Conectar
To examine workplace experiences, perspectives on coming out at work, organisational climate and mental health status of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and other sexual, and gender minority healthcare providers (LGBTQ+ HCPs) within an East Asian cultural context.
Observational, cross-sectional study.
An online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 173 Taiwanese LGBTQ+ HCPs between May and August 2024.
Most of the 173 respondents did not disclose their LGBTQ+ identities to any colleagues, and approximately two-fifths met the clinically significant threshold for depressive symptoms. Furthermore, compared to LGBTQ+ HCPs who disclosed to all, most, about half or a few colleagues, those who had not disclosed to any colleagues reported higher levels of depressive symptoms, lower self-esteem, less comfort with disclosure, greater perceived necessity to conceal their LGBTQ+ identities, lower scores for job stability or security, poorer interpersonal relations and lower agreement that an LGBTQ+-inclusive workplace climate would influence their willingness to remain in their current jobs. Although approximately 80% of the LGBTQ+ HCPs reported that they were familiar with national workplace antidiscrimination laws and that their organisations had grievance mechanisms, nearly two-fifths did not trust the grievance systems or procedures within their organisations.
Results emphasise the urgent need to create an LGBTQ+-inclusive workplace environment with clear and enforceable antidiscrimination policies and inclusive organisational practices to improve both disclosure safety and mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ HCPs.
The study results extend existing knowledge by identifying the relationship between different levels of disclosure and mental health status among LGBTQ+ HCPs. They also highlight the importance of establishing support groups, a comprehensive mental health referral system and enforcement mechanisms that safeguard legal rights without compromising the privacy or safety of LGBTQ+ HCPs.
No patient or public contribution.
To assess anaesthesia capacity and practice in Sierra Leone by enumerating the anaesthesia workforce by volume, training level and distribution across urban and rural areas and facility ownership; estimating the prevalence of anaesthesia methods used for common surgical procedures by provider category; and evaluating hospital infrastructure and the availability of essential anaesthesia-related medications and equipment.
A nationwide, cross-sectional, facility-based study combining structured questionnaires administered through face-to-face interviews with facility leads and retrospective review of surgical and anaesthesia logbooks.
Public and private hospitals and clinics in Sierra Leone providing surgical care with general, regional or local anaesthesia within an operating theatre.
69 of 78 eligible surgical facilities nationwide were included. Facilities providing surgical services between September 2022 and August 2023 were eligible; facilities without registries or declining participation were excluded.
Across participating facilities, the anaesthesia workforce comprised 198 full-time positions, predominantly non-physician providers, with only 40.4% (80/198) trained to administer anaesthesia independently. Ketamine-based and spinal anaesthesia were most common, while general anaesthesia with a protected airway accounted for just 5.0% (415/8339) of procedures. Anaesthesia practices varied by provider training level. Essential infrastructure, equipment and medications fell below international minimum standards, with shortages most pronounced in rural facilities.
Severe shortages of certified anaesthesia providers, limited anaesthesia techniques and inadequate material resources remain major barriers to safe anaesthesia and surgical care in Sierra Leone. Targeted investments in workforce development, infrastructure and resource allocation—particularly in rural areas—are required to improve the safety, quality and equity of anaesthesia care nationwide.
Our objectives were (1) to characterise the age-sex-standardised prevalence of comorbidities among people living with HIV (PLWH) and people not living with HIV (PnLWH) between 2001 and 2019 and (2) to examine the effect of comorbidities on direct healthcare costs among PLWH and PnLWH.
This was a retrospective, matched cohort study conducted with the Comparative Outcomes and Service Utilisation Trends (COAST) cohort, which contained all known PLWH in British Columbia (BC), Canada and a general population sample.
BC, Canada.
A total of 9554 PLWH and 47 770 PnLWH from the COAST cohort were followed between 2001 and 2019. Participants were at least 19 years old and 82% male in both groups.
The primary outcomes were the age-sex-standardised prevalence of 16 comorbidities, calculated annually, among PLWH and PnLWH. Secondary outcomes included direct healthcare costs associated with each comorbidity among PLWH and PnLWH. Outcomes were ascertained from administrative health databases.
PLWH exhibited a higher age-sex-standardised prevalence of most comorbidities compared with PnLWH over the study period. Relative disparities in liver and kidney diseases markedly decreased since 2008. Disparities in the prevalence of mental health disorders and substance use disorder (SUD) were consistently large throughout the study period. Comorbidities were associated with high healthcare costs, especially among PLWH.
This study underscores the persistent and evolving burden of non-AIDS-defining comorbidities among PLWH, even in the context of improved HIV management. The high prevalence of mental health disorders and SUD, coupled with the substantial healthcare costs associated with these conditions, emphasises the need for holistic and integrated care models that address the full spectrum of health challenges faced by PLWH.
FreshRSS 