FreshRSS

🔒
❌ Acerca de FreshRSS
Hay nuevos artículos disponibles. Pincha para refrescar la página.
AnteayerTus fuentes RSS

Breathing control training as a treatment for functional seizures (BREATHS trial): a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled efficacy and acceptability trial study protocol

Por: Kanaan · R. · Duncan · R. · Mihalopoulos · C. · Braat · S. · OBrien · T. J. · Velakoulis · D. · Kwan · P. · Mulder · R. T. · Cook · M. · Mullen · S. · Mayne · D. · Oliver · G. · Eleftheriadis · D. · Ameen · O. · Chatterton · M. L. · DSouza · W. · Nicolo · J.-P. · Perucca · P. · Winton-Brow
Introduction

Functional seizures (FS) are events that resemble epileptic seizures, but are not attributed to brain pathology and are instead thought to be due to psychological factors. A small, multisite, open-label, single-arm, pilot trial of a breathing intervention known as breathing control training (BCT) found it to be safe and effective in reducing seizure frequency in FS. We propose a protocol for a study to confirm these results.

Methods and analysis

A 24-week, multicentre, individually-randomised, assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group efficacy and acceptability trial of BCT versus control (Befriending) in 220 participants ≥16 years of age with FS. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to receive two sessions of either BCT or Befriending over a 4-week period. Sessions will be delivered by a respiratory physiotherapist at a clinical care site or via telehealth. They will complete assessments prior to commencing treatment and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after their initial session of BCT/Befriending. The trial will be conducted alongside treatment as usual. An economic evaluation including cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will be carried out from health sector and societal perspectives.

Ethics and dissemination

The study has been approved by The Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/84335/Austin-2022) and the New Zealand Central Health and Disability Ethics Committee (2022 FULL 12324). Findings will be reported to trial participants and consumers; presented at local, national and international conferences; and disseminated by a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Nurse Practitioner‐Sensitive Outcome Measures in Older Person Care: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT

Background

Nurse practitioner-sensitive outcomes (NPSOs) are critical indicators of the quality and effectiveness of nursing care provided to older adults. These outcomes, which include metrics such as falls, pressure ulcers, infection rates, frailty, delirium, length of stay, hospital readmissions, and quality of life (QoL), are essential for assessing the impact of nurse practitioners (NPs) and enhancing patient safety. Despite their importance, the current literature on NPSOs in services for older adults remains limited. This scoping review aims to address this gap by systematically mapping the existing research, identifying key themes, and uncovering areas needing further exploration. By doing so, the authors seek to provide a comprehensive overview that will inform future research directions and contribute to the enhancement of clinical practice in older person services (OPS). This review is important for healthcare providers, policymakers, and researchers who are committed to improving the quality of nursing care and outcomes for older people.

Aim

The aim of this scoping review is to map the existing research on NPSOs in services for older adults. This review seeks to identify key themes and gaps in the current literature to guide future research and enhance clinical practice in this area.

Method

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were utilised to structure this scoping review.

Results

From initial screening of 3593 manuscripts drawn from seven databases, 66 were deemed eligible for full screen. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were ultimately selected for data extraction and analysis. The most common outcome measures reported were complications and comorbidities, and QoL.

Conclusions

This review highlights that the reporting of NPSOs in older person care is lacking and requires further attention.

Palliative Care for People With Very Severe to Extreme Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD): A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT

Aim

To explore current evidence regarding the provision of palliative care for individuals with very severe to extreme behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) in a hospital setting.

Design

Scoping review.

Reporting Method

The PRISMA-ScR reporting guideline.

Methods

The JBI guidelines for scoping reviews were followed. A data extraction form assisted in the identification of key findings via a process of content analysis.

Data Sources

Studies were obtained from bibliographic databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.

Results

This review included six articles, and nine categories emerged from the findings. Symptom assessment and management, pain assessment challenges, atypical presentation of end-stage dementia, complex prescribing and treatment practices, principles of person-centred care, collaboration; training for health care professionals; emotional impact on staff; and family and caregivers.

Conclusions

This scoping review highlighted a significant gap in the literature regarding palliative care for people living with very severe to extreme BPSD in hospital settings. This review highlighted key differences in the presentation of people with BPSD needing palliative care. There is a need for tailored models of care, specialised training and education for health professionals, families, and carers, and recognition of dementia as a terminal illness.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

The results of this review provide valuable insights into the level of understanding about the unique palliative care needs for people experiencing very severe to extreme BPSD, making an important contribution to the planning and development of future models of care.

Impact

Mapping the available literature highlights a paucity of research in palliative care for people with very severe to extreme BPSD in hospital settings. There is a need for rigorous research studies and models of care developed and informed by the evidence for this small population necessitating unique care needs.

Patient or Public Contribution

No patient or public contribution.

❌