The objective of this study was to investigate the utility of the days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) metric within a cohort of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage of a chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). We evaluate the validity of the DAOH metric in a national CSDH cohort and examine how the DAOH metric compares to its constituent outcomes (mortality and hospital bed days) at an organisational level.

Retrospective cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics data linked to the national death registry to identify patients who underwent burr-hole drainage of CSDH in English National Health Service neurosurgical units between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2020. Construct validity was assessed by measuring the patterns of DAOH across categories of known perioperative risk factors. Variation between units in the risk-adjusted values for DAOH, postoperative mortality and days in hospital was explored using funnel plots. Linear regression and logistic regression were used to derive the risk-adjusted rates.

Overall, 16 450 patients who underwent at least one burr-hole drainage of CSDH were identified during the time period. The median 30-day DAOH was 16 (IQR, 0–24); the median for the 90-day DAOH was 74 (42–84), and was better at measuring the complete stay associated with the index admission. Worse 90-day DAOH values were associated with older age, increasing comorbidities and greater frailty. Risk-adjusted 90-day DAOH values for neurosurgical units varied more markedly than for its constituent outcomes.

The 90-day DAOH looks to be a valid outcome metric for patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for CSDH that is feasible to derive using national hospital data. Future work should explore how to estimate a minimally important clinical difference for DAOH and evaluate its utility as an outcome measure.

People with severe mental illness (SMI) experience substantially reduced life expectancy, largely due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Sedentary behaviour is a major risk factor for CVD, and people with SMI spend significantly more time sedentary and are less physically active than the general population. While interventions to increase physical activity have focused on structured exercise, these are not accessible or acceptable to many consumers. The sedentary time elimination with periodic activity snacks (STEPS) study aims to test and evaluate the feasibility of a codesigned novel intervention using ‘activity snacks’ to interrupt sedentary behaviour in people with SMI.

The STEPS study is a single-arm feasibility trial. We will recruit 20 participants with SMI to complete a 6-week intervention. The intervention will include the use of the STEPS smartphone app to prompt short bouts of movement across the day, the type of which are personalised to the individual. Feasibility will be assessed through recruitment and retention rates, adherence to the intervention and acceptability measured via qualitative interviews. Secondary outcomes include changes in sedentary time, physical activity, mood and quality of life, with pre–post variables analysed via either a t-test or Mann’s Whitney U test, dependent on the normality of the data. Effect sizes for secondary outcomes will be calculated as Cohen’s d.

This trial has received ethical clearance from the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2025/QMS/117193) and was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000265471p). Results from this trial will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000265471p).

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living with disability have unequal access to health and disability support services. The impacts of colonialism and the deficit-based, Western medical model of disability have been identified as barriers to services in remote Aboriginal communities. This study explored different perceptions of disability and identified strategies to help bridge the gap between Aboriginal community members in the Fitzroy Valley and Western health and disability support services.

Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach with in-depth interviews. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Preliminary results were presented to community representatives for contextualisation, validation and to co-design recommendations.

Fitzroy Valley in the Kimberley region, Western Australia.

Aboriginal community members with lived experience of disability (n=7) and health and disability support service providers (n=12).

Eight themes were identified: (1) Aboriginal kinship systems are a community strength and support for people living with disability; (2) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive disability as a social construct; (3) Western medical model of disability differs from Aboriginal perceptions of disability; (4) Aboriginal people from the Fitzroy Valley perceive different types of disabilities in various ways; (5) good awareness of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder in the Fitzroy Valley, but more education is wanted; (6) focus on functional needs and supports for disability; (7) barriers to disability services and (8) decolonise disability services. Community co-designed recommendations focus on centring the Aboriginal worldviews of disability in the Fitzroy Valley.

Decolonising disability services is needed to improve access for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. This should involve adapting the current Western medical model of services to enable strengths-based diagnostic and support services that align with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander kinship systems, cultures and ways of being. Community leadership must play a central role in this shift.