Paediatric kidney transplantation, while life-saving, presents significant academic challenges for children. Frequent hospitalisations, medical treatments and the psychosocial impact of chronic illness can severely disrupt educational trajectories. This study aimed to explore the post-transplant academic experiences of children from the perspective of their parents.
A qualitative phenomenological study. Data were collected through in-depth, semistructured interviews and analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
The study was conducted in Lahore, Pakistan, with participants recruited from the registry of the Punjab Human Organ Transplantation Authority (PHOTA).
Thirteen parents of children who had undergone a kidney transplant and were enrolled in a formal school.
Five major themes emerged from the analysis: (1) academic disruption and coping, detailing declines in performance and motivation alongside efforts to maintain engagement; (2) cognitive fatigue and emotional strain, encompassing reduced focus, memory difficulties and psychological distress; (3) school attendance, participation and support, highlighting frequent absenteeism, limited engagement in activities, and the critical role of institutional flexibility; (4) social identity and peer exclusion, revealing fears of stigma, self-isolation and misunderstanding from peers and (5) navigating the future, reflecting parental anxieties about long-term educational and career prospects alongside adaptive hope. The findings underscore that formal support systems in schools and healthcare settings are currently underdeveloped to meet these children’s complex needs.
This study illuminates the profound and multifaceted academic challenges faced by children after kidney transplantation. The results emphasise that a transplant is not merely a medical event but a life-altering experience with significant educational consequences. There is a critical need for integrated, targeted interventions that provide robust psychological support, flexible educational policies and comprehensive school reintegration programmes to ensure these children can achieve their full academic and personal potential.
To evaluate the incremental diagnostic value and sub-phenotyping capability of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) compared with Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE) in patients with elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP).
Prospective registry study. [Results from ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05114785]
A single NHS hospital in the UK.
The primary outcome was the rate of diagnostic discordance between TTE and CMR. Secondary outcomes included the characterisation of specific pathologies identified by CMR where TTE was normal, non-diagnostic or provided a non-specific diagnosis.
CMR demonstrated diagnostic discordance with TTE in 74% (n=194) of cases. In patients with a normal TTE (n=54), CMR identified heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in 46% (n=25) and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in 19% (n=10). For non-diagnostic TTE cases (n=15), CMR detected HFpEF in 53.3% (n=8) and IHD in 26.7% (n=4). Among those with non-specific left ventricular hypertrophy on TTE (n=47), CMR revealed HFpEF in 45% (n=21) and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 34% (n=16).
CMR markedly improves diagnostic precision and sub-phenotyping in patients with elevated LVFP, identifying key conditions like HFpEF, IHD and specific cardiomyopathies that TTE frequently misses. These findings highlight CMR’s critical role as a complementary imaging tool for refining diagnoses and informing management strategies in cardiovascular conditions.