Conectar
The BioCaPPE (Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer/Prevention and Environment) study is a multicentre prospective observational cohort designed to identify biomarkers associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk that may be modifiable through lifestyle factors. This paper describes the cohort, along with the data and bio-samples available for future studies in PCa risk assessment.
Canadian men at risk of PCa were enrolled based on one of two criteria (1) negative first prostate biopsy within 6 months from enrolment (Group 1); or (2) a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood level between 2.5 and 10 ng/mL without prior prostate biopsy (Group 2). At baseline, blood samples and comprehensive data were collected. PCa incidence and lifestyle factors were updated for all participants over 2 years, with extended follow-up for those who provided additional consent.
Recruitment was conducted across four health centres in Quebec, Canada. A total of 2053 men were enrolled—1499 in Group 1 and 554 in Group 2. All participants completed the initial visit, which included collection of medical and family history, anthropometric measurements, demographic information, dietary and alcohol intake, physical activity, tobacco use, medication use, and quality of life assessments, and candidate biomarker measurements. At the 2-year mark, 7.2% of participants had developed PCa; this figure has since increased to 15.3% (median follow-up: 6.1 years). Additionally, 84% (n=1718) consented to ongoing annual follow-up.
This large, prospective cohort of men at risk of PCa offers valuable resources for risk stratification and primary prevention. The BioCaPPE biosamples and data are available to support the identification of lifestyle-related biomarkers associated with PCa risk in this population.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03383016.
by Mylaine Breton, Catherine Lamoureux-Lamarche, Véronique Deslauriers, Djamal Berbiche, Maude Laberge, Annie Talbot, Aude Motulsky, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Isabelle Gaboury
BackgroundAccess to primary care is an important component of health systems. Given the barriers experienced by unattached patients to accessing primary care in Quebec (Canada), the Ministry of Health mandated the province-wide implementation of Primary care access points for unattached patients (Guichet d’accès première ligne; GAP), an organizational innovation designed to orient patients to the most appropriate professional or service. This study aims to 1) document the factors associated with unmet healthcare needs after receiving GAP services and 2) assess whether those factors vary by GAP orientation.
MethodsThis cross-sectional study builds on data collected between April and July 2024 using an online patient questionnaire. All patients with a valid email address registered on the centralized waiting list for unattached patients in three local health territories (LHTs) received an email invitation to participate in the survey. The total sample included 20,282 participants who responded to the questionnaire and used the GAP.
ResultsThe findings showed that younger age, self-reporting poor/fair physical and mental health, receiving services in LHT 3 and reporting an emergency room visit were associated with increased likelihood of reporting unmet needs. Stratified analyses suggested that some characteristics (age, use of emergency room) were associated with unmet needs across orientations, while others (self-reported physical and mental health) were associated with specific orientations.
ConclusionThis study serves as a first step in deepening our understanding from a patient perspective of how to better plan primary care services and improve unattached patients’ experiences using the GAP. The findings showed that patients oriented to other professionals than a medical appointment with a family physician had the highest percentage of unmet needs. The next step involves an in-depth exploration of the reasons for patients’ unmet needs, enabling the development of more precise and effective strategies to address them.
by Shirley Ge, Hope Lappen, Luz Mercado, Kaylee Lamarche, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Catherine L. Hough, Virginia W. Chang, Adolfo Cuevas, Thomas S. Valley, Mari Armstrong-Hough
BackgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in the delivery and outcomes of critical care are well documented. However, interventions to mitigate these disparities are less well understood. We sought to review the current state of evidence for interventions to promote equity in critical care processes and patient outcomes.
MethodsFour bibliographic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and Embase) and a list of core journals, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were queried with a pre-specified search strategy. We analyzed the content of interventions by categorizing each as single- or multi-component, extracting each intervention component during review, and grouping intervention components according to strategy to identify common approaches.
ResultsThe search strategy yielded 11,509 studies. Seven-thousand seventeen duplicate studies were removed, leaving 4,491 studies for title and abstract screening. After screening, 93 studies were included for full-text review. After full-text review by two independent reviewers, eleven studies met eligibility criteria. We identified ten distinct intervention components under five broad categories: education, communication, standardization, restructuring, and outreach. Most examined effectiveness using pre-post or other non-randomized designs.
ConclusionsDespite widespread recognition of disparities in critical care outcomes, few interventions have been evaluated to address disparities in the ICU. Many studies did not describe the rationale or targeted disparity mechanism for their intervention design. There is a need for randomized, controlled evaluations of interventions that target demonstrated mechanisms for disparities to promote equity in critical care.
FreshRSS 