Cardiopulmonary bypass has been used to perform complex cardiac surgery for over 70 years. Advances in bypass techniques and perioperative medicine have increased the safety of cardiac procedures, leading to reduced morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, cardiopulmonary bypass still carries risks, including systemic inflammation and dysfunction of various organs. To date, optimal blood pressure management during cardiopulmonary bypass remains a subject of ongoing debate. Conflicting evidence exists regarding negative outcomes associated with both low and high mean arterial pressures. Current clinical guidelines recommend a broad target range for mean arterial pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass, which underscores the existing gap in knowledge. In non-cardiac surgery, the time-weighted average of mean arterial pressure has been used to determine minimum safe thresholds, with greater deviation from 65 mm Hg associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. However, the definition and reporting of low blood pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass varies between studies, and the use of time-weighted averages below the threshold is still uncommon. Details on pump flow during extracorporeal circulation are seldom reported.
We plan to conduct a retrospective, single-centre data analysis to investigate the effects of both arterial blood pressure and extracorporeal pump flow, including their time-weighted averages and areas under defined thresholds, during cardiopulmonary bypass on neurological outcomes in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2023. The study will include both elective and emergency procedures, with separate analyses conducted based on the urgency and complexity of the operations. Digitally recorded anaesthesia and perfusion records will be imported and validated to extract information on haemodynamic parameters, neurological monitoring and extracorporeal circulation. Ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes will be identified by screening postoperative brain imaging records for keywords indicating neurological events. Diagnostic data and additional patient and procedural information will be extracted from the local cardiac surgery database and hospital information system. Information about incidence and course of postoperative delirium will be extracted from the patient data management system used in intensive care. We expect to include approximately 500–700 cases per year in the final analysis.
The local ethics committee approved our study (Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Graz, IRB00002556, 36-296 ex 23/24). We aim to publish the results of our study preferably in an open access format.
The study protocol was registered at the Center for Open Science (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FAMV3).
This study engaged key stakeholders—older adults, family caregivers, home care support workers, nurses, and home healthcare leaders—to explore perspectives on essential components and integration into home care models, and to explore the role of their technology readiness for health smart homes adoption.
A qualitative methodology with a quantitative component, early-phase exploratory design.
Semi-structured interviews underwent qualitative thematic analysis, with cross-case analysis comparing stakeholder perspectives to identify convergences and divergences. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse Technology Readiness Index (TRI 2.0) survey data to provide background and context to the qualitative findings.
Among 18 participants—older adults (n = 6), family caregivers (n = 2), nurses (n = 7), and support workers/healthcare leaders (n = 3)—findings reflected optimism for health smart home adoption and its potential to support ageing in place. Nurses and care workers saw health smart home as a tool for improving care coordination and quality of life. Key adoption considerations included education, data visualisation, privacy, and security. Technology readiness scores were moderate, with nurses scoring highest (3.52), followed by caregivers (3.41), support workers (3.13), and older adults (3.10).
While stakeholders were open to integrating health smart home into home care, concerns around usability, security, and training must be addressed to facilitate adoption.
Findings suggest that while health smart home technology holds promise for enhancing ageing in place, varying levels of technology readiness across stakeholders highlight the need for tailored education and support strategies to ensure successful implementation.
Despite a strong preference for ageing in place among older adults, integrating health smart home technologies into home care remains challenging. Key issues include ensuring intuitive functionality, protecting privacy, and clarifying the roles of caregivers and healthcare professionals in a technology-enhanced care model. This study addresses the critical gap in understanding how health smart home solutions can be effectively tailored to support the diverse needs of older adults, family caregivers, and home care nurses and support workers.
Stakeholders were generally optimistic about health smart home technologies supporting ageing in place and improving quality of life. Nurses and support workers highlighted the need for tailored data visualisations, alert parameters, and clear role guidelines. A novel finding was that older adults and family caregivers viewed health smart home as a way to reduce intrusive monitoring, promote independence, and maintain a familiar living environment. Family caregivers valued the ability to stay involved remotely through activity data, offering reassurance and peace of mind. Across all groups, privacy safeguards were seen as essential, with strong concerns about data security, transparent usage policies, and user control over data sharing.
Findings have implications for community-dwelling older adults, family caregivers, home care professionals, researchers, and technology developers. Insights from this study can inform the design of user-friendly health smart home technologies, shape future research, and guide tailored implementation strategies in home care settings.
An advisory group of community-dwelling older adults in Western Australia provided input on study design and methodology. Their recommendations led to the use of one-on-one interviews to ensure accessibility and relevance for older adults when exploring technology readiness and smart home integration. While the advisory group did not contribute to the data itself or its analysis, their feedback shaped the method of engagement to ensure its relevance and accessibility to potential participants.
Suicidal thoughts and behaviours are linked to a wide range of mental health conditions. New interest in the psychiatric benefits of nitrous oxide (N2O) has only recently emerged. The broad pharmacological effects of N2O are thought to be due in large part to N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonism and opioid effects. The purpose of this study protocol is to test whether inhalational N2O exerts rapid antisuicidal effects as a transdiagnostic treatment for suicidal ideation.
This is the protocol of a single-centre pilot study of N2O inhalation in 85 psychiatric inpatients. The initial 45-min double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled inhalation session either consists of 50% N2O and 50% oxygen (‘active treatment’) or 50% oxygen plus air. The primary outcome is the change in Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation scores between the day before and the day after inhalation. A second inhalation containing N2O will be administered 1 week after the first inhalation to ensure that all study participants receive the active treatment at least once. For the mechanism of action and prediction, a nested biomarker substudy will employ multimodal techniques, including analysis of hair and blood samples and electroencephalography.
This study was approved by the local ethics committee (‘Kantonale Ethikkommission—Kanton Zürich’) and by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic). Study results will be disseminated primarily by peer-reviewed scientific journals and also by conference presentations, patient and public events and social media.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT06636357.