Preventable hospital patient harm events disproportionally affect certain patient populations. For some, harm extends beyond physical injury to include cultural, emotional or spiritual impacts. While these disparities are linked to socio-demographics (eg, race, education), they are driven by structural factors (eg, procedures and policies). Patient safety monitoring systems (eg, incident reporting, patient concerns) were not originally designed to identify equity-related harms and may inadvertently obscure or reinforce the injustices they should address. This study will examine how equity is currently considered within hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems across Canada and will identify opportunities to strengthen these systems’ responsiveness to inequities in patient safety.

This 3-year exploratory sequential mixed-method study began in September 2024. Phase one involves qualitative interviews with patient safety and equity leads, patients/families/caregivers and leaders of innovative initiatives to explore current practices, gaps and innovations in how equity-related factors are identified and addressed within incident reporting and patient concerns systems. Findings will inform Phase 2, a modified Delphi process with patient safety and equity experts and persons with lived experience of equity-related harm events to refine and reach consensus on key equity-promoting features, considerations and recommendations for these systems. In Phase 3, consensus items will be used to develop a national cross-sectional survey assessing the extent to which equity is integrated into hospital incident reporting and patient concerns systems in Canada. A patient advisory committee will inform data collection, interpretation of findings and dissemination.

Ethics approval has been received for Phase 1, with subsequent approvals to be sought for later phases. Dissemination plans include peer-reviewed publications, presentations at international conferences and knowledge exchange activities to inform patient engagement, the design of incident reporting and patient concerns systems and policy development.

The aim was to assess point-in-time stock availability and pricing of drugs used for postpartum haemorrhage management (oxytocin, misoprostol, heat-stable carbetocin and tranexamic acid (TXA)).

Cross-sectional point-in-time survey using an adapted version of the WHO/Health Action International methodology.

In public, for-profit and not-for-profit private health facilities and in pharmacies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), India and Kenya.

211 health facilities in the DRC (n=63), India (n=76) and Kenya (n=72).

Availability was calculated as a mean percentage of facility types where each medicine was observed on the day of data collection. Average procurement prices were calculated by obtaining the current purchase price per drug at each facility and then averaging prices across all facility types.

Availability of the four medicines was limited, and only oxytocin in the DRC met the WHO’s benchmark of 80%. Across all countries, availability of oxytocin, misoprostol and TXA was lower in public health facilities than in other facility types, indicating an important gap. Where the four medicines were available, non-quality-assured products were predominant across the three countries. The average facility procurement prices in India and Kenya were reported to be lower than those in the DRC.

Availability of oxytocin, misoprostol, heat-stable carbetocin and TXA was suboptimal and varied by facility type and geography, and similar trends were found across the four drugs. This indicates that access strategies should be tailored to each drug, geographical area and facility type. Strategies to improve commodity access in public-sector facilities will be especially important, as well as improving the availability of quality-assured products, possibly through value-based procurement practices.