To explore barriers and facilitators to midwifery practice of intermittent auscultation according to national guidance in the UK.

Multisite ethnographic study using observations of practice, semistructured interviews and informal conversations. Framework analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

11 maternity units across seven NHS maternity services in England and Wales in 2024.

Midwives and other maternity care professionals involved in fetal monitoring during labour.

‘Intermittent auscultation’ (IA), or listening to the fetal heart rate at regular intervals, to monitor fetal well-being during active labour.

Not applicable.

IA monitoring was frequently observed to be marginalised due to national and local pressures. IA is a complex skill that requires expertise and practice to develop and maintain. However, lack of a robust evidence base for IA methods is a further barrier to implementation. The study uncovered examples of facilitators that include: leadership engagement, access to knowledge and information supported in mentorship programmes and peer support models. These features created micro-environments where IA was valued, supported and integrated into care.

Our study highlights the significant impact of multilevel factors on the implementation of IA within UK maternity care. However, when organisational readiness, strong leadership engagement and supportive conditions are present, IA can be delivered in accordance with guidance. These findings underscore the need to align policy, infrastructure and organisational culture to sustain evidence-based, woman-centred practices such as IA.

Over the last decade, a growing number of health interventions (eg, medical assistance in dying and mitochondrial donation) have become legalised or decriminalised globally. Newly legalised health interventions share characteristics that are distinct from other health interventions, making their implementation more challenging. They are often highly emotive, controversial and associated with strong opinions and ethical dilemmas, with some of them being high-stake and irreversible. This study aimed to identify, systematise and map the factors that affect the implementation of health interventions that have recently been legalised.

A systematically conducted review.

PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched to identify studies published between 2014 and 2024.

We included studies if they evaluated the implementation of health interventions that were newly legalised or newly decriminalised.

Data were extracted and synthesised through descriptive analysis. Both deductive and inductive thematic analyses were applied to map the barriers, facilitators and implementing strategies that influence the implementation of newly legalised health interventions in healthcare settings.

The search strategy yielded 1510 publications, of which 78 were included in this review. Findings showed that several newly legalised health interventions, including medical assistance in dying (n=56 studies); medical abortion (n=13); assisted human reproduction (n=3); psychedelic-assisted therapies (n=3); use of medical cannabis (n=2) and use of biosimilars (n=1) were addressed. The analysis identified a total of 880 diverse barriers, facilitators and strategies in five domains across system, organisational and individual levels: (1) patients/service users/consumers; (2) healthcare providers; (3) healthcare organisation; (4) legal processes and (5) system. These were further divided into 27 themes of barriers, 18 themes of facilitators and 17 themes of strategies.

Implementing newly legalised health interventions is complex. Our findings can support the development of an implementation plan for the spread and scaling of future health interventions, maximising the impact of interventions and making them accessible to more people and health organisations.

Disasters can have a disproportionate impact on highly vulnerable hospitalised patients. Managers preparing hospital networks for disasters play an important role in enhancing networks’ readiness by creating disaster plans and imparting that knowledge through training and simulation exercises. The objective of this research was to uncover how those working in disaster preparedness roles in Australian hospital networks perceived the challenges that they face while ensuring adequate preparation for disasters.

A qualitative study design was employed which involved purposive sampling of Australian hospital network professionals responsible for disaster preparedness. Thematic analysis of data collected through individual online interviews generated prominent challenges of disaster preparedness in Australian hospital networks.

Local hospital networks across Australia

Twenty-six disaster preparedness managers, including hospital executives, disaster managers, emergency management coordinators and business continuity managers from 23 hospital networks located in five Australian states and one territory, participated in semi-structured online interviews. Interview transcripts were coded through an iterative inductive thematic analysis process to synthesise the predominant challenges faced by these participants when preparing their hospital networks for disasters.

Participants reported four challenges: staff’s limited interest in preparedness, budgetary constraints, staffing issues and ambiguous relationships with state and national health departments. They also presented four related solutions: capitalising on interest after disasters, attracting funding with evidence from prior disasters, facilitating staff’s availability for disaster training and specifying network-government relationships for accountability.

Disasters, although infrequent, are known to occur and can be catastrophic, yet those working in hospital network disaster preparedness roles encounter limited availability of wider staff for training and low interest in disaster planning. The sudden onset of a disaster can take a heavy toll on patients if hospitals’ staff are not sufficiently trained in disaster response or are not aware of the disaster plan. By identifying the perceptions of managers to disaster preparedness, this research presents specific challenges that hospital networks can address to improve awareness and preparation.

This study aimed to explore perceptions of the Paediatric Improvement Collaborative’s (PIC’s) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) among clinicians, with a focus on awareness, frequency of use, applicability and areas for improvement.

Cross-sectional online survey and semi-structured interviews.

Clinicians working in all Australian states and territories. Recruitment was via non-probability convenience sampling. Invitations to participate in the online survey were posted on national- and state-level paediatric organisations, networks and groups. Survey participants could express interest in taking part in a follow-up online interview.

A total of 466 clinicians, including consultants/specialists (46.1%), specialists in training (residents/registrars: 20.4%), nurses (17.8%), allied health professionals (4.7%) and general practitioners (3.6%) participated in the survey. Findings indicated a high level of usage, with two-thirds of participants (63.9%) using the guidelines weekly. Most participants (91.8%) deemed the CPGs highly applicable to their practice settings, and over half (57.9%) had referred to more than 10 different PIC CPGs in the past month. Patterns of use reflected experience, seniority and scope of practice, with utilisation significantly higher among specialists in training, those working in emergency settings and those with less practising experience. Ten clinicians were interviewed to gain deeper insights, reinforcing that PIC CPGs serve multiple purposes, such as to check practice and for self-learning, for teaching more junior staff, and to reinforce treatment decisions with parents and patients. The guidelines were noted as being useful for all members of the multidisciplinary team in providing consistent language and uniform care. Key areas for improvement included enhancing accessibility in time-pressured environments, such as incorporating human factors-based navigation features and standardised layouts, and integrating additional tools and localised referral information.

PIC CPGs are viewed as a source of credible, evidence-based information that was valued across medical, nursing and allied health professionals.

To explore the experiences of clinicians providing pastoral and mental health services to racially and ethnically minoritised students (REMS) at UK universities, aiming to understand the challenges REMS face in accessing support and to identify ways to improve service inclusivity.

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

Student health and well-being services at five universities in the North East of England, a region with comparatively low racial diversity.

Ten clinicians (nine female, one male; nine White British, one other ethnic background; mean age 42.8 years) working in therapeutic roles with experience supporting REMS. Participants were recruited via opportunity sampling.

Semi-structured interviews, averaging 44 min, were video-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis to identify key themes.

Six overarching themes were identified: (1) the chokehold of layered systemic challenges, (2) dynamics of power, (3) lack of safety for REMS, (4) "Am I really getting it?", (5) psychological therapies for white people by white people and (6) the thirst for expertise. Clinicians were enthusiastic about providing culturally responsive care but reported limited access to reflective spaces and training. Contextual factors—including racism, Brexit and the marketisation of higher education—were perceived to affect service delivery and REMS’ engagement with mental health support. Business-model approaches to service provision were sources of frustration.

Clinicians face structural and systemic challenges in providing culturally sensitive mental health support to REMS. Enhancing staff training, reflective practice and service adaptation may improve access and efficacy. Findings offer practical insights for universities aiming to strengthen equity in student mental health services, and future work could evaluate interventions to increase clinician preparedness and REMS engagement.

Progress at the intersection of artificial intelligence and paediatric neuroimaging necessitates large, heterogeneous datasets to generate robust and generalisable models. Retrospective analysis of clinical brain MRI scans offers a promising avenue to augment prospective research datasets, leveraging the extensive repositories of scans routinely acquired by hospital systems in the course of clinical care. Here, we present a systematic protocol for identifying ‘scans with limited imaging pathology’ through machine-assisted manual review of radiology reports.

The protocol employs a standardised grading scheme developed with expert neuroradiologists and implemented by non-clinician graders. Categorising scans based on the presence or absence of significant pathology and image quality concerns facilitates the repurposing of clinical brain MRI data for brain research. Such an approach has the potential to harness vast clinical imaging archives—exemplified by over 250 000 brain MRIs at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia—to address demographic biases in research participation, to increase sample size and to improve replicability in neurodevelopmental imaging research. Ultimately, this protocol aims to enable scalable, reliable identification of clinical control brain MRIs, supporting large-scale, generalisable neuroimaging studies of typical brain development and neurogenetic conditions.

Studies using datasets generated from this protocol will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at academic conferences.

Adolescence is a critical period marked by rapid brain development and the onset of many mental health disorders. Brain MRI studies during adolescence, especially when paired with behavioural phenotypes and information about genetic risk factors, hold promise to advance early identification of mental health risk and spur the creation of targeted treatments to improve patient function, prognosis and quality of life. However, prospective neuroimaging is costly and time-intensive, and individuals who participate may not be reflective of the general population. These challenges are compounded when examining adolescents, as many families lack the time, energy or resources to participate in studies that use research-grade imaging. Repurposing clinical MRIs obviates many of the challenges of neuroimaging research. Here, we describe the brain-behaviour-genetics study protocol. This protocol describes procedures used to recruit participants with recent high-quality clinical brain MRIs and prospectively acquire genetic and sociobehavioural data, resulting in a highly cost-efficient design that harnesses a vast and underused neuroscientific resource.

The brain-behaviour-genetics protocol aims to recruit 1000 adolescents who have clinical brain MRIs contained in Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s electronic health record. One or both parents of the adolescent proband will be recruited when possible. Parents and adolescents will complete a series of self-report scales spanning the domains of mental health, trauma, risk and resilience. Saliva samples will be collected from the adolescent and at least one biological parent, using an at-home saliva collection kit. Subsequent analysis will examine associations between brain development, genetics and behavioural measures in adolescence.

Approval for the study had been obtained from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s institutional review board (IRB #23–0 20 851). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Hospital falls persist as a major threat to patient safety. This study aimed to develop an interprofessional reference standard to prevent, manage and report hospital falls.

A Delphi consensus methodology, informed by the Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies guideline, was used to design the reference standard. An interprofessional expert panel (n=47) of health professionals, researchers, policymakers and consumers participated in three Delphi rounds. Following the review of clinical guidelines, an e-Delphi survey was developed and piloted to derive 60 initial items for the standard. Two iterative rounds of e-Delphi surveys were distributed via Research Electronic Data Capture and included free-text questions and 9-point Likert scales. An online consensus meeting followed, to ratify the final standard.

In the first Delphi round, there was over 80% agreement for 44/60 items to be included in the reference standard. This increased to 48/60 items in Round 2. At the final consensus meeting, 12 items still did not reach consensus for inclusion and one was added, yielding 49 items. Items that replicated text according to falls with injury/without injury were combined, resulting in 42 items in the final reference standard. Agreed items included: (1) brief screening of falls risk on hospital admission; (2) comprehensive falls assessment for inpatients who are older, frailer or have complex conditions; (3) single interventions (such as environmental adaptations and exercise); (4) multifactorial interventions; (5) education of patients, families and staff; (6) optimising local falls hospital policies, procedures and leadership capability; (7) optimising documentation and reporting; (8) improving accreditation processes; (9) workforce redesign to augment falls education. Items that did not reach agreement (n=12) pertained to alarms, bed rails, grip socks, artificial intelligence, volunteers and care bundles.

This new reference standard provides a checklist for staff, patients, managers and policymakers to reduce unwanted variations in prevention, management and reporting of hospital falls.

ANZCTR 386960

Although lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, recent advances in early detection and treatment have led to improvements in survival. However, there is a considerable risk of recurrence or second primary lung cancer (SPLC) following curative-intent treatment in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Professional societies recommend routine surveillance with CT to optimise the detection of potential recurrence and SPLC at a localised stage. However, no definitive evidence demonstrates the effect of imaging surveillance on survival in patients with NSCLC. To close these research gaps, the Advancing Precision Lung Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes in Diverse Populations (PLuS2) study will leverage real-world electronic health records (EHRs) data to evaluate surveillance outcomes among patients with and without guideline-adherent surveillance. The overarching goal of the PLuS2 study is to assess the long-term effectiveness of surveillance strategies in real-world settings.

PLuS2 is an observational study designed to assemble a cohort of patients with incident pathologically confirmed stage I/II/IIIA NSCLC who have completed curative-intent therapy. Patients undergoing imaging surveillance will be followed from 2012 to 2026 by linking EHRs with tumour registry data in the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. Data will be consolidated into a unified repository to achieve three primary aims: (1) Examine the utilisation and determinants of CT imaging surveillance by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, (2) Compare clinical endpoints, including recurrence, SPLCs and survival of patients who undergo semiannual versus annual CT imaging and (3) Use the observational data in conjunction with validated microsimulation models to simulate imaging surveillance outcomes within the US population. To our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to integrate real-world data and microsimulation models to assess the long-term impact and effectiveness of imaging surveillance strategies.

This study involves human participants and was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB), University of Florida IRB 01, under approval number IRB202300782. The results will be disseminated through publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Safety considerations encompass ensuring the confidentiality of patient information. All disseminated data will be de-identified and summarised.

Many people with psychosis find the world very frightening. It can be difficult for them to do everyday things—for example, walking down a busy street, travelling on a bus or going to the shops. Sometimes, the fears are so great that individuals rarely leave their homes. gameChange virtual reality therapy is designed to reduce this agoraphobic avoidance. In gameChange, users practise going into computerised immersive versions of ordinary situations. A virtual therapist guides users through the programme. A mental health worker also supports people. People normally do six sessions of gameChange, but now they can do more as headsets can be left with many people. We originally tested gameChange with 346 patients with psychosis. People saw a significant reduction in their fears. People with the most severe problems made the biggest improvements. This led to gameChange receiving National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Early Value Assessment (EVA) approval for its use with patients with psychosis who have severe agoraphobic avoidance. NICE EVA approval is conditional on further evidence generation. We aim to carry out a real-world trial of gameChange used in the NHS. The overall aim is to gather evidence on the four essential areas (clinical benefits on agoraphobia, level of engagement and adherence, healthcare resource use, adverse effects) and the two further supporting areas (health-related quality of life, generalisability) identified in the NICE evidence generation plan for gameChange.

200 patients with psychosis and severe agoraphobic avoidance will be randomised (1:1) to receive gameChange in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or to a waitlist control group receiving TAU. Assessments will be conducted blind to group allocation at baseline, 8 weeks (end of treatment) and 26 weeks (follow-up). The trial will be embedded in services in at least seven National Health Service (NHS) trusts across England. The primary outcome is agoraphobic avoidance at 26 weeks assessed with the Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale. The secondary clinical outcomes are agoraphobic distress, paranoia and social contacts. There will be tests of moderation of the main clinical outcome. Treatment acceptability, adverse effects and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed. The target estimand is the treatment policy estimand and all primary and secondary analyses will be carried out incorporating data from all participants including those who do not complete treatment.

The trial has received ethical approval from the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (25/WA/0081). A key output will be the evidence needed for a NICE guidance update on gameChange and a clear recommendation concerning future routine use in the NHS.

ISRCTN79060696.

Primary care nurses (PCNs) are the second largest workforce in primary care and play a critical role in facilitating access to coordinated care and reducing health disparities. There is renewed interest in team-based primary care as a solution for health workforce challenges. Some team models enable PCNs (ie, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, licensed/registered practical nurses) to leverage one another’s expertise to work to optimal scope; the extent to which this happens depends on multiple context-dependent factors. We will conduct an umbrella review to synthesise and compare international knowledge syntheses focused on scope of practice enactment (ie., roles and activities) of PCNs in primary care.

We will conduct the umbrella review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA-P) guidelines, and using the Nursing Care Organization Framework as guidance. We will search a wide range of scientific electronic databases and grey literature sources, and consider articles published in English and French by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and designated key partner countries for inclusion, with no publication date limits. Two independent reviewers will screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles, and any disagreements will be resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. We will use the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews to assess the quality and risk of bias in the included systematic and scoping reviews.

Results will be presented in a PRISMA Scoping Review flow diagram. We will synthesise data from included studies in a detailed literature review table and develop visual aids to communicate the shared and unique roles and activities of PCN scope of practice. We will disseminate the results of the review through peer-reviewed publications and conferences related to this field. Ethics approval is not required.

High-quality clinical practice guidelines and hospital standards on falls prevention and management now exist, yet their implementation into clinical practice is variable. Insights from consumers could help to guide the development of a process to improve the implementation of falls prevention and management, particularly in rehabilitation hospitals where fall rates are high.

A qualitative descriptive study will incorporate semistructured interviews and focus groups to explore the perspectives of hospital consumers on how hospital falls prevention evidence can best be implemented into rehabilitation practice. Thematic analysis of the data will be conducted in NVivo using a six-phase thematic coding process guided by Braun and Clarke. Evaluation and synthesis of the data will also follow the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist. Consideration of the results from the interviews and focus groups will provide insights into the views of people with lived experience of hospitalisation and falls. Thematic analysis will be supported by direct quotes for each key theme and will highlight how the themes relate to the study aims and the rehabilitation context.

The study was approved by La Trobe University Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC24526). The study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and findings will be presented at conferences, workshops and online events.

Diabetes is a long-term health condition that requires continuous high-intensity self-management to prevent complications. This can be challenging for teenagers striving for independence and developing a sense of self. Maintaining engagement with adolescents with diabetes has favourable outcomes. Coyne et al1 undertook a qualitative study in two clinics in Ireland. The study aimed to understand the perceptions of attending diabetes clinics and experiences of consultations from multiple viewpoints. Researchers completed individual interviews, or focus group, with adolescent patients, their parents and...