FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Comparison of industry payments to psychiatrists and psychiatric advanced practice clinicians in the USA, 2021: a cross-sectional study

Por: Havlik · J. · Ososanya · L. · Lee · M. S. · Wahid · S. · Heyang · M. · Sun · Q. W. · Ross · J. S. · Rhee · T. G.
Objectives

To compare industry payment patterns among US psychiatrists and psychiatric advanced practice clinicians (APCs) and determine how scope of practice laws has influenced these patterns.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

This study used the publicly available US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Sunshine Act Open Payment database and the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) database for the year 2021.

Participants

All psychiatrists and psychiatric APCs (subdivided into nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs)) included in either database.

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Number and percentage of clinicians receiving industry payments and value of payments received. Total payments and number of transactions by type of payment, payment source and clinician type were also evaluated.

Results

A total of 85 053 psychiatric clinicians (61 011 psychiatrists (71.7%), 21 895 NPs (25.7%), 2147 CNSs (2.5%)) were reviewed; 16 240 (26.6%) psychiatrists received non-research payment from industry, compared with 10 802 (49.3%) NPs and 231 (10.7%) CNSs (p United States Dollars (US) $) 100 (33.9% vs 14.6%; IRR, 2.14 (2.08 to 2.20); p US$ 1000 (5.3% vs 4.1%; IRR, 1.29 (1.20 to 1.38); p US$ 10 000 (0.4% vs 1.0%; IRR, 0.39 (0.31 to 0.49); p

Conclusions

Psychiatric NPs were nearly two times as likely to receive industry payments as psychiatrists, while psychiatric CNSs were less than half as likely to receive payment. Stricter scope of practice laws increases the likelihood of psychiatric NPs receiving payment, the opposite of what was found in a recent specialty agnostic study.

NIMBUS study protocol: a single-centre feasibility study of non-invasive monitoring with bowel ultrasound in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Por: Green · Z. · Mayberry · E. · Ashton · J. J. · Beattie · R. M. · Evans · A. · Wahid · A. · Edwards · M. O.
Introduction

Incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in childhood and treatment increasingly targets mucosal healing. Monitoring bowel inflammation requires endoscopy or MRI enterography which are invasive, expensive and have long waiting lists.

We aim to examine the feasibility of a non-invasive monitoring tool—bowel ultrasound (BUS)—in children with IBD and explore correlations with inflammatory markers and disease activity measures. Some BUS criteria have been found to correlate with these markers; however, this has not been validated in children.

We aim to examine the feasibility of BUS for monitoring inflammation in this population; highlighting useful parameters for this purpose. We aim to inform a larger scale randomised controlled trial using BUS.

Methods and analysis

This prospective observational feasibility study will be carried out over 24 months at the Noah’s Ark Children’s Hospital for Wales, Cardiff; with the endpoint recruitment of 50 participants. Children aged 2–18 years with a modified Porto criteria diagnosis of IBD will be included.

Patients without IBD or who have previously undergone IBD-related surgery will be excluded; as will families unable to give informed consent.

Ultrasound scan images and reports will be collected, as well as laboratory results and clinical outcomes.

The primary aim will assess the feasibility of targeted BUS for disease monitoring; including recruitment statistics. The secondary aims will involve data collection and correlation analysis for targeted ultrasound parameters, biomarkers, disease activity scores and prediction of changes in treatment. The statistical methods will include: feasibility metrics, descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation and 2 analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval is granted by NHS Research Ethics Committee. The sponsor is Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed medical journal.

Trial registration number

NCT05673278.

❌