FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Feasibility of micro-costing for hospital-at-home in Danish municipalities: a prospective pilot study

Por: Tayyari · N. · Duvald · I. · Galle Madsen · M. · Engelbrecht Sjol · S. · Nielsen · C. P. · Risor · B. W.
Objectives

To test the feasibility of identifying and quantifying resource use for a Hospital-at-Home (HaH) model in Danish municipalities, we used a micro-costing approach. Additionally, we aimed to generate a transparent activity and time dataset. This dataset will support subsequent tariff development with time-driven activity-based costing and feed into the economic evaluation of an ongoing randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Design

Prospective pilot feasibility study.

Setting

Three municipalities in the Central Denmark Region in collaboration with emergency department specialists and general practitioners.

Participants

56 elderly acute patients treated in HaH during the pilot phase.

Outcome measures

Feasibility of micro-costing data collection (completeness, consistency and acceptability to staff) and descriptive resource-use quantities by activity and provider group. No price assignment or cost estimates are reported.

Results

Patients received a mean of 3.8 HaH treatment days with 7.8 acute team visits and 3.9 municipal-staff visits per treatment course. The acute team spent a mean of 742 min per patient across treatment activities, communication, documentation and transport, while municipal care staff recorded a mean of 213 min. Intravenous medicine administration and vital sign assessments were the most frequent activities. Data completeness and consistency improved over time through co-design and feedback.

Conclusions

Detailed resource-use measurement using provider logs was feasible in a municipal HaH model and produced an activity and time dataset suitable for tariff development. Findings are context-specific and not generalisable due to the small sample. The micro-costing log refined through the pilot will be applied in an RCT, where time and activity data will be used to construct a tariff using time-driven activity-based costing.

Impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients: the VA

Por: Demaure · N. · Le Cunff · J. · Duchene · M. · Rozec · B. · Espitalier · F. · Cabon · J.-M. · Oilleau · J.-F. · Guerci · P. · Labaste · F. · Abou-Arab · O. · Guinot · P.-G. · Duval · P. · Besnier · E. · Flecher · E. · Leroyer · I. · Morcet · J. · Fougerou-Leurent · C. · Mansour · A. · Nesse
Introduction

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after cardiac surgery and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Lung-protective ventilation strategies have been proposed to reduce PPCs, but the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and the use of alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) remain controversial.

Methods/analysis

In this investigator-initiated, multicentre, open, randomised, parallel-group, superiority clinical trial, elective cardiac surgery patients at risk of PPCs will be assigned to one of two intraoperative ventilation strategies: (1) an open-lung ventilation strategy with protective ventilation, moderate PEEP and RMs or (2) a standard protective ventilation with low PEEP and no RM. The primary outcome will be a composite of prolonged (>24 hour) postoperative mechanical ventilation, reintubation for any cause or hospital-acquired pneumonia within 7 days of surgery, or death within 28 days of surgery. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Ethics and dissemination

The VACARM (impact of intraoperatiVe moderAte positive end-expiratory pressure with reCruitment mAnoeuvres versus low positive end-expiRatory pressure on major postoperative pulMonary complications and death after on-pump cardiac surgery in high-risk patients) trial has been approved by an independent ethics committee for all study centres. Recruitment began in July 2021. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed medical journals.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04408495.

❌