Conectar
To assess the implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures and associated factors in healthcare in low-resource settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Multinational cross-sectional study.
The study was conducted from February to November 2022 in Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Madagascar and Nigeria.
A total of 6749 healthcare workers (HCWs) at 324 healthcare facilities (HCFs) were enrolled from different levels of care and types.
Standardised HCW and HCF questionnaires assessed COVID-19-related exposures and IPC measures and descriptive analyses were conducted overall and by country and HCF. Partial proportional odds models were used to assess factors associated with HCW compliance to hand hygiene and mask wearing.
Among 324 HCFs, the reported presence of IPC programmes ranged from 51.4% (n=111) at primary non-hospitals to 83.3% (n=18) at tertiary HCFs. More than half reported no patient or HCW screening (57.4%, n=186). Only 19.8% (n=64) reported handrub at point of care in every room. Among 6749 enrolled HCWs, 54.0% were working in high-risk patient care. More HCWs reported sufficient availability of masks (62.7%, n=4231) compared with respirators (28.5%, n=1926). HCW compliance with hand hygiene and mask wearing, respectively, was improved by presence of an IPC programme (OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5; OR: 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6), IPC training received by the HCW (OR: 1.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 1.7; OR: 1.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5) and availability of handrub and masks, respectively (OR: 5.9, 95% CI 4.1 to 8.4; OR: 2.3, 95% CI 2.0 to 2.7).
We conducted a large survey including HCFs across levels of care and type in urban and rural regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Critical gaps in IPC programmes and access to IPC equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic hindered HCW compliance with recommended IPC practices. To improve general infection control and pandemic preparedness in low-resource settings, continued focus on strengthening IPC programmes and ensuring access to materials/equipment is essential.
Objetivo: analizar los factores de riesgo cardiovascular del personal sanitario mediante la tabla REGICOR, en función edad, sexo, categoría profesional y turno de trabajo, así como el estrés laboral que experimenta nuestro equipo. Método: estudio descriptivo transversal cuya población fueron profesionales quirúrgicos Área V, Murcia, entre Enero y julio de 2020. Búsqueda bibliográfica y el instrumento un cuestionario con variables sociodemográficas y los factores de riesgo. Se explicó todo el proceso y firmaron Consentimiento Informado. Se calculó el RCV mediante REGICOR. El estrés con test de Hock y Escala General de Satisfacción. Resultados: muestra final n= 55, 18,2% (n =10) hombres y 81,8% (n= 45) mujeres, edades 35 y 64 y X= 49,4 años (DT = 8,7). Según la categoría profesional: 60% enferme-ros/as y 45,5% turno rodado. FRCV recogidos: IMC X=24,6 Kg/m2 presentando sobrepeso 32,1%, colesterol 30,9%, 22,6% hipertensos y 7,3% diabéticos. Edad y el riesgo coronario se relacionan de forma directa y significativa (r=0,550, p<0,001). Estrés< 42 puntos. Escala de satisfacción laboral 61,1 (DT=1,06). Conclusiones: los resultados obtenidos muestran elevadas prevalencias de factores de riesgo modificables especialmente obesidad, dislipemia y tabaquismo. Según la tabla Regicor elevada prevalencia de riesgo alto o muy alto. Sexo y edad fuertemente asociados al riesgo coronario. Mientras que el turno de trabajo y categoría profesional no existe asociación. El estrés no está relacionado en la población del Hospital Virgen del Castillo.
FreshRSS 