The Improving the Wellbeing of people with Opioid Treated CHronic pain (I-WOTCH) randomised controlled trial found that a group-based educational intervention to support people using strong opioids for chronic non-malignant pain helped a significant proportion of people to stop or decrease opioid use with no increase in pain-related disability. We report a linked process evaluation of the group-based intervention evaluated in comparison to a usual-care control group that received a self-help booklet and relaxation CD.

We interviewed 18 intervention facilitators, and 20 intervention and 20 control participants who had chronic non-malignant pain and were recruited from general (family) practices in the UK. Quantitative data included change mechanism questions on the trial questionnaires which explored motivation, expectations and self-efficacy. Fidelity was assessed by listening to a sample of audio-recorded group sessions and nurse consultations. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using ‘follow a thread’ and a mixed-methods matrix.

Four overarching themes emerged: (1) the right time to taper, (2) the backdrop of a life with chronic pain, (3) needing support and (4) the benefits of being in a group. Delivery fidelity was good, adherence (83%) and competence (79%) across a range of intervention groups. Staff delivering the intervention found three typical responses to the intervention: resistance, open to trying and feeling it was not the right time. The group experience was important to those in the intervention arm. It provided people with a forum in which to learn about the current thinking about opioid usage and its effects. It also gave them examples of how feasible or personally relevant coming off opioids might be.

The process evaluation data showed that the I-WOTCH intervention was well delivered, well received and useful for most interviewees. Being ‘the right time’ to taper and having support throughout tapering, emerged as important factors within the context of living with chronic pain.

ISRCTN49470934.

Time from symptom onset to treatment initiation in tuberculosis (TB) remains stubbornly prolonged despite reductions in disease incidence. Delays may contribute to increased morbidity, mortality, onward spread of disease and poor patient experiences. Most delays occur prior to hospital referral. The average primary care healthcare provider in England is unlikely to see TB on a regular basis. Little is known about primary care diagnostic and referral challenges.

Adults aged 65 years or older are more likely to experience delays. However, little is known about their journey from symptom onset to treatment initiation.

We will carry out a narrative study including adults aged 65 years or older, living in the English Midlands and receiving treatment for active TB. Twelve English and 12 Urdu or Punjabi speakers will be recruited from TB clinics and interviewed. Their primary care records will be accessed, and the primary care story and secondary care letters will be extracted. Each of the data sources will be analysed using dialogical narrative analysis. Data will be triangulated within participants and across the data set.

This study received approval from the Health Research Authority and the Research Ethics Committee in April 2022. Risk management and equity considerations have been made a priority. Findings will be disseminated through publication in open access peer-reviewed journals, presentations to policy makers, primary healthcare and secondary healthcare professionals, and through public facing materials developed in conjunction with patients, members of the pubic, TB services and charities.