Conectar
As discussed in the accompanying editorial Nursing on the front foot,
People living with Long Covid often find the complexity of navigating health services difficult. The nurse’s role is to support patients in this context. This includes ensuring they are sufficiently informed about what Long Covid is. The specialist nurses recommended the British Heart Foundation’s online resource - Long Covid: Symptoms, tests and treatments: https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/heart-matters-magazine/news/coronavirus-and-your-health/long-covid%23whatdoesfatiguefeel.
Information about Long Covid is also available via Long Covid Physio:
Every person...
For many decades, nurses have been expected to base their practice on up-to-date, research-derived evidence, melded with knowledge from nursing theory, experience—our own and others—and innovating in practice. This composite, complex evidence base is passed on through generations of nurses both formally, through educational opportunities and our own readings, and informally through the stories we tell of our practice. These nursing narratives encompass and connect the multiple levels at which nurses work—alongside a person and their families and carers, within the structures of healthcare and social-care organisations and in policymaking settings. Essentially, narratives enable compelling and memorable links to be drawn between research, theory and experience, creating the certainty and confidence we need to work effectively within our very different practice environments. Any turbulence in practice, deficiency in the evidence base or challenge to our ability to pass on our narratives is likely to cause ambiguity and anxiety and...
Commentary on: Turk F, Sweetman J, Chew-Graham CA, et al. Accessing care for long covid from the perspectives of patients and healthcare practitioners: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2024;27:e14008. doi.org/10.1111/hex.14008
Training to enhance healthcare providers’ knowledge about Long Covid and tailored, equitable and timely access to integrated healthcare suitable for diverse and complex needs is required in the management of Long Covid. Future research is needed to address misinformation and the provision and effectiveness of reliable online resources for Long Covid patients along with an understanding of the effectiveness of integrated models of Long Covid care across diverse clinical settings.
Long Covid is an emerging long-term condition resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection, characterised by a wide array of persistent symptoms, it is heterogenous in nature with fluctuations and experiences of relapse.
Motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (MND/ALS/ALS) is an incurable disease which leads to muscle weakness that worsens over time. MND/ALS is highly heterogeneous in its presentation, with many people experiencing a rapidly progressive trajectory of symptoms. Many people living with MND/ALS (plwMND/ALS) experience a combination of flaccidity and spasticity of the muscles involved in speech, swallowing, breathing and coughing. This makes it challenging to deal with the saliva and mucous (‘secretions") produced by the body. Failure to manage these problems effectively can lead to accumulation and aspiration of secretions, which may cause pneumonia and respiratory insufficiency. Knowing the best way to treat this problem is a challenge. Systematic reviews report substantive ongoing uncertainty regarding secretions management (SM). Little is known about the comparative effectiveness of secretion management interventions, their impact on quality of life and acceptability for plwMND/ALS and their unpaid/family.
A complex intervention systematic review of SM for plwMND/ALS and/or their carers will be conducted using an iterative logic model approach, designed in accordance with the principles and guidance laid out in a series of articles published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality on complex intervention reviews . Eight electronic databases will be searched for publications between 1996 and present: Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, EBSCO Academic Search Ultimate, Scopus, EBSCO PsycInfo, Ovid MEDLINE and the Social Sciences Citation Index. This will be supplemented by hand searching of reference lists of included studies. Two reviewers will independently screen the results for potentially eligible studies using AS Review Lab (a semi-automated machine learning tool). Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment, using Gough’s Weight of Evidence Framework, will be independently performed by two reviewers. A framework thematic synthesis approach will be employed to analyse and report quantitative and qualitative data. The reporting will be conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Complex Intervention Extension Statement and Checklist.
This review will involve the secondary analysis of published information; therefore, ethical approvals are not required. Dissemination will be via presentation at scientific meetings, presentations to MND/ALS support groups and publications in peer-reviewed journals.
CRD42025102364.
The TRAjectory of knee heaLth in runners (TRAIL) study is a prospective cohort study investigating the long-term knee health trajectories of runners with and without a heightened osteoarthritis risk. This study aims to describe the recruitment results and baseline characteristics of the TRAIL cohort.
Runners aged 18–50 years and running ≥3 times and ≥10 km per week on average in the past 6 months were eligible. Participants were recruited via running podcasts, running clubs and social media between July 2020 and August 2023. Data were collected at study enrolment and at a face-to-face baseline testing session, which occurred a median of 33 weeks (IQR 18 to 86 weeks) after enrolment. Follow-up data collection is ongoing.
Out of 462 runners who completed an online registration form, 268 runners enrolled, of which 135 had a history of knee surgery (46% females) and 133 were non-surgical controls (50% females). 60% of the surgery group had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 33% meniscus and/or cartilage surgery, and 7% other knee surgery. 54 participants previously enrolled were unable to continue in the study before attending baseline data collection. Of the 214 runners who remained in the study and attended baseline data collection, 108 had a history of knee surgery (49% females) and 106 did not have a history of knee surgery (51% females).
Participants will be followed for 10 years through ongoing patient-reported outcomes and continuous monitoring of training loads using wearable devices. At baseline, 4- and 10-year follow-up, knee MRI and knee-health patient-reported outcomes will be collected to evaluate structural and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis progression. Data will inform guidelines for safe running practices and rehabilitation post-knee surgery.
Eye disease and vision impairment are known to be associated with reduced mental well-being, but less is known about the well-being of people with near-normal levels of vision. Here, we examined the association between self-reported eyesight and mental well-being, controlling for eye disease, mental ill-health and demographic factors, for adults with a wide range of age and vision.
Population-based cross-sectional study.
7705 adults (56% women; median age 49 years, range 16–104 years) who participated in the Health Survey for England 2013, self-reported their eyesight status and completed the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale.
Mental well-being, controlling for self-reported mental ill health, self-reported eye disease, age, sex, socioeconomic group and ethnic origin.
Poorer self-reported eyesight was strongly associated with lower mental well-being (univariate linear model, F(4,7700)=94.7, p2=0.047). Relative to reporting ‘poor’ vision, each subsequent level of vision predicted better well-being, with the exception of ‘fair’ vision, which was not significantly different from ‘poor’ reported vision. This association remained significant after controlling for self-reported mental ill health, self-reported eye disease, age, sex, socioeconomic group and ethnic origin.
Self-reported eyesight is strongly associated with mental well-being, irrespective of whether people have vision impairment or a diagnosed eye disease. This relationship exists in people with and without mental ill-health. Mental well-being should be considered in people with reduced eyesight, regardless of whether they have a diagnosed eye disease or mental ill-health. Interventions which improve vision may have a positive impact on mental well-being.
Skin temperature assessment is essential for the diagnosis of cellulitis and monitoring treatment response, but is currently subjective and can contribute to overdiagnosis. We aimed to characterise skin temperature changes over time in cellulitis and compare two objective measurement approaches, a thermal imaging camera (TIC) and a non-contact infrared thermometer (NCIT).
A device comparison study nested within a prospective cohort. We measured limb temperatures daily for 4 days using a TIC and two NCITs.
Two acute hospitals in the UK’s National Health Service.
202 adults (age ≥18 years) diagnosed with lower limb cellulitis who attended hospital for antibiotic treatment.
We used linear mixed-effects models to quantify changes in temperature over time and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) to assess reliability. We compared temperature measurements between devices using Lin’s concordance coefficients and Bland-Altman plots with estimated 95% limits of agreement.
202 patients were included: 95% white ethnicity. Baseline limb temperature differences varied between 2.4°C and 3.4°C, depending on the device. All devices showed significant reductions in affected limb temperature per day, with the largest decrease recorded by the TIC (–0.34°C per day, 95% CI –0.48°C to –0.19°C, p
Daily temperature changes may be too small for reliable monitoring at the individual patient level, but cumulative changes from day 0 to day 3 may be sufficient for clinical interpretation, despite limitations in the precision of device measurements. NCITs’ measurement capabilities differ widely, so these devices cannot be used interchangeably. Due to this and the potential benefits of advanced thermal image analysis, TICs should be prioritised for further study in cellulitis. Future research should confirm our findings in different skin tones and explore the clinical utility of thermal imaging in enabling earlier diagnosis or detecting signs of therapeutic failure.
Acknowledging equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in research is not only a moral imperative but also an important step in avoiding bias and ensuring generalisability of results. This protocol describes the development of STAndards for ReporTing EDI (START-EDI) in research, which will provide a set of minimum standards to help researchers improve their consistency, completeness and transparency in EDI reporting. We anticipate that these guidelines will benefit authors, reviewers, editors, funding organisations, healthcare providers, patients and the public.
To create START-EDI reporting guidelines, the following five stages are proposed: (i) establish a diverse, multidisciplinary Steering Committee that will lead and coordinate guideline development; (ii) a systematic review to identify the essential principles and methodological approaches for EDI to generate preliminary checklist items; (iii) conduct an international Delphi process to reach a consensus on the checklist items; (iv) finalise the reporting guidelines and create a separate explanation and elaboration document; and (v) broad dissemination and implementation of START-EDI guidelines. We will work with patient and public involvement representatives and under-served groups in research throughout the project stages.
The study has received ethical approval from the Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (study ID: 7592283). The reporting guidelines will be published in open access peer-reviewed publications and presented in international conferences, and disseminated through community networks and forums.
The project is pre-registered within the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8udbq/) and the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Network.
When I took over as editor-in-chief (EiC) of Evidence-Based Nursing (EBN) in August 2010, I had a simple but ambitious goal: to make it easier for nurses and midwives to access research evidence and help them use it to improve their practise. I also hoped to amplify their voice in influencing health policy. 15 years later, as I write my final editorial before stepping down from my post at the end of July, I reflect on how the EBN team collectively brought that original vision to life.
At the heart of EBN are our commentaries—incisive, insightful pieces that critically evaluate current research. But over time, we’ve grown far beyond that. In 2011, we launched the Research Made Simple (RMS) series, which aims to demystify research methods for practitioners. I am proud that these papers have become an important resource for healthcare lecturers teaching research skills.
As a nurse educator,...
FreshRSS 