIV treatment and elevated risks of vertical HIV transmission to their infants, as compared with older women. This paper describes the methods for the ENGAGE project, aiming to investigate and optimise healthcare for prevention of vertical HIV transmission (commonly prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT)) for AGYW living with HIV in Tanzania.

Methods and analysis

ENGAGE uses a mixed-methods design to co-create and prototype an intervention package for pregnant/postpartum AGYW living with HIV through three phases in three Tanzanian regions. Phase 1 characterises the problem by investigating care engagement and outcomes in a cohort of N=10 147 AGYW receiving PMTCT services in routine healthcare. Phase 2 uses qualitative interviews to understand the social-structural drivers of care engagement from the perspective of AGYW, healthcare providers and community stakeholders and an evidence review of potential solutions. In phase 3, we will use findings from phase 1 and 2 to co-create (together with AGYW and healthcare providers) an intervention package to optimise PMTCT care for most at-risk AGYW. The co-creation will be done through an intervention development action cycle, where ideas are presented, feedback sought and refinements made iteratively via several workshops over about 6 months. The resulting co-created intervention package will be prototyped at selected facilities/communities and refined into a final version, ready for piloting for feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effect in a later phase. This protocol focuses on the co-creation phase 3 and its preceding phases 1 and 2.

Ethics and dissemination

ENGAGE has received ethical approval from the Tanzania National Health Research Ethics Committee (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/4637), and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2024-05745-01) for analysis of data in Sweden. Findings will be disseminated to AGYW, healthcare providers, community stakeholders, health officials, researchers, policy makers and the wider local and global scientific community.

❌