Conectar
To identify and synthesise qualitative evidence on nurses' perceptions of reasons for missed nursing care in hospitals.
Systematic review of qualitative evidence.
An extensive search of all relevant databases was conducted. Study selection, quality assessment, data extraction and meta-aggregation were performed independently by two reviewers according to the JBI guidelines for systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the ConQual approach.
The electronic databases CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, PsychInfo, and Scopus were searched in January 2024 and repeated in May 2025.
Thirty-one studies from hospital settings worldwide were included following critical appraisal, with overall quality rated moderate to high. The studies contributed 168 findings, which were organised into 10 categories and three synthesised findings: Organisational and system-level factors influencing missed nursing care, Teamwork and cultural factors influencing missed nursing care, and Individual nurse- and patient-related factors influencing missed nursing care.
Reasons for missed nursing care represent an interplay of systemic, organisational, and individual factors within complex resource-constrained contexts.
Healthcare organisations are recommended to implement system-level interventions, rather than relying solely on behaviour-focused solutions. Healthcare leaders should ensure flexible staffing, strong managerial support, and adequate resources to enable fundamental care. Building collaborative, interprofessional cultures that value relational and fundamental care as well as technical tasks is essential, together with education and mentorship that support nurses' decision-making, resilience, and clinical competence.
Hospital leaders, policymakers, and nurse managers can use the recommendations to reduce missed nursing care and promote a safe person-centred practice. Implementing systemic changes will improve nurses' working conditions and capacity to deliver comprehensive care, ultimately enhancing patient satisfaction and outcomes.
The ‘enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research statement’.
No patient or public involvement.
The review is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. PROSPERO CRD42023438198 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/search)
The production of science is characterized by socio-political and technological forces that influence what knowledge is produced. In this context, empty reviews have received little attention, with debate ranging over the pros and cons of their publication. However, their dissemination may improve the ability to recognize and prioritize research gaps. The main aim of the study was to map empty reviews published in nursing science.
A scoping review in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley, Joanna Briggs Institute and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The review protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework database in April 2025. Four databases and grey literature were searched; there were eligible scoping or systematic reviews defined as “empty” in the field of nursing. A modified framework of Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice, and Research recommendations was used to summarize the extracted data.
Fifteen empty reviews were identified. In terms of Patterns, the empty reviews were mainly published in high-income countries over the last 10 years and related to clinical practise and outcomes, education and training, organizational and human resources, and approaches to maternity care, mental health, and nursing education. In general, reporting guidelines were used, while funding was not documented. In terms of Recommendations, more primary studies, the development of tools and the strategic use of empty reviews to inform the funding and research agenda were suggested.
Empty reviews in nursing may indicate neglected or emerging areas that can help orient research agendas to ensure equity-oriented priorities and reduce the marginalization of under-investigated topics. Recognizing empty reviews as legitimate scholarly outputs supports transparent mapping of knowledge gaps, helping funders, institutions, and research programs direct resources to under-investigated areas. Dedicated registries that publicly report empty reviews, establish minimum reporting standards, and require explicit keywords in titles and abstracts would improve transparency and accessibility, and stimulate targeted primary research that can turn “empty” areas into active inquiry. From this perspective, empty reviews may attract research investment rather than be seen as methodological failures.
To examine factors, including symptom burden profiles and self-care, associated with quality of life among individuals with heart failure and multimorbidity.
A cross-sectional design.
353 adults aged 50 years or older with heart failure and at least one additional chronic condition were recruited from a university-affiliated hospital. Three symptom burden groups were identified (low, moderate, and high) through latent profile analysis of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale scores. The Heart Failure Self-care Index and EuroQoL-5D-5L measured self-care behaviours and quality of life. This study examined group differences and associations overall and stratified by symptom burden groups via multivariable linear regression.
A higher disease burden and the high symptom burden group compared to the low symptom burden group were associated with lower quality of life. Self-care maintenance was positively associated with a higher quality of life, but not in the high-burden group. Among individual symptoms, pain and depression were associated with lower quality of life. In the high-burden group, older age was positively associated with quality of life. Higher symptom burden groups included a greater proportion of women and middle-aged adults.
Symptom burden and self-care maintenance show significant associations with quality of life in multimorbidity. Symptom burden profiles identified through latent profile analysis may complement conventional approaches by targeting high-risk individuals, such as middle-aged individuals and women with high symptom burden, for follow-up and integrated multimorbidity management.
For healthcare providers, including nurses, these findings underscore the importance of holistic, symptom-based care approaches combined with routine support for self-care maintenance. Adopting a life-course approach, through early identification and management of high-risk individuals, may help promote aging in place with a better quality of life for those with heart failure and multimorbidity.
STROBE checklist.
No patient or public contribution.
by Wenting Yan, Carmel L. Montgomery, Liz Dennett, Stephanie A. Chamberlain
BackgroundThe demographic landscape of Western countries has shifted to a more diverse one. Along with the trend of an aging population, a new problem has emerged, which is the increased linguistic diversity in the aging population in these countries. As people age and their care needs increase, they may not receive optimal care if they don’t speak the same language as their caregivers in long-term care facilities. Culturally and linguistically responsive long-term care services are important to ensure the best care for an aging population, but there is limited evidence in the literature on the scope and practice of these services. The objective of this scoping review is to map out the types of CLR programs in LTC settings and examine their core components and target populations.
MethodsThe Arksey and O’Malley framework, further developed by Levac and colleagues, will be employed in this scoping review. The research question was framed using the PCC framework. A comprehensive systematic search was developed with an experienced librarian and will be conducted in Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. All primary study designs, including quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, will be included. Studies must focus on culturally and linguistically responsive care programs used or implemented in long-term care services. There will be no date or language limitations. Findings will be thematically synthesized to answer the research question.
ConclusionThis review protocol provides a transparent process for how it will be conducted. We aim to contribute to a better understanding of what culturally and linguistically responsive care programs exist, how cultural and linguistic responsiveness is currently addressed across diverse care environments, and what gaps remain in long-term care.
by Orit Wonderman Bar Sela, Shay Ofir Geva, Gaby S. Pell, Yiftach Roth, Jason Friedman, Afnan Muhana, Silvi Frenkel-Toledo, Nachum Soroker
Unidirectional transcranial magnetic stimulation (udTMS; e.g., via Figure-of-8 coil) depolarizes mainly neurons whose axonal orientation aligns with the direction of the induced electric field. A novel dual H-coil (T360°) TMS system (BrainsWayTM, Israel) generates a rotational magnetic field aimed to recruit a larger neuronal population by induction of a multidirectional electric field (rfTMS). This study aimed to comparatively assess the neurophysiological properties of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle following udTMS (via Figure-of-8 and H7 coils) vs. multidirectional rfTMS. In this study, 10 healthy adult subjects received TMS via the three coil configurations in a random order. The results showed that rfTMS elicited larger MEPs at a lower resting motor threshold (rMT) compared to the unidirectional coils. These findings suggest that rfTMS is likely to recruit larger populations of neurons compared to conventional udTMS coil configurations. This may be advantageous in efforts to enhance motor recovery following brain damage by treatments using TMS.by Clarisse Kagoyire, Albert Ndagijimana, Gilbert Nduwayezu, Jean Nepo Utumatwishima, Jean Pierre Mpatswenumugabo, Marie Anne Mukasafari, Diane Rinda, Vedaste Ndahindwa, Kristina Elfving, Gunilla Krantz, Torbjörn Lind, Ali Mansourian, Renée Båge, Ewa Wredle, Elias Nyandwi, Aline Umubyeyi, Jean Baptiste Ndahetuye, Petter Pilesjö
Despite national progress, stunting remains prevalent in specific regions of Rwanda, highlighting the limitations of coarse-resolution data for effective mapping and intervention planning. This study explored optimal spatial resolution and analytical approach to capture localised dynamics and the multifactorial nature of stunting. A cross-sectional, population-based study was conducted in the Northern Province of Rwanda, focusing on children aged 1–36 months. Data were collected using structured questionnaires covering socio-demographic, economic, health, childcare, livestock factors and anthropometric measurements. Environmental characteristics were obtained from national datasets, while household geographic coordinates were captured using a customized mobile geodata platform (emGeo). After data cleaning, predictors were analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression as well as geographically weighted logistic regression (GWLR) to account for spatial heterogeneity. Among 601 children, stunting prevalence was 27% (boys 33.8%; girls 20.9%). GWLR improved model fit, increasing adjusted deviance explained from 34% to 39%. Significant predictors included child age (adjusted OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.78–3.39), male sex (OR = 2.83; 95% CI: 1.65–4.86), birthweight (OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.54–0.94), maternal autonomy (ability to refuse sexual intercourse; OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27–0.86), inconsistent maternal social support (OR = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.20–4.42), household electricity access (OR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.27–0.84) and handwashing facilities (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07–0.67). GWLR revealed substantial spatial heterogeneity in these factors, delineating areas where each factor matters most. This household-level, spatially explicit analysis reveals localised risk patterns often masked by aggregated national data. Prioritising context-specific interventions (such as electrification, hygiene promotion, and enhanced maternal social support), can enhance effectiveness. The proposed analytical workflow provides a model for addressing persistent stunting in other resource-limited settings.by Jimmy Andreyvan Cainamarks-Alejandro, Liliana Cruz-Ausejo, Miguel Angel Burgos-Flores, Jaime Rosales-Rimache, Jonh Astete-Cornejo, David Villarreal-Zegarra
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic marked an increase in depressive, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, more specifically among healthcare workers, teachers, and police officers. These workers face external and occupational factors which had a significant impact on mental health, significant increase in workload and direct exposure to the virus, shortage of personnel protective equipment, and instances of abuse, including discrimination. Mental health care in primary care requires a process of early identification and timely referral of complex cases. Telehealth emerges as an effective alternative for addressing challenges in mental health care, although its implementation encounters obstacles.
ObjectiveTo design a telehealth service that facilitates screening, initial management, and timely referral for mental health diagnoses in workers with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to evaluate usability, acceptability, and user satisfaction.
MethodsMixed-method study with a user-centered design approach involving key external and internal service users in three sequential stages (pre-design, co-design, and post-design). The study phases lasted 6 months, involving a total of 23 participants in the pre-design phase (contextual inquiry and preparation and training), 12 participants in the co-design phase (framing the issue, generative design, and sharing design), and in the post-design phase, 4 participants were involved in service implementation, and 81 participants—drawn from the subgroup of 134 users who received psychoeducation—were included in the efficacy assessment.
ResultsThe proposal included the development and evaluation of a service model guide and a telehealth software platform. First, the participants took part in a series of workshops (Pre-design, Co-design) where they provided ideas for meeting the product requirements, based on the Design Thinking methodology framework. The telehealth service model was named TelePsico CENSOPAS. It comprised four processes: a) Service promotion; b) User pre-identification; c) Appointment management; d) Psychoeducation counseling and referral. The Telehealth platform was designed through three cycles of an iterative process and integrated a proprietary development platform with third-party service technologies for communication support and information exchange. During post-design, the pilot test involved 698 screened patients; 193 were identified with mental health risks, and 134 of them received psychoeducation sessions. In addition to user acceptance, the usability score of the platform was 86.1 ± 16.9 SD, satisfaction dimensions of the service was 45.1 ± 7.2 SD for satisfaction with care processes, and 36.7 ± 5.2 SD satisfaction with psychological care.
ConclusionThe proposal for mental health telehealth services and its supporting platform was successfully developed and accepted by both internal and external users, particularly within well-structured occupational health services in workplaces serving vulnerable occupational groups. In addition, it achieved higher satisfaction and usability scores than Peru’s outpatient care services. These findings support the replicability of user-centered design frameworks—such as design thinking—within the occupational health sphere.
Stroke is one of the top causes of disability in Malaysia, yet caregivers have limited access to structured, culturally tailored education to support poststroke care.
To develop and validate the CaknaStrok Education Package (CEP), a blended learning intervention comprising a printed guidebook and a trilingual mobile health application for informal stroke caregivers in Malaysia.
Methodological study involving the development and validation of a caregiver education programme guided by the Analyse, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) instructional design framework.
Development and validation were conducted in Malaysia between January 2022 and December 2023. Both experts and caregivers were recruited from two tertiary hospitals on the East Coast of Malaysia, with caregivers identified from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics at these hospitals.
Content validation involved 10 multidisciplinary experts. Face validation involved 14 informal stroke caregivers who met eligibility criteria, and all completed the study.
CEP was developed based on prior needs assessment and expert input. Content validation was undertaken using the Content Validity Index (CVI) and face validation using the Face Validity Index (FVI), both assessed on a four-point Likert scale. Qualitative feedback was also obtained from the participants.
CEP consists of six modules delivered via a printed guidebook and a trilingual app with videos, assessment tools and local resources. Experts rated the content highly valid (Scale-level (S)-CVI/the average method (Ave): 0.97–0.99 across domains). Caregivers reported strong acceptability (S-FVI/Ave: 0.95–0.99). Qualitative feedback from experts and caregivers informed refinements to content clarity, usability and presentation, including improved navigation, consistent language use and enhanced visual design. Suggestions requiring substantial structural changes were documented for future iterations.
The CEP shows strong content and face validity as a blended caregiver education tool. By combining printed and digital formats, CEP addresses cultural and access challenges and provides a scalable model for stroke caregiver education in Malaysia. Further pilot or feasibility studies are warranted to evaluate usability, engagement and implementation in real-world settings prior to effectiveness evaluation.
Cancer is the leading cause of death and morbidity among children and adolescents worldwide. Functionality-based interventions are relevant among children and adolescents with an oncological diagnosis, whence studies summarising evidence on this topic are needed. This systematic review will summarise evidence on the effect of interventions to improve functionality indicators among paediatric patients diagnosed with cancer.
This protocol will follow Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-Protocols reporting guidelines. The systematic review will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA 2020. Studies will be searched in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL, LILACS and PEDro. Additional searches will include Google Scholar, reference lists of included studies, relevant reviews and trial registries. Studies will be included if they implement a functionality-based intervention. They must evaluate effects among paediatric patients with an oncological diagnosis. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life. There will be no limits to language or year of publication, and articles published in peer-reviewed journals will be accepted. Only randomised controlled trials will be included. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess risk of bias. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis will be conducted if studies are clinically and methodologically homogeneous. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed using Higgins’ inconsistency test (I²). Meta-analysis may estimate combined effects using random-effects and the inverse variance method. The R statistical software will be used. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.
This study used data from previously published studies, thus waiving submission to an Ethics Committee. Scientific dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and workshops for the public.
CRD42024462833.
To evaluate the prognostic significance of tumour deposit (TD) across different N stages in patients with stage III colon cancer and to develop and validate a novel N staging system that incorporates TD count to improve prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS).
Retrospective cohort study based on population-based data and external validation.
Secondary and tertiary care settings; data from the SEER database, a population-based cancer registry capturing cancer incidence and survival information (USA, 2010–2017); and a single-centre validation cohort from South China (2015–2019).
A total of 8739 stage III colon cancer patients from the SEER database who underwent curative surgery were included; 1335 (15.3%) had TD. Patients with
The outcome was cancer-specific survival (CSS). The prognostic impact of tumour deposit (TD) and the comparative performance of the novel N staging system versus the AJCC system were evaluated using the Fine-Gray competing risks model, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) and Brier score.
TD was independently associated with poorer CSS: 1 TD (SHR=1.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.47, p=0.017), 2–3 TDs (SHR=1.36, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.58, p3 TDs (SHR=2.02, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.35, pet al, TDs were converted to metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) using the following weighting: 1 TD=3 mLNs (N1c), 1 TD=2 mLNs (N1) and 1 TD=1 mLN (N2). The novel N staging system stratified patients as nN1a (1 nLN), nN1b (2–3 nLNs), nN2a (4–6 nLNs) and nN2b (≥7 nLNs). This approach showed improved prognostic accuracy compared with AJCC N staging: 3-year AUC (0.623 vs 0.614) and Brier score (0.151 vs 0.157, p
TD significantly worsens prognosis in stage III colon cancer, particularly in lower N stages. Incorporating TD counts into the N staging system with different weightings based on N stage enhances prognostic accuracy and risk stratification within stage III disease, particularly for the heterogeneous AJC N1c category. This novel staging system provides better prognostic value and more accurate treatment guidance and should be considered for broader clinical use, subject to further (eg, prospective) validation.
Acute pain following pulmonary surgery can affect the recovery process of patients. The use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) injections offers a long-lasting analgesic effect, but its clinical application remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the impact of combining bupivacaine with ITM injections on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients who have undergone pulmonary surgery.
This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial will enrol 254 patients undergoing elective lung surgery, who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either group IT (receiving an intrathecal injection of 3 mg bupivacaine and 0.25 mg morphine before general anaesthesia induction) or the control group (C group). The primary outcome includes postoperative recovery quality on day 1 (quality of recovery, QoR-15), with secondary outcomes encompassing postoperative recovery quality on days 2 and 3 (QoR-15), pain scores within 72 hours postoperatively, analgesic rescue, intraoperative haemodynamic parameters, opioid consumption, postoperative adverse reactions, recovery metrics, complications, chronic pain incidence and sleep quality.
The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. This study protocol (V.2.0, 30 October 2024) involves human participants and has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University (number 2024-08-02-2), Taicang Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University (number 2025 SR-041) and Yichang Central People’s Hospital (number 2024-513-02). Each individual who agrees to participate in the research will provide written informed consent after the objectives and procedures of this study are explained to them.
ChiCTR2400092935. Registered on 26 November 2024.
In the field of medicine, there has been a growing understanding of the impact of social and economic inequities on patients’ health outcomes. Social medicine was established with the intention of addressing these social and economic drivers of health when caring for patients. Physicians who practise social medicine aim to take an interdisciplinary and interprofessional approach to patient care with an emphasis on the promotion of health equity and patient advocacy. As the effects of social determinants of health (SDOH) on health outcomes have become more widely appreciated, medical professional organisations and accrediting bodies have advocated for formal education on the impact of SDOH in undergraduate and graduate medical curricula. The goal of this scoping review is to examine how undergraduate and graduate medical education programmes in the USA have implemented social medicine concepts into their curricula.
The proposed scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The review team worked with a medical librarian, who created a unique search for five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, ERIC and the Web of Science Core Collection). Additionally, we will conduct a grey literature search that includes medical school and residency programme websites, as well as Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD), Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine (AAIM) and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) conference abstracts. Two independent reviewers will assess all articles for eligibility. Data will be extracted using the Covidence data extraction tool. We will present the results of the extraction in tabular form. Themes identified during the full-text review and data extraction process will be discussed.
Data will be gathered from publicly accessible sources, so ethics approval is not necessary. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and reported at conferences related to medical education and social medicine.
This protocol is registered on OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7PZ8U).
To assess the acceptability and adoption of multiparameter point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) at the primary healthcare level in a resource-limited region of Peru.
Qualitative case-control process evaluation.
Eight primary healthcare facilities in northern Peru, including both urban and rural centres, where routine chronic care and laboratory services are provided.
Sixty-three participants: 36 patients, 12 laboratory technicians, 10 healthcare professionals and five facility heads. Eligible patients were ≥18 years, residing in the catchment area, with or without prior NCD diagnoses. Healthcare workers, including physicians, nurses, laboratory staff and facility managers.
Multiparameter POCT devices were installed in four intervention facilities, accompanied by staff training and community awareness activities, while four control facilities continued with conventional laboratory diagnostics.
Primary outcome: perceptions of patients and healthcare workers regarding the acceptability and adoption of POCT devices. Secondary outcomes: identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation, including infrastructure, supply chains and training gaps.
(1) Individuals: POCT was valued for speed and comfort, but concerns over accuracy were mentioned. (2) Intervention characteristics: laboratory staff valued POCT’s practicality in emergencies, but noted limitations in handling multiple samples. (3) Outer setting: urban centres outperformed rural facilities, with more staff and longer operating hours. (4) Inner setting: calibration gaps impacted POCT and conventional test reliability, requiring quality control and training. (5) Process: clear staff communication boosted patient confidence in POCT, but inconsistent training could lead to reliability doubts.
Multiparameter POCT devices show promise for enhancing NCD care in resource-limited primary healthcare settings, particularly in rural areas. However, their sustainability depends on broader health system reforms, including reliable supply chains, expanded training and stronger quality assurance mechanisms. Further research should examine strategies for embedding POCT within national regulatory and policy frameworks.
To understand how public health practitioners (PHPs) are using parental guidance on talking to children in their work with parents. In 2021, evidence-based guidance was produced for parents of young children to facilitate these conversations, but it is unclear how this guidance is being promoted to parents or used by PHPs.
Qualitative study, consisting of in-depth, semistructured interviews.
Local authority, National Health Service or other healthy weight service providers in the UK.
Participants were PHPs working on children’s healthier lifestyles programmes in the UK as part of the UK’s National Child Measurement Programme (NCMP). Invitations to participate were distributed via the Department of Health and Social Care and regional and national networks.
24 participants were interviewed. Practice varied between organisations with the guidance being used in NCMP letters to parents, in follow-up phone calls with parents and in training NCMP staff and other health or education professionals. Participants valued the evidence-based guidance and its compassionate tone, feeling it gave them and parents, confidence in addressing a sensitive topic. Some felt it was too lengthy for parents with learning disabilities or low literacy levels. Others identified a need for similar guidance for older children. Though helpful, participants acknowledged the guidance was only one small part of a necessary systems-wide approach to promoting healthy weight.
The guidance is a useful tool but needs systematic promotion to increase use and effectiveness. Further work is warranted to develop adapted versions for other populations.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors have shown substantial benefit in reducing cardiovascular and kidney events across diverse clinical populations, but the underlying physiological mechanisms remain unclear. However, existing mechanistic studies on renal and cardiovascular haemodynamics show variability in design, have limited statistical power and yield inconsistent outcomes, thus limiting the ability to draw generalisable conclusions. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and proposed the first meta-analysis to aggregate individual participant-level data from mechanistic studies to identify consistent physiological patterns and enhance understanding of the therapeutic effects of SGLT inhibition.
Gold-standard measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) was selected as the primary outcome for this systematic review, which aimed to identify all completed mechanistic studies investigating the effects of SGLT inhibition. Electronic databases including Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched using a detailed search strategy. In total, 24 studies (n=1296) were identified. This systematic review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Key variables including demographics, medical history, concomitant medications, vital signs, mGFR, renal haemodynamics, urine and plasma biochemistry, tubular sodium handling, echocardiography, cardiac output monitoring, arterial stiffness and fluid volume will be extracted. A one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis under a Bayesian framework will be conducted, using hierarchical models to simultaneously analyse data from all eligible studies. The risk of bias due to missing results will be assessed. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup evaluations will be incorporated to explore sources of heterogeneity and assess robustness of findings.
Ethics approval was obtained from University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Findings from the Mechanisms of SGLT Inhibitor Action and Physiological Mediators (MOSAIC) meta-analysis will be published in peer-reviewed journals and results will be disseminated at scientific conferences.
CRD420251001413.
Unplanned hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge measure the quality of healthcare. This study aims to identify the characteristics of patients at higher risk of readmission.
Retrospective cohort study.
North-east Italy (Marca Trevigiana Local Health Authority).
The study examined a total of 39 467 index admissions from hospital discharges (SDO) in the 890 000-inhabitant area during 2022.
Readmission rates and 95% CIs were computed by risk factor, age and type of admission (surgical or medical). A logistic mixed-effects model was used to estimate readmission OR, adjusting for potential confounders.
A total of 2197 readmissions occurred within 30 days of the index admission, resulting in an overall rate of 30-day readmissions of 6.7% (CI 6.4% to 7.0%). The median time to readmission was 11 days (IQR 5 to 20). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age and sex, the following clinical conditions were associated with a higher risk of readmission: alcohol-related disease (OR=2.06, CI 1.36 to 3.13), metastatic cancer (OR=1.98, CI 1.57 to 2.50), epilepsy (OR=1.93, CI 1.36 to 2.75), dialysis or end-stage kidney disease (OR=1.92, CI 1.39 to 2.66), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR=1.88, CI 1.49 to 2.36), stoma (OR=1.72, CI 1.22 to 2.44), transplant (OR=1.62, CI 1.03 to 2.55), being bedridden (OR=1.57, CI 1.28 to 1.93), anaemia (OR=1.57, CI 1.35 to 1.83), urinary tract infection (OR=1.54, CI 1.30 to 1.83), pneumonia (OR=1.52, CI 1.31 to 1.75), dementia (OR=1.49, CI 1.24 to 1.79), diabetes (OR=1.37, CI 1.17 to 1.61) and transfusion (OR=1.34, CI 1.03 to 1.73).
Several chronic and acute conditions at index admission significantly increased the risk of readmission. Strengthening transitional care, outpatient services and palliative care could mitigate readmissions.
Urgent and emergency care (UEC) systems in England face unprecedented pressures, with record accident and emergency attendances, persistent breaches of ambulance response targets and poorer outcomes for time-sensitive conditions. National UEC recovery plans have introduced multiple innovations—such as same-day emergency care, virtual wards and specialty hubs—to manage these pressures and improve patient flow. Rural coastal areas are particularly vulnerable to excessive demand due to higher levels of deprivation, older populations with complex health needs, seasonal surges that generate unpredictable demand and challenges in attracting and retaining staff. Following the Chief Medical Officer’s 2021 Annual Report, funding research and developing bespoke solutions to manage UEC demand and address geographical disparities has been recognised as a national priority. The Elevate study responds to this priority by identifying and evaluating innovative models of UEC in rural coastal communities in England.
The Elevate study is a 30-month, mixed-methods evaluation that comprises three interlinked work packages: (1) National service mapping—outlining provision of innovative models of UEC in rural coastal areas of England. This will be developed through document review and interviews with regional and national service leaders. (2) Quantitative analysis—quasiexperimental and longitudinal approaches will use National Health Service (NHS) England’s Emergency Care Data Set and linked routine NHS datasets to evaluate the impact of UEC models on health and process outcomes. Standard and bespoke metrics will be developed and used to assess performance. (3) Qualitative case studies—up to 12 case studies of UEC models in rural coastal communities. Interviews with patients and staff and non-participant observation will explore how and why different UEC models influence patient experience, clinical outcomes, resource use and the workforce. Findings will be integrated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify components of UEC models that are effective, scalable and sensitive to local context,
Ethical approval for qualitative components was granted by the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (25/NS/0099). Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, policy briefs, creative media and community engagement activities to ensure findings are communicated inclusively and effectively to policymakers, health and social care practitioners and the public.
Research Registry (researchregistry11126).
Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Current management relies on umbilical artery Doppler patterns in the smaller twin. These patterns are, however, inconsistent and do not represent a reliable severity scale, complicating clinical decision-making and parental counselling. This study aims to improve risk stratification by identifying predictors of adverse outcomes, while also evaluating the pathophysiology and multi-organ impact of sFGR in early childhood.
This is a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study conducted in six tertiary fetal medicine centres with expertise in complicated twin pregnancies. Recruitment began in March 2023 and will continue until December 2026, targeting 274 MCDA twin pairs with complete follow-up to develop a prediction model for adverse perinatal outcomes in sFGR at the time of diagnosis. Standardised data collection includes serial ultrasound examinations, advanced fetal imaging (cardiac, cerebral and 3D volumetric), fetal brain MRI and detailed placental phenotyping. Maternal and parental well-being are assessed during pregnancy and after birth. Neurodevelopmental outcome is evaluated up to 2 years after birth using validated tools. The statistical analysis plan includes predictive modelling with internal validation.
The study has been approved by the ethical review boards of all participating centres. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, international conferences and engagement with clinical guideline committees.
Onchocerciasis, commonly known as river blindness, is a parasitic disease caused by Onchocerca volvulus affecting millions predominantly in sub-Saharan Africa. Robust epidemiological evidence points to a clinical relationship between onchocerciasis and epilepsy, a condition termed onchocerciasis-associated epilepsy (OAE). Despite extensive research and various successful elimination programmes over the past decades, the pathogenesis of OAE is still unknown. Current hypotheses propose that O. volvulus microfilaria, their excretory-secretory products or the newly discovered filarial O. volvulus RNA virus 1 (OVRV1) virus may traverse the blood-brain barrier, triggering seizures or immune responses that result in neurological damage. However, direct evidence of microfilaria or their DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or brain tissue remains elusive, likely due to immune-mediated parasite clearance. Additionally, investigations into the potential neurotoxicity of these novel filarial viruses have yet to be pioneered.
This prospective cohort study will involve 100 ivermectin-naïve children aged 2–5 years, recruited from rural communities in the Aketi health zone, located in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This region is known to be an onchocerciasis-endemic area with a high prevalence and transmission of OAE, despite years of community-directed treatment with ivermectin. Lumbar punctures (LP) will be performed in children presenting with complex febrile seizures according to WHO’s paediatric guidelines. CSF samples will be examined for white blood cells, protein levels, glycorrhachia, microfilaria, OVRV1 and O. volvulus biomarkers. Children will be followed annually, monitoring the development of epilepsy and O. volvulus infection. This approach aims to elucidate the presence of O. volvulus and OVRV1 in the brain and their role in the pathogenesis of epileptic seizures and the myriad of clinical symptoms observed in OAE.
The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Kisangani (UNIKIS/CE/KGB/001/2025) and the University of Antwerp (project ID 7323-Edge n/a-BUN B3002025000078). Written informed consent will be obtained from all parents and/or legal guardians of children for whom an LP is considered. Findings will be disseminated at national and international levels via meetings and peer-reviewed open-source publications. Study data will be stored in an open repository.
Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202507670131109).
FreshRSS 